I'm not denying any scientific evidence supporting your claims. Doesn't change the fact we're spiritual creatures. Love is the highest, most pure form of energy.
It sure is a nifty feeling, contagious even at times. Is it energy? No. It's only a serotonin upshot wrapped in cognitive dissonance, evolutionarily designed to keep us from abandoning the mewling poop machines that drop out when another biological imperative, reproduction, is executed.
Through the magic of higher reasoning we have made it something bigger and more refined, which is good and all, but to think that we're enveloped in a mystical layer of unseen energy is not only backwards thinking, it's assimilating and oversimplifying dogma from various religious movements.
You're cherry picking again. Animals are amply able of displaying what can be perceived as love, or at least behaviour that's not in their self-interest to protect and provide for their young. Does the imperative to pass on their genes to the next generation demonstrate their ownership of a soul?
Nothing I said was to be construed as offensive, it's simply another viewpoint, if you took it offensively, you did so yourself.
Again, I challenge you to clarify your previous position: is a Down's victim really just too lazy to will himself out of his affliction? It's a mental health issue at it's core, so really, since mental health problems are only a fabrication of big pharma, shouldn't they be able to decide enough is enough?By the way, regardless if you think love is an energy in this reality or not, my example of karma still stands true. Put out positive energy around you and others, it may come in return. Put out bad energy around you, negativity will be returned. It's a very simple concept that if you spread love to someone, they're more likely to spread it back than if you spread hate to them.
No. Put out good deeds and
usually those good deeds are recognized and rewarded in time by their own acts, be it from reciprocal adoption of the golden rule or simply the perception that their good acts will in turn get more of your good deeds.
Causality of the tendency of people to seek out other kind spirited people does not validate karma as a concrete absolute. Building a financial enterprise on the notion is delirious.
You're just using karma as a way to be lenient in your business model, relying on karma to address issues for you, since you are a good person, at least in your mind, nothing bad can happen to you. Ever heard of natural disasters? Acts of god? I suppose people who loose everything they own must have secretly been horrible people, in this or past lives.
To take a page from a more religious stance, god helps those that help themselves, ie, shit won't happen if you stand on your ass waiting and counting your blessings. This is probably the most sensible approach I ever saw issued from dogma.