Pages:
Author

Topic: [2019-10-29] Lebanon’s Economic Crisis Highlights Bitcoin’s Limitations (Read 374 times)

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
I do not think bad of the development of Cryptocurrency or Bitcoin so far in Lebanon.
Annoying factor always happens in every corrupt country that triggers Lebanon's economic collapse today,
I am sure for the year 2020, with the resignation of the Lebanese PM, for the Reform of the economic crisis that has hit Lebanon will improve.
With the current elite government system pushing Bitcoin and the economy in Lebanon to the point of collapse.

Bitcoin for now is still very much needed by the Lebanese people to boost the economy that is currently devastated. Lebanon needs Bitcoin going forward.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
You don't need those costly equipments. You've never given a key to someone else with funds on it?

Have you ever received a key that was supposed to have funds on it and paid for it without checking?
You're telling me that in a country on the brink of failure with no internet access you're going to deal with private keys based only on trust?
Seriously, let's be real here.

If I would have ever done this kind of deal the first thing would be to empty the address that belongs to that key, send the funds to a secure address wait for confirmation and only then pay the guy.
Only dishonest people will do that, and it's exactly the same thing when you do or give something to someone for a delayed payment. Your client could never pay you. It's also the same thing when you receive a cheque.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
You don't need those costly equipments. You've never given a key to someone else with funds on it?

Have you ever received a key that was supposed to have funds on it and paid for it without checking?
You're telling me that in a country on the brink of failure with no internet access you're going to deal with private keys based only on trust?
Seriously, let's be real here.

If I would have ever done this kind of deal the first thing would be to empty the address that belongs to that key, send the funds to a secure address wait for confirmation and only then pay the guy.

In order to not need internet to use Bitcoin, it requires you to purchase additional hardware such as a Gotenna mesh device for example. I however doubt that most common joes getting started with Bitcoin know about these, or the satellites that Blockstream has running.

I think that gotenna will not able to ship a hundred thousand of those in a country with no internet and communications down, nor that the people there would be willing to spend 200$ on those. You would have far worse things to worry that sending bitcoins at that point.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
You don't need those costly equipments. You've never given a key to someone else with funds on it? You don't need internet to give a paper wallet, an opendime  key, a tangem card to someone...
Still, how do you get the common joes to know about them? The general train of thought is that you can't use Bitcoin without internet. Dealing with physical cash is what people in these parts of the world know to transact offline because that's what they have been doing all the time. No additional learning curve required to chew through.

You also said that you did not agree to highlight bitcoins limits because of infrastructural problems. You might be right, however, it highlights the importance and the indispensibility of paper money and commodity money.
Agreed. I'm not a fan at all of fiat, but I like what paper money is and how it can be used to circumvent various degrees of government surveillance, and the fact that it can be exchanged locally in the most peer to peer possible way. This is also why we have seen various governments already put everything to work in order to get people to adopt digital money.
legendary
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1107
uhm.... another clickbait article with bitcoin in the title?
banks shuttering and a single relatively unknown car dealer that started to accept bitcoin doesn't mean that the crisis is in any shape or form connected to bitcoin
ah and the local trader's telegram group members increased from 150 to 300 , how could I have forgotten about this revolutionary event
Lebanese who are not able to send money abroad will not take extra steps to buy bitcoins and then send them abroad , especially if they never heard or dealt with bitcoins before
this article looks like the author's wishful thinking rather than news to me
full member
Activity: 952
Merit: 104
Nope bitcoin is nothing limitations we know that only the government want to gives limits using bitcoin Bitcoin become they scared if bitcoin replace fiat money the corrupt official they can't control the digtal currency.
I believe until the have an electricity and have an internet access to mine bitcoin nobidy can stop bitcoin and there's nothing limitations. And we use bitcoin stored in the phone use for mode of  payment.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
Also many people expected bitcoin to be an untraceable and anonymous cryptocoin for buying drugs. Many were disappointed that was why cryptonote was developed.
People expect a lot but know very little. Bitcoin is very transparent by nature, and there is always a trail to follow. That by default means it's not anonymous at all.

That is because the people believed in those news articles about bitcoin as an untraceable and anonymous coin to use for the darkweb. The clickbait victims. I was one of those people hehehe.

You also said that you did not agree to highlight bitcoins limits because of infrastructural problems. You might be right, however, it highlights the importance and the indispensibility of paper money and commodity money.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
It would help if you also explain why people don't need internet to use Bitcoin.

