Time will tell who is right.
So how much closer are you to opening that lounge?
Topic: 3000-6000 BTC loan - Hookah Lounge - 9/18/12 Update - page 16. (Read 55332 times)
So how much closer are you to opening that lounge?
Time will tell who is right.
So how much closer are you to opening that lounge?
Time will tell who is right.
Can time also clarify if one can be cured of Down's through karma too? I hate cliffhangers.
Time will tell who is right.
Epic thread is epic.
you guys are being a little too harsh. Hes just a kid. live and let live.
It appears to me that Dank has smoked too much weed as an adolescent, and is incapable of understand simple, logical statements. I'm withdrawing from this thread as he has wasted too much of my time. His lounge will never go anywhere, nor will his life. 
He is clearly severely delusional. Delusional people are everywhere. Indeed, Dank has wasted a lot of people's time, but this thread has at least generated a lot of good information on running a small business (and the effort involved).
Despite this thread marking a rather abysmal blemish on my start here, I'm thinking of doing a series of threads to share my knowledge, I'm sure people like Ant would relish the opportunity to help out as well, just as long as the people on the other end aren't complete fucktards.
... I have high hopes this includes just about everyone, except, well, you know.
It appears to me that Dank has smoked too much weed as an adolescent, and is incapable of understand simple, logical statements. I'm withdrawing from this thread as he has wasted too much of my time. His lounge will never go anywhere, nor will his life.
He is clearly severely delusional. Delusional people are everywhere. Indeed, Dank has wasted a lot of people's time, but this thread has at least generated a lot of good information on running a small business (and the effort involved).
I'm not saying the definition is accurate, I'm saying the concept is.
"I know that the words are using are wrong, but I'd rather keep using them wrongly because I'm too arrogant to even admit I can fuck up such a single thing. Post hoc ergo propter hoc, wherefore, stultus est sicut stultus facit."
It appears to me that Dank has smoked too much weed as an adolescent, and is incapable of understand simple, logical statements. I'm withdrawing from this thread as he has wasted too much of my time. His lounge will never go anywhere, nor will his life.
I'm not saying the definition is accurate, I'm saying the concept is.
creationism has a completely different definition in another reality. therefor you're wrong
Snap, there's that. This might take a while then on account of having to debate multiversaly.
creationism has a completely different definition in another reality. therefor you're wrong
Who was talking about evolution? Evolution and creationism are both correct. We evolved into what we are, yes. We were also created, by the universe, by god. We are made of the universe.
Again, it's just the perspective you're looking from, both are true.
Again, it's just the perspective you're looking from, both are true.
Evolution has predictive power and is useful. Creationism predicts nothing and is therefore useless.
Yes it is. Your refusal to even acknowledge the way words work is hilarious.
Who was talking about evolution? Evolution and creationism are both correct. We evolved into what we are, yes. We were also created, by the universe, by god. We are made of the universe.
Again, it's just the perspective you're looking from, both are true.
Again, it's just the perspective you're looking from, both are true.
Evolution has predictive power and is useful. Creationism predicts nothing and is therefore useless.
You don't pick and choose karma.
But you do pick and choose what to answer. Obviously your view is incorrect, or you would have a quick answer for us.
Who was talking about evolution? Evolution and creationism are both correct. We evolved into what we are, yes. We were also created, by the universe, by god. We are made of the universe.
Again, it's just the perspective you're looking from, both are true.
Again, it's just the perspective you're looking from, both are true.
Evolution has predictive power and is useful. Creationism predicts nothing and is therefore useless.
You fail to realize, I'm not arguing against science, at all. Science is only good for our reality though, how can you judge something of another reality with science? Don't tell me you're not open to the possibility of a multiverse or alternate realities, are you?
Anything is possible, but no, that would not happen. You don't pick and choose karma.
Anything is possible, but no, that would not happen. You don't pick and choose karma.
Maybe reality has hit me, and not you?
Think what you wish, I can't debate this forever, every valid point I make is disregarded with some snide remark or illogical reasoning. I used to think like you guys, I used to be a straight A atheist who dwelled into science, then something happened to change my view. I guess you could call it hitting reality.
Whatever floats your boat.
Think what you wish, I can't debate this forever, every valid point I make is disregarded with some snide remark or illogical reasoning. I used to think like you guys, I used to be a straight A atheist who dwelled into science, then something happened to change my view. I guess you could call it hitting reality.
Whatever floats your boat.
Hitting reality? Or hitting a bong one too many times?
I think it's more of every valid question we ask of you is disregarded with some illogical reasoning or "proof" of something that doesn't exist.
Try answering the questions that are asked of you. Here is an easy one:
Do you think a child born with Downs can be cured if his/her parents increase their positive karma?
Jump to: