Pages:
Author

Topic: ### A ChainWorks Industries (CWI) Project - CWIgm | Simple Powerful Stable - page 25. (Read 67732 times)

legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
hi all ...

there are pages i need to go through if i am to answer ALL the posts ... tho im glad there are a number of community ( yes - we have a pretty decent community here now ) members that have helped others with their issues and questions ...

for that - we thank you ...

the results that have been posted are mostly good - some not so - and others can use some recoding to get working again ...

but all in all - it shows us one thing ... that we are on the right track to build a miner that will fulfill the initial two goals we have set ... stability and ease of use ...

there are bugs ... there are issues ... but there is also a set of rules we abide by in CWI ... not just rules set by law - but rules we set for ourselves also ... goals are a major part of our everyday work as well ... so its encouraging to see such an active and interested community get together and bash the hell out of CWIgm-Beta - so that we can make it one of the best miners we can ...

we are working through a number of issues for the next test version ... after that version - we will begin work on the major update to fix any issues that may arise in the next test release ( CWIgm-0.9.9 )  ... we hope that you will all help in this endeavor - and also hope that the process of building this miner will be as seamless as possible ...

there are certain unscrupulous peoples out in crypto - from those selling miners that dont belong to them to those that change code in an unauthorized way ...

id like to say these three things tho ...

first - we do not support or promote these people ( or what they peddle ) in any way shape or form ...

second - if you the user wish to help us in our endeavor to progress this miner for ALL of us to use - then we will do everything in our power to facilitate that ... on the other hand - if you use any of the products that have been hacked - and do not come directly from us ( as we provide the MD5hash to check ) - then we can take no responsibility to anything at all ... either way its a 'use at your own risk' scenario ... but getting our miner from our links we provide and checking them against the hashes we provide - will ensure that what you are actually doing IS helping us improve in more ways than just the code ...

third - CWIgm is ONE project of seven modules in the CWI-EcoSystem ... the CWI-Pool system can be used whether you use CWIgm or other miners ... theFARM is currently in the rebuild process and will take many months to complete to a level equal to what we had before - which will also be an integral part of not only CWI-Pool - but also CWIgm and a number of other components of the CWI-EcoSystem ... so have some patience as all these pieces of the puzzle are being created - modified - and improved so that when each piece is done properly - will be a part that fits the puzzle that is the CWI-EcoSystem perfectly ...

we have taken on board a number of things here - especially the issues that a lot of users that are facing currently ... but there is a lot of misunderstanding here also ... especially to do with diff - shares - parameters - and a few other things ... we cannot teach you all everything about mining ( as we continuously learn also - in our own way ) - as some of you are veteran miners and some of you are beginners ... our aim is simply that WE can all have a say in what is happening - and donate our time to post updates - issues - and results WITHOUT the negativity that comes ignorance / not understanding ... if you dont know - ask ... and anyone that can answer - please do ...

we are now approaching a better working CWIgm - and will have it for testing soon ...

the issues that a number of users are facing is being looked into ... everything from windows resizing / character issues to stratum connection ...

all this takes time - and also requires a LOT of patience ... this is all still a new arena for all of us ...

btw - both sigt and dnr nethash have increased ... so you need patience there also Wink ...

#crysx
hero member
Activity: 838
Merit: 500
Is it just me or has the pool stopped finding blocks?

Looks fine to me. Diff went up a bit so it'll take longer to find blocks.
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
Join Cashbery Coin!
Is it just me or has the pool stopped finding blocks?
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
Join Cashbery Coin!
I just got in an the rates are really good... couple requests/questions I have would be:
1. Some kind of exit from the miner, pressing x in the top right of the window seems to be my only option
2. Are we going to be able to point this miner at other pools eventually?
3. What kind of time frame do you have on adding algos like, equihash, lbry, lyra2Rev2, etc...?
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
https://wallet.merit.me/?invite=Pikachu
Any chance that the pool can send an email notification if a worker goes offline?
hero member
Activity: 838
Merit: 500
Hello,

I am not able to use the --lodiff option.
When the option is enabled, I am not able to connect to the stratum server as shown on the following picture:


When the option is disabled, the miner is working just fine:


I also tried to mine on CWI pool using ccminer instead of cwi miner:
- lodiff port 2000 can't connect
- hidiff port 6000 work perfectly fine

Do you know what can block me using the lodiff port?

I am running 4 x 1070s and I don't use any flags. It does mine on 6000 do takes longer to submit a share but the share has more value compared to ones you would submit using a lo diff port.
full member
Activity: 462
Merit: 100
Parachute for sale. Used once. Small red stain.
besides trying to get better hashrates, I also work to get my power output as low as I can without sacrificing those rates. I just received access this morning and am working on optomizing this, for those who are interested. I see most miners just crank up power as high as they can and get to work. I've crank mine up as well but it seems as though this particular miner runs a bit hotter than some other ones, even though I do this on all the miners I have used.

I know some of you arent interested in the power output but for those who are I'm hoping this assist in your testing.

the system Im testing on uses one card. I have another with mulitple cards but I like testing and optimizing on the one card before applying those to mulitple cards (seems to work well for me)

Nvidia Geforce GTX1070, 8GB, samsung memory
Nvidia driver ver 384.76
Video BIOS ver 86.04.50.00.23
CUDA Driver ver 9.0.103
WIN 10, 64bit Build 15063
Intel Core i5-7400 @ 3.00 GHz
8GB DDR4 2400mhz

The screen shot shows getting around 28 MH/s with power at 70% (102 watts). I try to get between 92-97 watts without sacrificing hash rates but depending on miner takes some time to tweak. When I can get power down more with the same or better rates I'll post but this is just my first tweak. I know it shows low shares but I let it run for 30 minutes after taking that shot and the hash rate is still the same, between 27.8 - 28.2.



newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Hello,

I am not able to use the --lodiff option.
When the option is enabled, I am not able to connect to the stratum server as shown on the following picture:
https://image.prntscr.com/image/e_FqjE1xRGCA_1z2Wd_YgA.png

When the option is disabled, the miner is working just fine:
https://image.prntscr.com/image/NJpBks29SBKBznSljxUCsA.png

I also tried to mine on CWI pool using ccminer instead of cwi miner:
- lodiff port 2000 can't connect
- hidiff port 6000 work perfectly fine

Do you know what can block me using the lodiff port?
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Does solved in GUI means that my rig solved a block? (if so, did it generated last share that confirms block or it generated valid diff share that confirms block?)
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 378.78
CPU:   0%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [11:49:31]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 16477.2            | Block:      37555 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 458.918                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:     0.97 | Shares: 3494.99 | Rej: 0.331943% | Speed:  308.06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        : Shares: 566.06  | Rej: 0.97 | Speed:   49.57MH/s|
1.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        : Shares: 566.81  | Rej: 2.91 | Speed:   49.75MH/s|
2.ASUS GTX 1080 Ti           : Shares: 608.45  | Rej: 2.91 | Speed:   52.22MH/s|
3.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        : Shares: 551.3   | Rej: 1.94 | Speed:   49.69MH/s|
4.EVGA GTX 1080 Ti           : Shares: 593.36  | Rej: 1.94 | Speed:   53.37MH/s|
5.EVGA GTX 1080 Ti           : Shares: 609.01  | Rej: 0.97 | Speed:   52.97MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        : T:62C | F:90% | P:204W | I: 24.0 | Core:1736Mhz |
1.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        : T:64C | F:94% | P:205W | I: 24.0 | Core:1743Mhz |
2.ASUS GTX 1080 Ti           : T:60C | F:86% | P:223W | I: 24.0 | Core:1857Mhz |
3.GeForce GTX 1080 Ti        : T:64C | F:96% | P:210W | I: 24.0 | Core:1741Mhz |
4.EVGA GTX 1080 Ti           : T:61C | F:89% | P:240W | I: 24.0 | Core:1890Mhz |
5.EVGA GTX 1080 Ti           : T:64C | F:96% | P:235W | I: 24.0 | Core:1868Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[11:47:53]Share: 2573e037              | [10:15:24][GPU3]:Job not found (=stale
[11:48:14]Mean netDiff: 16878.4        | )
[11:48:17]Share: 2029b133              | [10:18:31][GPU4]:Job not found (=stale
[11:48:18]Mean netDiff: 16879.5        | )
[11:48:44]Share: 08e9a7fe              | [11:00:25][GPU2]:Invalid nonce
[11:49:14]Share: cdf9dba7              | [11:12:03][GPU2]:Invalid nonce
[11:49:28]Share: b3d683e1              | [11:19:23][GPU4]:Job not found (=stale
[11:49:30]Share: 4ef3c864              | )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scan time: 30s | DCs: 0 | User:asdtrader | Conn:0d 13:40:20 | Latency:43ms
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 115
                     _________          __  ________
                     \_   ___ \__  _  _|__|/  _____/  _____
                   / /    \  \/\ \/ \/ /  /   \  ___ /     \
          _________\ \     \____\     /|  \    \_\  \  Y Y  \  __________
                      \______  / \/\_/ |__|\______  /__|_|  / /
                             \/                   \/      \/ /
                        VC++ 2013 and CUDA 8.0 x64 384.94
CPU:0.42%          ChainWorks Industries beta - Version 0.9.8         [10:32:52]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Algo:Skunk      | Port: 2000 | NetDiff: 15564.2            | Block:      37425 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coin:signatum   | POW: 1250  | Estimated coins/day: 141.194                    |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solved:   0 | Diff:     0.28 | Shares: 11.2    | Rej: 0.621118% | Speed:  102.77
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080               : Shares: 4.83    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   33.33MH/s|
1.MSI GTX 1080               : Shares: 4.13    | Rej: 0.07 | Speed:   34.40MH/s|
2.MSI GTX 1080               : Shares: 2.24    | Rej: 0    | Speed:   34.75MH/s|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.MSI GTX 1080               : T:57C | F:57% | P:114W | I: 24.0 | Core:1632Mhz |
1.MSI GTX 1080               : T:54C | F:55% | P:114W | I: 24.0 | Core:1670Mhz |
2.MSI GTX 1080               : T:55C | F:55% | P:113W | I: 24.0 | Core:1682Mhz |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PowerLimit 55, Core and Mem +150
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
Tribus
GTX 970 - 26 MGH
GTX 1060 3gb - 34 MGH
GTX 1070 - 54 MGH
GTX 1080 - 71 MGH
GTX 1080 ti - 97 MGH

some problem
1- lines broken after some time or window resize
2- sometime "job not found"
3- bad working with 2 active miner.
4- waiting more algoritms
hero member
Activity: 2156
Merit: 612
Online Security & Investment Corporation
I want to be a beta tester. I have 4 NVIDIA rigs.
legendary
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1001
Is there a way to see all current/default parameters?

Request for feature:
- key for graceful exit of the program

So far very smooth operation on 3x1060, intensity 24, power limit 90, core +100, mem -200, trying -400 atm.
Power usage ~ 100W

I use AB (4.4.beta15 i think) for overclocking and power limit. The strange part is that different cards differently do the power limit:
` of these almost strictly never goes above power limit, the other one is "bouncing" between 80 and 100% (limit 90), third is verystrictly following the limit - going 86-91...

How to reach 80w usage? making power limit even lower?
@100W, speeds are 20.2MH for 6gb, 18-18.2 for 3GB cards

And the interface is nice looking Smiley
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
Also i am not sure what intensity does. I mean using i=22 give me more coins per day then i=25 on my Zotac AMP! Extreme Gtx 1070 x7 Rig. Shouldnt i=25 give best results?
Intensity is like using more RAM by app. If you have enough you will be able to run with this intensity. BUT when it is close to your limit - then you have stability issues, and slower hashrate - consider it to be like swapping to HDD.
It's not correct, but i think easier to understand the idea.
newbie
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
very stable work with -i 23   3 x MSI GTX 1060 6 GB . Tested with intensity 24 and 25 but working unstable, many reject

https://i.imgur.com/a/DesqV

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Results from my 24h with 2x 1080ti MSI Gaming X


Really enjoy using CWIgm, looking forward to future development and adding more algos (Personally betting for timetravel ^^)
Thanks for great work!
sr. member
Activity: 326
Merit: 250
Should I use  --lodiff   for  6x    GTX  1070   ?

I think so, not using --lodiff can be for bigger farms. Altough i am dumb haha and have no clue how this difficulty works etc xD. But i have rigs with 7x gtx 1070 and i use --lodiff.


Also i am not sure what intensity does. I mean using i=22 give me more coins per day then i=25 on my Zotac AMP! Extreme Gtx 1070 x7 Rig. Shouldnt i=25 give best results?
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1112
LLP Programming & Electronics
Should I use  --lodiff   for  6x    GTX  1070   ?
full member
Activity: 728
Merit: 106
What is a problem with setting correct difficulty to a rig?
I think the best shares ratio is 5-6 shares per minute. So 1 share each 10-12seconds. It is a sweet spot. No problems with handling it and the same time it is enough for hashrate accuracy (5minutes average should equalize fluctuations)
So what is the problem of setting diff for the miner considering how many shares where received from it for the past 1-2-5 minutes?

In case there are too many miners you always can lower it by including miners quantity in the formula somehow

P.S. I see that you are working on it. And now it is 0.97 even for 6*1080. But again all rigs got this diff. No more no less
Pages:
Jump to: