The best that any earnest independent analysts can get is VAERS data with a reporting rate which runs at under 1% and has no reporting standards whatsoever. There is no way that this is an accident.
attacks on data are widespread among the power structures..
hmmm
no the attacks are widespread amung the conspiracy theorists...against the power structures
note the difference
when you stop relying on conspiracy sites fighting talk... and realise that real doctors treating real patients making real medical reports.. has more reliable rate at much higher than your foolish mis-informed 1%
you start to realise those having severe adverse affects that require hospital treatment are pretty much 99.9% accurate.
yea only 1% of crybabies cry about the insignificant 'boo boos'. but that does not mean the severe adverse reports are too only 1% accurate
We are finding out that standard medical sites are and have been the conspiracy sites all along. franky1 is a conspiracy theorist.
How can you tell? In the range of 99% of people who visit the medical would have been fine without the visit by using a little common sense about their malady. In fact, many of those people were persuaded into some kind of procedure that harmed them more than they would have been helped if they had done nothing. When you consider the millions of people who die under doctors' care, and the $billions of dollars they pay the doctors to die, it's turning out that the enemy is really the medical.