150 BTC sent!!: http://blockchain.info/tx/6f1eb48d1cdf9787d6ade82d668bfed2265fb25fca32c5f7acd4509a2ee9e0ba
Enjoy!
Please note that I was supposed to deduct RBB money from these totals, but forgot to do so. This means that people who collected both RBB and this bounty will either have to 1) Return their January RBB money to David or 2) Have the RBB BTC that should have been deducted from this payout deducted from their next milestone payout.
Topic: 300 BTC Coding Contest: Distributed Exchange (MasterCoin Developer Thread) - page 16. (Read 129207 times)
January 30, 2014, 05:27:08 PM
January 30, 2014, 03:42:42 PM
Hey JR, I'd just need to make a slight correction to the addresses. I've generated a new one just for MSC:
1MMF42zk8f4TqoV1QFeia18bb14rBHXzAU
Thanks JR.
1MMF42zk8f4TqoV1QFeia18bb14rBHXzAU
Thanks JR.
Updated the list. Please check. Thanks!
Sorry to be such a pain, but I should give you my updated BTC address as well: 1JJ6e9iWjGgEnCQRivKvdfNjRTgYVaKtWy
Oops!
Updated. Thanks
January 30, 2014, 11:03:22 AM
BITCOIN SECURITY ENFORCER NEEDED FOR MASTERCOIN PROJECTS – $1000 REFERRAL BOUNTY
http://blog.mastercoin.org/2014/01/30/bitcoin-security-enforcer-needed-for-mastercoin-projects-1000-referral-bounty/
January 30, 2014, 06:28:32 AM
Hey Bitoy,
Please take a look at pull 41, it's a change to DEx (additional intent byte) and I'm waiting on feedback about whether we'll be implementing backwards compat for existing TMSC DEx transactions - unfortunately I missed that discussion during the last conference as we were switching providers.
We need to get that into play & settled I think before we can attack consensus for DEx.
Thanks
Zathras
Please take a look at pull 41, it's a change to DEx (additional intent byte) and I'm waiting on feedback about whether we'll be implementing backwards compat for existing TMSC DEx transactions - unfortunately I missed that discussion during the last conference as we were switching providers.
We need to get that into play & settled I think before we can attack consensus for DEx.
Thanks
Zathras
Thanks Zathras,
I missed that discussion.
Does this mean all Dex transaction is invalid?
https://github.com/mastercoin-MSC/spec/pull/41/files
January 30, 2014, 01:36:24 AM
Hey Bitoy,
Please take a look at pull 41, it's a change to DEx (additional intent byte) and I'm waiting on feedback about whether we'll be implementing backwards compat for existing TMSC DEx transactions - unfortunately I missed that discussion during the last conference as we were switching providers.
We need to get that into play & settled I think before we can attack consensus for DEx.
Thanks
Zathras
Please take a look at pull 41, it's a change to DEx (additional intent byte) and I'm waiting on feedback about whether we'll be implementing backwards compat for existing TMSC DEx transactions - unfortunately I missed that discussion during the last conference as we were switching providers.
We need to get that into play & settled I think before we can attack consensus for DEx.
Thanks
Zathras
January 29, 2014, 10:40:24 PM
Developers:
I've pushed the new verification API online for Mastercoin-explorer (example). Could you guys let me know once you have also done this so I can add you to my DEx consensus checker?
I've pushed the new verification API online for Mastercoin-explorer (example). Could you guys let me know once you have also done this so I can add you to my DEx consensus checker?
Edit
Transactions API working
http://mymastercoins.com/jtransactions.aspx?address=1G3P5bws8wRVrVfKWxv8F85pRjs9qXyyA6¤cy_id=2
I'll update the transaction api today. Added some fields and updated the scripts, (I will need to reparse the entire db).
btw requesting a hackathon for TMSC sycn. (I'm +8 GMT Singapore,Hong Kong Time Will prepare espresso =)
January 29, 2014, 07:10:50 PM
Grimentz MSC address: 1rM1oMEFMfhPBo4kRaf2CMXf9XQCHyYWi
Updated. Thanks!
January 29, 2014, 06:23:32 PM
Grimentz MSC address: 1rM1oMEFMfhPBo4kRaf2CMXf9XQCHyYWi
January 29, 2014, 04:55:44 PM
Congrats for the time spent on the project. Highly rewarded but I'm pleased that brilliant people like this are.
Keep the good work !
Keep the good work !
January 29, 2014, 04:36:10 PM
Grazcoin's BTC address is MSC compatible.
Updated. Thanks!
