Pages:
Author

Topic: 2007-10-3 4-Star General Wesley Clark: The US will attack 7 countries in 5 years - page 2. (Read 1759 times)

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
"Advanced ICBM's?" How about no ICBM's.

Sure about that?

http://iranprimer.usip.org/resource/irans-ballistic-missile-program

Quote
The Islamic Republic is the only country to develop a 2,000-km missile without first having a nuclear weapons capability.

sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
Didn't you guys watch the new Robocop movie? It shows how the US will pacify Iran with their army of robots.

The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans.

"Advanced ICBM's?" How about no ICBM's.

The problem for US citizens is not about ICBM's (whether they have them or not) but about the general attitude towards the US. The US gov. attitude is pretty much the same if you are in Iran. It kind of reminds me of the Iraq story  "The nation possesses weapons of mass destruction and other weapons. And with Armed Forced currently numbering in their millions..."
 
newbie
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
Didn't you guys watch the new Robocop movie? It shows how the US will pacify Iran with their army of robots.

The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans.

"Advanced ICBM's?" How about no ICBM's.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
So, after Syria, Iran will be next?

The problem with Iran is that unlike Iraq, that nation possesses advanced ICBMs and other weapons. And with Armed Forces currently numbering in their millions, an invasion of Iran could become the costliest ever war waged by the Americans.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Knowledge is Power
This video has been around for ages and yes it is pretty much on the money. Only reason they're not in Iran yet is because they haven't been able to blow the nuclear weapons bulllshit out of proportion, and Iran has actually been very reasonable. They know they can't do the same thing as in Iraq.
full member
Activity: 343
Merit: 100
So, after Syria, Iran will be next?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
btw... Russian companies  have rights to a large amount of oil fields in iraq
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10731708/Russias-Lukoil-opens-giant-Iraq-oil-field-adding-to-crude-glut.html

Love when people try to bash the U.S. with fud

Quote
An agreement was signed between Russia and Iraq in 2012 to buy military equipment worth $4.3 billion, and that by virtue of the signature of the agreement, Le Bourget Air Show officially brought the agreement into force.”

Us and their gun deals....Smiley
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
That embassy employs over 15000 people......
Not just american, but Iraqi's they live eat and sleep in that compound.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
99% of most embassy staff are military in hostile countries, that is kinda like a no shit sherlock thing. would you work at a embassy in afgan with out security? FACK NO

So the ~100 embassy staff needs the security of ~16,900 soldiers? That is 169 soldiers for every single staff. And then they need some 5,000 additional private security contractors as well?
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
Nice spotting this one.
Replacing personell with soldiers .. that low bryant , very low..

Nothing wrong there, as 99% of the embassy staff in Baghdad are from the military. Normal embassies and consulates don't employ more than a thousand people, including all the security guards.

But why did you use the world soldiers when it's obvious the original text was with personnel.
It's clear that you purposely replaced the text , RT style  to make your point.

full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Nice spotting this one.
Replacing personell with soldiers .. that low bryant , very low..

Nothing wrong there, as 99% of the embassy staff in Baghdad are from the military. Normal embassies and consulates don't employ more than a thousand people, including all the security guards.

99% of most embassy staff are military in hostile countries, that is kinda like a no shit sherlock thing. would you work at a embassy in afgan with out security? FACK NO
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
Nice spotting this one.
Replacing personell with soldiers .. that low bryant , very low..

Nothing wrong there, as 99% of the embassy staff in Baghdad are from the military. Normal embassies and consulates don't employ more than a thousand people, including all the security guards.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
btw... Russian companies  have rights to a large amount of oil fields in iraq
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10731708/Russias-Lukoil-opens-giant-Iraq-oil-field-adding-to-crude-glut.html

Love when people try to bash the U.S. with fud
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
You are wrong US had a complete pull out of Iraq....

The US had a partial pullout, after all the oil wells and the gas rigs were given to the American Corporations. Some 17,000 American soldiers are stationed at the American embassy in Baghdad and at consulates in Basra, Mosul and Kirkuk. Also, there are more than 5,000 American private security contractors, stationed all over Iraq.

Love how you got that from wiki but did not put the header up there and changed it around lol
Full article
Full withdrawal (2011)[edit]
See also: U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement
With the collapse of discussions about extending the stay of U.S. troops,[25][26] President Obama announced the full withdrawal of troops from Iraq, as previously scheduled, on 21 October 2011.[26] The U.S. retained an embassy in Baghdad[26] with some 17,000 personnel,[27] consulates in Basra, Mosul and Kirkuk, which have been allocated more than 1,000 staff each,[27] and between 4,000 to 5,000 defense contractors.[26]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We occupy and secure the embassys in Iraq that is all, who cares if private contractors are there...

over 67,000 are stationed in Europe... Guess we occupy euro as well
 Kuwait   11,415
 Japan   50,631
 Germany   40,328
 United Kingdom   9,485

Stop twisting facts to suit your needs.

Nice spotting this one.
Replacing personell with soldiers .. that low bryant , very low..

Guess that mother russia is also occupied by the americans , they have 2000 embassy personal soldiers  there.
legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
You are wrong US had a complete pull out of Iraq....

The US had a partial pullout, after all the oil wells and the gas rigs were given to the American Corporations. Some 17,000 American soldiers are stationed at the American embassy in Baghdad and at consulates in Basra, Mosul and Kirkuk. Also, there are more than 5,000 American private security contractors, stationed all over Iraq.

Love how you got that from wiki but did not put the header up there and changed it around lol
Full article
Full withdrawal (2011)[edit]
See also: U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement
With the collapse of discussions about extending the stay of U.S. troops,[25][26] President Obama announced the full withdrawal of troops from Iraq, as previously scheduled, on 21 October 2011.[26] The U.S. retained an embassy in Baghdad[26] with some 17,000 personnel,[27] consulates in Basra, Mosul and Kirkuk, which have been allocated more than 1,000 staff each,[27] and between 4,000 to 5,000 defense contractors.[26] President Obama and al-Maliki outlined a broad agenda for post-war cooperation without American troops in Iraq during a joint press conference on 12 December 2011 at the White House. This agenda included cooperation on energy, trade and education as well as cooperation in security, counter-terrorism, economic development and strengthening Iraq's institutions. Both leaders said their countries would maintain strong security, diplomatic and economic ties after the last U.S. combat forces withdraw.[28][29]

President Barack Obama paid tribute to the troops who served in Iraq on 14 December 2011, at the Fort Bragg military base in North Carolina. As the last of the American troops prepared to exit Iraq, he said the United States was leaving behind a "sovereign, stable and self-reliant" Iraq.[30] On 15 December, an American military ceremony was held in Baghdad putting a formal end to the U.S mission in Iraq.[31][32][33] The last 500 soldiers left Iraq on the morning of December 18, 2011.[1][2][3][4][5][6] At the time of withdrawal, the United States had one remaining soldier, Staff Sergeant Ahmed K. Altaie, still missing in Iraq since October 23, 2006, and had offered a $50,000 reward for his recovery.[34] On 26 February 2012, his death was confirmed.[35][36][37]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We occupy and secure the embassys in Iraq that is all, who cares if private contractors are there...

over 67,000 are stationed in Europe... Guess we occupy euro as well
 Kuwait   11,415
 Japan   50,631
 Germany   40,328
 United Kingdom   9,485

Stop twisting facts to suit your needs.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1217
You are wrong US had a complete pull out of Iraq....

The US had a partial pullout, after all the oil wells and the gas rigs were given to the American Corporations. Some 17,000 American soldiers are stationed at the American embassy in Baghdad and at consulates in Basra, Mosul and Kirkuk. Also, there are more than 5,000 American private security contractors, stationed all over Iraq.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
The video is of 2007. So the time-frame is over. The Americans invaded Iraq in 2003, and they are still occupying that country. But none of the others (Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran) are currently under American occupation. Looks like Clark's plan was vetoed by Obama, after he was elected as the POTUS in 2008.  Grin


You are wrong US had a complete pull out of Iraq....
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwCgthp_E

"We're gonna start with Iraq, then we're gonna move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran."

/sarcasm I'm glad that my country is not on that list.

However, this will turn right back around eventually. The US won't 'reign' forever.

We don't "reign" now. Our leaders seem to think we do. Sadly their messes seem to blow back on civilians when the perpetrators are long out of office.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 501
in defi we trust
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUCwCgthp_E

"We're gonna start with Iraq, then we're gonna move to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran."
"Seven countries in five years? Is that a classified memo?"
"Yes sir!"
"Well don't show it to me"

With 0 matches in 7 not 5 years , I wouldn't trust this guy making bitcoin price forecasts.

Although an intervention to make dust out of what is left of the "Pirates of Somalia" would be a good idea.

Pages:
Jump to: