| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
I apologize for my technical ineptitudes.I am trying to understand how segwit sa…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 02:28:09 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 02:33:29 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
I did not make this a political thing.I didn't think you did. One of us replyin…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 12:58:36 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
No need to attack with sarcasm.If you are addressing that to me, I assure you my…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 12:55:12 PM |
|
|
|
address balances at specific block? Development & Technical Discussion
There is nothing better than building your own database, i also built my own but…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 12:17:24 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
Whoa, whoa, wait...From the point of view of old clients, segwit adds one coinba…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 12:09:39 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
Whoa, whoa, wait...From the point of view of old clients, segwit adds one coinba…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 11:58:58 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
If using logic and asking pointed questions makes me a troll, then I guess I am…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 11:49:39 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
From the point of view of old clients, segwit adds one coinbase output that cont…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 10:39:41 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
From the point of view of old clients, segwit adds one coinbase output that cont…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 10:29:36 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not sure about the space reducing part. Was that actually mentioned anywhere…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 16, 2016, 12:15:24 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
So, I'm on mobile right now so I can't give as detailed of a response. I will ed…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 11:50:23 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion
OK, so you agree that if segwit achieves the activation level, all nodes will ha…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 11:13:53 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion
Are you trying to claim that having the entire existing installed base not being…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 10:19:09 PM |
|
|
|
address balances at specific block? Development & Technical Discussion
100% correct? I'm not sure you can be.What if an output can be unlocked by, s…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 10:03:50 PM |
|
|
|
address balances at specific block? Development & Technical Discussion
Walk the chain from block 0 and build your own database. I already did that.How…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 09:55:05 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 09:51:38 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? SEGWIT WASTES PRECIOUS BLOCKCHAIN SPACE PERMANENTLY Development & Technical Discussion
ACKI dun get it either. it is a hardfork pretending to be a softfork that incre…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 09:42:59 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion
considering the obstacles it faces, I will not implement segwit support into ini…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 08:53:26 PM |
|
|
|
address balances at specific block? Development & Technical Discussion
just look up all transactions (debit credit) affecting certain address, and filt…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 08:33:27 PM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion
Read the BIPs: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.They are appropriately named. The…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 07:41:41 AM |
|
|
|
address balances at specific block? Development & Technical Discussion
Does anybody know how to query balances for all addresses as of a specific block…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 07:13:36 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit details? Development & Technical Discussion
Read the BIPs: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips.They are appropriately named. The…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 15, 2016, 07:08:21 AM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
If you think I am ignoring overall system speed, then you are not really reading…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 13, 2016, 12:21:23 AM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
Otherwise we would still be using the slowest CPU that will eventually complete…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 12, 2016, 11:59:41 PM |
|
|
|
LevelDB reliability? Development & Technical Discussion
LevelDB being stupid is one of the major reasons that people have to reindex on…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 11, 2016, 10:21:32 PM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
This is an very informal proof, because I wanted it to be as readable as possibl…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 11, 2016, 01:19:21 PM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
This is an very informal proof, because I wanted it to be as readable as possibl…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 11, 2016, 09:26:42 AM |
|
|
|
LevelDB reliability? Development & Technical Discussion
LevelDB being stupid is one of the major reasons that people have to reindex on…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 11, 2016, 08:37:26 AM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
but yes, use hashes for non-permanent data, index for permanentI thought of a po…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 11, 2016, 08:32:19 AM |
|
|
|
LevelDB reliability? Development & Technical Discussion
why use a DB for an invariant dataset?That sounds like an exam question for DBMS…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 08:33:30 PM |
|
|
|
LevelDB reliability? Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin Core does not store the blockchain in a database (or leveldb) and never…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 08:28:26 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
canonical encoding means a numbering system for each block, tx, vin, vout so tha…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 08:25:11 PM |
|
|
|
LevelDB reliability? Development & Technical Discussion
