Congratulations to the nominees, and thanks to all who participated in picking them. The poll to vote for newbie of the year is now live.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/poll-2019-bitcoin-forums-newbie-of-the-year-5222643
Topic: [2019] BitcoinTalk's Newbie of the Year [2019] (Read 1751 times)
<...>
Code:
name USER_ID rank trust posts activity earnedMerit sentMerit TxReceived TxSent url
Ratimov 2627711 Full Member +5 / =0 / -0 2289 224 722 1373 409 1150 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2627711
zasad@ 2654005 Full Member +1 / =0 / -0 496 168 624 294 319 208 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2654005
Rikafip 2658890 Full Member +2 / =0 / -0 810 168 531 231 314 230 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2658890
RapTarX 2530429 Sr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 829 350 471 186 242 171 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2530429
PrimeNumber7 2561166 Sr. Member +0 / =1 / -0 862 322 445 219 213 204 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2561166
efialtis 2597426 Sr. Member +4 / =1 / -0 1875 252 404 196 234 187 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2597426
Soonandwaite 2527697 Sr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 947 364 344 146 185 127 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2527697
geophphreigh 2652924 Full Member +5 / =0 / -0 195 154 302 84 83 49 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2652924
terizla 2641576 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 238 196 270 97 86 51 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2641576
Jean_Luc 2550169 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 215 210 222 26 84 15 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2550169
Ya3rob 2649358 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 198 182 208 103 136 103 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2649358
Lachrymose 2718725 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 77 42 208 82 102 62 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2718725
whotookmycrypto 2538373 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 169 168 205 44 113 32 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2538373
Crypto-DesignService 2528593 Full Member +0 / =1 / -0 175 175 190 73 82 67 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2528593
ADAMA_NOW 2631031 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 11 11 174 0 30 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2631031
Ulven 2561049 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 727 322 174 86 136 80 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2561049
Sat0shisGhost 2551755 Full Member +4 / =0 / -0 276 276 167 82 65 51 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2551755
Yabes 2548375 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 156 156 167 39 58 33 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2548375
Tom Bombadil 2715989 Member +0 / =0 / -0 107 70 163 70 108 66 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2715989
rare_designer 2702851 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 10 10 157 78 20 7 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2702851
mstrozier 2582465 Member +0 / =0 / -0 108 108 143 30 46 4 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2582465
SpendingBitcoin 2707078 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 53 53 141 44 25 43 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2707078
nomteck1 2521019 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 175 175 138 17 25 7 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2521019
Salamstar 2601287 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 311 196 136 65 107 64 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2601287
WunderSchwein 2556543 Full Member +0 / =1 / -2 1371 266 119 59 100 57 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2556543
saiga31 2692446 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 13 13 114 4 37 4 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2692446
palukritik 2702808 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 39 39 109 2 35 2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2702808
jackbauercsgo 2518540 Full Member +8 / =0 / -0 415 350 108 37 57 12 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2518540
MrFreeDragon 2666474 Full Member +0 / =0 / -0 174 154 107 47 54 36 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2666474
The-Devil 2726750 Jr. Member # +0 / =1 / -3 90 42 102 7 41 6 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2726750
Bitlover10 2600854 Full Member +0 / =1 / -0 151 151 102 40 64 34 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2600854
DragonDance 2615217 Member +0 / =0 / -0 80 80 94 40 34 20 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2615217
Herr Kaufmann 2710516 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 49 49 90 1 26 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2710516
Bloodie44 2697260 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 1 1 82 1 17 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2697260
Gangster-Hamster 2646989 Member +0 / =0 / -0 833 196 82 29 61 27 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2646989
Firehawk1524 2658304 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 42 42 81 3 16 3 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2658304
ritaconscience 2682439 Member +0 / =0 / -0 135 112 81 40 23 12 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2682439
PopoJeff 2662896 Member +0 / =0 / -0 248 168 81 12 38 10 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2662896
ScamViruS 2581425 Member +0 / =0 / -0 186 168 80 40 59 39 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2581425
N0sferatu 2542787 Member +2 / =1 / -0 342 308 77 15 43 14 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2542787
Aeshman 2518138 Member +0 / =0 / -0 431 336 75 18 30 16 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2518138
StackGambler 2559072 Member +0 / =0 / -2 464 196 66 31 46 26 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2559072
Becky666 2526732 Member +0 / =0 / -0 227 227 64 26 40 22 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2526732
Andriian 2636344 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 15 15 64 7 24 6 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2636344
Voland.V 2720242 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 171 56 63 0 33 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2720242
pressnegl 2574536 Member +0 / =0 / -0 67 67 63 28 17 16 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2574536
Khaos77 2522969 Member # +0 / =0 / -4 735 378 62 11 32 2 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2522969
Reserve Protocol 2696563 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 3 3 61 0 2 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2696563
Pepelangelo 2718161 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 1 1 57 1 5 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2718161
LeafAndWood 2693444 Newbie +0 / =0 / -0 21 21 56 0 17 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2693444
The-One-Above-All 2580400 Member # +0 / =0 / -17 1035 238 56 19 30 8 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2580400
mandown 2546135 Member +0 / =0 / -0 827 336 54 15 47 14 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2546135
slicecoin 2558971 Member +0 / =0 / -0 75 75 51 0 2 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2558971
Ryutaro 2647304 Member +0 / =0 / -0 96 96 51 25 41 25 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2647304
Duality-CDOO 2543114 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 58 58 50 0 1 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2543114
keplernetwork 2549701 Jr. Member +0 / =0 / -0 31 31 50 0 1 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2549701
Note 1: There could be other candidates I have not listed, such as accounts active during the beginning of 2019, but not since the 01/10/209, or accounts that were created before 01/01/2019 but were Newbies at the time.
