[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 14.

N_S

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 12:52:32 PM

Quote from: kleeck on September 14, 2013, 12:49:40 PM

We have received some attention here: http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinStocks/comments/1mc1mw/vmcactivemining_drastically_cut_prices_of_the/

And even after slashing prices the competition is still going to be ahead.

Sigh.

Remember, there is room for a number of players in this space - no single company has a monopoly on profit. ActM has a great partnership in eASIC which gives mainstream, "real world" credibility to this operation.

There is still quite a bit of time on the clock and as far as publically-traded mining operations go, ActM still stands the best chance of delivering.

SoylentCreek

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 12:17:48 PM

Quote from: SoylentCreek on September 14, 2013, 11:56:34 AM

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 11:46:09 AM

come on guys, crumbs has the cutest icon and those Tinkerbell pictures, he posted, are cute too.
Ummm.. maybe this part of hes recovery therapy after that goatse happening?

Now, who in advisory board can write up a short, smart, caring and while also believable press release about price cuts and make sure it's posted on very BTC news site? Anyone?

I told Ken yesterday over the phone that this needs to happen ASAP. From what I gathered, the Advisory board was pretty much in the dark on the price cut (not really a smart move on Ken's behalf). Nonetheless, what's done is done, and there's no changing it, unless he decides to lower the prices even further. Still, we need to be getting some publicity from the reduced prices.

What do you mean by "what's done is done" ?
Most normal people do not read this fucked up thread. So, this is still news. No excuses.

Meaning that Ken took it upon himself to do a price decrease, without notifying any board members, and thus missing out on a fantastic PR opportunity. Still, reduced prices are good news, and we can only hope that if Ken has something else to announce in the coming weeks (wink), that he'll handle it with a little more grace. Really hoping that he'll have a credible PR team by then.

elasticband

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom

alot going on in the mining securities world at the moment

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: kleeck on September 14, 2013, 12:49:40 PM

We have received some attention here: http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinStocks/comments/1mc1mw/vmcactivemining_drastically_cut_prices_of_the/

And even after slashing prices the competition is still going to be ahead.

Sigh.

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 12:17:48 PM

Quote from: SoylentCreek on September 14, 2013, 11:56:34 AM

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 11:46:09 AM

come on guys, crumbs has the cutest icon and those Tinkerbell pictures, he posted, are cute too.
Ummm.. maybe this part of hes recovery therapy after that goatse happening?

Now, who in advisory board can write up a short, smart, caring and while also believable press release about price cuts and make sure it's posted on very BTC news site? Anyone?

I told Ken yesterday over the phone that this needs to happen ASAP. From what I gathered, the Advisory board was pretty much in the dark on the price cut (not really a smart move on Ken's behalf). Nonetheless, what's done is done, and there's no changing it, unless he decides to lower the prices even further. Still, we need to be getting some publicity from the reduced prices.

What do you mean by "what's done is done" ?
Most normal people do not read this fucked up thread. So, this is still news. No excuses.

We have received some attention here: http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinStocks/comments/1mc1mw/vmcactivemining_drastically_cut_prices_of_the/

somestranger

hero member

Activity: 487

Merit: 500

Are You Shpongled?

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 12:46:09 PM

Do we only own Active Mining? Is VMC fully owned by Ken?

We own "AMC" (mining) and "VMC" (hardware) under the "ActiveMining" virtual identity, but we don't have voting rights. Ken gets to do whatever he wants.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Do we only own Active Mining? Is VMC fully owned by Ken?

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Quote from: SoylentCreek on September 14, 2013, 11:56:34 AM

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 11:46:09 AM

come on guys, crumbs has the cutest icon and those Tinkerbell pictures, he posted, are cute too.
Ummm.. maybe this part of hes recovery therapy after that goatse happening?

Now, who in advisory board can write up a short, smart, caring and while also believable press release about price cuts and make sure it's posted on very BTC news site? Anyone?