Thoughts?In my opinion LevelDB is better than the previous Berkley DB Bitcoin us…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 06:06:13 PM |
|
|
|
LevelDB reliability? Development & Technical Discussion
LevelDB being stupid is one of the major reasons that people have to reindex on…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 04:10:42 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
I think we have to admit that a large part of the BTC blockchain has been deanon…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 04:06:58 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
Who said there was a scaling problem with bitcoin?me. and I am ready to repeat i…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 12:36:02 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
thanks. i like it.if you want really fast speed, you can make a CUDA/OpenSSL ver…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 10, 2016, 06:55:34 AM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
I create separate files that just contain the signatures, so pruning them is a m…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 09, 2016, 07:05:45 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
Segwit prunes old signatures, and since the signatures are major source of entro…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 09, 2016, 07:04:10 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
Segwit prunes old signatures, and since the signatures are major source of entro…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 09, 2016, 03:28:24 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
so say, @james you only have the blocks data - from 1 to 400000. stored close, o…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 08, 2016, 03:52:26 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
Assuming you have already the blockchain internally, it might be easier to just…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 08, 2016, 02:51:40 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
James, can you please describe how you actually implemented your db?I'm especial…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 08, 2016, 01:13:25 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
http://tarantool.org/this looks like a right way to go, but..1) I failed to inst…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 08, 2016, 12:29:21 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
There are some intel chips with 128MB L4 cache (shared cpu/gpu). Obviously the f…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 07, 2016, 03:55:27 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
http://tarantool.org/Looks pretty interesting. I was looking for a lightweight D…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 06, 2016, 03:22:06 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 11:53:28 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
I think it's very important to be able to browse through all the records in a sh…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 05:51:52 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
Once all the balances for all the addresses are verified at all the bundle bound…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 04:56:02 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
sounds like a good stuff.I'll give it a better look once I get sober so can you…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 04:40:16 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteNot sure what sort of things "like to do anything on each single one of the…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 04:25:01 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
In its raw form with all the data scattered across the 200 bundles, a simplistic…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 03:43:29 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
for utxo, my approach with iguana creates a parallel set of datasets in read onl…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 03:23:20 PM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
It really is a pointless question.I think it's very important to be able to brow…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 11:12:57 AM |
|
|
|
An optimal engine for UTXO db Development & Technical Discussion
for utxo, my approach with iguana creates a parallel set of datasets in read onl…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 10:56:58 AM |
|
|
|
[PRE-ANN] WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform. Announcements (Altcoins)
I confirm that I will be advising and investing in this project, especially on m…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 05, 2016, 08:44:48 AM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
Once each block has those, then how can an attacker rewrite the history?It's ver…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 04, 2016, 07:53:37 PM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
Of course if the external chain is some arbitrary ledger that can be updated at…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 04, 2016, 07:10:36 AM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
Hi James,how does this relate to the (concept of) BlockNet project? Any thoughts…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 04, 2016, 06:59:20 AM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
Where is your claimed Privatebet project?Where is your claimed Skynet project?Wh…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 04, 2016, 06:58:46 AM |
|
|
|
Declaration of Independence - Atomic Cross Chain Asset Standard Announcements (Altcoins)
Of course if the external chain is some arbitrary ledger that can be updated at…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 04, 2016, 06:29:26 AM |
|
|
|
[ANN] BitcoinDark (BTCD)--Financial_Privacy/SuperNET_Core/InstantDEX/PAX/Divs Announcements (Altcoins)
Friends, is it possible to make my own paper wallet for BTCD and other altcoins?…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 03:57:05 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
If I use the block 290000 checkpoint to skip verifying sigs prior to that, could…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 03:15:30 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
I am assuming only sigs after block 290000 need to be verified as long as the ch…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 02:47:24 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
You can sign a vin properly by multiple signers and get multiple signatures, eac…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 02:09:13 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
The problem is that a lot of the data is high entropy and not compressible. I be…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 12:14:15 PM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
