Actually, there is a big difference between Trump accusations and Hillary accusations.
Trump has done very little wrong regarding his governmental operations. And, he has done a lot of good - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55119252. In addition, Trump is in favor of Making America Great Again - MAGA.
Hillary did a lot of bad in government... One example is the Benghazi episode - https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Benghazi+Hillary&t=ffab&ia=web. And outside of government, she wants to make American freedom - MAGA - go away. She calls it a cult - Hillary Clinton: "There Needs To Be A Formal Deprogramming" Of The Trump Cult Members - https://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/351830-2023-10-07-hillary-clinton-there-needs-to-be-a-formal-deprogramming-of.htm.
You are mixing government stuff with personal stuff. The Trump trials are personal stuff. So:
That's what Jack Smith is saying too.
Trumps lawyers are literally arguing in court that that the Washington DC charges should be thrown out because for all the crimes he's been charged with involve his official actions as president and therefore he should be immune from criminal prosecution.
Jack Smith says he was acting as a candidate and working for his re election campaign, which is separate from office of the president.
Things happening in the Trump trials. This first link is different than the article, below. BREAKING IN GEORGIA! Lawyers withdraw!! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7q_ZyhBnYE.
Stefanik Hits "Radical Leftist" Trump Judge With Ethics Complaint
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stefanik-hits-radical-leftist-trump-judge-ethics-complaint
While the jury is still out over whether the wife of Judge Arthur Engoron made anti-Trump posts on X, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) has filed an ethics complaint against judge himself, accusing him of displaying "inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance" towards the former president in his civil fraud trial taking place in New York.
"I filed an official judicial complaint against Judge Arthur Engoron for his inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance in New York's disgraceful lawsuit against President Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization," Stefanik told NBC News. "Americans are sick and tired of the blatant corruption by radical Leftist judges in NY. All New Yorkers must speak out against the dangerous weaponized lawfare against President Trump."
According to the complaint, Engoron has exhibited "clear judicial bias" against Trump, including telling Trump's attorney that the former president is "just a bad guy," who NY Attorney General Letitia James "should go after."
"Simply put, Judge Engoron has displayed a clear judicial bias against the defendant throughout the case, breaking several rules in the New York Code of Judicial Conduct," reads the letter.
"Judge Engoron entered summary judgment against the defendant before the trial even began, without witnesses, other evidence, and cross-examination," she continued, noting that this was "despite the fact there's disputed material evidence–and there's no victim of the defendant's supposed fraud. "
Stefanik also notes that Engoron and his staff are "partisan Democrat donors," and that Engoron himself, as recently as 2018, "donated to the Manhattan Democrats."
...
Elise Stefanik wants to run for VP it seems.
Former prosecutor on Stefanik’s ethics complaint against NY fraud judge: ‘She knows better’
“She knows better,” Andrew Weissmann told MSNBC on Friday. “And that is really — this idea that it’s constantly a step too far and it’s now normalized where you have somebody in Congress doing that and the judge is just doing his job.”
Weissmann, who was a federal prosecutor in New York and the FBI’s general counsel, described Stefanik as one of “a number of enablers” for Trump.
“You may disagree with him,” he said, referring to the judge. “You can say that. You can say he’s missed evidence. But really? A complaint against him for doing his job? Beyond the pale.”
Stefanik’s complaint against Judge Arthur Engoron alleges that the judge has shown “inappropriate bias and judicial intemperance” against Trump in the case.
Her letter also echoes many of the same arguments Trump’s legal team has in protesting the trial, brought forth by New York Attorney General Letitia James, in which prosecutors are seeking to strip the former president and his adult sons of their state business licenses.
Engoron already ruled that Trump committed business fraud by manipulating the value of his assets, the trial is set to determine damages. Prosecutors are seeking at least $250 million in penalties.
Trump took the stand in the trail on Monday, going on random stump-speech-like tangents which sparked rebuke from Engoron towards Trump’s lawyer, Chris Kise.
“Mr. Kise, can you control your client? This is not a political rally,” Engoron said.
Much of Stefanik’s complaints were over a partial gag order imposed on Trump and his attorneys preventing him from bad-mouthing employees of the court and case witnesses. He has been fined a total of $15,000 for two violations of the order.
“If anyone in America must have the constitutional right to speak out against the judge, his staff, the witnesses, or the process, it’s a defendant going through a process he believes is politicized and weaponized against him,” Stefanik wrote. “To gag a defendant is un-American.”
The seven-week trial remains ongoing.