Note 2: The data related to merits is as of this morning. The remaining data is as of last Friday (I'm downloading it now).
Edit: Here's an idea: Do the same per main board/local board (be it restricted to Newbie or else) ... quite ambicious to do. I figure it's best to see how this proposal (OP's) plays out first.
It’s pretty difficult to tell. I’ve gone briefly over a list of accounts created from the 01/01/2019 onwards, that have received at least 20 sMerits (https://public.tableau.com/shared/G2XFMK2PP?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link), and numerically, @Ratimov seems the best candidate, even more so having been created during mid-June 2019. Content wise is difficult to say due to the language barrier, but the structure and detail of the posts seems rather good. There are a few other forum members that have excellent numbers, who also have a large local board tradition (making it pretty impossible to compare content).
If you have some potential candidates that you're unable to gauge thoroughly due to language, you can post it them as "possibilities." Maybe other members who frequent the same local boards will help with the assessment.
It’s pretty difficult to tell. I’ve gone briefly over a list of accounts created from the 01/01/2019 onwards, that have received at least 20 sMerits (https://public.tableau.com/shared/G2XFMK2PP?:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link), and numerically, @Ratimov seems the best candidate, even more so having been created during mid-June 2019. Content wise is difficult to say due to the language barrier, but the structure and detail of the posts seems rather good. There are a few other forum members that have excellent numbers, who also have a large local board tradition (making it pretty impossible to compare content).
Any objections to me moving it to Meta?
I don't mind, not that it matters much.
Unfortunately I still can't come up with any suitable nominations. All notable newbies that I recall are sockpuppets. This probably says more about me than the actual state of the forum - I'm sure there are great genuine noobs hiding somewhere.
There has to be -- we just don't go to those places. Things that excite us are boring to noobs. We have no idea what the noobs find exciting. Part of the aging process.
The benefit of moving it to Meta is that it will be seen by a fresh set of eyes who (wisely, most likely) steer clear of the Reputation section.
Any objections to me moving it to Meta?
I don't mind, not that it matters much.
Unfortunately I still can't come up with any suitable nominations. All notable newbies that I recall are sockpuppets. This probably says more about me than the actual state of the forum - I'm sure there are great genuine noobs hiding somewhere.
~
Lol, no similarities were insinuated. I agree that many are probably unaware of their nominations. Which isn't a bad thing per se.
17 posts receiving 11 merit is a great start for any newbie on this forum, worth acknowledging in my opinion.
nominated retracted
Thanks for participating, but I agree with V8s, that's obviously a sock-puppet, and not even trying to hide the fact.
Leave it open for another week or so. Maybe some other nominations will come along. I kept nominations for my Troll Poll open for a month. Also, you may have gotten some more traffic by putting this thread in Meta.
Since I made the suggestion as it parallels the NFL's post season I've decided to keep nominations open until Super Bowl Sunday. Meta board might have been a better place for this post as opposed to reputation.
Any objections to me moving it to Meta?
Anyone else thinks how stupid the "BTC is not Bitcoin" argument is? It's like saying $AMZN is not Amazon anymore because Amazon has moved from selling solely books to now selling a dozen million of products.
What are you going to do next then? Shill an utter shit altcoin?
oh wait..
What are you going to do next then? Shill an utter shit altcoin?
oh wait..
Well after all that I hardly dare even nominate this fella. He seems almost too good to be true.
arbiter5
Anyone know anything about him?