These are not just thoughts, but description of a working system that syncs enti…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 11:07:13 AM |
|
|
|
Using compact indexes instead of hashes as identifiers. Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteWhat number of blocks is beyond the common sense reorg danger? I know theor…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 06:14:05 AM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
I noticed it as I found my code was assuming only a single SIGHASH type per vin,…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 03, 2016, 05:34:01 AM |
|
|
|
Unconfirmed transactions Development & Technical Discussion
unconfirmed bitcoins are worthless. I'd never take them as a payment, no matter…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 09:44:56 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
But actually, the sig not validating still doesnt mean the vin is always invalid…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 06:15:21 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
OK, so I am not crazy thinking this is a possible case of undefined behaviorWell…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 06:00:29 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
So unlike RBF enabled in one vin propagates to the entire tx, the signatures are…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 03:22:46 PM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
I would suggest you all convert your BTC to nanosecond block time cryptocoins.Oh…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 02:45:54 PM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
Supposedly, changing the block time is a more complex and bigger change than cha…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 02:44:18 PM |
|
|
|
Unconfirmed transactions Development & Technical Discussion
RBF suddenly starts making sense, doesn't it?funny how many people were resistin…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 02:41:27 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
My question is AFTER it is validated, what does it mean?Signatures are pass/fail…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 12:01:31 PM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks you, but this is not the question. Assume the sigs verify. see above resp…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 11:47:32 AM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
I can verify it is a valid signature, but what happens if there is SIGHASH_ALL f…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 11:08:19 AM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
I can verify it is a valid signature, but what happens if there is SIGHASH_ALL f…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 11:07:27 AM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
But for a multisig output that is being signed by multiple signers and where the…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 10:25:15 AM |
|
|
|
SIGHASH precedence for multisig? Development & Technical Discussion
As you know there are several SIGHASH types, each signature has a byte at the en…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 09:25:49 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
This was asked, and answered in another recent thread: https://bitcointalk.org/i…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 07:42:18 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
What 's it?Publication of last blocks by economic giants like Walmart. Because o…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 06:52:43 AM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
This was asked, and answered in another recent thread: https://bitcointalk.org/i…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 02, 2016, 06:43:19 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin 9000: a long-term scaling plan Development & Technical Discussion
We propose a strategy to scale Bitcoin to a far greater throughput and performan…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 04:53:48 PM |
|
|
|
What should the txn fee for a 1550 byte transaction be? Bitcoin Technical Support
Use http://cointape.com/ for finding out the best fee for every KB according to…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 01:24:37 PM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Do you want objective analysis, or just unthinking agreement to whatever you pos…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 12:22:43 PM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
However, an equally ridiculous set of assumptions can be used to take over a PoW…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 12:13:41 PM |
|
|
|
Why blocktime decrease instead of blocksize increase is not discussed? Development & Technical Discussion
This was asked, and answered in another recent thread: https://bitcointalk.org/i…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 12:10:02 PM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
Human intervention largely indicates a critical failure.But the knowledge that i…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:56:12 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
If you can describe one which doesn't involve something related to a checkpoint,…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:52:36 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
You have proven nothing. There is no market for formerly large stakeholding keys…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:51:22 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
So now they are low intelligence large stakeholders?The point is the danger of d…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:34:53 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
So, as we see even "buy keys" attack can do nothing if economic majority keeps a…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:29:51 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
How would it be possible for all large stakeholders to go from being large stake…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:23:54 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
"It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen."Use t…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:13:25 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
I look forward to the proof of the OP's conclusion "The cost of this attack is v…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:04:53 AM |
|
|
|
Proof that Proof of Stake is either extremely vulnerable or totally centralised Development & Technical Discussion
"It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen."Use t…
|
n/a | jl777 | March 01, 2016, 11:03:53 AM |
Jump to: