Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 638. (Read 2591920 times)
October 08, 2012, 08:15:44 AM
is it planned to add "ASIC Features" like Stratum or so to p2pool?
October 08, 2012, 06:22:47 AM
How it is possible, that BTC nodes are in 98% on v5 and LTC nodes only 40%? Cmon!
Compiled on win32 latest git (5.0-14-g42ef991), downloadable from my skydrive:
http://sdrv.ms/NtmDt5
Compiled on win32 latest git (5.0-14-g42ef991), downloadable from my skydrive:
http://sdrv.ms/NtmDt5
October 07, 2012, 07:01:16 AM
The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.
See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
Connections are coming in slowly. Looking at the week graphs, previous node restarts were followed by a faster increase in incoming connections.See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
I'm not sure if it's a fluke or if a recent change is designed to produce this results but as I said, no actual adverse effect to report.
October 06, 2012, 06:44:42 PM
The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.
See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
Nope, nothing there. Version: 5.0-14-g42ef991See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
http://rav3n.dtdns.net:9332/static/graphs.html
Looks normal to me.
October 06, 2012, 06:21:35 PM
The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.
See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
Nope, nothing there. Version: 5.0-14-g42ef991 See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
http://rav3n.dtdns.net:9332/static/graphs.html
Looks normal to me.
October 06, 2012, 01:40:00 PM
The latest update today from git master changed something to the p2p connections. My node gets far less incoming connections.
See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
See http://p2pool.bouton.name:9332/static/graphs.html
No adverse effect to report but if all nodes behaved like mine I guess there may be a problem.
October 05, 2012, 08:43:09 AM
OK did my part today, everyone else step up.
Quote
2012-10-05 04:13:23.468000 Pool: 371GH/s Stale rate: 7.5% Expected time to block: 9.8 hours
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000004ead2e21c87a0b8c381f8e4aa9d6982fc521808fdb42d184d4e
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.890000 GOT SHARE! 6 2d184d4e prev 585422e7 age 45.91s
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000004ead2e21c87a0b8c381f8e4aa9d6982fc521808fdb42d184d4e
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.890000 GOT SHARE! 6 2d184d4e prev 585422e7 age 45.91s
Well, do more.
October 05, 2012, 08:14:48 AM
OK did my part today, everyone else step up.
Quote
2012-10-05 04:13:23.468000 Pool: 371GH/s Stale rate: 7.5% Expected time to block: 9.8 hours
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000004ead2e21c87a0b8c381f8e4aa9d6982fc521808fdb42d184d4e
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.890000 GOT SHARE! 6 2d184d4e prev 585422e7 age 45.91s
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000 GOT BLOCK FROM MINER! Passing to bitcoind! http://blockexplorer.com/block/00000000000004ead2e21c87a0b8c381f8e4aa9d6982fc521808fdb42d184d4e
2012-10-05 04:13:24.793000
2012-10-05 04:13:24.890000 GOT SHARE! 6 2d184d4e prev 585422e7 age 45.91s
October 04, 2012, 10:19:38 AM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1244616
Maybe bump work feeding to new protocol?
If no one noticed 95% of p2pool is on v5 Shame on last 5%
Maybe bump work feeding to new protocol?
If no one noticed 95% of p2pool is on v5
Shame on last 5% 
October 03, 2012, 07:03:30 PM
I hereby retract my statement about p2pool not scaling properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h. p2pool clearly had a good run not too long ago.
Then I rejoined.
So now I'm changing my statement.
p2pool doesn't scale properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h and I'm part of p2pool.
Sigh.
M
Then I rejoined.
So now I'm changing my statement.
p2pool doesn't scale properly when the pool hash rate is > 300g/h and I'm part of p2pool.
Sigh.
M
October 03, 2012, 05:01:35 AM
Yeah, but It supposed to be fixed with bitcoind 0.7?
October 03, 2012, 01:33:27 AM
During startup:
Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78
See: https://github.com/forrestv/p2pool/issues/30Code:
2012-10-03 02:27:51.800039 ...inserting 22449 verified shares...
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010 ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818 ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616 ...success!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010 ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818 ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616 ...success!
Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78
October 02, 2012, 08:31:39 PM
During startup:
Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78
Code:
2012-10-03 02:27:51.800039 ...inserting 22449 verified shares...
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010 ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818 ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616 ...success!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854010 ...done loading 22448 shares!
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854372
2012-10-03 02:27:56.854690 Initializing work...
2012-10-03 02:28:10.631818 ...success!
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632188
2012-10-03 02:28:10.632673 Joining p2pool network using port 9333...
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473353 > Unhandled error in Deferred:
2012-10-03 02:28:13.473845 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-10-03 02:28:13.474051 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher
2012-10-03 02:28:16.303616 ...success!
Latest version from git b07f142a605adb09735c0a2c16621f57bb678c78
October 02, 2012, 03:28:40 PM
Why am I seeing this repeatedly in my console?
Code:
2012-10-01 20:31:14.959000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
It's just a peer requesting a share you don't have, potentially on purpose to measure ping times: http://forre.st:9332/pings
October 01, 2012, 07:33:52 PM
Why am I seeing this repeatedly in my console?
Not "all the time", but I see it regularly. Here's another set:
M
Code:
2012-10-01 20:31:14.959000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
Not "all the time", but I see it regularly. Here's another set:
Code:
2012-10-01 20:32:32.820000 Pool: 374GH/s Stale rate: 9.3% Expected time to block: 9.1 hours
2012-10-01 20:32:34.529000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:41.169000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:43.630000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:34.529000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:41.169000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
2012-10-01 20:32:43.630000 Sending 0 shares to 92.251.166.251:58565
M
October 01, 2012, 05:36:39 PM
so, it means the HD6470M had not completed just only 1 true share for 20 minutes? if it works more than 23 hours, I will get gain?
More or less, yeah.If p2pool tells you that "expected time to share" is 23hrs it is possible to NOT get payd all day long, even two when mining 24/7. 35MH is just not good enough.
October 01, 2012, 12:09:11 PM
so, it means the HD6470M had not completed just only 1 true share for 20 minutes? if it works more than 23 hours, I will get gain?
More or less, yeah. October 01, 2012, 11:54:08 AM
it is a notebook with HD6470M, just works for test.
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
http://img.aalun.com/di/PRR5/1.png
and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
http://img.aalun.com/di/AAAP/2.png
so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
As it says in the p2pool window, you'll only get a share every ~23 hours. The shares that are showing as accepted in cgminer are the diff-1 pseudo shares that p2pool uses to track your hashrate.miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
http://img.aalun.com/di/PRR5/1.png
and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
http://img.aalun.com/di/AAAP/2.png
so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
October 01, 2012, 11:44:14 AM
it is a notebook with HD6470M, just works for test.
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
http://img.aalun.com/di/PRR5/1.png
and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
http://img.aalun.com/di/AAAP/2.png
so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
As it says in the p2pool window, you'll only get a share every ~23 hours. The shares that are showing as accepted in cgminer are the diff-1 pseudo shares that p2pool uses to track your hashrate. miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
http://img.aalun.com/di/PRR5/1.png
and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
http://img.aalun.com/di/AAAP/2.png
so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
October 01, 2012, 11:25:42 AM
it is a notebook with HD6470M, just works for test.
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
miner and p2pool seems work normally, but the accept is only 9 which has worked for 20 minutes.
CG option: -g 1 -v 2 -w 128 -I 6
and static shows 0 shares and 0 DOA
so why? is the GPU too poor to fix p2pool?
Jump to: