Pages:
Author

Topic: 1XBIT campaign could be the next longest running campaign even with scam reports - page 2. (Read 615 times)

hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.
There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites
Check the faq section of this gambling review site and you will see:

Quote
Q: Who owns 1xbit?
1xbit is owned and operated from 1xCorp N.V. which is licensed in Curacao. This is the same group that owns 1Xbet.

1xbit review

You can also paste 1xCorp N.V. directly on Google and the search will link to 1xbet instantly.

Actually I've found the same complaints we see regards 1xbit on this forum in another reviews sites, but regards 1xbet. Mainly issues with gamblers who were able to grow their bankroll after some time betting, and once they did, their accounts were freezed (no withdrawls allowed anymore).
sr. member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 366
It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.

Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.

But please don't think I am in favor of what you are doing. You've probably done the right thing as far as your account is concerned. You are earning from an account that is considered useless already given the many red trusts that it gained. But please be aware that what you are promoting is generally a scam platform. By earning, you are actually influencing others to use a platform that will take away their money. For yourself, all is good because you are earning good. For others, they're at risk.
full member
Activity: 630
Merit: 130

Most times it's not about the money. Many accusations came up against 1xbit and the made efforts to resolve this issues but weren't given much attention instead many insisted they were scammers and WI forever remain. Personally I joined the campaign to see for myself  how reliable they are and I will say they have been the best campaign and still standing. It's a matter of choice on what one choose to hold on to

Quote
Everyone here desires to earn someday from a campaign signature and so far 1xbit has proven to be reliable to their signature participants and no week passes without each participant who has meet their weekly requirements getting their funds in their wallet. We all anticipate to have 1xbit last even longer than any other campaign on the forum and if they don't  they still deserve some accolades they have been reliable enough for so long now

Ofcourse its all about the money. Most of the signature campaigns only accepts higher ranked members. Seldom accepts members and lower ranks that's why you joined the campaign. You're eagerly wanting to be paid as soon as possible here.
Well, I doubt that once 1xbit fall, you will be able to find managers that will accept you for the negative trust. Youngsters like us here in the forum need to understand the consequences as much as possible.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 516
The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.
There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites

If the situation were clear, surely large football clubs or even international football federations would not allow 1xBit to be advertised next to their name. I know the situation is quite controversial, but I think that before a large football club signs an advertising contract, it has lawyers to check it out. I am not a specialist, but they should be because they really live off of it.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 421
Bitcoindata.science
The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.
There is no proof both 1xbet and 1xbit is owned and managed by the same group of casino operators but my major concern is how far they site still get endorsement and happen to be one of the largest gambling sites in Europe despite the aligation levied against them. I'm wondering if there is no regulatory agency that sees into the reputation of most of this online casinos and gambling sites
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 516
Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

I don't know the plans of the 1xBit marketing team, so I don't know if this campaign will last for long, but it looks like they are happy with the results so far as they decided to launch a second campaign:

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-sports-signature-campaign-open-5376183
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-restart-of-1xbit-signature-campaign-new-signatures-and-more-spots-5367666

Both are active and run simultaneously.

I don't understand why they created two campaigns? I know you're not part of the management of this scam casino, but it's kind of weird that they have two high payout campaigns and they refuse to pay customers who deposited and won at the casino, so they're taking the customers' hard-earned money to pay campaign participants and legitimize the casino. Is strange that

It seems they are testing various forms of campaigns. The main campaign has a standard code of signature and is long-term. They launch additional campaigns for the needs of events and they last a week or two. At least I drew such conclusions from what they have announced and done so far.



Companies who are tagged as scam or have any other issues that made their name painted with red and still running a signature campaign and accepting red tagged users will encourage other users to participate into a shady project regardless If it will destroy their forum reputation just like this user thought.
I don't know if you paid attention, but there are some DT members in the forum who are giving a red tag for very bland things .. Of course they have the right to do so, because they do it according to their opinion. However, as a consequence, the number of red tag accounts increases very quickly. In my opinion, signature campaigns which will accept accounts with neagtive trusts will start appearing soon, as it happens in bounty campaigns. So even if the 1xbit signature campaign ends, I am not afraid of finding a new campaign.

You guys could've saved your reputations If you stayed away from that campaign after you found out that it has an issue, or at least check the status of that platform before applying.
Yes, you're right you can't blame the DT's for tagging you because that's the right thing to do. Participating in a shady business as an advertiser means you're one of them.

