[ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] - page 185.

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 05, 2014, 12:27:37 AM

Quote from: Bargraphics on April 04, 2014, 10:45:11 PM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 09:04:01 PM

Quote from: Nosniw on April 04, 2014, 08:57:22 PM

Quote

     Hashrate Average   Weighted Shares
12 hours     5,197.59 Gh/s   52278832
3 hours     7,027.41 Gh/s   17670928
22.5 minutes   8,792.99 Gh/s   2763824
256 seconds   8,698.94 Gh/s   518497
128 seconds   9,376.45 Gh/s

almost 10Th/s! Shocked

Fantastic! In a mere 10ish months ActM has managed to amass more hashing power than Bargraphics! Tongue

But with all due seriousness, it's nice to see the numbers grow.

Lies, got quite a bit more on ghash Tongue

Grrr! Will at least we have amassed more hashpower than one of your mining addresses! Baby steps Tongue

lol I think we've got about 120TH/s of catchup to overtake Bar - the dude is a stealth monster.

Ozymandias2

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Bargraphics on April 04, 2014, 10:45:11 PM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 09:04:01 PM

Quote from: Nosniw on April 04, 2014, 08:57:22 PM

Quote

     Hashrate Average   Weighted Shares
12 hours     5,197.59 Gh/s   52278832
3 hours     7,027.41 Gh/s   17670928
22.5 minutes   8,792.99 Gh/s   2763824
256 seconds   8,698.94 Gh/s   518497
128 seconds   9,376.45 Gh/s

almost 10Th/s! Shocked

Fantastic! In a mere 10ish months ActM has managed to amass more hashing power than Bargraphics! Tongue

But with all due seriousness, it's nice to see the numbers grow.

Lies, got quite a bit more on ghash Tongue

Grrr! Will at least we have amassed more hashpower than one of your mining addresses! Baby steps Tongue

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 09:04:01 PM

Quote from: Nosniw on April 04, 2014, 08:57:22 PM

Quote

     Hashrate Average   Weighted Shares
12 hours     5,197.59 Gh/s   52278832
3 hours     7,027.41 Gh/s   17670928
22.5 minutes   8,792.99 Gh/s   2763824
256 seconds   8,698.94 Gh/s   518497
128 seconds   9,376.45 Gh/s

almost 10Th/s! Shocked

Fantastic! In a mere 10ish months ActM has managed to amass more hashing power than Bargraphics! Tongue

But with all due seriousness, it's nice to see the numbers grow.

Lies, got quite a bit more on ghash Tongue

klondike_bar

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1005

ASIC Wannabe

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 09:04:01 PM

Quote from: Nosniw on April 04, 2014, 08:57:22 PM

Quote

     Hashrate Average   Weighted Shares
12 hours     5,197.59 Gh/s   52278832
3 hours     7,027.41 Gh/s   17670928
22.5 minutes   8,792.99 Gh/s   2763824
256 seconds   8,698.94 Gh/s   518497
128 seconds   9,376.45 Gh/s

almost 10Th/s! Shocked

Fantastic! In a mere 10ish months ActM has managed to amass more hashing power than Bargraphics! Tongue

But with all due seriousness, it's nice to see the numbers grow.

thats for sure. when it was 1TH i looked at my rigs and giggled. now they are looking a bit more serious

Ozymandias2

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: Nosniw on April 04, 2014, 08:57:22 PM

Quote

     Hashrate Average   Weighted Shares
12 hours     5,197.59 Gh/s   52278832
3 hours     7,027.41 Gh/s   17670928
22.5 minutes   8,792.99 Gh/s   2763824
256 seconds   8,698.94 Gh/s   518497
128 seconds   9,376.45 Gh/s

almost 10Th/s! Shocked

Fantastic! In a mere 10ish months ActM has managed to amass more hashing power than Bargraphics! Tongue

But with all due seriousness, it's nice to see the numbers grow.

Nosniw

newbie

Activity: 45

Merit: 0

Quote

     Hashrate Average   Weighted Shares
12 hours     5,197.59 Gh/s   52278832
3 hours     7,027.41 Gh/s   17670928
22.5 minutes   8,792.99 Gh/s   2763824
256 seconds   8,698.94 Gh/s   518497
128 seconds   9,376.45 Gh/s

almost 10Th/s! Shocked

Flashman

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Hodl!

Quote from: Bargraphics on April 04, 2014, 09:56:39 AM

The boards do not reach 750GH with ease. CGMiner was bugging out badly. After getting them running stable and OC to 720 Clock Speed that particular one runs at about 520GH on CGMiner which mostly corresponds with what Eligius is saying.

I don't suppose that 650W PSU is really the right one for running much over 500, the w/gh probably gets nearer 1:1 ... hard to say also how much is thermal throttling.

Simon Templar

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

It's all good bud. Only braving a comment because of the good vibe. It's hard not to get excited when I'm looking at the hash rate rise in the data center and seeing miners out in the open. I'm not grinning from ear to ear yet but am starting to see that perhaps my cash wasn't wasted when I jumped in with both feet. This could be something new in the Bitcoin space but it's still early doors so tread lightly is my best advice.

knybe

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

decentralize EVERYTHING...

noob posts with a sarcastic slant are always kinda suspect… my apologies mate.

Simon Templar

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

You've got me wrong mate. Having read this thread I can see why though. Remove the blinkers and read my first post with no bias.

knybe

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

decentralize EVERYTHING...

Quote from: Simon Templar on April 04, 2014, 05:30:35 PM

Just when you thought it was over, ActiveMining seem to be sitting pretty. Wow, what a turn around. If drawingthesun isn't selling for 0.00000000001 anymore then things are indeed on the up! Thanks very much Bargraphics for sharing your Fast-Hash One Prospector Guide. Props to you. I'd add that using cotton buds dipped in, or sprayed with isopropyl alcohol is the best way to remove unwanted thermal compound as it leaves components squeaky clean. This is essential for maximum heat transfer. And less is more; to cover an area of a square inch, think a grain of rice in terms of thermal paste application.

you still at it fool? still baffles me that you poor ones spend so much time getting through just to post in this thread and get deleted… A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

thanks for being so committed.

Simon Templar

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Just when you thought it was over, ActiveMining seem to be sitting pretty. Wow, what a turn around. If drawingthesun isn't selling for 0.00000000001 anymore then things are indeed on the up! Thanks very much Bargraphics for sharing your Fast-Hash One Prospector Guide. Props to you. I'd add that using cotton buds dipped in, or sprayed with isopropyl alcohol is the best way to remove unwanted thermal compound as it leaves components squeaky clean. This is essential for maximum heat transfer after you reapply. And less is more; to cover an area of one square inch, think a grain of rice in terms of thermal paste application and reduce if less than 1 in sq.

Ozymandias2

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: VinceSamios on April 04, 2014, 01:53:00 PM

Another prospector reported running at: http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/16n9rn1agFhpepzP5WLJumfgKQEt4qRMYQ

It feels so much more real seeing these babies in the wild

VinceSamios

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

Another prospector reported running at: http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/16n9rn1agFhpepzP5WLJumfgKQEt4qRMYQ

Ozymandias2

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: kleeck on April 04, 2014, 10:37:30 AM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 10:20:35 AM

People keep mentioning that ActM is going to put out 3-4ph/s this month but I just cannot see that happening. The closest thing that Ken has said regarding this is:

Quote from: kslaughter on April 02, 2014, 01:05:15 PM

Yes, this [EVO] is the board that we are building 5,000 in April.

As much as I want to believe that ActM will add 6-8% of the network hashrate in a single month, the above quote only references building the boards, not necessarily the completed board+chip miner. Until Ken confirms that he plans on building 5000 completed miners in April-May, I think conservatism is more appropriate.

As an added piece of speculation, the reason for adding a mere 100th/s per month to the self-mine farm is the limiting factor of chips. I do not believe ActM has thousands of chips ready to go and instead is likely buying them a couple hundred at a time which are then split into sales and the self-mine farm the revenue from which is used to buy more chips the following month. Having the boards ready made IS a good thing since the only thing that will need to be done to complete the miner is to throw the chip onto the board, but until I am corrected by Ken, I do not believe that it is a safe assumption that we will have 5000 boards AND 5000 chips this month.

Quote from: Bargraphics on April 04, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 10:00:12 AM

First Peoples ASIC, now a potential additional datacenter, why are you not on salary?

I wish the salary would be some dividends! I have a lot of connections and I try to help out whoever I can if I see a good fit.

Your help is very much appreciated! Dividends would indeed be fantastic!

After Ken stated that he would be manufacturing 5000 boards in April the below exchange took place:

Quote from: kslaughter on March 30, 2014, 07:41:23 PM

Quote from: MilkyWayMasta on March 30, 2014, 07:37:32 PM

Will you have enough chips for the 5,000 boards?

Yes

This is why people believe Ken will have 5000 Gold Rush Miners in hand within April.

