[2019-10-29] Lebanon’s Economic Crisis Highlights Bitcoin’s Limitations - page 2.

hatshepsut93

legendary

Activity: 3024

Merit: 2148

If a country has problems with banks, people start switching to cash. So, unless there's some hyperinflation going on, cash is better than Bitcoin, since you don't need electricity and internet connection to use it, and it's already widespread. Bitcoin could be useful for international transactions in those countries, but majority of people don't need them.

Quote

It [bitcoin] could help them, perhaps, if they were sitting at home with 24 hours worth of electricity and internet, and they could work online to get paid for their online work.

I've recently made a thread about how hard it is to find online work that pays in Bitcoin.

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 6403

Blackjack.fun

Quote from: hugeblack on October 29, 2019, 09:53:42 AM

The Lebanese currency (Lebanese pound) has largely collapsed due to excessive inflation and corruption, which has gradually eroded the value of the currency against the dollar.

Nope, it didn't.

The Lebanese pound is pegged at 1500 LBP for 1$ since 1997.

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1492

Quote from: 1Referee on October 29, 2019, 04:26:48 AM

Click-bait headline.

I expected to read about "high" fees and whatnot as they were referring to Bitcoin's limitations, but all I read about was how sucky that country's infrastructure itself is. Roll Eyes

Very poor journalism. I expect this from CoinIdol, but Coindesk seems to have followed the same path of publishing nonsense just for the sake generating content volume.

It is alright to highlight bitcoin's limits because of a country's infrastructural problems. However, this criticism if coming from a belief that bitcoin is supposed to be the savior of the world is a mistake.

Harlot

hero member

Activity: 1806

Merit: 672

Definitely not a limitatiom for Bitcoin but the limitation for the country and their citizens itself. You cannot blame the technology and the asset on why they aren't able to acquire it in the first place, it's like blaming their cellphone on why it doesn't provide free internet. The way I see it is if people really do wanna earn Bitcoin they will find a way to do so because I doubt that people below the poverty line are even interested to buy one or even if they know BTC in the first place.

hugeblack

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 4002

Let's divide the discussion into two parts (the first relates to Bitcoin as a network and the second as a currency):

Bitcoin breaks the border where anyone in the world can send money to and from Lebanon.
Using banks can’t happen at the moment "because of the popular revolution^[*]" and the banking constraints associated with political problems.

The Lebanese currency (Lebanese pound) has largely collapsed due to excessive inflation and corruption, which has gradually eroded the value of the currency against the dollar. On the contrary, bitcoin is fluctuating against the dollar and rising in the long term.

[*] Banks have been closed for several days and may continue due to demonstrations.

cr1776

legendary

Activity: 4228

Merit: 1313

Bitcoin won't help people who won't help themselves. Instead of complaining about someone - "the rich" - take action and do something. Given how divisible bitcoin is, anyone can use it.

However, trying to use bitcoin after you are already enmeshed in a crisis is kind of like trying to buy fire insurance when your home is already on fire. This isn't bitcoin's fault, it is the fault of the person who didn't plan ahead.

There isn't a country in the world where the politicians aren't willing to sell everyone's liberty down the river for their own power. They push envy in the promise of "free" stuff to sell their agenda so everyone with any sense should prepare now, instead of when the house is on fire.

Look at Chile, they are on the road to Venezuela. Smart people there should be moving money offshore and buying bitcoin if they don't have the ability to move other things out of the country.

buwaytress

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 3684

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

I'm pretty sure a national economic crisis highlights fiat's limitations, not Bitcoin.

I mean sure, Bitcoin has limitations -- but what would you like to compare it to?

1. Gold? Sure, try storing gold and see if people don't start robbing you.
2. Fiat? Try see how much your fiat buys you today, tomorrow, and next week.
3. One of those altcoins purporting to support broken economies like Dash? What happens when the devs and companies stop marketing it?

I never agreed economic crises would push Bitcoin to the fore anyway. People need to eat when money's an issue. Not buy Bitcoin.

But Bitcoin certainly provides avenues for transfers, for independence, for storing value securely. It's not pretended to be much more than that.

pjcaruci

newbie

Activity: 78

Merit: 0

Lebanon can solve many of its problems with the help of crypto and blockchain technologies

Kyraishi

hero member

Activity: 952

Merit: 513

Well, it's hard to try and compare bitcoin to like Robin Hood, because even though it's meant to be a currency that allows everyone to be free and manage their own money, the only people who are able to actually invest in it and get a decent amount of it would be the filthy rich and politicians.

There are definitely ways for someone to hold BTC without having access to the internet a lot (greenaddress and paper wallets come to mind), but it's going to be no point because the people that are living paycheck to paycheck won't be able to invest any money in BTC.

1Referee

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1427

Click-bait headline.

I expected to read about "high" fees and whatnot as they were referring to Bitcoin's limitations, but all I read about was how sucky that country's infrastructure itself is. Roll Eyes

Very poor journalism. I expect this from CoinIdol, but Coindesk seems to have followed the same path of publishing nonsense just for the sake generating content volume.

Kakmakr

legendary

Activity: 3542

Merit: 1965

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Let's not blame Bitcoin for the limitations and restrictions that Banks are creating for Bitcoin. Angry

Banks and corrupt governments will go out of their way to make Bitcoin use impossible and we have seen how legislation are used to slow Bitcoin down. I said "slow it down" on purpose, because you cannot stop it. Wink

Electricity might be a problem, but when it is available, people should charge their phones and do the transactions when the phones are charged. People in Africa has been doing this with M-Pesa for years and they find ways to manage this limitation. < They use generators, small solar panels etc.> Wink

magneto

hero member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 753

Quote

“Bitcoin will not help the people. It will help the politicians because they are the filthy rich ones who have access to money,” one anonymous bitcoin trader with family in Lebanon told CoinDesk. He uses a European bank account to buy bitcoin, then sends it to people on the ground in Lebanon.

“It [bitcoin] could help them, perhaps, if they were sitting at home with 24 hours worth of electricity and internet, and they could work online to get paid for their online work. That’s a utopian scenario,” he added. “In Lebanon, the internet is very expensive. Electricity doesn’t come often. We sometimes have electricity for just six hours a day.”

Sure, perhaps it will help the rich as well, even potentially to a greater extent than the unbanked.

However, does that mean that BTC has no use to the unbanked and underbanked internationally? I don't personally perceive that as a valid argument - just because it may benefit another group doesn't mean that the grassroot adopters can't be helped.

Besides, there are services that have started long ago that allow people to store BTC without any internet connection. It's a matter of adoption.

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1492

You cannot argue that there are limits, however, you also cannot argue that bitcoin is created for payments that can breakdown borders. Lebanon's problem is political and infrastructural, you cannot expect the cryptospace to save the Lebanese from all of the world's fundamental problems.

salamat700

jr. member

Activity: 126

Merit: 8

Quote

Lebanon is far from a poster child for cryptocurrency adoption. News of Lebanese banks shuttering to prevent a bank run was met with predictable enthusiasm from the global bitcoin commentariat. People in Lebanon can no longer send foreign currencies, mainly dollars and euros, abroad. Further, due to heavily restricted banking access and limited liquidity provided by established grassroots networks, most Lebanese civilians also struggle to acquire bitcoin.

“Bitcoin will not help the people. It will help the politicians because they are the filthy rich ones who have access to money,” one anonymous bitcoin trader with family in Lebanon told CoinDesk. He uses a European bank account to buy bitcoin, then sends it to people on the ground in Lebanon.

“It [bitcoin] could help them, perhaps, if they were sitting at home with 24 hours worth of electricity and internet, and they could work online to get paid for their online work. That’s a utopian scenario,” he added. “In Lebanon, the internet is very expensive. Electricity doesn’t come often. We sometimes have electricity for just six hours a day.”

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/how-lebanons-economic-crisis-highlights-bitcoins-limitations

I can feel that there is really a big potential for Bitcoin in Lebanon, it is just that there are factors that are beyond control. However, maybe if the problem in Lebanon will escalate for a longer period of time, people will gradually be starting to take notice of the real and full potential of Bitcoin to be a tool that can help them.

What do you think, guys?

Topic: [2019-10-29] Lebanon’s Economic Crisis Highlights Bitcoin’s Limitations - page 2. (Read 376 times)