I was previously red tagged for a little thing which made my account worthless. That's why I joined the 1xBit signature campaign.
hero member
Activity: 2716
Merit: 552
Companies who are tagged as scam or have any other issues that made their name painted with red and still running a signature campaign and accepting red tagged users will encourage other users to participate into a shady project regardless If it will destroy their forum reputation just like this user thought.
I don't know if you paid attention, but there are some DT members in the forum who are giving a red tag for very bland things .. Of course they have the right to do so, because they do it according to their opinion. However, as a consequence, the number of red tag accounts increases very quickly. In my opinion, signature campaigns which will accept accounts with neagtive trusts will start appearing soon, as it happens in bounty campaigns. So even if the 1xbit signature campaign ends, I am not afraid of finding a new campaign.

You guys could've saved your reputations If you stayed away from that campaign after you found out that it has an issue, or at least check the status of that platform before applying.
Yes, you're right you can't blame the DT's for tagging you because that's the right thing to do. Participating in a shady business as an advertiser means you're one of them.
full member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 101
I don't really see the point of not banning 1xbit from this entire forum. Why are they allowed to keep advertising even though they are a well documented scam? This seems to me as a gross negligence in part of the Bitcointalk moderators. I understand that some people are desperate to make some money, but I think in the long term, more people will lose money rather than make it.
this is an open forum so anyone is free to be in this forum, if you feel disturbed then just ignore it or just leave this forum because criticizing the moderator's way of working is the same as being dissatisfied with the freedom that exists in this forum.

we all have the right to play on any gambling site and also join the signature campaign on any gambling site.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1140
What's your insight on 1XBIT campaign are they going to be one of the longest-running campaigns.
As you know scammers are not moderated in this forum, that's the problem, can't do much for the 1xbit campaign, but we have done what we can but that doesn't mean they have to stop, their payouts to participants are high and they accept color marked members.

My view is of course there is, in my opinion the members in this forum don't care anymore about their 1xbit campaign and gambling site, unfortunately victims from outside the forum are increasing every day, over time they will stop themselves to promote their campaigns here, I'm sure it will happen, not last long.
On the time that they would find that it isnt really relevant to make out some advertisement on here and find out that they are just wasting some money

allocated for marketing then they would definitely stop but for now they could still do all they want because they do have the funds and its true that

scams arent moderated but the community could really give out that warning and awareness that people should stay away on this one.
hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The most shocking part is that they belong to the same group of 1xbet, a big and popular fiat casino which has already sponsored soccer teams like Chelsea and Liverpool, also appearing very often in online advertisements even though you aren't looking for gambling content on the internet. As far as I know they are the largest bookmaker in Europe nowadays. Nevertheless, they are involved with the scam casino 1xbit, but people seem to not bother with this, including the regulators. They keep playing at the site without caring for their money or keep promoting it without caring for their own reputation.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
What's your insight on 1XBIT campaign are they going to be one of the longest-running campaigns.
As you know scammers are not moderated in this forum, that's the problem, can't do much for the 1xbit campaign, but we have done what we can but that doesn't mean they have to stop, their payouts to participants are high and they accept color marked members.

My view is of course there is, in my opinion the members in this forum don't care anymore about their 1xbit campaign and gambling site, unfortunately victims from outside the forum are increasing every day, over time they will stop themselves to promote their campaigns here, I'm sure it will happen, not last long.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1127
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

I don't know the plans of the 1xBit marketing team, so I don't know if this campaign will last for long, but it looks like they are happy with the results so far as they decided to launch a second campaign:

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-sports-signature-campaign-open-5376183
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-restart-of-1xbit-signature-campaign-new-signatures-and-more-spots-5367666

Both are active and run simultaneously.

I don't understand why they created two campaigns? I know you're not part of the management of this scam casino, but it's kind of weird that they have two high payout campaigns and they refuse to pay customers who deposited and won at the casino, so they're taking the customers' hard-earned money to pay campaign participants and legitimize the casino. Is strange that
legendary
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1971
A Bitcoiner chooses. A slave obeys.
I don't really see the point of not banning 1xbit from this entire forum. Why are they allowed to keep advertising even though they are a well documented scam? This seems to me as a gross negligence in part of the Bitcointalk moderators. I understand that some people are desperate to make some money, but I think in the long term, more people will lose money rather than make it.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 516
Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.

I don't know the plans of the 1xBit marketing team, so I don't know if this campaign will last for long, but it looks like they are happy with the results so far as they decided to launch a second campaign:

1. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-sports-signature-campaign-open-5376183
2. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-restart-of-1xbit-signature-campaign-new-signatures-and-more-spots-5367666

Both are active and run simultaneously.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225

I don't think they will run long , for me it is only their PRIDE thats why they are still holding the campaign but the truth is? this does not add value in their business because Bitcointalk users are taking their distance from this obvious scam casino site.

It's very challenging for us members here in Bitcointalk, other forums will just ban 1XBIT and all their participants, majority of us here are annoyed on 1XBIT presence here but the admin has a rule that scams are not moderated here so it's a challenge for us here to tell the community and expose them, we keep on encouraging people to be wise and always do research on where to put money and practice diligence all because we have seen how 1XBIT is working to promote their casino to scam people.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1160
Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook
Not sure how long they will continue their campaign, but it looks like they are happy with the result because until now the campaign is still active. They have enough participants to wear their signature, and these people look like they are regular employees as with the red-tagged they received, they might not be accepted again to another campaign.
member
Activity: 840
Merit: 23
It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.
Everyone here desires to earn someday from a campaign signature and so far 1xbit has proven to be reliable to their signature participants and no week passes without each participant who has meet their weekly requirements getting their funds in their wallet. We all anticipate to have 1xbit last even longer than any other campaign on the forum and if they don't  they still deserve some accolades they have been reliable enough for so long now
sr. member
Activity: 2618
Merit: 439
The majority of us here don't want this casino to have a campaign here, but the scam here is not moderated I'm surprised that they are already on their 7th month and they are still doing great,
I thin DOING GREAT is not necessary to mentioned because they are doing great in favor of their Paid shill participants and not about the forum content so Nope this is not great.

It will all be okay once they clean up their mess. It's been 7 months, and still we see gamblers telling their experiences on how bad the service is.
I don't have anything against them but we all want our money to be in safe hands. We want to deposit and withdraw our money anytime we want it to with complete numbers.
It's not just about the signatures that we should look at, it's what's within. They can go 2 years running this campaign but what about the unsolved history regarding the service itself? Should it all be sugarcoat by on time payment in signature advertising?
Their signature campaigning is a sign that they are desperately needed this bitcointalk.org community to bring players in their site because of their willingness to spend thousands of dollars just to promote their site here even tough they are  facing bad impact , looking at their paid participants? do you really think this will bring positive outcome towards their gambling site?
no i don't think so because from so much big payments now they have adjusted (though still decent) yet they felt like spending funds without any returns.

and also look at this thread, the administration of 1xbit stops collaborating anymore here lol.
hero member
Activity: 2002
Merit: 516
As I wrote earlier, at the moment the manager of neither one nor the other 1xBit signature campaign has no choice. There is a condition that only accounts that have received a negative trust for promoting 1xBit in the past can be accepted. But I saw that in the new 1xBit signature campaign there are also exceptions for accounts that received a red tag for little things.
I was only referring to this year first 1xbit campaign which they brought to this forum some months ago, like seven months ago or something. I noticed there has been other two or three campaigns that were later introduced with the previous ones disabled. My bad that I did not know much about how the campaign manager are accepting and rejecting accounts that applied for their campaign later. I did not know people with negative trust are now also accepted. That is how it should be, there are some red trust that does not worth it. But this does not mean I trust 1xbit though.

In fact, the rules of the campaign have not changed much. The community just does not like this campaign much, so there are slight inconveniences from time to time.  Simply managers (because at the moment, as far as I know, there are two different ones - one for each campaign, because at the moment two are running simultaneously.) adapt to the conditions they have.
legendary
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1193
Gamble responsibly
As I wrote earlier, at the moment the manager of neither one nor the other 1xBit signature campaign has no choice. There is a condition that only accounts that have received a negative trust for promoting 1xBit in the past can be accepted. But I saw that in the new 1xBit signature campaign there are also exceptions for accounts that received a red tag for little things.
I was only referring to this year first 1xbit campaign which they brought to this forum some months ago, like seven months ago or something. I noticed there has been other two or three campaigns that were later introduced with the previous ones disabled. My bad that I did not know much about how the campaign manager are accepting and rejecting accounts that applied for their campaign later. I did not know people with negative trust are now also accepted. That is how it should be, there are some red trust that does not worth it. But this does not mean I trust 1xbit though.
Pages:
Jump to: