They have a new campaign right now, it's their third campaign for this month
[1xBit.com] - Christmas SPECIAL- Signature Campaign [OPEN] the rate is very attractive $100 for legendary I hope higher members with no red trust will not be tempted to participate, I still believe that their campaign here will not last as many accusations are still coming and it will have a snowball effect.
Topic: 1XBIT campaign could be the next longest running campaign even with scam reports (Read 635 times)
December 19, 2021, 09:43:49 AM
December 19, 2021, 05:51:30 AM
I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?
Have you heard about Chipmixer scam anyone on this forum, I have not even heard of Chipmixer scammed anyone before, but this is what we are talking about for 1xbit, that some 1xbit users complained of their deposited and their winning not paid them by 1xbit, this is a big different cases entirely. Chipmxier is a mixer, they can not help an address already taggged by government that has been involved in criminal activities to mix, it is not possible, they are only concerned about privacy, but some people can use it as an advatange for criminal activities just like some people use money for criminal activities, should this be the reason fiat currencies should not exist anymore?
December 19, 2021, 12:15:08 AM
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?
It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit. Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things. The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.
If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.
I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay? I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think?
If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.
It's none of my business what people do with their money, just like it's none of Chip Mixers business what their customers do with their money. I think Chip Mixing is a good service to have for the community. Yes, some people will do bad things with their money, they should be held accountable for those bad things. Providing a mixing service is not a bad thing. Stealing money from you customers is. Chip Mixer isn't stealing money. 1xbit is.
In my opinion, the word "mixing money" is just a nicer name for "laundering money". Of course, as long as no criminal charges are brought, I have nothing to fight for, because the Bitcointalk jet set is still making great money on this business. You know very well that sooner or later it will happen, because you also know that Bitcoin mixers / launderers were created mostly for that. Talks like yours are just cover, same like other bullishits that are covering at start all ponzi schemes and other scams. This is pure hypocrisy to me.
YOU ALL KNOW IT VERY WELL!
December 18, 2021, 11:24:00 PM
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?
It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit. Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things. The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.
If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.
I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay? I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think?
If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.
It's none of my business what people do with their money, just like it's none of Chip Mixers business what their customers do with their money. I think Chip Mixing is a good service to have for the community. Yes, some people will do bad things with their money, they should be held accountable for those bad things. Providing a mixing service is not a bad thing. Stealing money from you customers is. Chip Mixer isn't stealing money. 1xbit is.
December 18, 2021, 09:34:20 PM
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?
It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit. Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things. The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.
If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.
I understand that once Chipmixer receives official criminal charges, you will mark everyone, who wear their ad in signature in red. Until that happens, you can turn a blind eye to their money laundering and pretend everything is okay? I think it's hypocrisy .. don't you think?
December 18, 2021, 08:54:28 PM
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?
It doesn't take a high sense of morality to understand the difference between Chip Mixer and 1xbit. Chip Mixer is an honest business that is useful to both honest and dishonest people doing both honest and dishonest things. The same could be said for any crypto exchange, or vpn service, or really any business that provides a service or sells goods that could help someone commit a crime.
If Chip Mixer regularly stole money from their customers like 1xbit does, then members of the Chip Mixer campaign would receive negative trust like you.
December 18, 2021, 08:14:44 PM
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect.I understand your opinion, but I am surprised that you are focusing your attention only on 1xBit. If you are driven by such a high sense of morality, why are you not criticizing the ChipMixer signature campaign? After all, it is clear that all mixers are involved in money laundering. Why do you not criticize and mark red users who, in signature have ChipMixer ad and support criminals (or maybe even terrorists as it is suggested in Wikipedia)?
December 18, 2021, 12:50:10 PM
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
I am not saying it directly, I just used it as an example. Just saying the real reason why negative trusts given to the people that joined the campaign not bad. I have read in some posts how some people that joined the campaign are not having guilt but only chasing the weekly paid money which is wrong. That others that can be fall into the category of money loss should be what they should post about I stead of advertising non reputable campaign on this forum. The post was just indirect. 
