Private 165333 15:31:29 2012-02-04 05:16:01 1802362 27.08% Invalid 12399 0 0.00000000
I´m waiting for the 3rd invalid block this day....
Topic: [1200 TH] EMC: 0 Fee DGM. Anonymous PPS. US & EU servers. No Registration! - page 138. (Read 499597 times)
February 04, 2012, 11:04:37 AM
It´s a joke, or
Private 165333 15:31:29 2012-02-04 05:16:01 1802362 27.08% Invalid 12399 0 0.00000000
I´m waiting for the 3rd invalid block this day....
Private 165333 15:31:29 2012-02-04 05:16:01 1802362 27.08% Invalid 12399 0 0.00000000
I´m waiting for the 3rd invalid block this day....
February 04, 2012, 05:14:30 AM
My 5% donation time is still running! Hope other will do so too, at least for a few days!
Greetz
NetworkerZ
Greetz
NetworkerZ
February 04, 2012, 04:50:25 AM
There is a 10% fee..
You could at least add the whole details. The fee is for cashing out Unconfirmed BTC, and when there is the possibility that a recent block is invalid, i can only consider that fee fair (otherwise the pool would have to pay for the missing BTC).
Why not just wait until everything is confirmed?
Also, i am taking the chance to thank Inaba for all the features that make EMC great.
I am donating a tiny % of my measly 240Mh/s, and hope everyone considers donating something as well.
Every bit helps, i guess...
February 04, 2012, 01:43:45 AM
That particular bitcoind maintains about 80 - 100 connections at any given time. I guess I could try to track down the public ups of the other pools bitcoind and explictly specify them.
I will try to do that tomorrow.
As far as hip 16/17 goes I will make an announcement with regards to that tomorrow that should satisfy everyone.
I will try to do that tomorrow.
As far as hip 16/17 goes I will make an announcement with regards to that tomorrow that should satisfy everyone.
February 04, 2012, 01:42:21 AM
There is a 10% fee..
February 03, 2012, 11:22:05 PM
Is there something we can do about invalids? I know some time ago BTCGuild had a lot of invalids and they were able to lower them significantly somehow. I know before these last few we were better than average, but I don't know if luck and averages really have to apply to invalids. For instance, I'm wondering if members couldn't make sure their bitcoin client peers with the pool's bitcoind in order to help propogate the pool's blocks faster.
It's the time from the pool accepting the share to the bitcoind submitting it to the network(and of course how well connected bitcoind is to the network)
If that's got ANY delays in it, those delays of course increase the chance of an invalid/orphan.
Reducing those delays reduces the chance of getting an invalid/orphan.
It could certainly help if everyone did - but the risk ... I guess if the bitcoind didn't actually contain the wallet - but simply posted the blocks it would only be a ddos risk - and then that's not really an issue coz you could move it pretty quickly if the pool is easy to redirect to a different bitcoind ... hmm and if you modified bitcoind to ignore requests that didn't alienate it on the network then having lots of connections might be OK ... OK I'm thinking out loud now ... I better stop rambling
February 03, 2012, 11:01:42 PM
Is there something we can do about invalids? I know some time ago BTCGuild had a lot of invalids and they were able to lower them significantly somehow. I know before these last few we were better than average, but I don't know if luck and averages really have to apply to invalids. For instance, I'm wondering if members couldn't make sure their bitcoin client peers with the pool's bitcoind in order to help propogate the pool's blocks faster.
I asked earlier if it would benefit anything (as in cut down stale shares, duplicates, etc. and perhaps even invalids) if the pool set up a VPN for the dedicated miners (possibly filtered so it's not abused), and possible with existing hardware without impacting the already running software performance. I don't really know enough, perhaps someone else does?
February 03, 2012, 10:40:16 PM
Is there another pro BIP 17 pool out there?
At least Inaba?
February 03, 2012, 10:18:03 PM
Is there something we can do about invalids? I know some time ago BTCGuild had a lot of invalids and they were able to lower them significantly somehow. I know before these last few we were better than average, but I don't know if luck and averages really have to apply to invalids. For instance, I'm wondering if members couldn't make sure their bitcoin client peers with the pool's bitcoind in order to help propogate the pool's blocks faster.
It's the time from the pool accepting the share to the bitcoind submitting it to the network(and of course how well connected bitcoind is to the network)
If that's got ANY delays in it, those delays of course increase the chance of an invalid/orphan.
Reducing those delays reduces the chance of getting an invalid/orphan.
February 03, 2012, 10:07:17 PM
Is there something we can do about invalids? I know some time ago BTCGuild had a lot of invalids and they were able to lower them significantly somehow. I know before these last few we were better than average, but I don't know if luck and averages really have to apply to invalids. For instance, I'm wondering if members couldn't make sure their bitcoin client peers with the pool's bitcoind in order to help propogate the pool's blocks faster.
It's the time from the pool accepting the share to the bitcoind submitting it to the network(and of course how well connected bitcoind is to the network)
If that's got ANY delays in it, those delays of course increase the chance of an invalid/orphan.
Reducing those delays reduces the chance of getting an invalid/orphan.
February 03, 2012, 10:01:01 PM
Is there something we can do about invalids? I know some time ago BTCGuild had a lot of invalids and they were able to lower them significantly somehow. I know before these last few we were better than average, but I don't know if luck and averages really have to apply to invalids. For instance, I'm wondering if members couldn't make sure their bitcoin client peers with the pool's bitcoind in order to help propogate the pool's blocks faster.
February 03, 2012, 09:52:25 PM
stupid invalids , that was an awesome round too..
Oh well, get ready for another 10hr+ block soon ROFL! ACK!
Oh well, get ready for another 10hr+ block soon ROFL! ACK!
February 03, 2012, 08:55:53 PM
I spoke too soon, another invalid block 
February 03, 2012, 08:36:06 PM
7 minutes every block would be better 
February 03, 2012, 07:00:02 PM
wow look at that 7min round =)
February 03, 2012, 06:38:35 PM
The luck is with us now 
February 03, 2012, 04:47:04 PM
Yes, you would earn less but more frequent!
Greetz
NetworkerZ
Greetz
NetworkerZ
February 03, 2012, 04:28:37 PM
You won't earn more, if the pool has more power!
Greetz
NetworkerZ
Greetz
NetworkerZ
I know!! But, we will find blocks more frequently... That's my problem... Sometimes, it takes 19 Hours to find a single block!! This is too bad... More power will mitigate this kind of situation... Don't you think?!
February 03, 2012, 04:16:09 PM
It's the same ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_large_numbers
February 03, 2012, 04:11:31 PM
I liked it when the pool had about 60 Ghs. I would get about 0.30BTC when we got a block.
Now I get about 0.04BTC. But we get more blocks so I'm not sure if it's better or worse.
Now I get about 0.04BTC. But we get more blocks so I'm not sure if it's better or worse.
Jump to: