It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Devcoin Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 06:08:01 AM | ||
Devcoin Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 05:52:20 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
I don't like that solution either. It's not linked to actual usage in any way an…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 05:43:50 AM | ||
Ripple XRP Exchange with BTC, LTC, NMC, PPC, NVC, DVC, FRC, TRC etc Altcoin Discussion
Once I get my free Ripples I will be able to start telling Ripple about all the…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 04:59:14 AM | ||
FreiCoin (FRC) discussion (was FreiCoin (FRC) for TRC, PPC, LTC or BTC) Altcoin Discussion
What you are calling "zombie" might well just be "sleeper"... Basically allow so…
|
n/a | markm | February 12, 2013, 08:50:07 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Re sucking in more users, if it is precisely an increase in the number of users…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 04:35:56 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
If I recall correctly, pretty much the only, or at least the core, argument in f…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 04:25:03 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
And what about having nodes build in some sorts of max block size relay delay, s…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 04:06:31 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
there are things that can be done to disincentive miners from attempting to brea…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 03:39:13 AM | ||
Ripple Giveaway! Altcoin Discussion
rpVft3wic2fZ2saY5BjEtL8R2NPrubxWG5
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 02:29:08 AM | ||
Devcoin Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 02:17:57 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Okay but if you have somewhere in the neighborhood of three megaminers, of a sca…
|
n/a | markm | February 21, 2013, 02:02:15 AM | ||
How merchant will behave when there is hard fork & they are not sure who win? Bitcoin Discussion
Hmm, the one I remember was about enabling multiple-signature transactions, whic…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 08:26:22 PM | ||
Is Ripple a Bitcoin Killer or Complementer? Founder of Mt Gox will launch Ripple Bitcoin Discussion
I'm not quite sure where you're going with this. It would be more correct to say…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 07:54:34 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
The point is that if this system was in place, and the fixed reward was small, t…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 07:05:29 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
How about a simple as Satohshi's reward-halving method?Simply double the block s…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 07:03:07 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Miners like lots of paying transactions, but payment processors like lots of tra…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 06:35:15 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
s/the blockchain/the primary blockchain/Also, I am pretty convinced we can doubl…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 04:29:33 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
It is not, at extremis, about a little bit of profit margin more or less... It i…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 04:20:18 PM | ||
Should casual users avoid the Satoshi client? Bitcoin Discussion
Is sheer number of individuals "adopting" the big main essential metric?What abo…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:50:18 PM | ||
Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) Bitcoin Discussion
I suspect it is more about exactly how much to increase the block size, includin…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:54:45 PM | ||
Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) Bitcoin Discussion
Yes but low value is not necessarily a bad thing.If primary chain coins reach a…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:38:17 PM | ||
Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) Bitcoin Discussion
A lot of the appearances of the word bitcoin in this thread might be more useful…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:28:44 PM | ||
Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) Bitcoin Discussion
The danger is that someone will lure you into agreeing to download and use a nod…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:04:23 PM | ||
Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) Bitcoin Discussion
The client in it's current state is not a viable option for most people to run a…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 02:45:13 PM | ||
BitWasp Marketplace - to make sites similar to Silkroad Bitcoin Discussion
Hmmm not sure what that Torbutton or Tor browser are about, I run Tor per se, ju…
|
n/a | markm | September 17, 2012, 08:55:00 AM | ||
A new idea for bitcoin markets Project Development
Great then, set it up, if people like it they will use it, if it is free open so…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 01:27:00 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 01:17:33 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 11:39:31 AM | ||
Is a monopoly on the full working Blockchain possible? Bitcoin Discussion
It pretty much *is* "increasing the block size limit".Don't increase that limit…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 12:39:15 PM | ||
Wouldn't it be more fair if the bitcoins were shared equally? Beginners & Help
Here is a much much simpler system.Instead of trying to "be fair" by divvying up…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 12:18:08 PM | ||
A new idea for bitcoin markets Project Development
Are you aware of Ripple.com?-MarkM-
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 11:48:36 AM | ||
Proof of work to unlock payments in a chain hierarchy Development & Technical Discussion
Various ideas have come up from time to time to lock-step exchange rates between…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 10:34:38 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 10:50:34 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 10:41:15 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Wow nice idea johnyj, I like it! Well done!Of course whether it will play out th…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 10:19:39 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Can we go with specialisation rather than centralisation?By keeping the primary…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 07:35:51 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, but, if we the people cannot ourselves examine the gold-plated bars of tung…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 05:21:22 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 05:34:04 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 04:22:41 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:15:56 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Quote* By the way, for totally different reasons, it's already not really possib…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 04:13:35 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
So leaving the limit in place and forcing most peoples transactions to go throug…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 04:04:58 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Quote* By the way, for totally different reasons, it's already not really possib…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:55:30 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
TL;DR: Maybe factor in exchange-rates, since the more massively and swiftly the…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:30:57 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 03:08:54 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Well for starters they need not use "previously unheard-of transactions" to pad…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 02:42:47 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
I strongly suspect that even despite Moore's Law being thought by some to be run…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 02:16:01 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