In order to not need internet to use Bitcoin, it requires you to purchase additional hardware such as a Gotenna mesh device for example. I however doubt that most common joes getting started with Bitcoin know about these, or the satellites that Blockstream has running.
You don't need those costly equipments. You've never given a key to someone else with funds on it? You don't need internet to give a paper wallet, an opendime  key, a tangem card to someone... Moreover gotenna mesh is only useful to reach a relay to broadcast a transaction when you are in the middle of nowhere, but if a 2G network is available you can simply send your signed raw tx by SMS to someone who's able to broadcast it. You can also sending it by fax if no mobile network is available, or by post mail...
It also exists hosted wallets controllable by sms commands.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
Also many people expected bitcoin to be an untraceable and anonymous cryptocoin for buying drugs. Many were disappointed that was why cryptonote was developed.
People expect a lot but know very little. Bitcoin is very transparent by nature, and there is always a trail to follow. That by default means it's not anonymous at all.

Moreover you don't need internet to use bitcoin, and you only need very few electricity to use a smartphone or an old mobile phone. That's enough to use Bitcoin. And it's not difficult to generate enough electricity to load a smart/mobile phone.
It would help if you also explain why people don't need internet to use Bitcoin.

In order to not need internet to use Bitcoin, it requires you to purchase additional hardware such as a Gotenna mesh device for example. I however doubt that most common joes getting started with Bitcoin know about these, or the satellites that Blockstream has running.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
It is alright to highlight bitcoin's limits because of a country's infrastructural problems.
I don't think it's alright.

It's like saying that Bitcoin is limited because you don't have electricity or an internet connection to transact. It only highlights the limitations of your local electricity provider's network and your ISP.
Moreover you don't need internet to use bitcoin, and you only need very few electricity to use a smartphone or an old mobile phone. That's enough to use Bitcoin. And it's not difficult to generate enough electricity to load a smart/mobile phone.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 273
I can feel that there is really a big potential for Bitcoin in Lebanon, it is just that there are factors that are beyond control.

There is really a big potential for Bitcoin not just in Lebanon but everywhere. The very big problem is that these potentials are far from reality because what they need are more than just an alternative mode of payment, much less than a digital one. What they need are the basics. In times of war and calamities, especially in countries such as Lebanon, people are not looking for advance technologies, not even money sometimes because there is nothing to buy. They are looking for the most basic of needs such as food, water, shelter, and clothing. Why is Bitcoin suddenly pushed forward as a sort of a solution?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1460
It is alright to highlight bitcoin's limits because of a country's infrastructural problems.
I don't think it's alright.

It's like saying that Bitcoin is limited because you don't have electricity or an internet connection to transact. It only highlights the limitations of your local electricity provider's network and your ISP.

However, this criticism if coming from a belief that bitcoin is supposed to be the savior of the world is a mistake.
That's something you can blame news outlets for. Even if Bitcoin could be the savior of the world as you state it, then it's still up to the people to make the best of it. From what I have seen, people are not capable of seeing the value of Bitcoin and therefore they will not help themselves or their environment.

Only a few have enough sense in them to buy into Bitcoin before things in their country escalate for the worse.

Agreed. Also many people expected bitcoin to be an untraceable and anonymous cryptocoin for buying drugs. Many were disappointed that was why cryptonote was developed.
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
I wonder what news headlines we'll see next? Barter is better option than Bitcoin for Lebanese? Bitcoin is useless on Lebanon?


  • ECONOMIC COLLAPSE: OUR NEW POLL SHOWS EATING NEIGHBORS CURES HUNGER FASTER THAN BITCOIN
  • SHOCK LATEST: FIRETORCH KEEPS WOLVES FROM DOOR BETTER THAN CRYPTOCOINS
  • SCIENTISTS SAY BUCKETS HOLD MORE RAIN WATER THAN BITCOIN DOES

Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
For a moment I thought I made a boo-boo but it seems that the so-called black rate is between 1580 and 1600 so although indeed a bit devalued it 's nothing that would be regarded as collapsed Venezuela style.
And browsing through the news it seems that they are committed to trying to keep this rate, although I'm not so sure it's the best idea.

well, what can the Lebanese treasury ministry/central bank possibly do to maintain a manipulated official rate in a barely functional controlled market if the free-market rate is falling in a functioning free-market? It's never been possible to control anywhere else this has happened, and so I agree with you, they would be wiser to abandon the peg in the calmest possible way
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
~

did the dollar peg not fail in the black market recently? it's hard to tell, we're relying alot on hearsay from Lebanese people living this situation, but I've heard that the LBP/USD peg is meaningless now when doing cash business in a free market

For a moment I thought I made a boo-boo but it seems that the so-called black rate is between 1580 and 1600 so although indeed a bit devalued it 's nothing that would be regarded as collapsed Venezuela style.
And browsing through the news it seems that they are committed to trying to keep this rate, although I'm not so sure it's the best idea.

Anyhow it's a country that was unlucky, if they would have been on an island far away from the middle east they would be doing ok, but...


legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 3080
The Lebanese currency (Lebanese pound) has largely collapsed due to excessive inflation and corruption, which has gradually eroded the value of the currency against the dollar.

Nope, it didn't.

The Lebanese pound is pegged at 1500 LBP for 1$ since 1997.

did the dollar peg not fail in the black market recently? it's hard to tell, we're relying alot on hearsay from Lebanese people living this situation, but I've heard that the LBP/USD peg is meaningless now when doing cash business in a free market
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 355
When most exchanges don’t serve a country's users, it makes it difficult for them to purchase bitcoin. Since Lebanese banks shuttering and inflation problems, bitcoin becomes a way to send funds without banking services. But the internet and electricity limitations make it worse, furthermore, traders charge 10% fees to convert bitcoin into cash. In this case, better to keep bitcoin instead of cash when there is political and economic instability.

I live in an Asian country whose government is quite open to the innovations and benefits of cryptocurrency hence it is not that hard to get hold of Bitcoin here in my place. I am surely sympathetic with people who are facing difficulties to be a part of the Bitcoin bandwagon, just like what many Lebanese are experiencing.

However, in every crisis there are opportunities sprouting so am sure that soon there will be enterprising people who can provide the financial and cryptocurrency services people can be looking for. We can not expect Bitcoin to be the be-all solution to a country's ills and problems but Bitcoin can be a tool for people to protect their wealth and transact business in and out of the country with some ease.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 514
When most exchanges don’t serve a country's users, it makes it difficult for them to purchase bitcoin.
Since Lebanese banks shuttering and inflation problems, bitcoin becomes a way to send funds without banking services.
But the internet and electricity limitations make it worse, furthermore, traders charge 10% fees to convert bitcoin into cash.
In this case, better to keep bitcoin instead of cash when there is political and economic instability.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
It is alright to highlight bitcoin's limits because of a country's infrastructural problems.
I don't think it's alright.

It's like saying that Bitcoin is limited because you don't have electricity or an internet connection to transact. It only highlights the limitations of your local electricity provider's network and your ISP.

However, this criticism if coming from a belief that bitcoin is supposed to be the savior of the world is a mistake.
That's something you can blame news outlets for. Even if Bitcoin could be the savior of the world as you state it, then it's still up to the people to make the best of it. From what I have seen, people are not capable of seeing the value of Bitcoin and therefore they will not help themselves or their environment.

Only a few have enough sense in them to buy into Bitcoin before things in their country escalate for the worse.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 531
Let's divide the discussion into two parts (the first relates to Bitcoin as a network and the second as a currency):
Good idea.

I'm pretty sure a national economic crisis highlights fiat's limitations, not Bitcoin.

I mean sure, Bitcoin has limitations -- but what would you like to compare it to?

1. Gold? Sure, try storing gold and see if people don't start robbing you.
2. Fiat? Try see how much your fiat buys you today, tomorrow, and next week.
3. One of those altcoins purporting to support broken economies like Dash? What happens when the devs and companies stop marketing it?

I never agreed economic crises would push Bitcoin to the fore anyway. People need to eat when money's an issue. Not buy Bitcoin.

But Bitcoin certainly provides avenues for transfers, for independence, for storing value securely. It's not pretended to be much more than that.


I've never liked it when people would look at financial crises and then directly relate them to crypto-currency as if they were able to fix them. Crypto-currency has only ever been a secondary payment method and a possible storage tool for capital, but if the market eventually goes to shit, people are going to be looking at getting the essentials, not buying BTC, and we'll likely see a BTC crash since a lot of the users would be cashing out for the essentials, not keeping their money in a speculative currency - although this is a pretty extreme example of a market crash.

If a country has problems with banks, people start switching to cash. So, unless there's some hyperinflation going on, cash is better than Bitcoin, since you don't need electricity and internet connection to use it, and it's already widespread. Bitcoin could be useful for international transactions in those countries, but majority of people don't need them.

Quote
It [bitcoin] could help them, perhaps, if they were sitting at home with 24 hours worth of electricity and internet, and they could work online to get paid for their online work.

I've recently made a thread about how hard it is to find online work that pays in Bitcoin.
This is also pretty true in most advanced currencies, a lot of the people in struggling economies are known to keep a large amount of cash to spend and use in the case.
Pages:
Jump to: