Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 25. (Read 479317 times)

We will be operating like a normal company, except we will have weekly dividends not quarterly dividends.  We will do the accounting for the previous month using normal accounting methods, if the accounting shows a profit, then we will declare a dividend allowing for some of the profit to be retained for growth per the description, this dividend then will be split over the number of weeks in the month that the dividend will be paid in.  AMC is paying the dividends, AMC is doing the mining, VMC is doing the manufacturing and of course is not making a profit at this point.  

I vote for 1 or 3, this could make the share price growing some weeks before the miners are fully deployed. Everybody would came in to receive the large first dividends

I am working on hiring a PR firm.  Lot of things are going to be happening in the next few weeks and months.

So when we are up and running with a mining farm and delivering those pre-order sales, we will be in for...

(1)  A very, very large one off dividend payment whch includes the profits from all those pre-orders since the hardware started selling, up to the delivery of initial units, as well as normal weekly divs.

(2)  Normal weekly dividend payments which don't include those pre-orders sales that occured between the start of hardware sales and the paying of divs on harware sales, because those profits will be re-invested into the company.

(3)  A few larger than normal weekly divs which will see the profits from pre-orders sales that occured between the start of hardware sales and the paying of divs on hardware, spread evenly until normal divs resume.

(4)  Non of the above.


Discuss.

Fair enough TMAN I would consider that resolved and accept you over reacted rather than tried to spread fud.

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.  Process of elimination is a design strategy that pros have been using for ages.  The same is said for marketing-photography as well.  When you look at a makeup add, what you see is a simple shot of a beautiful woman, staring longingly at you.  The truth is, to get that shot, a photographer and model spent hours in a studio, shooting through hundreds (if not thousands) of various poses and lighting setups, etc.  The photographer then spent several more hours in post production, weeding out all the "okay" ones and narrowing it down to just a few to present to the company.  

In the case of Pepsi, they redo their branding almost once every few years.  I am not going to argue in favor of the presentation, which is laughable.  Still, Pepsi is a multi-billion dollar company, and when a firm has the potential to lock in a several-million dollar design contract to do their refresh, they are going to say or do whatever it takes to get the board members on their side. Notice I said refresh and not design.  The Pepsi logo has maintained the same basic concept since the 50's.  At the end of the day, graphic design is art.  There are those who can appreciate it, and there are others who cannot.  People look at modern art all the time and say to themselves, "I could do that."  The problem is, they didn't do it.  I do not mean to come across as pretentious, but this is an area that I have worked in for quite awhile now.

I'm glad you have and are acquiring more shares of ACTM. It shows that you do have a stake in the share price. It's given me renewed confidence.

Just please, get some PR out to market! The world should know about this company!

Well,  I'm glad that's all over.

Being the optimist, I think having Ken online has been a refreshing change.

Just hearing mention of company buisness as limited as it was from Ken sends a positive singnal through the community and is music to my ears.

If only we were to be subjected to a little more information and a little more frequently.

Now it is time to stamp 'active mining' on your back and walk around shirtless

It wasn't fud, I was enraged by my take on the situation, I will always apologise if I see I was wrong. I am glad btct price didn't move otherwise I would be feeling a lot worse

first time i see a customer bow down for ken and apologize

In the above statement, I was speaking about myself, as I have purchase shares on the open market for myself, and  I am also [going to] purchase shares for my own account.  The first statement was in the past and the second statement was in the present all on the same account.

I think you should go ahead and buy more shares if you want, Ken. The important thing is disclosure; this would preferably happen sooner than 10 days after trading, but now that we have you Bitcoin address on Bitfunder we can check ourselves.

Whoa, TMAN, props for manning up, admitting you were wrong and apologizing.

Thanks for he clarification, once gain sincere apologies I 100% retract everything I said, even ken being an idiot. Ill downgrade it to another poor communicator. Carry on ill be back in the next few months with some LC funds..

Stuart I was wrong.

I only have one personal account on bitfunder which I use to trade in which I had before I started AMC/VMC.  I do have another account on bitfunder, but I have not made any trades for ActiveMining in that account.  When I said now above, I meant that I was in the process of purchasing shares, as you see from the listing of my account I had on 1.02 BTC which is from dividends.  I knew that I did not have very much in that account, so I was going to put some BTC into that account and purchase some shares.  I seen the post about not caring about the share price or having any shares and that is when I made that post.

With respect to you, please read what I wrote above, ken indicated he is trading on 2 accounts. If 1 is a company account where did the funds come from and why wasnt the buyback announced. Answer that ken and if I am wrong I will retract what I have said. 

Seeing that he was buying even at .005 is very bullish. I had become skeptical in the past few days but now my confidence is restored in this company

Thanks Ken!

With respect Ken doesn't need to answer that.

Legally an apology isn't enough to resolve this, an apology does not impact on the original accusation.

You need to withdraw the statement, withdraw the accusation, admitting it was incorrect or you will by implication stand by it. I think you need to be aware your statements go beyond the usually FUD on here and make specific accusations of illegal activity and as such would be considered attempts to damage the reputation of the company and its CEO.

Oh please.  This is just some nonsense "branding experts" spout in order to justify charging huge rates for basic design work.

Check out the design brief for the new logo Pepsi came up with a few years ago (and read the whole PDF).  It's total insanity like you wouldn't believe.

There is nothing wrong with crowdsourcing a design.  All that matters is that it looks good and fits the mood of what the company is trying to do. (the logo for monster energy wouldn't look as the logo for Charmin toilet paper, obviously).  But those things should be obvious to anyone with any design sense.

Glad to hear that.

And personally, I'm very happy you own ActM shares, I think this is a guarantee for everyone that you believe in a good profit for shareholders.