So that particular calculation for automatically "adapting" is simply an example…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 02:00:15 AM | ||
NovaCoin - Balthazar's PPC scrypt fork Announcements (Altcoins)
This's good for you. I say sorry if I underestimated you. So you have a wide lis…
|
n/a | markm | February 20, 2013, 01:13:14 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Yeah maybe we should also do polls in deepest darkest Africa, both of groups of…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 11:42:27 PM | ||
artificial 250kB limit? Development & Technical Discussion
The *...* emphasis was basically an attempt to differentiate "will eventually so…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 08:45:11 PM | ||
(NSFW) From the lovely girls of ClassyCams we have a treat for you! Service Discussion
Eesh it's a webcam pic. I think you're trying too hard my man.Thank you. I was…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:06:54 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
We won't even need a new hard fork, since everyone and their descendants will ha…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 08:55:40 PM | ||
artificial 250kB limit? Development & Technical Discussion
Stitch in time . . .Stitch in time is one thing, building in an always-on knitti…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 07:57:05 PM | ||
(NSFW) From the lovely girls of ClassyCams we have a treat for you! Service Discussion
lol wow. You think the people are fake or the signs? I could see you thinking…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 07:45:14 PM | ||
artificial 250kB limit? Development & Technical Discussion
Wow. So lets see if I have this right. Only people who use custom hacks ever mad…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 07:35:19 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Okay then, lets for the sake of argument imagine you are correct that 10,000 nod…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 05:15:52 PM | ||
(NSFW) From the lovely girls of ClassyCams we have a treat for you! Service Discussion
Weird, those images look more like OpenSim simulations than actual real humans.…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 05:24:20 PM | ||
artificial 250kB limit? Development & Technical Discussion
So the current one megabyte hard limit is already double the limit Satoshi origi…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 04:11:15 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 04:07:33 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 03:50:43 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Ripple is out of closed beta too, maybe it can take a lot of the load off the bl…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 03:42:28 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 03:30:11 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 02:58:29 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
I suspect we could double the block size without massive disruption, but once yo…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 03:18:45 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Ripple is out of closed beta too, maybe it can take a lot of the load off the bl…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 02:39:07 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Once ASIC production gets down pat, churning out chips whose research and setup…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 02:05:01 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 02:27:08 PM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 12:49:17 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Maybe we could start off with a really conservative schedule of increases, like…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 11:27:11 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Here's an idea: Reject blocks larger than 1 megabyte that do not include a total…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 10:25:34 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
They are going to refuse to "relay" things that got into the highest difficulty…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 10:16:59 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
I thought one of the main points being brought up is that on the contrary it all…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 10:02:49 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
What exactly is wrong with this proposal, that justifies all this drama?https://…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:53:04 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
- snip -I agree. I even think if ever a hard fork in Bitcoin should happen the n…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:45:06 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
you could never get away with a hard fork on this point so the best you could do…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:42:51 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:26:07 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteThis raises the issue of exchange rates between chains. A user might see t…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:13:26 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 09:04:19 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
I do think it is kind of black-and-white.Basically until fees get so insane that…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 08:36:43 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
At first how would that work? Are they supposed to accumulate transactions and m…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 08:47:10 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Miners can game the system too simply, such as by lots of them all deciding to o…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 08:05:46 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not afraid of the markets nor do I think it's actually possible to achieve s…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 08:12:05 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Where do you think the value in bitcoins comes from? They have no use beyond the…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 07:34:05 AM | ||
The fork Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 07:21:40 AM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin is just the primary chain in a whole family of merged-mine-able blockcha…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 06:49:25 AM | ||
Is Ripple a Bitcoin Killer or Complementer? Founder of Mt Gox will launch Ripple Bitcoin Discussion
My problem with the rest of your argument is that information is not scarce, so…
|
n/a | markm | February 19, 2013, 04:53:00 AM | ||
What exactly is wrong with LTC? Altcoin Discussion
Altcoins draw in people who consider being able to mine the main reason to get i…
|
n/a | markm | February 18, 2013, 03:55:53 PM | ||
Idea, is it plausible? Project Development
You can solve the not enough bids problem by involving your supplier or sockpupp…
|
n/a | markm | February 18, 2013, 11:45:26 AM | ||
Devcoin Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 17, 2013, 09:05:50 PM | ||
Devcoin Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 17, 2013, 09:45:02 PM | ||
Devcoin Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | markm | February 17, 2013, 02:47:09 AM | ||
GRouPcoin Announcements (Altcoins) |
n/a | markm | February 17, 2013, 03:15:38 AM | ||
GRouPcoin Announcements (Altcoins) |
n/a | markm | August 22, 2012, 03:12:25 AM | ||
GRouPcoin Announcements (Altcoins) |
n/a | markm | April 10, 2012, 09:34:40 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
The current Ripple is maybe better referred to as a B2B network than a P2P netwo…
|
n/a | markm | February 17, 2013, 03:03:54 AM | ||
After testing Ripple... Altcoin Discussion
Selling the initial coins is a form of proof of work requirement, since in gener…
|
n/a | markm | February 13, 2013, 08:28:40 PM | ||
Ripple SOUNDS nice but there are some MAJOR problems Off-topic
Yes but if the government cannot trust someone to co-operate in curbing terroris…
|
n/a | markm | February 13, 2013, 11:55:25 PM | ||
Could WoW switch it's currency to just 5 bitcoins per server? Economics
Supposedly ideal strategies run by scripts likely just become predictable prey f…
|
n/a | markm | February 13, 2013, 08:08:59 PM |