Topic: 2024 & Prediction of World War III - Effect on Cryptocurrencies - page 2. (Read 1152 times)

You have to be blind not to see this. And I'm not talking about Russia's neighbors only. What about Venezuela? Also Russia's neighbor? Iraq? Syria? All Russia's neighbors?   Btw, just to prove I'm right:  riots starting in Budapest, Hungary. Coincidence? I don't think so! Victor Orban is well-known for supporting Russia. Remember what happened in Belarus? Latest events in Hungary are a carbon copy of what happened there. Next target Slovakia?  

Yes, these are exactly thoughts of a US sockpuppet Sandu, not the people of Moldova.


OMG, you crazy Ukrainian troll going full retard and starting to threaten to attack your neighbor states?   Luckily, this is not going to happen.

Not going to comment on a propaganda article from a .ua website.

Since the beginning of 2024, I no longer know much about the conflict that is going on, especially between Russia and Ukraine, even the media now seems to no longer report on it or indeed I don't look for it myself. Based on your very detailed narrative regarding the struggle for territory that Russia continues to control every day, it makes me wonder why Ukraine is still resisting. This means that instead of having to sacrifice many soldiers and civilians who had to be trained to fight, from the start Russia offered to solve this problem by taking up arms. My knowledge is minimal regarding the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, what I am saying is based on the views of ordinary people who see how bad it would be if many lives were sacrificed, and in any aspect Russia is clearly superior. As a result of this impact, the economies of each region, especially war zone areas which were previously fine, now have to accept the consequences of conflict which are increasingly unclear.

As for the impact on crypto, because the OP involves these variables, the long-term impact is not yet visible. Crypto market volatility is still healthy, in fact many crypto projects from these two countries also exist in the crypto market industry, which shows that the influence of this war is only focused on currency values and rising prices of basic commodities.

If what happens is not a nuclear war, then the price of Bitcoin will increase rapidly. IMO
When there is a war in which no more than 6 countries participate, inflation is a very big risk, especially since the government blocks access to all banks in that country, so fiat currency will lose its value. People affected by war certainly need food and shelter, Bitcoin is one of the most perfect alternatives for saving money.
Bitcoin will survive even though the war lasts a long time, its influence is still strong as an economic force when the function of fiat starts to stall.

FTFY.
Well the situation is not as simple as that. ISIS was a CIA project and was created by the US regime (not destroyed by them). Just like Al-Qaeda, the regime uses these radicals for its own operations as a proxy. Sometimes they are directly hired, sometimes just "nudged" in the right direction that benefits the regime.
ISIS did exist and today they still continue to exist but not in their former strength as a fake "state" controlling half of Syria and Iraq. Instead they exist as a form of radical ideology that is very hard to eradicate and in smaller groups in somewhat controlled and monitored regions (regions where usually a US military base is nearby!).

Every now and then the US regime organizes some of these radicals and creates a new group to let lose on the world and mainly in the region to create chaos and use that chaos as an excuse to "make money" be it by invasion, by selling "security" to tiny artificial dictatorships like the Arab regimes around the southern shores of the Persian Gulf, be it by selling weapons, by invasion and stealing resources, etc...

Why do you think Biden went nuts after the US military secret facility in northern Jordan (across Syrian border) was attacked on January this year? It definitely wasn't because of the handful of casualties since the 200+ attacks on US bases to that point had higher casualties and he never even talked about them. It was because this particular facility was used for training ISIS terrorists and those who were eliminated in the attack were the high ranking US officers/operatives responsible for their training.

Oh, don't be so naïve! We all know ISIS ceased to exist - it was destroyed by the US. Right now it's being used as sort of a brand name for CIA operations. I'm not even sure ISIS existed at all. Chances are it was artificially created by the CIA to justify US attacks on Iran and Afghanistan.   

Distance is not a factor in terrorist attacks; besides this particular branch of this terrorist organization operates mainly in Central Asia which is across the southern borders of Russia. So it is not far away. The nationality of the 4 terrorists arrested were Tajik too which shows from where they came from.

The fact that they flew in from Turkey is another indication of this terrorist organization being behind this attack (majority of terrorist attacks from Takfiri groups is from terrorists flying in from Turkey!).

Last but not least, ISIS-k claimed responsibility for the attack shortly after the attack.

ISIS-K is really the one who attacks the Crocus City Hall?  i'm not really sure to believe that. all of a sudden those guys are mortal enemies of the West suddenly just lose volts and then attack Russia which is far away from them.

i couldn't see how things are going with all the wars in every corner of the globe, my country seem to be joining as well but this time, the West is targeting China vs my country. i guess Bitcoin and all major cryptocurrencies will not be adopted during a world chaos except memecoins. it's the only the poor men can afford when wars break out.

Could you explain why?
The biggest reason for this particular problem is that the weapons meant for Ukrainian defense is being sent to the Zionists to be used to commit genocide in Palestine. I don't see how that situation is changing considering the terrorist organization those weapons are being given to is not stopping as it sees itself at the end of the line.

I can't comment on other situations but Armenia is all Russia's fault. The power vacuum Russia created in Caucasus, lack of cooperation with Iran and of course the increasing threat of the usurper Aliyev in Baku, and some other problems has left Armenia with little choices and of course the "journalist" in Yerevan is making the worst ones as the head of the Armenian government!

Out of desperation he is hoping the colonizers can put a leash on Turks that plan on wiping out Armenia from maps.
But of course the colonizers don't help anyone, they just colonize and use you...

But overall I agree that they are the latest CIA projects, we're going to see some messed up situation in Caucasus and Central Asia in the near future.
In fact this is why we suddenly see this new US proxy called ISIS-K appearing and already having committed terrorist attacks inside multiple countries in the region (eg. Crocus City Hall, Russia).

Russia is not going to be able to fight Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Finland, all three Baltic countries on their west border, Georgia, Moldova and all these former soviet republics together. Actually Putin would be thrown out of the Kremlin before that happens.

All those crazy people hyping up another Russian invasion need a reality check. With the amount of soldiers being committed to Ukraine alone, they cannot handle another conflict, let alone so many others.

Seeing how Ukraine is now bleeding from the “brotherly” embrace of Russia, any adequate neighbors are trying to get rid of their “big brother” and at the same time a very intrusive ally - Russia. This is the usual logic of all normal people. Therefore, referring to some mythical CIA projects in all In cases where Russia does not like some political processes in neighboring states, it is not worth it.

Russia would have captured Moldova long ago if Ukraine had not been located territorially between them. Moldova understands this very well. Therefore, it is also logical that Moldova is now looking for allies and defenders. When choosing between Russia and Romania, Moldova, of course, will give preference to civilized Romania over barbaric Russia. But the whole question of the security of states neighboring Russia now rests on Ukraine’s resistance to the onslaught of the Russian horde. Ukraine will survive and the security of states in this region will strengthen.

The streak of difficulties with arms supplies to Ukraine should end in a few months. And then everything will be fine. As soon as Ukraine fights off Russia, it will be able to solve the problem of the Russian enclave of Transnistria very quickly, within a few days. For this purpose, Moldova’s consent to Ukraine’s conduct of the corresponding special operation in Transnistria will be sufficient.

By the way, according to OSINT analysts, as of April 5, the situation in the Avdeevsky direction demonstrates catastrophic losses for the Russian army. The visually confirmed number of destroyed equipment of the Russian Armed Forces reached 984 units. This is only the part that was confirmed by video and photos: the actual losses are even higher.

During the same period of time, the Ukrainian army lost 152 units of military equipment. This creates a dismal Russian casualty ratio of 6 to 1 in favor of the Ukrainian military. In exchange for the victims of the meat assaults, Russia receives only patches of scorched earth and burnt ruins. At this rate, the Russian army will be erased faster than even border Kharkov can be captured, and the occupiers will definitely not see Kyiv.

https://www.dialog.ua/war/292876_1712569630/amp

Perhaps you don't realize it yet, but Ukraine has already lost this war. In hindsight, key events of this war so far were the battles of Bakhmut and Avdiivka. Ukraine lost so many troops trying to prevent Russia from capturing these cities that it's ability to fight on is greatly endangered. Ukraine needs at least 5000000 new recruits and at least half a year to train them, the time Ukraine doesn't have. Even if they will be able to recruit 500k people, this will ruin Ukraine both demographically and economically and it will de-facto cease to exist.