I remember that exchange but it instantly raised my vagueness/incomplete answer flag. Ken said yes we will have enough chips for 5,000 boards, but he does not mention WHEN. I've mentioned before that from past experience I've found it's best to approach vague statements from Ken with caution (remember that whole "we shipped out first product from back in November" or more recently the whole "is it our chip and proprietary vs. licensing" thing?). Again, I would absolutely love to be wrong as that's just more money in my pocket and I absolutely look forward to being corrected.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: ChefBorjan on April 04, 2014, 10:02:11 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on April 04, 2014, 09:52:09 AM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 09:29:23 AM

3.5ph/s * 1w/gh = 3.5MW which seems like it would be more power than our little datacenter can handle

Remember Bargraphics knows a guy that can host the entire amount. If we need to it's doable.

DTS... weren't you jumping ship the moment our shares were available again?

I see the future being dividends paid to our addresses long before trading happens.

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 10:20:35 AM

People keep mentioning that ActM is going to put out 3-4ph/s this month but I just cannot see that happening. The closest thing that Ken has said regarding this is:

Quote from: kslaughter on April 02, 2014, 01:05:15 PM

Yes, this [EVO] is the board that we are building 5,000 in April.

As much as I want to believe that ActM will add 6-8% of the network hashrate in a single month, the above quote only references building the boards, not necessarily the completed board+chip miner. Until Ken confirms that he plans on building 5000 completed miners in April-May, I think conservatism is more appropriate.

As an added piece of speculation, the reason for adding a mere 100th/s per month to the self-mine farm is the limiting factor of chips. I do not believe ActM has thousands of chips ready to go and instead is likely buying them a couple hundred at a time which are then split into sales and the self-mine farm the revenue from which is used to buy more chips the following month. Having the boards ready made IS a good thing since the only thing that will need to be done to complete the miner is to throw the chip onto the board, but until I am corrected by Ken, I do not believe that it is a safe assumption that we will have 5000 boards AND 5000 chips this month.

Quote from: Bargraphics on April 04, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 10:00:12 AM

First Peoples ASIC, now a potential additional datacenter, why are you not on salary?

I wish the salary would be some dividends! I have a lot of connections and I try to help out whoever I can if I see a good fit.

Your help is very much appreciated! Dividends would indeed be fantastic!

After Ken stated that he would be manufacturing 5000 boards in April the below exchange took place:

Quote from: kslaughter on March 30, 2014, 07:41:23 PM

Quote from: MilkyWayMasta on March 30, 2014, 07:37:32 PM

Will you have enough chips for the 5,000 boards?

Yes

This is why people believe Ken will have 5000 Gold Rush Miners in hand within April.

Bargraphics

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.

Prospector1 - 22.5 Minutes - 1,006.66 Gh/s on Eligius

Looks like they are getting a little over 500GH/each which is good

Stuartuk

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Multiple data centres is preferable to a single mega one for an important reason - fire risk. A damaged cable or water leak could cause arking then a local fire and in the dry heat with lots of air movement combustion of boards and plastics would easily occur and spread. Months of outlay and time could be lost forever inside an hour. Spread the risk.

Ozymandias2

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

People keep mentioning that ActM is going to put out 3-4ph/s this month but I just cannot see that happening. The closest thing that Ken has said regarding this is:

Quote from: kslaughter on April 02, 2014, 01:05:15 PM

Yes, this [EVO] is the board that we are building 5,000 in April.

As much as I want to believe that ActM will add 6-8% of the network hashrate in a single month, the above quote only references building the boards, not necessarily the completed board+chip miner. Until Ken confirms that he plans on building 5000 completed miners in April-May, I think conservatism is more appropriate.

As an added piece of speculation, the reason for adding a mere 100th/s per month to the self-mine farm is the limiting factor of chips. I do not believe ActM has thousands of chips ready to go and instead is likely buying them a couple hundred at a time which are then split into sales and the self-mine farm the revenue from which is used to buy more chips the following month. Having the boards ready made IS a good thing since the only thing that will need to be done to complete the miner is to throw the chip onto the board, but until I am corrected by Ken, I do not believe that it is a safe assumption that we will have 5000 boards AND 5000 chips this month.

Quote from: Bargraphics on April 04, 2014, 10:13:48 AM

Quote from: Ozymandias2 on April 04, 2014, 10:00:12 AM

First Peoples ASIC, now a potential additional datacenter, why are you not on salary?

I wish the salary would be some dividends! I have a lot of connections and I try to help out whoever I can if I see a good fit.

Your help is very much appreciated! Dividends would indeed be fantastic!

Topic: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] - page 185. (Read 629902 times)