Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 217. (Read 479475 times)
Well, I am happy that the ActiveMining price has gone down now even if for a couple of hours. Thanks for this guys!
BTCGarden wants 35% of the network. AM has at least 20%.
What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
ActM has more than one employee. I believe it is 5 employees, not to mention the contracts with the engineering firm producing avalon clones and the contract in the works with the reputable chip manufacturer Easic. It's not just Ken behind this guys. There are real-world companies backing this up.
BTCGarden and Labcoin
Labcoin looks nice even though they are still using 130nm chips. Their estimated cost/GH looks great. Since they aren't looking to update to current gen/next gen chips i find this to be realistic and possible.
BTCGarden on the other hand seems kinda expensive when it comes to cost/GH in the chips. Those kinda prices make the ROI slightly high for the end users. Also 130nm chips as well. Making it easier to get to market since it relatively common place right now.
At the cost/chip labcoin seems to be the competition here. However over the long term more and more people are going to want 28nm chips to save on electricity costs, specially as difficulty skyrockets as the network works it's way to 25k TH or more. First ones with the cheaper to run chips are a better investment, IMHO.
You may get a quicker buck day trading with Labcoin and BTCGarden for the next little while, but I don't it is a good enough reason to bail on ActM. I maybe buy some shares of the other two as well but I still see ActM as holding it's value after the initial panic selloff to buy the other two is over.
VolcanicEruptor has been pretty quiet all of a sudden... why do I get the feeling that he made a huge profit.
BTCGarden wants 35% of the network. AM has at least 20%.
What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
LOL how convenient for them.
The Labcoin site looks like a cheap scam setup (not saying it is just looks like it) and btcGarden claim there are going to have 35% of the network?!! Where do these fools come from? Do you think there is enough appetite for another 1M USD IPO? These people haven't got anything other than a few claims on a forum at the moment. They are months behind in terms of building confidence and attaining funding and will very very likely never get there. Ken has a successful IPO, full funding, a partnership with one of the fastest growing chip companies in the US (eASIC), he is paying dividends, hard hardware pre-orders paid for, and has been thoroughly checked out and verified by several sources. I know where my money is staying - with the company that are already more than halfway to delivering not some flight of fancy dreamed up in the past week. Ever heard of the term 'joining the bandwagon'?
A five year old could knock this page up in an hour, maybe less-
http://labcoin.com/
Looks like the kids organized a little market manipulation and came on this thread. cute.
LOL... owned.
Ha the party is over folks, move along...
BTCGarden wants 35% of the network. AM has at least 20%.
What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
LOL... owned. What's going to be left?
Also both BTCGarden and Labcoin seem to be at a more advanced stage of development and have more than ONE employee.
Wooops.
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy.
Is it ? There are 2 new competitors about to go to IPO. Both of them seems to be same or better as ActM and in earlier dates too.
Which two?
BTCGarden and Labcoin
Ouch.. 
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy.
Is it ? There are 2 new competitors about to go to IPO. Both of them seems to be same or better as ActM and in earlier dates too.
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy.
All in, Now lets see the cards
Oh wow. Panic down
It means, it's the best time to buy.
Oh wow. Panic down
Why would someone who is endorsing another want to remain anonymous?
Read the bitfunder irc chat log. I was bitching about them for awhile. This should be valid proof of my motives.
Now that you have promised not to sell, you can enable your public portfolio in BTCT and link it for us.
ok, how?
Use the API
https://btct.co/api/act?key=
insert key
https://btct.co/account
Portfolio API URL:
Read-Only API Key:
Either one
Example of a public one here Sandstorm
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2340876
Cheers burnside, at last something constructive. Transparency may as well start now. This is my trading profile at btct.co:
https://btct.co/api/act?key=dee...
It's better to not give out your API key. True, it's read-only, but it also grants access to the CSV's of your trade history. (PM me if you want to change it now...)
The better way to do a public portfolio is to turn it on in the account settings. Then on the main account page a new URL will show up that will give you your public portfolio link.
Cheers.
Hence his indirect request that Ken confirms the meeting took place, I guess.
Partly why this is believable as any deception would be relatively short lived. I wasn't trying to cast this claim into doubt though but rather I was trying to give a more general warning against someone trying to inflate or deflate the price of a security with no evidence.
Hence his indirect request that Ken confirms the meeting took place, I guess.
Hi Guys,
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
I don't doubt you but it is important for people to remember that anyone could have said the exact same thing with zero actual positive information who just wants to pump the price up a little bit more. Again I have no reason to disbelieve you but i urge people to not react on unconfirmed news even if it is news you want to here.
Hi Guys,
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
I recently traveled to California for a nice vacation and to meet up with some companies such as Terrahash, HashFast, and also some local bitcoiners. While planning this trip I also tried to meet up with Ken but I arrived the day he was leaving I believe. However, one of the bitcoiners that I knew up here who wishes to remain anonymous is also a Silicon-Valley based engineer and in my opinion very well versed in the world of ASICs, was able to meet up with Ken for me.
I asked him to give me an overview of how he felt about Ken and the ASIC project he is working on in a nutshell. He confirmed with me that Ken is the real deal and that based on the conversation that was had, he doesn’t see any reason to think otherwise.
Now I know this might not sound like much but in my opinion if Ken can make this particular Engineer come to this conclusion then us shareholders should be in a very good position.
I’ll leave it at that and if Ken reads this he can confirm that he did indeed have a meeting with the Engineer on Friday.
This is looking even better guys!
To the mooooooon
Jump to: