[4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 673.

vs3

hero member

Activity: 622

Merit: 500

Quote from: bitjoint on June 06, 2013, 03:47:14 AM

Quote from: Lucko on June 06, 2013, 02:43:23 AM

Quote from: valladex on June 06, 2013, 02:37:03 AM

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?

Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...

What I find amusing is that despite the increased difficulty, the additional hashrate on the pool (~13Thash/s right now) is having an impact on the pool's luck (increased frequency finding blocks).

Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days): 121%, 106%, 97%

I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?

Yup, and that's exactly the expected outcome - and I quite like it as well!

Roland68

member

Activity: 103

Merit: 10

1:39:33 18787336 none none 240045 25.03390000

why no reward Huh

?

just fixed ....

1:39:33 18787336 402 0.00078557 240045 25.03390000 Kiss

thanks

bitjoint

sr. member

Activity: 333

Merit: 250

Commander of the Hodl Legions

Quote from: Lucko on June 06, 2013, 02:43:23 AM

Quote from: valladex on June 06, 2013, 02:37:03 AM

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?

Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...

What I find curious is that despite the increased difficulty, the additional hashrate on the pool (~13Thash/s right now) is having an impact on the pool's luck (increased frequency finding blocks).

Pool luck (1 day, 7 days, 30 days): 121%, 106%, 97%

I have noticed that my rewards are slightly smaller, but more frequent, so the overall earning is higher. Have you noticed the same?

McManus

newbie

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

i have reward problem with block #239996 and #239995
i hope slush fix this bug

Lucko

hero member

Activity: 826

Merit: 1000

Quote from: valladex on June 06, 2013, 02:37:03 AM

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?

Difficulty has noting to do with round reword. Higher difficulty means that there are less rounds. What changes reword for round is your hash rate vs. pool hash rate...

valladex

member

Activity: 61

Merit: 10

so with a 20-25% increase in difficulty the rewards have dropped 25-30% each round, can anyone tell me if their is always such correlation?

Psyrick

newbie

Activity: 30

Merit: 0

Just had a thought about the bitcoin network's dynamics. The increasing diffuculty to match the total hash rate offers the bitcoin end user greater security through harder levels of encryption within the blockchain. But not really, since a 51% attack is still a growing possibility. Meanwhile, the fact that blocks come out at the same average rate means transaction won't reach confirmations any faster. That doesn't seem fair enough to the users of a growing network. If block reward quantities were frequently adjusted for total network rate, while the difficulty increased at a more steady and easy rate, we could still be cutting from the same size of pie, and block solution rate could actually represent our total hashing power. Perhaps that would be a problem with all the <10s blocks we'd be getting, though. Thoughts on the matter?

vs3

hero member

Activity: 622

Merit: 500

Quote from: OlgaA524 on June 05, 2013, 08:22:27 PM

Does anyone know why I might be getting this while trying to start a miner on my new machine?

2013-06-05 19:21:41: Listener for "Default" started
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": 05/06/2013 19:21:42, started OpenCL miner on platform 0, device 0 (Tahiti)
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, checking for stratum...
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, no response to getwork, using as stratum
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, No JSON object could be decoded
2013-06-05 19:21:52: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:52, Failed to subscribe
2013-06-05 19:21:54: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:54, IO errors - 1, tolerance 2

Port 8332 is the default for "getwork" protocol. Slush was talking about deprecating it completely and it seems this is already a fact.

I just looked at the stats page and it used to say so-and-so-% stratum vs getwork (lately was 97-98%) and now it doesn't say anything, which makes me think that getwork is gone completely.

In this case -
Solution 1: Set your miner to use "stratum".
Solution 2: if you can't do #1 just run the proxy on one of your machines and point your miners to the proxy.

OlgaA524

newbie

Activity: 54

Merit: 0

Does anyone know why I might be getting this while trying to start a miner on my new machine?

2013-06-05 19:21:41: Listener for "Default" started
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": 05/06/2013 19:21:42, started OpenCL miner on platform 0, device 0 (Tahiti)
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, checking for stratum...
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, no response to getwork, using as stratum
2013-06-05 19:21:42: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:42, No JSON object could be decoded
2013-06-05 19:21:52: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:52, Failed to subscribe
2013-06-05 19:21:54: Listener for "Default": api2.bitcoin.cz:8332 05/06/2013 19:21:54, IO errors - 1, tolerance 2

Gleason

full member

Activity: 207

Merit: 100

It looks to be fixed and corrected for me now!

Thanks!

nottm28

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: bspurloc on June 05, 2013, 06:58:13 PM

I dont like when Slush doesn't fix blocks where I get a reward for 1/6 my miners.

I dont like when Slush fixes blocks where I had a reward as if I had 3+ miners.

HOWEVER I do like to know he noticed a problem and fixed it more than those 2!

Thanks Slush... Wink

Yeah he seen it and I know he is watching

xempew

jr. member

Activity: 45

Merit: 10

Quote from: vs3 on June 05, 2013, 06:37:16 PM

Give it some time - the 'none none' usually appears while it is recalculating the shares and scores. I've seen it take up to 15-20min after a block has been found until it finishes, and for longer-duration blocks it may take even longer. So - patience ...

As vs3 stated... this ended up resolving itself.

bspurloc

hero member

Activity: 569

Merit: 500

I dont like when Slush doesn't fix blocks where I get a reward for 1/6 my miners.

I dont like when Slush fixes blocks where I had a reward as if I had 3+ miners.

HOWEVER I do like to know he noticed a problem and fixed it more than those 2!

Thanks Slush... Wink

vs3

hero member

Activity: 622

Merit: 500

Quote from: diskodasa on June 05, 2013, 06:49:50 PM

Quote from: xempew on June 05, 2013, 06:40:15 PM

I also have noticed the same... for block #239957 I have "none" for shares/reward. But it took about about 2.5 hours to find that block, so I will wait as vs3 suggested.

Or else, you wil start to panick?!

Seems things are about to change - the 0.00000001 is now:

18419 2013-06-05 22:10:11 2:13:41 23972744 none none 239957 25.05265005 84 confirmations left

EDIT: WOW - and while I was typing it changed yet again:
18419 2013-06-05 22:10:11 2:13:41 23972744 2664 0.00272833 239957 25.05265005 84 confirmations left

diskodasa

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 250

Quote from: xempew on June 05, 2013, 06:40:15 PM

I also have noticed the same... for block #239957 I have "none" for shares/reward. But it took about about 2.5 hours to find that block, so I will wait as vs3 suggested.

Or else, you wil start to panick?!

aurel57

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1001

wow are GH/s just went up another 1000? I guess maybe a lucky day made some asic miner move to us?

xempew

jr. member

Activity: 45

Merit: 10

I also have noticed the same... for block #239957 I have "none" for shares/reward. But it took about about 2.5 hours to find that block, so I will wait as vs3 suggested.

nottm28

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: Tamis on June 05, 2013, 06:34:38 PM

Same here no shares...

2 options:

1) slush will see it and force a recount of these shares.
2) it will go unnoticed and you will lose out, there will be a lucky few slush miners who will win and who are hoping right now that the block will go unnoticed - one time that is likely to be you.

Overall we are all winners (for the record I have 0.00000003 -but I don't care either way whether it's fixed).

vs3

hero member

Activity: 622

Merit: 500

Quote from: stephengillon on June 05, 2013, 06:32:36 PM

Something is definatlly screwed up, i just got no shares on 239969

Give it some time - the 'none none' usually appears while it is recalculating the shares and scores. I've seen it take up to 15-20min after a block has been found until it finishes, and for longer-duration blocks it may take even longer. So - patience ...

Tamis

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Same here no shares...

Topic: [4+ EH] Slush Pool (slushpool.com); Overt AsicBoost; World First Mining Pool - page 673. (Read 4382714 times)