[ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] - page 167.

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: lobbes on April 14, 2014, 11:33:00 AM

Quote from: JoTheKhan on April 14, 2014, 11:19:43 AM

...

Only trolls and people who own shares of CT want to be on CT. Fuck CT, Do Havelock until we do some decentralized exchange.

I would go as far as saying it is in the trolls' and CT owners' best interest to be migrated to Havelock. How would anyone be able to off-load on CT once the whales arrive?

The only argument for CT I have heard is the 'Well we are on CT already' to which DTS pointed out that Havelock has reached out to Ken, offering to help verify shares!

Considering Ken has been having some difficulty finding the time to do the verification (four months now?), this seems like the most obvious solution.

You can actually buy ownership of CT on CT. There is a security for CT profits. These people would make quite a little BTC off AMC being listed there.

canth

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1001

Quote from: knybe on April 14, 2014, 11:27:26 AM

My vote for Havelock but with our luck it'll be shutdown a week after we're listed.

So? How does that make us any worse off than now? Ken'll still have a CSV of all shareholders information.

lobbes

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 101

Quote from: JoTheKhan on April 14, 2014, 11:19:43 AM

...

Only trolls and people who own shares of CT want to be on CT. Fuck CT, Do Havelock until we do some decentralized exchange.

I would go as far as saying it is in the trolls' and CT owners' best interest to be migrated to Havelock. How would anyone be able to off-load on CT once the whales arrive?

The only argument for CT I have heard is the 'Well we are on CT already' to which DTS pointed out that Havelock has reached out to Ken, offering to help verify shares!

Considering Ken has been having some difficulty finding the time to do the verification (four months now?), this seems like the most obvious solution.

sparky999

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

I hv shares on CT and shares in limbo but would still prefer Havelock. The only plus to CT is volume is so small it's probably not on the SEC radar yet.

knybe

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

decentralize EVERYTHING...

My vote for Havelock but with our luck it'll be shutdown a week after we're listed.

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: VinceSamios on April 14, 2014, 08:03:53 AM

Quote from: bigdude on April 14, 2014, 12:26:40 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on April 14, 2014, 12:03:50 AM

- No one that wants to preserve our share value wants to be on CryptoTrade. I can only assume the CryptoTrade fans are either 1)shills 2)bought UKYO shares and are acting in self interest 3)are trolls.

Couldn't agree more.

I bought Ukyo shares, but I think havelock is a much much much better place to be. 50x the volume.

Only trolls and people who own shares of CT want to be on CT. Fuck CT, Do Havelock until we do some decentralized exchange.

canth

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1001

Adding my voice to the list of shareholders who would like Havelock to be the primary exchange. At this point anything would be better than nothing, but Havelock is the superior option. Once that's done, experimentation with CounterParty or other Bitcoin based protocols is fine.

lobbes

full member

Activity: 240

Merit: 101

Quote from: drawingthesun on April 14, 2014, 02:58:44 AM

Well to quell any fears, I am of the belief that if we move over to Havelock Ken must also move all the CryptoTrade users too. It would be unfair to them leaving their shares in such an illiquid environment.

...

He should definitely move CT users over if going to Havelock.

I'm very excited for CC implementation, but we have to be realistic here... and 2015 isn't a far-fetched estimate for a 'stable' decentralized system. I don't want to be sitting without my shares for another year.

Ken, please get us on Havelock. If it is true that they offered to verify the shares for you.. well that's just more of a reason in my book.

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: bigdude on April 14, 2014, 12:26:40 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on April 14, 2014, 12:03:50 AM

- No one that wants to preserve our share value wants to be on CryptoTrade. I can only assume the CryptoTrade fans are either 1)shills 2)bought UKYO shares and are acting in self interest 3)are trolls.

Couldn't agree more.