And the failure you mentioned, I don't see it frankly: Russia is moving slowly but steadily, pushing AFU further west. Russians are capturing a small town or two almost every day after the fall of Avdiivka. They have now reached a town of Chasiv Yar, fighting is going on in the streets right now. Realistically, Russians are going to capture it in like days, because AFU don't have resources to defend the city. They even have issues to defend bigger and more strategically important cities like Kharkiv, Slavyansk and Kramatorsk. In Kharkiv, there is no internet, electricity, water. People are leaving en masse, many are trying to relocate to Dnipro. Real estate prices plummeted.

Regarding Kazakhstan, you're right in a way. Kazakhstan, Moldova and Armenia are the latest CIA projects and these countries are actively severing their ties with Russia now. Moldova is rumoured to be annexed by Romania soon, perhaps except two regions: Transnitria and Gagauz. So yeah, things are getting interesting.   

For the third year now, Russia has been attacking Ukraine with all military means (except nuclear), but has not achieved its goals. Because of this, the international authority of Russia and Putin himself has been greatly shaken, and the Kremlin is looking for a way out of this difficult situation. After all, it was originally planned to capture Ukraine in a few days. Now Putin’s efforts are aimed at weakening assistance from other states to Ukraine and waiting for Trump to come to power in the United States. But if the situation does not change in Russia's favor, Putin will be forced to start other wars to divert the attention of his citizens from the failures in Ukraine.

Apparently, such preparations are already underway in parallel. One eloquent fact testifies to the preparation for war with neighboring countries. When Russia started a war against Ukraine, Vladimir Putin signed a special decree according to which Ukrainian citizens could receive Russian citizenship through a simplified procedure. And last December, he signed a similar decree regarding citizens of Kazakhstan and Moldova.

Kazakhstan is now almost openly moving away from Russia, and the Kremlin really doesn’t like this. Therefore, just as at one time, before the attack on Ukraine, Putin stated that Ukraine is an artificially created state and that such a nation as the Ukrainians does not exist, the same thing is now being announced in relation to Kazakhstan. In addition, as in the case of Ukraine, Russia also has claims to the northern territories of Kazakhstan, which were allegedly previously donated by Russia and where ethnic Russians live who will need to be protected.

If Russia does not attack the Baltic countries to measure strength with NATO countries, then an attack on Kazakhstan could lead to a covert or overt war with Turkey. After all, Kazakhstan and Turkey belong to the Turkic peoples and relations between them have recently been growing, including in military terms. The world is really on the threshold of the Third World War and there are a lot of options for starting it now, more than ever.

You have to be pretty dumb to think a world war will only have 6 countries involved, or that there were only 6 countries involved in the previous world wars. Leaving that aside, if it somehow did start then it will most likely escalate to the point of using nuclear weapons eventually, but in the meantime all stock markets would crash and crypto would also become worthless. Internet connectivity would most likely be targeted and severed, making crypto pretty much useless compared to how useful it is now. It will eventually drag pretty much every country into the war, depending on how long it lasts, because any country that does not pick a side will likely be treated badly by either of the aggressor groups.

Indeed, everyone also recognizes the advantages of crypto, which will not be disturbed or disturbed by whatever circumstances occur in any part of the world. As long as there are still people who can carry out their normal activities, then crypto can still run well.
But if it leads to a war on a large scale such as a world war, where all countries are involved and infrastructure is disrupted and activities can no longer be carried out calmly, then it is certain that there will be an indirect impact on crypto. If the infrastructure has collapsed, it is certain that the need that must be used is an internet network. If it is not available, then it is certain that the movement or circulation of crypto cannot run.
Therefore, avoid this so that there is no world war whose escalation will clearly affect everyone, crypto will no longer be of any use.

Mass murderers and psychopaths always justify their criminal acts one way or the other. If you ever asked Ted Bundy why he murdered all those people he would justify it somehow without accepting that he was a serial killer.

This is funny since his own Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff compared him with Hitler and the Nazi regime, expressing his concern by describing it as being worried Trump will pull a "Reichstag Moment". This is before he effectively stripped Trump of all his powers as the commander in chief.

I agree with your opinion. While cryptocurrencies possess a degree of decentralization, they are still fundamentally connected to the real-world economy. The investors, traders, and infrastructure supporting crypto exist within the traditional economic landscape. Economic turmoil, job losses, and lack of basic necessities – all of which can result from war –  severely impact people's ability and willingness to engage with cryptocurrency, consequently affecting the overall market.

Large-scale wars, and especially a potential world war, would inflict immense economic distress. Physical infrastructure damage, trade route blockades, and supply chain interruptions lead to a cascade of economic woes. This would fundamentally alter how money flows, potentially reducing access to exchanges and impacting the value of currencies used to buy and sell crypto.

Therefore, the conclusion is that a major war, especially a large-scale or world war, will likely have severe negative consequences for cryptocurrencies. The value of these assets could drop significantly.

First of all, I'd like to set the record that nobody agreed on shit lol, if anything a lot of us here are in agreement that should a full-blown world war were to happen, it's going to be a full military-centered conflict with chances of these people sending nukes against each other cause let me just remind you that the only thing that's stopping these people from nuking each other is a big shiny red button, and a piece of paper saying they shouldn't and they can't send nukes against them.

Now going back, if a war were to happen, and if it were to be of global scale we might get cut off from internet access, and in turn, our access to cryptocurrencies are good as done. Demand for crypto would die down, and until the war is over, we might not have use for it whatsoever. Unless we invent a new way to transact with cryptocurrencies without having to use the internet. If this is made possible then this might become the de facto currency during the war, which would in turn, increase demand and love for crypto.

When the US military attacks a country , they will call it punishing criminals , punishing terrorists, bringing  peace to the world and being the world's only messenger of peace . But when a country that is not an ally of the United States has a conflict or war related to national interests, it will be called an invader, a terrorist , and must be destroyed. The conflicts and wars that killed millions of people in Japan, Vietnam, and Iraq caused by the US were all wars against evil  .

According to the official version, the United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Japanese were fanatics and would not capitulate, and the only way to end the war without the entry of American troops was an atomic bombing. The alternative could have been an American invasion. President Truman wrote in his memoirs that this would have cost half a million American lives, and then he noted that it would also have resulted in the deaths of millions of Japanese. Thus, according to the official explanation, the bombing was not only justified, it was actually also humane because it saved so many lives.

  Until now, the United States has not only not been punished, but has not even apologized for the murder of Japanese civilians.

Donald Trump, while still President of the United States, said that it was thanks to this program that World War II ended and an “unprecedented era of global stability” began.

US President Barack Obama and his administration, who visited the Hiroshima Peace Memorial in 2016, said that there would be no apology for the nuclear strike in 1945. First of all, because Japan was the first to attack the United States when it attacked Pearl Harbor in Hawaii on December 7, 1941, where the US Pacific Fleet was stationed and where 2.4 thousand Americans died.
The mayor of Hiroshima, Tomihisa Taue, when he conveyed an invitation to Obama to visit the Memorial, said: they say, the very fact that the American leader will visit a city that suffered from the American atomic bombing is important.
https://rg.ru/2016/05/24/pochemu-ssha-ne-izviniaiutsia-za-atomnye-bombardirovki-iaponii.html

Advice to an aggressor: Don't attack others and you won't have to mourn the death of your loved ones. No one knows what kind of weapon may appear in the hands of the one you have taken as your victim.
Before the attack on Ukraine, Russia threatened everything with its Black Sea Fleet, which was bulky and intimidating in sight. Now its remnants are hiding away from the shores of Ukraine, fearing the spread of Ukrainian-made drones.
I hope I have satisfied your curiosity. This will make the popcorn even tastier.

Albert Einstein said it best, " I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

So, if WWIII  destroy the world with Nukes, Bitcoin will not be the focus of the people that has to survive such a hostile and damaged planet.