Pages:
Author

Topic: 300 BTC Coding Contest: Distributed Exchange (MasterCoin Developer Thread) - page 21. (Read 129207 times)

sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250
Tachikoma,

Please check
8d47449b082ffe6f6b2adad327591778c43bf984e84062fb1cb13320b47ccbbd

I'm also getting this as invalid.

Date: 1/11/2014 5:20:31 AM      
Remarks: Sender 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j doesn't have 0.1 TMSC. Bal:0.096 Sale:0 Pend:0      


Edit
Only 8 address left to sync

MM=0.096 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j ME=0.02
MM=536.90527669 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 ME=0
MM=0.2 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT ME=1.537
MM=2.9643 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN ME=1.8273
MM=70.91312399 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb ME=89.00112399
MM=1 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ ME=1.00002089
MM=106.12380845 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm ME=107.12380845
MM=0.006 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc ME=0.106
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250
This is a very fast synch only 10 address left (from 22 a few minutes ago =)

MM=0 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P ME=0.4
MM=0.096 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j ME=0.02
MM=536.90527669 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 ME=0
MM=0.2 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET ME=0
MM=0.2 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT ME=1.537
MM=0.2 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC ME=0
MM=2.9643 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN ME=1.8273
MM=70.91312399 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb ME=89.00112399
MM=1 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ ME=1.00002089
MM=0.006 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc ME=0.106
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250
For the address 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P   

Mymastercoins has 0 TMSC.     

Master Explorer has  .4 TMSC
Due to the following simple send trans
95ce712e72c4ab26201d89bab21219f090a9ee873b5edab375a3b416cb1509de
0a8be4a7e57ee12e30695a3d34c17959ec7fe5931ce06ccac88f262e2d4a30cb


MyMastercoin implementation
95ce712e72c4ab26201d89bab21219f090a9ee873b5edab375a3b416cb1509de is a simple send to 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET
0a8be4a7e57ee12e30695a3d34c17959ec7fe5931ce06ccac88f262e2d4a30cb is a simple send to 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Quote
Bitboy has 0.106 for 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc but Mastercoin explorer has 0.006
Bitboy has 1.2 for 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL but Mastercoin explorer has 1.25
Bitboy has 20.0 for 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n but Mastercoin explorer has 22
Bitboy has 9.47471458 for 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B but Mastercoin explorer has 10.47471458
Bitboy has 0.7 for 17RVTF3vJzsuaGh7a94DFkg4msJ7FcBYgX but Mastercoin explorer has 0.5
Bitboy has 1.00002089 for 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ but Mastercoin explorer has 1
Bitboy has 89.00112399 for 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb but Mastercoin explorer has 38.91312399
Bitboy has 1.8273 for 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN but Mastercoin explorer has 2.9643
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has 1.537 for 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has  for 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 but Mastercoin explorer has 536.90527669
Bitboy has 0.02 for 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j but Mastercoin explorer has 0.096
Bitboy has 0.4 for 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P but Mastercoin explorer has 0

This looks better. Not everything appears to be DEx related though, which is good Smiley
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Nope, without a private key nobody can sent a valid transaction in your name. The only risk you have is that the remote server creates a transaction to outputs owned by the server itself and not to the recipient you had in mind. This is why it's important to always check the raw transaction any remote service creates for you before sending it out into the world Smiley
newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
Great job work Grazcoin, the masterchain.info site looks very good.

I was trying to make a sell offer for some MSC but when I tried verifying it said no pubkey on blockchain, it's probably a newb question but what did I do wrong?


My guess would be the following:

Your address has never been used before on the Bitcoin blockchain. Because of this Masterchain.info doesn't know your public key and can't create the transaction for you. Using this address to spent an output would probably solve this issue.

Graz uses the opposite approach that I'm using; that is I ask you for the public key. His solution is probably better since most people wouldn't know how to retrieve their public key. But perhaps he could add my solution as backup in case this happens.

OK, will make a transaction and try again.

I agree that there should be an option to input a pubkey as a backup, just wondering would the fact that you would have to enter your address and pubkey be a security risk for any reason?
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
MyMastercoin vs MSCE Test differences

If you guys can give me a attribute I can supply to your address verification URLs I can add yours as well.
Code:
Bitboy has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 0.106 for 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc but Mastercoin explorer has 0.006
Bitboy has 0.9 for 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL but Mastercoin explorer has 1.25
Bitboy has 106.12380845 for 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm but Mastercoin explorer has 107.12380845
Bitboy has 8.47471458 for 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B but Mastercoin explorer has 10.47471458
Bitboy has -9.89899999 for 1EAuHj8Z6rTCHPxXfaGzzPsZevC2mg1XAj but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 0.7 for 17RVTF3vJzsuaGh7a94DFkg4msJ7FcBYgX but Mastercoin explorer has 0.5
Bitboy has 18.0 for 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n but Mastercoin explorer has 22
Bitboy has -0.1001 for 1Q7soqFvsSkhNy5GdVw1oSm9KVpgzHA9Zk but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has -0.08797911 for 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ but Mastercoin explorer has 1
Bitboy has 71.00112399 for 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb but Mastercoin explorer has 38.91312399
Bitboy has -0.00000001 for 1PaPeaZKfNzc7uD8VvXLKyEbxc3roHNzEn but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has -80.0 for 15QBPtyFR76ak2NvdfKbgYNp7HtB3tbtRd but Mastercoin explorer has 70
Bitboy has -10.0 for 1EdAjiApS5cCpHdH4RKPMab1xmMVRWjLvk but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 1.8253 for 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN but Mastercoin explorer has 2.9643
Bitboy has 8.0 for 1MCHESTbJhJK27Ygqj4qKkx4Z4ZxhnP826 but Mastercoin explorer has 9
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has -1.0 for 1MCHESTxYkPSLoJ57WBQot7vz3xkNahkcb but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 1.537 for 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has  for 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 but Mastercoin explorer has 536.90527669
Bitboy has 0.02 for 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j but Mastercoin explorer has 0.096
Bitboy has 0.4 for 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P but Mastercoin explorer has 0

Tachikoma,

I think you have it backwards.

ex.

Mastercoin has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Bitboy has 0



Shizzle me dizzle, you are right. I should not monkey patch stuff apparently... Might need to revert it. Checking it out.
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250
Mine show only 22 differences.

Code:
MM=0 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P ME=0.4
MM=0.096 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j ME=0.02
MM=536.90527669 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 ME=0
MM=0.2 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET ME=0
MM=0.2 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT ME=1.537
MM=0 1MCHESTxYkPSLoJ57WBQot7vz3xkNahkcb ME=-1
MM=0.2 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC ME=0
MM=9 1MCHESTbJhJK27Ygqj4qKkx4Z4ZxhnP826 ME=8
MM=2.9643 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN ME=1.8253
MM=0 1EdAjiApS5cCpHdH4RKPMab1xmMVRWjLvk ME=-10
MM=70 15QBPtyFR76ak2NvdfKbgYNp7HtB3tbtRd ME=-80
MM=0 1PaPeaZKfNzc7uD8VvXLKyEbxc3roHNzEn ME=-1E-08
MM=70.91312399 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb ME=71.00112399
MM=1 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ ME=-0.08797911
MM=0 1Q7soqFvsSkhNy5GdVw1oSm9KVpgzHA9Zk ME=-0.1001
MM=20 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n ME=18
MM=0 1EAuHj8Z6rTCHPxXfaGzzPsZevC2mg1XAj ME=-9.89899999
MM=9.47471458 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B ME=8.47471458
MM=107.12380845 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm ME=106.12380845
MM=1.2 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL ME=0.9
MM=0.006 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc ME=0.106
MM=0 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV ME=-0.1
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Great job work Grazcoin, the masterchain.info site looks very good.

