It's a simple math that's working here. I think the 1xbit shills are not really caring whether the campaign would last long or not. They only care that they could earn a nice amount even if their accounts here are already considered untrustworthy or probably worthless because of red trusts. If somebody has his account lying around earning nothing, could not even be sold for a few bucks, then why not join a campaign even if it means losing the account's worth forever? Even a month's pay of $400 is probably enough for 1xbit shills to lose their accounts.
Correct. My account was worthless before I joined 1xBit signature campaign.
Im sure that for $400 you can buy clean Legendary account, or at least Hero.
To be honest they don't have any reputations, if you looked all of their participants you'll see they didn't even got at least 5 merits in last 120 days even though they're posting everyday. Also I doubt those accounts were actually his personal accounts, it's high chance a bought accounts because mostly have a long gap posting.
Actually the owner/team of 1xbit is the stupid, not the participants. They hire shitposter and keep paying them, while the campaign isn't benefit to them since most people in this forum already know how scammy 1xbit is.
I think that a 1xBit manager would like to be able to accept accounts that do not have a negative reputation in his signature campaign. He was just forced to accept red tagged accounts, because everyone who joined the campaign got it anyway. For me, it was a chance to earn money from a signature campaign in Bitcoin, not to participate in risky bounty campaigns. Simple as that.