I bought Ukyo shares, but I think havelock is a much much much better place to be. 50x the volume.

minerpart

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

IIIIII====II====IIIIII

He's been referred to this Prospector setup guide:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6106184

emkay47

member

Activity: 97

Merit: 10

Quote from: drawingthesun on April 14, 2014, 07:48:24 AM

Quote from: kodemage link="http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMining/comments/22ymey/fast_has_one_prospector_help/"

Heya,
I can't figure out how to get this board to talk to the computer. When I plug it in I get a Easy CD emulator thing. Running CG miner does not see the device.
The 'official' thread leaves a big hole in the instructions where there should be a command to run CG miner. There's a reference to using WinUSB in some way but no instructions on how to do that.
Does anyone have a Prospector Fat Has running and if so what command did you use with CG miner to start mining and how did you get the computer to see the mining board?

If someone can help this customer out.

Don't the boards work with default cgminer config?

Run the CGMINER compiled for HashFast boards .
Its on the HashFast thread somewhere ...
search it here somewhere - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426644.100

Also , The standard version of CGMINER also supports Hash Fast Boards ,
I guess the prospector board should appear as '' HFB '' in CGMINER .

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: kodemage link="http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMining/comments/22ymey/fast_has_one_prospector_help/"

Heya,
I can't figure out how to get this board to talk to the computer. When I plug it in I get a Easy CD emulator thing. Running CG miner does not see the device.
The 'official' thread leaves a big hole in the instructions where there should be a command to run CG miner. There's a reference to using WinUSB in some way but no instructions on how to do that.
Does anyone have a Prospector Fat Has running and if so what command did you use with CG miner to start mining and how did you get the computer to see the mining board?

If someone can help this customer out.

Don't the boards work with default cgminer config?

funkymunky

sr. member

Activity: 283

Merit: 250

Looks like another one in the wild Grin

http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMining/comments/22ymey/fast_has_one_prospector_help/

Can anyone help this user though?

BitcoinBaBa

full member

Activity: 225

Merit: 100

I too strongly urge for the shares to be listed on havelock. It certainly has better reputation and volume.

Please Ken do the needful and get us trading ASAP.
Waiting anymore will start attracting negative sentiment again . We certainly don't want that.
We have started mining and selling let's get to trading too and keep the good flow going.

Thanks.

JimmyJazz

full member

Activity: 207

Merit: 100

Come on Ken, whats the news on shares? This is a joke!!

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Well to quell any fears, I am of the belief that if we move over to Havelock Ken must also move all the CryptoTrade users too. It would be unfair to them leaving their shares in such an illiquid environment.

Remember when it comes to investing, one of the most important issues is liquidity of the market. Keep in mind that two thirds of the entire set of bitcoin investors have an account on Havelock and there are tens of thousands of bitcoin on that platform.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: dadaguo on April 14, 2014, 02:11:04 AM

Shares:

Working on getting the verification site up this week.

so,ken,where are we,one week is almost there~~just let us trade,it is not that hard~~~you can,t avoid without reasonabal ground~~

Ken can avoid it, I have been saying the exact thing you just said since December.

dadaguo

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Shares:

Working on getting the verification site up this week.

so,ken,where are we,one week is almost there~~just let us trade,it is not that hard~~~you can,t avoid without reasonabal ground~~

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: drasted on April 14, 2014, 12:55:58 AM

Arguing about which exchange is kind of pointless if ken just keeps putting off working on it.

If every shareholder just keeps posting about Havelock eventually he might get the hint.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: Speediegonzalez on April 14, 2014, 12:34:14 AM

Either way it is just a stop-gap solution.

It certainly is a stop-gap. But that stop-gap could last half a year or more.

Ken's waiting on the decentralized option reminds me of people waiting for decentralised filesharing. People had to wait about 3 years for Bittorrent.

Secure, tested decentralisation is hard and special. Even if CC was working tomorrow I would want to see some others on the system for several months before we jumped on board. The sad fact is the most likely outcome of the first decentralized asset trading system will be utter failure where everyone gets all their dividends and shares stolen. Satoshi was very special and very unique to release a system that worked very well. Most of the time grand ideas fall flat on their face.

Topic: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] - page 167. (Read 629902 times)