In further curmudgeonly objections, the similarity between American Football rookies and Bitcointalk newbies isn't that great, not that Direwolf said it really was. The young sportsmen will already have been playing for what a dozen years, will have been vigorously weeded out, and will have been trained up in a sub-culture and a culture steeped in the sport; whereas a btc newbie nowadays will probably have almost no experience, knowledge or skill. The first ever time he caught a football, or watched and took in a skillful play. So it's pretty good that we scrabbled together even a handful of handy noobs here and I wish them the best of luck. (I wonder if they are all even aware of their nominations?)
Suspicion is all that is required here. 'Sock' is a shortening of 'sock-puppet' which is a near synonym for 'alt' account. So it's there in his name. The suspicion.
When you put it like that, it does sound like they are admitting to be an alt account
Nomination retracted.
Suspicion is all that is required here. 'Sock' is a shortening of 'sock-puppet' which is a near synonym for 'alt' account. So it's there in his name. The suspicion.
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.)
I'll nominate SockyMcSockFace for gaining 10+ merit within a month as a newbie, such as raising the issue of BSV false flags. Kudos.
17 posts receiving 11 merit is a great start for any newbie on this forum, worth acknowledging in my opinion.
And you don't for one minute suspect that SockyMcSockFace violates rule 2?
2. Don't nominate your own alts, or an account you suspect is an alt of another established member.
No, I have no reason to suspect that this is an alt account, although like with any newbie it's entirely possible. But I also haven't read all the posts/replies to/from/about this user either.
If you'd like to show me any evidence, or reason why you're suspicious, then I will happily retract my nomination if it seems that this is the case.
Do enlighten me, with references please.
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.)
I'll nominate SockyMcSockFace for gaining 10+ merit within a month as a newbie, such as raising the issue of BSV false flags. Kudos.
17 posts receiving 11 merit is a great start for any newbie on this forum, worth acknowledging in my opinion.
And you don't for one minute suspect that SockyMcSockFace violates rule 2?
2. Don't nominate your own alts, or an account you suspect is an alt of another established member.
edited
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.)
17 posts receiving 11 merit is a great start for any newbie on this forum, worth acknowledging in my opinion.
nominated retracted
Also, you may have gotten some more traffic by putting this thread in Meta.
Suits better in B&H as more newbies could nominate themselves or there "ranking up colleagues". Even nominating ourselves is allowed, hence can garb more traffic in sections where newbies roam around more often.
Leave it open for another week or so. Maybe some other nominations will come along. I kept nominations for my Troll Poll open for a month. Also, you may have gotten some more traffic by putting this thread in Meta.
Bump.
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.) Should I allow more time? I planned on closing this thread tomorrow, January 12, around 19:00 (7pm, for those of you are 24-hour-clock-chalanged) but I can keep it open longer. What do you folks think?
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.) Should I allow more time? I planned on closing this thread tomorrow, January 12, around 19:00 (7pm, for those of you are 24-hour-clock-chalanged) but I can keep it open longer. What do you folks think?
The Academy Awards (the Oscars) are held in March for the proceeding year's works. I few more days and some bumps wouldn't hurt.
Bump.
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.) Should I allow more time? I planned on closing this thread tomorrow, January 12, around 19:00 (7pm, for those of you are 24-hour-clock-chalanged) but I can keep it open longer. What do you folks think?
I'll admit I'm a bit disappointed. Not with the quality of accounts that have been nominated, some great ones obviously. But I'm disappointed with the quantity of nominees (or lack there of.) Should I allow more time? I planned on closing this thread tomorrow, January 12, around 19:00 (7pm, for those of you are 24-hour-clock-chalanged) but I can keep it open longer. What do you folks think?
@ Rikafip has attained 500 merits since being created on the 4th of August 2019. Never heard of them till just now, but quite an achievement.
No suggestions, but this thread is a probably a good place to find nominees: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-future-of-bitcointalk-low-ranking-top-merit-earners-in-the-past-30-days-5185736
The only name I recognise in post #1 is Ratimov who has started a Russian Language version of the Known Alts thread. (and Loycemobile who doesn't count - no offence LoyceV 
)I haven't interacted with him practically at all, so am hesitant to nominate him without support/seconder.
No suggestions, but this thread is a probably a good place to find nominees: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-future-of-bitcointalk-low-ranking-top-merit-earners-in-the-past-30-days-5185736
The only name I recognise in post #1 is Ratimov who has started a Russian Language version of the Known Alts thread. (and Loycemobile who doesn't count - no offence LoyceV )I haven't interacted with him practically at all, so am hesitant to nominate him without support/seconder.
Thank you for your support. I have learned a lot for myself over the past 7 months on the forum. And I have done a lot of useful things for the forum as a thank you.
Impressive merit record buddy! Awesome really!
OPs idea has already proven to be great, we get to know members we werent aware of, for example because they are around in completely different sections of the forum, local boards etc.
Jump to: