Though I was kind of glad for the delay.
Decent decided to take care of distribution themselves
And the delay wasn't down to stratis either
chris_stratis
Im not into airing peoples dirty laundry! But lets get some facts strait, the agreement was to provide them with the ICO platform source code which we did, they "CLAIMED" to have developers but after we sent the source code they had no idea how to set it up or anyone to do so. Any delays or issues was down to them not having the resources they claimed
chris_stratis [7:23 PM]
Also, why did they wait 8 months to raise any issues?
[7:24]
I will tell you why, because they wanted to keep us cool, till distribution
[7:24]
Great business ethics
chris_stratis [7:25 PM]
During that time we provided them with additional support and the development of additional features at no extra cost
chris_stratis
And they raised no isses with paying us until one week before the payment was due
chris_stratis
Ask ICOCountdown to confirm the agreement that was in place
Posted in #generalToday at 7:26 PM
[7:26]
link
chris_stratis
I also have all the skype logs from the first conversations that took place
Anyways this is between the leadership of decent and the ceo of stratis to sort out. But considering there was an article done by decent blaming stratis, and decent going incognito and ignoring chris's attempts to sort this out I can understand why this has been made public