I told Ken yesterday over the phone that this needs to happen ASAP. From what I gathered, the Advisory board was pretty much in the dark on the price cut (not really a smart move on Ken's behalf). Nonetheless, what's done is done, and there's no changing it, unless he decides to lower the prices even further. Still, we need to be getting some publicity from the reduced prices.

What do you mean by "what's done is done" ?
Most normal people do not read this fucked up thread. So, this is still news. No excuses.

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 11:46:09 AM

come on guys, crumbs has the cutest icon and those Tinkerbell pictures, he posted, are cute too.
[snip!]

Eww, EskimoBob... U and your dirty van -- go away!

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Every time crumbs has tried to sound like he knows what he's talking about, VBS has straightened him out pretty fast. I don't need to be an electronics expert to know that 24.76TH/S is not an overly accurate estimate. Rounding up could cause a difference of up to 500GH/S. I think it's safe to say that Ken will be accurate within that amount Roll Eyes

JohnyBigs

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 250

Ohh hai guys look its volcanic erupter who didnt even know companies on btct had a details tab lol.

SoylentCreek

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: EskimoBob on September 14, 2013, 11:46:09 AM

come on guys, crumbs has the cutest icon and those Tinkerbell pictures, he posted, are cute too.
Ummm.. maybe this part of hes recovery therapy after that goatse happening?

Now, who in advisory board can write up a short, smart, caring and while also believable press release about price cuts and make sure it's posted on very BTC news site? Anyone?

I told Ken yesterday over the phone that this needs to happen ASAP. From what I gathered, the Advisory board was pretty much in the dark on the price cut (not really a smart move on Ken's behalf). Nonetheless, what's done is done, and there's no changing it, unless he decides to lower the prices even further. Still, we need to be getting some publicity from the reduced prices.

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 14, 2013, 11:40:52 AM

Quote from: crumbs on September 14, 2013, 11:27:12 AM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 14, 2013, 11:18:40 AM

Quote from: creativex on September 14, 2013, 11:15:51 AM

Understood, but one has hardware and the other has simulations. I do not see ads as they're blocked, so I don't know what ASICMiner is advertising. Can you give me an example?

So you expect Ken to round up to the nearest, what? TH/S? Estimation requires at least a small degree of accuracy.
336MH/S for the USB block eruptor ..that's even 3 more decimal places precise than what I thought..
If Ken wants to advertise with accuracy in relation to other competitors, that's fine. I don't expect him to round to the nearest TH/S.

You don't have a point. Percentage wise, Ken gave a much more exact figure than Block Eruptor's 336. Changing the clock by just *one percent* would trash his numbers.
Further, we're not talking about finished, hashing miners, with a crystal locking in the clock -- we're talking about *chips*.

Edit: You do understand the difference between a chip and a miner, right?

Edit2: Pwnt by a lulzy ten-year old Cheesy

Here, have a funny picture:

You're kidding, right? .336 GH/S is acceptable but 24.76 TH/S is not? You also have to take into consideration that 24.76 is actually the sum of many modules. If you estimate a certain level of accuracy which each individual module then you would not round them off after adding them up. Crumbs, I didn't expect you to be this shitty at what you do!

No. I am not kidding.
.336 GH/s is the speed of a mining device, the clock of which could not be altered without replacing a crystal oscillator. The chip itself is capable of being clocked higher or lower.
U fail to understand the difference between a miner and a chip, so that's one of ur fails.

Here's another:
The number .336 offers three digit precision, while the number 24.76 offers *four* -- a whole order of magnitude greater. U even math, bro? Cheesy

EskimoBob

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

come on guys, crumbs has the cutest icon and those Tinkerbell pictures, he posted, are cute too.
Ummm.. maybe this part of hes recovery therapy after that goatse happening?

Now, who in advisory board can write up a short, smart, caring and while also believable press release about price cuts and make sure it's posted on very BTC news site? Anyone?