I was trying to make a sell offer for some MSC but when I tried verifying it said no pubkey on blockchain, it's probably a newb question but what did I do wrong?


My guess would be the following:

Your address has never been used before on the Bitcoin blockchain. Because of this Masterchain.info doesn't know your public key and can't create the transaction for you. Using this address to spent an output would probably solve this issue.

Graz uses the opposite approach that I'm using; that is I ask you for the public key. His solution is probably better since most people wouldn't know how to retrieve their public key. But perhaps he could add my solution as backup in case this happens.

Edit: Actually; you can already give your public key, the label said so. My bad! Smiley

Edit 2: Graz: This error should probably be a little more descriptive.
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250
MyMastercoin vs MSCE Test differences

If you guys can give me a attribute I can supply to your address verification URLs I can add yours as well.
Code:
Bitboy has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 0.106 for 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc but Mastercoin explorer has 0.006
Bitboy has 0.9 for 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL but Mastercoin explorer has 1.25
Bitboy has 106.12380845 for 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm but Mastercoin explorer has 107.12380845
Bitboy has 8.47471458 for 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B but Mastercoin explorer has 10.47471458
Bitboy has -9.89899999 for 1EAuHj8Z6rTCHPxXfaGzzPsZevC2mg1XAj but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 0.7 for 17RVTF3vJzsuaGh7a94DFkg4msJ7FcBYgX but Mastercoin explorer has 0.5
Bitboy has 18.0 for 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n but Mastercoin explorer has 22
Bitboy has -0.1001 for 1Q7soqFvsSkhNy5GdVw1oSm9KVpgzHA9Zk but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has -0.08797911 for 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ but Mastercoin explorer has 1
Bitboy has 71.00112399 for 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb but Mastercoin explorer has 38.91312399
Bitboy has -0.00000001 for 1PaPeaZKfNzc7uD8VvXLKyEbxc3roHNzEn but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has -80.0 for 15QBPtyFR76ak2NvdfKbgYNp7HtB3tbtRd but Mastercoin explorer has 70
Bitboy has -10.0 for 1EdAjiApS5cCpHdH4RKPMab1xmMVRWjLvk but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 1.8253 for 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN but Mastercoin explorer has 2.9643
Bitboy has 8.0 for 1MCHESTbJhJK27Ygqj4qKkx4Z4ZxhnP826 but Mastercoin explorer has 9
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has -1.0 for 1MCHESTxYkPSLoJ57WBQot7vz3xkNahkcb but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 1.537 for 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has  for 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 but Mastercoin explorer has 536.90527669
Bitboy has 0.02 for 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j but Mastercoin explorer has 0.096
Bitboy has 0.4 for 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P but Mastercoin explorer has 0

Tachikoma,

I think you have it backwards.

ex.

Mastercoin has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Bitboy has 0


newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
Great job work Grazcoin, the masterchain.info site looks very good.

I was trying to make a sell offer for some MSC but when I tried verifying it said no pubkey on blockchain, it's probably a newb question but what did I do wrong?

Also there is a possible typo when I enter sell offer details for any transaction it says - Amount for sell - should be Amount for sale.

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Sent you some: 6f01da6f16d102ab6bc5588801eff1ad8029add17ce15bec2ba9dbaf6047a505
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
I would like to help testing, but need some TMSC to do so.

mj6chHZSra8bevTdZe1B8TaQKbJVCxfsaS

1FCXBCeJmYgcutaqSp7QcnzLgpK6fd8swa

Thanks!
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Tachikoma, since the verification API is your baby, how do you want to play this? First JSON attribute/value pair perhaps?

I think we have two options:

1.
Add a new URI: /mastercoin_verify/information
This could initially return just the block height but we could other important details here later.

In example:
Code:
{"block_height": "280987"}

2.
Change the original APIs to not return a array anymore; but a hash with an extra :meta attribute. The actual return data would get added to a data key.
For instance:

http://mastercoin-explorer.com/mastercoin_verify/addresses
Code:
{"meta": {"block_height": "280987"}, "data":[{"address":"1Q1JfWShLNiX48TXt8GyYthVx9fFfaqnDm","balance":"7.05"},{"address":"1EZm7hqAXYNMp1dPTkQqxYo8jc3rmGMFdK","balance":"1831.6"},{"address":"1EXs6bGwHu2v5YPUUH6MxEqsUs8W8dJrMa","balance":"0.0"},{"address":"1294N6qtFriRdt7Ky1G9RXMMH3sc81YpMz","balance":"29.6207"}...]

I can't decide which implementation I like better so please vote away Smiley
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
MyMastercoin vs MSCE Test differences

If you guys can give me a attribute I can supply to your address verification URLs I can add yours as well.
Code:
Bitboy has -0.1 for 1F73UPD5xBKgTSRd8q6QhuncVmDnJAHxYV but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 0.106 for 1K6JtSvrHtyFmxdtGZyZEF7ydytTGqasNc but Mastercoin explorer has 0.006
Bitboy has 0.9 for 182osbPxCo88oaSX4ReJwUr9uAcchmJVaL but Mastercoin explorer has 1.25
Bitboy has 106.12380845 for 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm but Mastercoin explorer has 107.12380845
Bitboy has 8.47471458 for 1J2svn2GxYx9LPrpCLFikmzn9kkrXBrk8B but Mastercoin explorer has 10.47471458
Bitboy has -9.89899999 for 1EAuHj8Z6rTCHPxXfaGzzPsZevC2mg1XAj but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 0.7 for 17RVTF3vJzsuaGh7a94DFkg4msJ7FcBYgX but Mastercoin explorer has 0.5
Bitboy has 18.0 for 1HfXDX3ALapNebQC8stTdd5zK7kiCgvX9n but Mastercoin explorer has 22
Bitboy has -0.1001 for 1Q7soqFvsSkhNy5GdVw1oSm9KVpgzHA9Zk but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has -0.08797911 for 1QFWodNASZv8KRHnhypKaMys5CGRg7GrFQ but Mastercoin explorer has 1
Bitboy has 71.00112399 for 1BKpa19m5Xy9SvSzC5djPWtCfbuynSDwmb but Mastercoin explorer has 38.91312399
Bitboy has -0.00000001 for 1PaPeaZKfNzc7uD8VvXLKyEbxc3roHNzEn but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has -80.0 for 15QBPtyFR76ak2NvdfKbgYNp7HtB3tbtRd but Mastercoin explorer has 70
Bitboy has -10.0 for 1EdAjiApS5cCpHdH4RKPMab1xmMVRWjLvk but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 1.8253 for 16rAwebBXhJAM9ALf3fLFbaHKz24r2o3UN but Mastercoin explorer has 2.9643
Bitboy has 8.0 for 1MCHESTbJhJK27Ygqj4qKkx4Z4ZxhnP826 but Mastercoin explorer has 9
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EYe3HxCA9txmN9pfEADctC7v69wi3TbMC but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has -1.0 for 1MCHESTxYkPSLoJ57WBQot7vz3xkNahkcb but Mastercoin explorer has 0
Bitboy has 1.537 for 18xEZx3po1iJWP5H2aM3Do11dCGQyaebnT but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has 0.0 for 1EZUnr8NW6fYpHnnunxe5AmFxQsZrNrGET but Mastercoin explorer has 0.2
Bitboy has  for 13NRX88EZbS5q81x6XFrTECzrciPREo821 but Mastercoin explorer has 536.90527669
Bitboy has 0.02 for 1C2H7U2d7XuB61GZvD7CUgfNRaUHKhh91j but Mastercoin explorer has 0.096
Bitboy has 0.4 for 1EXoDusjGwvnjZUyKkxZ4UHEf77z6A5S4P but Mastercoin explorer has 0
sr. member
Activity: 449
Merit: 250
Zathras,

What is the URL of your verification api?

I'll reparse today and run the consensus check to tsmc.


Edit
Mine is at
http://mymastercoins.com/jaddress.aspx?currency_id=2

hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
Bitoy (and others). The spec mentions that the amount used in a Selling Order should be reserved and thus removed from the balance. I did a consensus check between us and I think you are not doing that yet. Because of this its harder to compare numbers; could you check your output and see if you could build in reserved funds to your solution?
Hey Tachikoma,

I already do the above but still struggling to locate differences between us from comparisons - are you already doing the above?

For example let's look at 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm, they got 107.12380845 TMSC from Exodus, bought & sold exactly 1 TMSC, sent & received exactly 1 TMSC.  Thus balance is still exactly 107.12380845.

However the address has an active selling order with 1 TMSC reserved.  Thus the balance should be 106.12380845 TMSC + 1 TMSC reserved.

Your final balance & verification API still provide 107.12380845 though (which lacks consensus with my 106.12380845 TMSC state).  





Is this a bug your end or am I missing something? (haven't slept much in the last couple of days so it may be something obvious Wink

Thanks
Zathras

Atriz - I actually think the above is yours - I thought 3BTC for 1TMSC was a bit strong!!! Smiley  Protocol wise you cancel a sell by creating another sell with a sale amount of zero.  To change you simply do another sell offer (you can only have one sell open at any one time).  Not sure how that applies to Graz's implementation though, he'd have to advise you there.


This is indeed a problem. I think it has to do with my internal address rewrite I did two weeks ago, it basically adds a caching layer on top of the address balances. I forgot to update my specs after this rewrite however so it's possible I introduced a new bug I did not catch.

I've barely had any time this week to do anything but I'm hoping to get some time over the weekend to check this out.  

Edit:

aTriz; bf9d9904a3797a36b42213e45974c9ee5a7a759147fef79c1648dc62cdc13b19 is a Selling Offer, a very pricey one at that Wink

Edit 2:

Found the problem. I kinda removed a large feature with my last rewrite. Initially I could insert a transaction at any moment in time without having to start from the Exodus. Every feature could calculate based on the latest block height. The new balance cache feature does not support this function at all. I monkey patched it for selling offers but the point where I really need to do a total rewrite is getting nearer and nearer Smiley

Edit 3:
It should be fixed now. Although I really need to do a full import soon to make sure everything still works from start to finish. Is there a place where we could list all our verification API locations by the way? I keep asking you guys for them but forgetting to write them down.
hero member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 683
Tontogether | Save Smart & Win Big
Alright thanks for the reply's fellas,

The address I listed above zathras is indeed mine Cheesy The one sent and received was with Bitoy when we were testing his wallet.

The transaction that I listed earlier: https://blockchain.info/tx/bf9d9904a3797a36b42213e45974c9ee5a7a759147fef79c1648dc62cdc13b19
I sent 1 TSMC over to address 1Bfg1HgA5fxxXpb3y5CmPvM47s321r2EA9 which isn't showing up on anything. Maybe you smarter minds can tell me what I did wrong here Smiley

So I believe if the 1 TSMC which was sent to my buddy was indeed valid then
my correct balance: 105.12380845 TMSC + 1 TMSC reserved.

Keep up the good work!
sr. member
Activity: 284
Merit: 250
Nice!

Sent my first transaction through the site:
https://blockchain.info/tx/bf9d9904a3797a36b42213e45974c9ee5a7a759147fef79c1648dc62cdc13b19


Also made a Sell offer but I believe I found a bug under "Price per coin" it won't let me type in a decimal, so I went to sell at .003 and instead it listed the sell offer at 3 BTC after typing in 003.

Update: I found that you must type 0 before typing in a decimal, I was attempting to put in .003 which didn't work but when typing in 0.003, it works perfect.


There is no way to cancel orders correct?




I could accept also format of .003, but for now only 0.003 is considered as valid.
To cancel an order, you create the same order with amount 0.
I am not sure that version that runs now on the website parses it correctly.

Pages:
Jump to: