3. With online casinos, isn't the number of hiring being limited compared to someone who wants to run an offline casino?
4. Which one is more easier to manage than the other?
And the last question is, which one would you go for if you have the resources?
3. The running cost can't be viewed that way, and the size of the casino matters regardless of whether it is an offline or online casino. People are often deceived by the physical structure of the business, neglecting the fact that online services need more hands too, especially, since they are not seeing their customers directly and their customers are not seeing them, but still, they need to satisfy their customers and to do that, more employees are needed in all departments just like we see in the offline casinos. But one important thing is that, since they are offline, more support staff would be trained for the purpose and work for them for smooth operations.
Take for example, if you see some fintech staff room, you will be amazed, their staff are in their hundreds. I've witnessed a local one, not to mention what it will be on the international standard when the casinos are dealing globally. So, I do not believe that being an online casino will limit the cost, it depends on standard and size.
4. I am not in the business, but as a business-oriented person myself, the two should be managed equally the same way if all conditions are the same. You will always need employees to manage and customers to serve, experts to hire, software to upgrade and maintain, and so on for the two of them.