December 18, 2021, 08:55:27 AM
This is exactly my point, it is like working for a thief so the thief will be able to steal more. In this case the thief is later known and charged to court, anyone the thief implicated as co-workers will also be among that will face justice. This is what is happening to 1xbit participates for supporting a betting platform that was and still accused of wrongdoing that can continue to result to money loss for 1xbit users.
Unfortunately, those who participated in the signature campaign cannot be charged because it's hard to trace who these people are, we can only get their location because some of them are posting in their local board but getting their information I don't think the authorities will pursue them, they are safe and they can promote as long as they want, in fact, we have 2 campaigns related to 1XBIT now in the service section.
December 17, 2021, 01:00:57 PM
Money matters but for some respect is more important said by Paul Walker in FF movie if I am not wrong.
Atleast you should try their site and sense how the feeling of getting scammed by someone then you won't support it even though if they are paying you.
This is exactly my point, it is like working for a thief so the thief will be able to steal more. In this case the thief is later known and charged to court, anyone the thief implicated as co-workers will also be among that will face justice. This is what is happening to 1xbit participates for supporting a betting platform that was and still accused of wrongdoing that can continue to result to money loss for 1xbit users. Atleast you should try their site and sense how the feeling of getting scammed by someone then you won't support it even though if they are paying you.
December 16, 2021, 11:51:09 AM
I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.
What is your opinion. From what I get from your post is that 1xbit is taking low quality posters. I am not saying you are a low quality posters, but you said you were unable to join a signature campaign before 1xbit came. Likely you are also preffering to join bounty campaigns until you joined 1xbit. What I can say is that you should try to increase you quality way of posting, have the merit required and see yourself join a better campaign will be achievable. The second is that you did not care if some people will see your signature, click on it and register on 1xbit. If the people are scammed, you do not care. What you care most about is to join a campaign, you do not care if the site is shady or not.
Before joining the 1xBit campaign, I took part in bounties, because I already had a red trust, so the quality of the posts did not matter, because I couldn't join any other signature campaign anyway.
Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.
Atleast you should try their site and sense how the feeling of getting scammed by someone then you won't support it even though if they are paying you.
December 15, 2021, 03:36:33 PM
Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.
Sure you could. You could say something about all the players that have had money stolen from them by 1xbit. You are responsible for helping drive traffic to 1xbit after all.
You choose not to though. Because they pay you. You could help other members avoid getting scammed, but instead you do the opposite. Because 1xbit is giving you money.
You could really expect people on having those u turn of decisions whenever they do get money from or lets say they wouldnt care on what the communities views and perceptions towards it as long he got paid.
He wont really be reminding about his account reputation though. At least he do make out some benefits on his red tagged account.lol
December 15, 2021, 06:43:29 AM
Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.
Sure you could. You could say something about all the players that have had money stolen from them by 1xbit. You are responsible for helping drive traffic to 1xbit after all.
You choose not to though. Because they pay you. You could help other members avoid getting scammed, but instead you do the opposite. Because 1xbit is giving you money.
December 15, 2021, 03:36:53 AM
I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.
What is your opinion. From what I get from your post is that 1xbit is taking low quality posters. I am not saying you are a low quality posters, but you said you were unable to join a signature campaign before 1xbit came. Likely you are also preffering to join bounty campaigns until you joined 1xbit. What I can say is that you should try to increase you quality way of posting, have the merit required and see yourself join a better campaign will be achievable. The second is that you did not care if some people will see your signature, click on it and register on 1xbit. If the people are scammed, you do not care. What you care most about is to join a campaign, you do not care if the site is shady or not.
Before joining the 1xBit campaign, I took part in bounties, because I already had a red trust, so the quality of the posts did not matter, because I couldn't join any other signature campaign anyway.
Of course you can have doubts about how 1xBit works. I haven't played there, but they've been paying me a campaign fee every week for several months, so personally I can't say anything bad about them.