Also updated MSC address for cmlacy, received by email
January 29, 2014, 04:31:00 PM
Here's the table with payout addresses:
I'll give you guys until tomorrow to correct any incorrect address above. Hopefully I didn't mix any up!
I can do the 150 BTC payout with the info above, but I need MSC addresses from cmlacy, grazcoin, and grimentz (or confirmation that your BTC address are Mastercoin-compatible).
Thanks!
| Contestant | Dev % | Testing % | Total BTC | @ $800 per BTC | BTC address | MSC address |
| Grazcoin | 19.87% | 16.96% | 28.3514 | $22,681 | 1BgGDZTvD2P6wU9emZtkAY3v13qrX8FiHY | (NEED MSC ADDRESS) |
I'll give you guys until tomorrow to correct any incorrect address above. Hopefully I didn't mix any up!
I can do the 150 BTC payout with the info above, but I need MSC addresses from cmlacy, grazcoin, and grimentz (or confirmation that your BTC address are Mastercoin-compatible).
Thanks!
Grazcoin's BTC address is MSC compatible.
January 29, 2014, 04:28:11 PM
Hey JR, I'd just need to make a slight correction to the addresses. I've generated a new one just for MSC:
1MMF42zk8f4TqoV1QFeia18bb14rBHXzAU
Thanks JR.
1MMF42zk8f4TqoV1QFeia18bb14rBHXzAU
Thanks JR.
Updated the list. Please check. Thanks!
January 29, 2014, 04:12:30 PM
Here's the table with payout addresses:
I'll give you guys until tomorrow to correct any incorrect address above. Hopefully I didn't mix any up!
I can do the 150 BTC payout with the info above, but I need MSC addresses from cmlacy, grazcoin, and grimentz (or confirmation that your BTC address are Mastercoin-compatible).
Thanks!
| Contestant | Dev % | Testing % | Total BTC | @ $800 per BTC | BTC address | MSC address |
| Zathras | 22.97% | 11.96% | 28.9467 | $23,157 | 1DrYXscsbMxhQMvvCmK7aVppbJGhr3RRSN | 1Px5ruEuWdtvkG3AJ1sJ8Q7ckV8B1f3us5 |
| Bitoy | 17.79% | 13.73% | 24.6565 | $19,725 | 14cn7BiyzUeMcddC3RUFk77Z2k8NcP66yf | 14cn7BiyzUeMcddC3RUFk77Z2k8NcP66yf |
| Grazcoin | 19.87% | 16.96% | 28.3514 | $22,681 | 1BgGDZTvD2P6wU9emZtkAY3v13qrX8FiHY | 1BgGDZTvD2P6wU9emZtkAY3v13qrX8FiHY |
| Grimentz | 6.89% | 10.79% | 12.2887 | $9,831 | 128MGmQKtKUPf66w2w9eaGc7YBqLrcnLx5 | 1rM1oMEFMfhPBo4kRaf2CMXf9XQCHyYWi |
| Jakecnn | 0.00% | 2.98% | 1.4905 | $1,192 | 1KDFVCw6GMVWeFUrdogGSXQiyjXZ8QWS3T | 1KDFVCw6GMVWeFUrdogGSXQiyjXZ8QWS3T |
| Cmlacy | 2.87% | 1.11% | 3.4226 | $2,738 | 19TwBziBeCb4VnrZgJasJukwRKNSVvDp7Y | 13pm7cmA5vVpKkDLJCvqh26kcp6V6PJ1Aq |
| Tachikoma | 24.39% | 17.33% | 33.0540 | $26,443 | 1JmGrSP6m9XcbuMxBbHk1rGVbr39Er7CxA | 1JmGrSP6m9XcbuMxBbHk1rGVbr39Er7CxA |
| Marvshneider | 1.73% | 8.96% | 6.2104 | $4,968 | 18aSfFtNQ6N6xurmBKNTCG7c6xLy8EUuy7 | 1PKKRfHgvfZi2ToZDKkKrCUFpvuVKHz9WV |
| Bebopzzz | 0.00% | 3.30% | 1.6513 | $1,321 | 17mtHCwN6yQcWGBFQAkWvHQZgtvUFwZYh1 | 1GmsjoERUACUwAsjKSLhSekH8EeXLRWKku |
| Azmenthe | 1.95% | 4.15% | 4.0279 | $3,222 | 1EdtK7EkErgeU17qRuifxASA2yMoxibxYv | 1AQBeWsRfbHst7NojYdt42MZThcR4jy8fk |
| Atriz | 0.00% | 5.02% | 2.5120 | $2,010 | 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm | 1LjT88X7Zu8BdbqJw8vfRa83NJuzYL9kqm |
| Mastream | 0.00% | 3.06% | 1.5310 | $1,225 | 16HM4xYc6BWP5Say7acFPKtt9cjvTrCxmb | 16HM4xYc6BWP5Say7acFPKtt9cjvTrCxmb |
| Fthoughts | 1.54% | 0.64% | 1.8570 | $1,486 | 1JJ6e9iWjGgEnCQRivKvdfNjRTgYVaKtWy | 1MMF42zk8f4TqoV1QFeia18bb14rBHXzAU |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 150 | $120000 |
I'll give you guys until tomorrow to correct any incorrect address above. Hopefully I didn't mix any up!
I can do the 150 BTC payout with the info above
Thanks!
January 29, 2014, 06:26:30 AM
Here is are the numbers for the distribution:
I'll give it a shot. For this contest (and the last one), I followed the following steps:
That last step fixes a problem where if you do a fantastic job grading other people you would have gotten slightly penalized for it, since your feedback doesn't give anything to yourself but is being counted heavily toward the final score.
I'm sure everybody would have their own way of doing this, but I hope this is close to fair!
I hope to do these payments tomorrow in BTC. I have a lot of figuring to do before I can do the MSC-payments across all bounties to date, but that will come next.
| Contestant | Dev % | Testing % | Total BTC | @ $800 per BTC |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 150 | $120000 |
As the mastercoin protocol and mastercoin foundation is all about transparency and consensus, I think also the judging should follow that approach.
Please consider writing the algorithm that you use (words are enough, but for sure code is preferred), and all participants could put the evaluations openly online - then the calculation will be totally transparent.
Please consider writing the algorithm that you use (words are enough, but for sure code is preferred), and all participants could put the evaluations openly online - then the calculation will be totally transparent.
I'll give it a shot. For this contest (and the last one), I followed the following steps:
- Normalize all feedback to fix those which don't add to 100%
- Attempt to determine how careful each person's feedback was (i.e. the same % for everyone is not very careful, but different percentages for each person with detailed comments on how you chose those percentages is very careful)
- Weight each person's feedback by how careful they were
- Get a percentage for each person based on the combined weighted feedback
- Perform a second pass through weighting step, changing each person's grade for themselves from zero to the result from the first pass
That last step fixes a problem where if you do a fantastic job grading other people you would have gotten slightly penalized for it, since your feedback doesn't give anything to yourself but is being counted heavily toward the final score.
I'm sure everybody would have their own way of doing this, but I hope this is close to fair!
I hope to do these payments tomorrow in BTC. I have a lot of figuring to do before I can do the MSC-payments across all bounties to date, but that will come next.
dacoinminster - thank you for the hard calculation work, and thank everyone else for the mutual efforts behind those bounties.
I still think that automated calculation (code) could really improve the process - it would be more clear how things are done, and it will save the bounties maintainer hard work for each of the next distributed bounties.
As for transparency - I would rather seeing how each person evaluates me, and show how I evaluate them. This only makes things more efficient and direct. It would be another step away from centralization.
In the future we could even use mastercoin protocol to automate the evaluation & calculation. Every participant could send coins to other participants (these can be some evaluation coins), and then the monthly evaluation code could gather these numbers and give a clear cut updated result.
Regarding the MSC-payments - please avoid sending many class A payments directly from exodus. It would be better to send all monthly MSC payments to some external address, and from that address to pay using multiple class B transactions to all. Let's take care of the utxo space.
January 28, 2014, 11:16:01 PM
Dev update #4
it is mainly a consolidation of JRs award methodology, the award amounts and mostly copy/paste of some of the stuff on this board with some cutting/edits (i tried to compress it but there was so many items). I have to think of a better way to do these updates.
http://blog.mastercoin.org/2014/01/29/development-update-4-master-protocol-wallet-and-distributed-exchange-milestone/
it is mainly a consolidation of JRs award methodology, the award amounts and mostly copy/paste of some of the stuff on this board with some cutting/edits (i tried to compress it but there was so many items). I have to think of a better way to do these updates.
http://blog.mastercoin.org/2014/01/29/development-update-4-master-protocol-wallet-and-distributed-exchange-milestone/
January 28, 2014, 08:28:51 PM
Here is are the numbers for the distribution:
I'll give it a shot. For this contest (and the last one), I followed the following steps:
That last step fixes a problem where if you do a fantastic job grading other people you would have gotten slightly penalized for it, since your feedback doesn't give anything to yourself but is being counted heavily toward the final score.
I'm sure everybody would have their own way of doing this, but I hope this is close to fair!
I hope to do these payments tomorrow in BTC. I have a lot of figuring to do before I can do the MSC-payments across all bounties to date, but that will come next.
Thanks everyone!
| Contestant | Dev % | Testing % | Total BTC | @ $800 per BTC |
| Zathras | 22.97% | 11.96% | 28.9467 | $23,157 |
| Bitoy | 17.79% | 13.73% | 24.6565 | $19,725 |
| Grazcoin | 19.87% | 16.96% | 28.3514 | $22,681 |
| Grimentz | 6.89% | 10.79% | 12.2887 | $9,831 |
| Jakecnn | 0.00% | 2.98% | 1.4905 | $1,192 |
| Cmlacy | 2.87% | 1.11% | 3.4226 | $2,738 |
| Tachikoma | 24.39% | 17.33% | 33.0540 | $26,443 |
| Marvshneider | 1.73% | 8.96% | 6.2104 | $4,968 |
| Bebopzzz | 0.00% | 3.30% | 1.6513 | $1,321 |
| Azmenthe | 1.95% | 4.15% | 4.0279 | $3,222 |
| Atriz | 0.00% | 5.02% | 2.5120 | $2,010 |
| Mastream | 0.00% | 3.06% | 1.5310 | $1,225 |
| Fthoughts | 1.54% | 0.64% | 1.8570 | $1,486 |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 150 | $120000 |
As the mastercoin protocol and mastercoin foundation is all about transparency and consensus, I think also the judging should follow that approach.
Please consider writing the algorithm that you use (words are enough, but for sure code is preferred), and all participants could put the evaluations openly online - then the calculation will be totally transparent.
Please consider writing the algorithm that you use (words are enough, but for sure code is preferred), and all participants could put the evaluations openly online - then the calculation will be totally transparent.
I'll give it a shot. For this contest (and the last one), I followed the following steps:
- Normalize all feedback to fix those which don't add to 100%
- Attempt to determine how careful each person's feedback was (i.e. the same % for everyone is not very careful, but different percentages for each person with detailed comments on how you chose those percentages is very careful)
- Weight each person's feedback by how careful they were
- Get a percentage for each person based on the combined weighted feedback
- Perform a second pass through weighting step, changing each person's grade for themselves from zero to the result from the first pass
That last step fixes a problem where if you do a fantastic job grading other people you would have gotten slightly penalized for it, since your feedback doesn't give anything to yourself but is being counted heavily toward the final score.
I'm sure everybody would have their own way of doing this, but I hope this is close to fair!
I hope to do these payments tomorrow in BTC. I have a lot of figuring to do before I can do the MSC-payments across all bounties to date, but that will come next.
Thanks everyone!
January 28, 2014, 04:50:46 AM
Developers:
I've pushed the new verification API online for Mastercoin-explorer (example). Could you guys let me know once you have also done this so I can add you to my DEx consensus checker?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tachikoma's BTC/MSC address is 1JmGrSP6m9XcbuMxBbHk1rGVbr39Er7CxA.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS4jPDAAoJECJFMARpVQb9YAgIAIPhNFPUavfbJyCt9KQ7aneE
LmhYXzDiInbSxeu6GLNp6jS20rp65tBsLMFUgG5ER2oHh/kxkNEBrSHRiWHwv1fO
y45psv8RaBBcAAmNQbfd6V+L3BmKzNXuWCrWRB4HsCF5Op6Rp0iSA5Y0SrTUJErM
OTuhHEOnYf/nCrHQZFxmY0Osw9XDo+R2vAsuxPOV9mYfsKCgkhEY3nYXr2skgeNn
76ZqrfasIhqX3Hn113O2+FSDLvbJWw2X9nqP79yYrFpvUS2TkHAG8Tkm8yGjbQ4F
WkYakwSNwtL11jOkh1FjupqC9nGwMziwX+A/rzN25OSnZF+tzaitbKiweGNAxsc=
=1tPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I've pushed the new verification API online for Mastercoin-explorer (example). Could you guys let me know once you have also done this so I can add you to my DEx consensus checker?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tachikoma's BTC/MSC address is 1JmGrSP6m9XcbuMxBbHk1rGVbr39Er7CxA.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS4jPDAAoJECJFMARpVQb9YAgIAIPhNFPUavfbJyCt9KQ7aneE
LmhYXzDiInbSxeu6GLNp6jS20rp65tBsLMFUgG5ER2oHh/kxkNEBrSHRiWHwv1fO
y45psv8RaBBcAAmNQbfd6V+L3BmKzNXuWCrWRB4HsCF5Op6Rp0iSA5Y0SrTUJErM
OTuhHEOnYf/nCrHQZFxmY0Osw9XDo+R2vAsuxPOV9mYfsKCgkhEY3nYXr2skgeNn
76ZqrfasIhqX3Hn113O2+FSDLvbJWw2X9nqP79yYrFpvUS2TkHAG8Tkm8yGjbQ4F
WkYakwSNwtL11jOkh1FjupqC9nGwMziwX+A/rzN25OSnZF+tzaitbKiweGNAxsc=
=1tPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
January 28, 2014, 03:44:33 AM
As of now, I believe I have all the feedback I need from everyone in order to calculate payouts.