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: crumbs on September 14, 2013, 11:27:12 AM

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 14, 2013, 11:18:40 AM

Quote from: creativex on September 14, 2013, 11:15:51 AM

Understood, but one has hardware and the other has simulations. I do not see ads as they're blocked, so I don't know what ASICMiner is advertising. Can you give me an example?

So you expect Ken to round up to the nearest, what? TH/S? Estimation requires at least a small degree of accuracy.
336MH/S for the USB block eruptor ..that's even 3 more decimal places precise than what I thought..
If Ken wants to advertise with accuracy in relation to other competitors, that's fine. I don't expect him to round to the nearest TH/S.

You don't have a point. Percentage wise, Ken gave a much more exact figure than Block Eruptor's 336. Changing the clock by just *one percent* would trash his numbers.
Further, we're not talking about finished, hashing miners, with a crystal locking in the clock -- we're talking about *chips*.

Edit: You do understand the difference between a chip and a miner, right?

Edit2: Pwnt by a lulzy ten-year old Cheesy

Here, have a funny picture:

You're kidding, right? .336 GH/S is acceptable but 24.76 TH/S is not? You also have to take into consideration that 24.76 is actually the sum of many modules. If you estimate a certain level of accuracy which each individual module then you would not round them off after adding them up. Crumbs, I didn't expect you to be this shitty at what you do!

SoylentCreek

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: drawingthesun on September 14, 2013, 11:28:23 AM

Active Mining at 0.0025 on BTCT.co

I am the bagholder of bagholders. How comes my successful investment these past few months has been Labcoin and its Active Mining that has lost me a lot of coin.

You haven't lost anything until you cash out.

drawingthesun

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Active Mining at 0.0025 on BTCT.co

I am the bagholder of bagholders. How comes my successful investment these past few months has been Labcoin and its Active Mining that has lost me a lot of coin.

crumbs

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 14, 2013, 11:18:40 AM

Quote from: creativex on September 14, 2013, 11:15:51 AM

Understood, but one has hardware and the other has simulations. I do not see ads as they're blocked, so I don't know what ASICMiner is advertising. Can you give me an example?

So you expect Ken to round up to the nearest, what? TH/S? Estimation requires at least a small degree of accuracy.
336MH/S for the USB block eruptor ..that's even 3 more decimal places precise than what I thought..
If Ken wants to advertise with accuracy in relation to other competitors, that's fine. I don't expect him to round to the nearest TH/S.

You don't have a point. Percentage wise, Ken gave a much more exact figure than Block Eruptor's 336. Changing the clock by just *one percent* would trash his numbers.
Further, we're not talking about finished, hashing miners, with a crystal locking in the clock -- we're talking about *chips*.

Edit: You do understand the difference between a chip and a miner, right?

Edit2: Pwnt by a lulzy ten-year old Cheesy

Here, have a funny picture:

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

I told you what asicminer is advertising. And I went on to say that it doesn't matter if Ken doesn't have the hardware yet, he should be able to advertise with the same accuracy as what already exists. Nobody should expect him to round up just because he doesn't have the final product yet.

creativex

sr. member

Activity: 434

Merit: 250

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on September 14, 2013, 11:18:40 AM

Quote from: creativex on September 14, 2013, 11:15:51 AM

Understood, but one has hardware and the other has simulations. I do not see ads as they're blocked, so I don't know what ASICMiner is advertising. Can you give me an example?

So you expect Ken to round up to the nearest, what? TH/S? Estimation requires at least a small degree of accuracy.
336MH/S for the USB block eruptor ..that's even 3 more decimal places precise than what I thought..
If Ken wants to advertise with accuracy in relation to other competitors, that's fine. I don't expect him to round to the nearest TH/S.

I don't expect anything. You're still ignoring the point I made, so I'll just assume you don't wish to discuss it further.

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 14. (Read 479499 times)