December 15, 2021, 03:01:52 AM
I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.
What is your opinion. From what I get from your post is that 1xbit is taking low quality posters. I am not saying you are a low quality posters, but you said you were unable to join a signature campaign before 1xbit came. Likely you are also preffering to join bounty campaigns until you joined 1xbit. What I can say is that you should try to increase you quality way of posting, have the merit required and see yourself join a better campaign will be achievable. The second is that you did not care if some people will see your signature, click on it and register on 1xbit. If the people are scammed, you do not care. What you care most about is to join a campaign, you do not care if the site is shady or not.
December 14, 2021, 10:35:10 PM
It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.
Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.
But please don't think I am in favor of what you are doing. You've probably done the right thing as far as your account is concerned. You are earning from an account that is considered useless already given the many red trusts that it gained. But please be aware that what you are promoting is generally a scam platform. By earning, you are actually influencing others to use a platform that will take away their money. For yourself, all is good because you are earning good. For others, they're at risk.
I can see what the opinion is about 1xBit and I knew what opinion I would get after joining this campaign. I joined the 1xBit campaign because I couldn't join any other campaign. I hope that it will last as long as possible, because when it ends, I will probably have to take part in risky bounties again.
December 14, 2021, 10:07:55 PM
Let earn something to red-tagged users. The participants of the campaign either red-tagged from the beginning of joining the campaign or got tagged after joining the campaign. Something like a red-tagged campaign. I don't know if it's run long, but it's an opportunity for 1xbit to promote scam casinos by possible scammers or by scammers. The problem is forum users especially those who are newbies do not see who wearing the signature. They probably jump into the scam by seeing their greedy offers and that's how the campaign lasts long. Just imagine if 1xbit does not get a response from the forum they won't run a campaign for longer. We don't have a way to ban them although we don't like to see them on the forum as long as they comply with forum rules.
December 14, 2021, 08:49:12 PM
As to whether this campaign will be one of the longest-running campaigns on this forum or not, we cannot tell. Surely, it will depend on how much improvement this campaign gave to their platform's statistics, probably in terms of number of new users, number and amount of bets, and so on.
But the point is that however well they promote their site, for as long as the accusations are rising and remain unsolved, they couldn't reach the success they want. User experience should be their priority.
But the point is that however well they promote their site, for as long as the accusations are rising and remain unsolved, they couldn't reach the success they want. User experience should be their priority.
December 14, 2021, 08:24:56 PM
As far as I know, representatives of 1xbit claim that 1xbet is a separate company. But it is possible that the owner is the same.
If it is the same capital group, it means that it is one of the largest casinos and bookmakers in the world.
I don't doubt they are one of the largest bookmakers in the world, what becomes even more surprising they are in such important position, while behaving in a shady way with their customers.If it is the same capital group, it means that it is one of the largest casinos and bookmakers in the world.
I know you promote them and everyone needs money for a living, but don't you feel bad for those who have been scammed by 1xbit and 1xbet?
As I see there is a wide variety of cases against their brands, and not only isolated accusations, like the ones against another casinos. So it's not possible to say it's persecution.
December 14, 2021, 06:19:08 PM
The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.
There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sitesQuote
Q: Who owns 1xbit?
1xbit is owned and operated from 1xCorp N.V. which is licensed in Curacao. This is the same group that owns 1Xbet.
1xbit is owned and operated from 1xCorp N.V. which is licensed in Curacao. This is the same group that owns 1Xbet.
1xbit review
You can also paste 1xCorp N.V. directly on Google and the search will link to 1xbet instantly.
Actually I've found the same complaints we see regards 1xbit on this forum in another reviews sites, but regards 1xbet. Mainly issues with gamblers who were able to grow their bankroll after some time betting, and once they did, their accounts were freezed (no withdrawls allowed anymore).
As far as I know, representatives of 1xbit claim that 1xbet is a separate company. But it is possible that the owner is the same.
If it is the same capital group, it means that it is one of the largest casinos and bookmakers in the world.
Jump to: