Topic: - - page 369. (Read 713534 times)

What I recall from the word dev, that it is true that all participants of social media bounty will be contacted by DECENT team, for every participant who participates in bounty social media facebook and twitter, if for bounty Newsletter will be sent by email to each participant and personally not to In publication to the public ..

"this option" meaning what?
Twitter allows (afaik) to receive direct messages from the "people you follow".
I think that Facebook has something similar.

But I think that each one of those in "social media" campaigns are also present in the e-mail campaign and DECENT will inform everybody more exactly when the time will come.
"Third quarter of 2017" is still far.

Hey bro,
Here is your answer..
"we will contact the participants through their social media accounts used to join the campaign. Make sure you have this option allowed in your profile settings to be able to receive further instructions on how to claim your reward. - See more at: https://decent.ch/en/decent-ico-bounties-update-rules/#sthash.1iOz8oCU.dpuf "

DECENT Testnet #2 is going to be launched soon.
We will post all the information about newly implemented features and bug-fixes in the upcoming days.

I have a business strategy/proposal for Decent which I believe would...

A.) Increase interest/media attention for the Decent project
B.) Increase the value of DCT (even before it releases)
C.) Raise more capital for the Decent project to continue development
D.) Bolster good faith with/support from the community

It's a bit unorthodox (though withholding ICO dispersement for two years is as well) so bear with me...

I believe Decent should run the world's first #ReICO. Given so much time has passed, I believe two facts to be true. Foremost many people are antsy to have their money, but simultaneously, Decent has made a great deal of progress.

With those facts in mind, If Decent were to allow users to sign up to return their ICO-purchased coins, those users would at minimum have the opportunity to benefit from the rise in the value of BTC since they first purchased and would no longer have to hold such a currently illiquid asset. Decent could then keep track the number of coins returned and Re-ICO these coins to a new round of investors.

As this second round would have a more limited supply of coins (as most original ICO participants will likely hodl) and there is hopefully a great deal of traction to attest to DCTs higher value, it is likely new investors will invest more BTC to be split over a smaller total coin supply and the second (or Re-ICO) would close with DCT at an even greater value than the first ICO.

In addition, beyond serving as a very marketable event for media attention, I would assume that the added bump to Decent's BTC reserve (at a time when BTC is nearly at an ATH) from this second round of funding would more than outweigh any loses taken through reimbursing original ICO participants, thus giving the DCT project added capital.

Food for thought...

Anyone, please feel free to comment/chime in and lets post a #ReICO if you agree with the general sentiment so we can be sure this proposal isn't lost in the thread before the devs can see/consider.

Sorry?
Anyway, I still want to know whether there will be a second, a third and a fourth stage of tests. April is almost over and all we saw was Caesar (scheduled for February).

No it wasn't. Since before the ICO started, the schedule has been q1/q2. Here's a link to the roadmap listed during the ICO http://decent.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/roadmap.png Roadmap uploaded August 2016.

Everything is still on schedule, with a Q2 release. I don't understand why some people, who I guess visit once in a while feel that this coin was supposed to launch last December or so.

Every participant will be contacted via the social network he/she used for registration. So it's important to have access to your account and allow messages receiving.

No, you don't need to fill anything to claim the bounties. The Appeal form is for those users who believe there was some mistake made within the counts.
All participants will be contacted with further information on how to claim it later on.

How about twitter and facebook, are we going to receive email to claim them? I'm not sure if I still have the passwords of the email I use to register on facebook and twitter.

The list of Newsletter Bounty participants won't be public.
Each user eligible for the reward, will be contact via his/her email.

The time has never been pushed back. Since the ICO, it has been repeated hundreds of times throughout this thread that the release of the Decent will be Q1/Q2 of 2017.

The launch was actually pushed back more than once...these guys can wotrk but obviously needs to work on their time estimations....

do I have to claim facebook and signatures bountys through this "appeal form"?

i think something like that i have seen it in Iota ico
i may be wrong , years ago is a long time

below is the link of the decent member who have given clear view of both facebook and twitter bounty doc files with total stakes .



when are we going to get the detail about how to claim the facebook bounty as my twitter bounty is not given due to low followers

Has been done before with a list of encrypted addresses. I forgot which ICO did it, but it was kinda neat: They would say "take you mail address and the salt, put it in this encrypter, see if the resulting hash is on the list". Worked quite well, as far as I remember.

Hi nice to see that the process have started to distribute the bounty coins, is this appeal form linked is for only if we have any problem with the bounty list or we have to claim the bounty also through this link

when will we receive the details about the claiming of the social media bounty.

It means you had less than 50 followers on that time you followed @decent.
You can appeal from here if you think there is an error https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1SDIwRSpsX8l9mkXSKhpYjuDfsr-cFMSN4y6I_7mXWWw/edit

I'll ask again, I see "Low followers" on my twitter listing, what does it means?? was their a limit? what was it?