[0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining| - page 88.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: kano on September 13, 2012, 07:24:09 AM

Quote from: Graet on September 13, 2012, 07:09:01 AM

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

Yep, what he said

.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

Quote from: Graet on September 13, 2012, 07:09:01 AM

Quote from: os2sam on September 13, 2012, 07:06:19 AM

I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?

Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.

I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.
Thanks,
Sam

Thanks Sam
Added to list

yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

It's something that had bugged me for a long time through many versions of CG Miner, but was never really that big of a deal to me and thought it was unique to something on my side. But then someone else it as a problem which caused me to inquire into it a bit more.

Here is a link to Kano's reply

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1111517

Thanks,
Sam

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Graet on September 13, 2012, 07:27:33 AM

...
Ahh, thanks for that kano

I didn't realise the implementation was so rare, had assumed most pools would be rolling time

Slowly becoming more common ... but I've no idea why it's common for other pools not to have it already though!
The (hack) idea has been around and been used for a quite a while ...

Graet

vip

Activity: 980

Merit: 1001

Quote from: kano on September 13, 2012, 07:24:09 AM

Quote from: Graet on September 13, 2012, 07:09:01 AM

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

Ahh, thanks for that kano

I didn't realise the implementation was so rare, had assumed most pools would be rolling time

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Graet on September 13, 2012, 07:09:01 AM

...
yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

The balance issue was that the old balance option was trying to balance based on getting work.
However, if one pool has roll-n-time - and the rest don't - then that one pool will be able to roll the work and thus generate much more work and thus the balance would be greatly in it's favour (and not balanced)

So there are now 2 balance options:
1) LoadBalance - the old one
and
2) Balance - based on trying to submit the same number of shares to each pool

Graet

vip

Activity: 980

Merit: 1001

Quote from: os2sam on September 13, 2012, 07:06:19 AM

I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?

Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.

I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.
Thanks,
Sam

Thanks Sam
Added to list

yeah I guess I cant keep on top of everything, never saw ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.

os2sam

legendary

Activity: 3583

Merit: 1094

Think for yourself

I see you still haven't updated your "About Ozcoin Mining Pool" list to reflect that you use/support rolltime?

Being that CGMiner's load balance and balance options cause the majority of shares being submitted to rolltime pools it would be nice to know which pools support rolltime.

I was really suprised that BTCGuild doesn't support rolltime, which was implied by ckolivas' and Kano's explanation of the balance disparity.
Thanks,
Sam

wknight

legendary

Activity: 889

Merit: 1000

Bitcoin calls me an Orphan

Lol.. pretty sad when you need to post up just to keep the post alive

Nothing Broke here.. just keep mining.

Thanks

Graet

vip

Activity: 980

Merit: 1001

Quote from: crazyates on September 06, 2012, 08:30:35 AM

Graet

vip

Activity: 980

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Tittiez on September 09, 2012, 05:11:27 AM

Feature request.

A per user DGM vs PPS.

Simply, show how much you've made mining DGM, and show how much you would have made mining PPS side by side. Maybe just the two numbers, or if you wanted to take it a step further, graphs displaying over time. Line graph would be better then a bar graph I think. I dunno.

Yes I'm aware of this, but I mean one of those per user, and maybe taking it a step further?

maybe, wouldn't really show anything meaningful for anyone but fulltime miners though and they get what that graph shows

Tittiez

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Feature request.

A per user DGM vs PPS.

Simply, show how much you've made mining DGM, and show how much you would have made mining PPS side by side. Maybe just the two numbers, or if you wanted to take it a step further, graphs displaying over time. Line graph would be better then a bar graph I think. I dunno.

Yes I'm aware of this, but I mean one of those per user, and maybe taking it a step further?

organofcorti

donator