Please be patient with me as I labor over my spreadsheet. There are a hilarious number of inconsistencies I have to normalize between your individual judging styles. Some of you put a ton of effort in to the evaluations, and others very little. Some of you left people out completely, or put people in the wrong category, or gave me numbers which didn't add up to 100%. Most of you were pretty biased towards the people you worked with the most, but hopefully those biases balance out.
I think probably the only people who will consider the final payout "fair" will be the testers, some of whom will make a pretty impressive hourly rate for the time they put in
Thanks!
Please be patient with me as I labor over my spreadsheet. There are a hilarious number of inconsistencies I have to normalize between your individual judging styles. Some of you put a ton of effort in to the evaluations, and others very little. Some of you left people out completely, or put people in the wrong category, or gave me numbers which didn't add up to 100%. Most of you were pretty biased towards the people you worked with the most, but hopefully those biases balance out.
I think probably the only people who will consider the final payout "fair" will be the testers, some of whom will make a pretty impressive hourly rate for the time they put in
Thanks!
As the mastercoin protocol and mastercoin foundation is all about transparency and consensus, I think also the judging should follow that approach.
Please consider writing the algorithm that you use (words are enough, but for sure code is preferred), and all participants could put the evaluations openly online - then the calculation will be totally transparent.
January 27, 2014, 08:32:27 PM
As of now, I believe I have all the feedback I need from everyone in order to calculate payouts.
Please be patient with me as I labor over my spreadsheet. There are a hilarious number of inconsistencies I have to normalize between your individual judging styles. Some of you put a ton of effort in to the evaluations, and others very little. Some of you left people out completely, or put people in the wrong category, or gave me numbers which didn't add up to 100%. Most of you were pretty biased towards the people you worked with the most, but hopefully those biases balance out.
I think probably the only people who will consider the final payout "fair" will be the testers, some of whom will make a pretty impressive hourly rate for the time they put in
Thanks!
Please be patient with me as I labor over my spreadsheet. There are a hilarious number of inconsistencies I have to normalize between your individual judging styles. Some of you put a ton of effort in to the evaluations, and others very little. Some of you left people out completely, or put people in the wrong category, or gave me numbers which didn't add up to 100%. Most of you were pretty biased towards the people you worked with the most, but hopefully those biases balance out.
I think probably the only people who will consider the final payout "fair" will be the testers, some of whom will make a pretty impressive hourly rate for the time they put in
Thanks!
January 27, 2014, 07:22:45 AM
- Testing installation in OSX and simple send of Mastercoin wallet
- Reported discrepancy between mastercoin-explorer.com and masterchain.info in simple send.
I don't know if I qualify for cents of the bounty with this, but the address (BTC and MSC) is the same linked in both sites were discrepancy was reported.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
MasterCoin testing
1rdyat8oxM33EUHBaGPvEUBiBgAvXHe5M
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJS5lDsAAoJED+0xWlW2PMs9FcH/j80lAWlqqXQJ7xwm26rWIjY
BlTU27iq26YNnzZMBLeSHhb63kccz3/7CxM6HJUzqciGHUp+uJhVqHhOKUph6v3/
/Lsw1TcX+w+KJ2xTLaYHXA9S+BSut0AL7IgHfbws3hVwizW9ZbgA1ldRTS6LKp2X
5eJZ8PEVSd3YWM05/9sRVgMBr031f0CmRq0Bs4F5H2xnkCJkJcSPcpLpx9seHiff
LalkpGGkJ4PK6Z+yO/sgmiOSCFXS8PRv5nbtNatXbjPyyr0qtUoXz4k+6IMHK+la
33ANtSjh8usb/M+bZKJTLW0fYu1TK4gWRVbQupZIPvvV94Ei3lWNbi0+/tbCXnY=
=ZfGP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Jump to: