Topic: 1 - The copycat epidemic within crypto casinos. - page 2. (Read 3174 times)

This could be related to their finances because hiring a designer and coder to create a site requires a lot of money. That's what led them to look for a casino site from the same developer as other casinos because maybe it will save costs and if they hire a designer and coder, it won't cost too much. Or copying other casino sites will make it easier for them to be recognized by other gamblers, so it won't take long to become famous. This depends on how a casino can serve its users well so that there won't be any problems later, even though their site imitates other casino sites.

of all the site we have here , you have just Punt in your mention when there are dozens of similar site that looks like scam in the end.

but yes why need to copycat when you can hire a designer to make one for you so reliability will be at look in your site.

if they cannot even invest in this amount then what more if there is a big winner in the future?

Well said and I wish the OP is following up on this and I also understand why the copy cat epidemic within crypto casinos,
This very copycat epidemic isn't just rampard with crypto casinos but with most of this digital Business and also the physical one, people always want to follow suit with what is trending and giving money as at the moment.
One thing certain in this very digital space is the fact that the competition is massive and the moment you give any chance, you'll be kicked out no matter the level of your professionalism.
I saw you mention FTX and I really felt bad for them and had to check the date of this post and tbis is also a constant reminder that, unnecessary competition and pride in business isn't right and necessary.

Business owners would really be going into that easy path rather than on finding those complex methods or ways which they could really be able to do or make a site on using up those current available which they

could really copy from.It is really just that some of them didnt bother on making out some alterations at least to make it a little look different with those current existing ones which there are people who are
really that doesnt like to see similar sites or do identical looking which it do really give out that kind of impression that it cant really be something trusted compared to those older ones.
Every now and then which you could see that new platforms or services are almost identical but it isnt really that right that it would really be automatically considered to be shady or scam.
People cant really just be that confident.

Well, first of all, the term copycat is many times abused. The fact that a site is doing something similar because it works does not make the copycats - in the end there is no need to re-invent the wheel is there? What also may be happening is that many sites are using the same base code or code creation platform, just as many videogames use the same engine and look a bit the same.

This is a very good move. To do gambling, it is clear that the reputation of one of the sites is important, at least this is for me. and I prefer something that is certain than having to try something new, especially if it offers a bonus that really doesn't make much sense.
But indeed maybe this is one of our levels of greed when we see a bonus which is indeed very large, it is clear that we will do anything to get this bonus without first seeing the clarity of the new site.
Trying is not wrong in this case, but we are not too sure why we continue to force it.

Well said. I'm no expert, so I don't know how far copyright infringement goes and where inspiration ends and plagiarism begins. But from what I've seen, it's clear that Punt.com is using a lot of the same graphics and themes as Stake.com. I've even uploaded a few screenshots for a side-by-side comparison here, for anyone interested. In fact, if I didn't know better, I would assume that Punt.com was simply a re-branding of Stake.com with a new name and some minor changes to the design. What I find most ridiculous is that Punt.com seems to be trying to pass itself off as an "original", even though it's clearly a clone of Stake.

These copycats do really believe that they could really be able to get some marketshare which the original site is gaining currently which is a bullshit kind of idea or belief on mind.
People on this community does really hate up copycats but cant really be denied that there are still people who do easily get hook into something which is similar to this.
Its never been good on looking or dealing up on a site which had obviously copied out other popular sites design which is almost identical but people should
really be watching it out because being new does mean that reputation and credibility isnt proven out yet.

I read some incredible comments in this thread by people who has absolutely no clue :-) Exit scam of the casino... What ?

In regards to all the blatant copycats I can say only one thing, stay away. I opened this website "punt" and this is nearly a copyright infringement in my humble opinion. A business that cannot invest in it's own original design is simply laughable, the person who came here to this forum to promote this joke of a website should be ashamed of himself

Casinos has one concept. It is no longer surprising to see that there are platforms sharing the same look, promotions, gambling games being offered and such, simply because they are on the same ground or industry. Plagiarism would be only accountable to those who are copying other platforms UI, as well as names which are closely alike or soundslike which ee have seen for years not only in gambling industry. Their intention is to ride with the hype of that particular or popular gambling platform for the attention to be divided to both original and copying platform. One reason I guess why this thing is still occuring at this moment is because only few are throwing complaints.

Well I consider something, when a site is launched to the world and especially if it is promoted here in the forum, it is necessary to point out that if it is a copy-paste of another site, they can improve it, that is, with the first comment made by the users, the casino must take action quickly and change everything, this to show that if they are authentic and that they were cheated in some way, this is something that can happen, the concept of every casino must always be original and not a copy of others, a casino should never cheat their players or promise them something that they can't deliver because that means total failure for them, that's how I see it.

I see that as much the same as plagiarism in the articles, even in the same publications that sometimes some members of the forum do in an unscrupulous way to show quality but in a not very good way.

Yes, it is true, there are many platforms that have a lot of authenticity and too much originality, sometimes it is annoying that one gets into a casino that is being born and is exactly the same as another, I think it is lack of work or a lot of laziness, maybe sometimes the sites were to be very good but they have or were sold that, the bad thing is that they would start off with the wrong foot, but everything is in the possibility of being fixed, just making a good change of environment can generate much more confidence and apologize, because having a casino for the first time is something that must be very difficult, apart from all the effort and capital.


Yes, I know that what you are looking for is that you can play well and that the casino meets the main requirements, but you also have to put in context that when there is a copy of a site it is not very well seen, it is something like doing a job identical to another either in a company or in an educational institute, I see it that way, when there is a casino that has possibly been cheated with something like that, because its duty is to immediately change its design, because that way It shows that it is authentic, legitimate and original, it will clear any doubt that the site is somewhat shady in its actions, but of course that is my way of seeing this.

More important is how the casino site can provide good service to its customers so they can be satisfied with its performance.
And although the casino site looks similar to other casinos, as long as the casino can provide satisfactory service to its members, it will not be a problem for the members.
They won't think about how it looks but how the casino can work well and not do anything bad or even cheat its members.
And this will be a healthy competition between casino sites where they must be able to provide the best for their members.

Well, whenever there is some type of doubt, it is better to listen to our intuition, this is something that can work for us and many times prevent us from losing money, it is something like that intuition that sometimes gives us in trading, that we have that hedge sense that it can warn when there is something wrong, if there is that presumption, it is better to pay attention to them, that is, if we do not trust sites that have such a shameless copy-paste, it is better not to be in that casino anymore, go to b+ Search for another that is very reliable, with a high reputation and that has enough profits for us to put our money there.

---

When we enter a casino we always look for the way that a casino meets our expectations, and one of them is that we manage to have the opportunity to have at least one win, not in everything but if it is feasible to win, of course this is fulfilled in sites like reliable casinos where they all have a high reputation, such as stake.com,.Sportsbet, bitcasino, Roobet, all that guarantee some security, but when a casino is a copy of another it is already something different, it could be said that it is spoken of plagiarism and it is what many do not want, so these things are what stop anyone from entering and depositing, this should be taken into account by many who want to launch a casino.

I do always stick with the original, i dont know but i do always have the bad impressions when it comes to copycat even if they do make out some alterations or changes but if its really that obvious then it is really

giving out that odd feeling or lost of interest.I might able to try it for some exemptions or curiosity but if it does give the same experience or doesnt really have something new then i do usually go back

into those original and i do much prefer on using them rather than on new ones which do really just simply copy their design and do make out some small changes
but its really that obvious.

Welcome to the forum; I just went through your post, and we can't say it is becoming a copycat.
As you know, the market competition situation and user trends are based on the likes and dislikes of the users.
Casinos must have to incorporate the features and offers, unlike other casinos. Adopting new requirements and trends is mandatory to attract new users and retain them.

Well, there are many opinions about it, so what can we say? that a casino is considered to be authentic even though it has similarities or that its environment is completely the same as another? We could think that when we enter a casino that it is identical to another, because in my case I would stop and put on a magnifying glass because it is not something usual, but we must also take into account that if we enter a casino where we have enough variety of games and that it is an honest casino, perhaps what it has to do is correct that option, and continue to be a normal casino team and be more authentic and original.

Indeed, there are enough established and respected online casinos for us to play in. Why should we bother with some copycats? Even if they promise enormous bonuses, how can we be sure it's not a scam?

So, the first move, make your platform originally looking. Not many people are going to trust you otherwise.

The truth is when I see a casino that is identical to another I leave and I don't go there anymore, although there is obviously the option that it be new people and that they don't know anything and that it wasn't their fault, that maybe they sold that type of environment in a casino, I prefer to pass and not go more than deposit and lose my money in a silly way, because a new casino must make a difference, be authentic by any measure, even have the best bonuses with the best wager possible, so that you can compare yourself against the big ones, such as stake.com, bitcasino.io, SB, among other casinos that are very reliable and highly reputable.

You could eventually spot out a possible scam casino in the first place or first glimpse because these people wont really be investing heavily on a site in terms of design or interface on making it look good.

Most of the cases scam projects would just simply be look simple and almost look like a school project.You would definitely notice a site which there's no effort on being put up when its created.

If they are really planning to scam on the first place then they would really be wasting up money for that.It wouldnt assure that it could hook up lots of players and bag up lots or tons of money
and ran away.Also, the wisest thing to be done is never ever to make up big deposits specially when you do deal with new gambling site.