[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 308.

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: JordanL on July 17, 2013, 10:27:48 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on July 17, 2013, 09:44:11 PM

Quote from: canth on July 17, 2013, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

The ticker is ActiveMining

Update: Removed the AM after ActiveMining in the details.

I think that is a good move, kslaughter. I have removed my objection from BTC-TC and voted to approve this asset.

Best of luck.

Thanks

JordanL

donator

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: kslaughter on July 17, 2013, 09:44:11 PM

Quote from: canth on July 17, 2013, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

The ticker is ActiveMining

Update: Removed the AM after ActiveMining in the details.

I think that is a good move, kslaughter. I have removed my objection from BTC-TC and voted to approve this asset.

Best of luck.

lewicki

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: kleeck on July 17, 2013, 09:55:00 PM

What does the score need to be for the security to be launched? Or is that not how this process works?

I think it was +4 last time it was instantly approved.

canth

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1001

Quote from: kslaughter on July 17, 2013, 09:44:11 PM

Quote from: canth on July 17, 2013, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

The ticker is ActiveMining

Update: Removed the AM after ActiveMining in the details.

Good deal. As to the question of how many votes are needed, the answer is at least 5 and then with a majority if there are no's.

kleeck

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

https://karatcoin.co

Quote from: canth on July 17, 2013, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

What does the score need to be for the security to be launched? Or is that not how this process works?

Streets 2.0

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 101

FRX: Ferocious Alpha

Quote from: kslaughter on July 17, 2013, 09:44:11 PM

Quote from: canth on July 17, 2013, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

The ticker is ActiveMining

Update: Removed the AM after ActiveMining in the details.

That's a good move, I think the details was the hang up since clearly it is tickered as ACTIVEMINING

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: canth on July 17, 2013, 09:31:25 PM

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

The ticker is ActiveMining

Update: Removed the AM after ActiveMining in the details.

canth

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1001

Quote from: ArcticWolf on July 17, 2013, 08:21:12 PM

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

BTCT would probably give at least 1 more approval vote if the requested ticker were changed from AM to ACTM.

"BlackLilac voted ABSTAIN with comment: I find it very questionable that this asset is trying to use the abbreviation "AM". That seems like an apparent attempt to cause confusion between and/or association with ASICMINER."

I share the same opinion - at the minimum, it gives the appearance that ActiveMiner is embracing brand confusion as a marketing ploy. Why not clear this up?

ArcticWolf

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: metalh47k on July 17, 2013, 08:17:09 PM

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

Nothing on that we can do but wait for approving votes

metalh47k

newbie

Activity: 28

Merit: 0

How are we going with the AMC BTC-TC -----> AM BTC-TC. I see its still awaiting approval by BTC-TC?

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: lewicki on July 17, 2013, 03:58:18 PM

Ken's been busy today taking orders and such. Transfers will be taken care of tonight and tomorrow. Likewise, dividends will be payed tomorrow as well.

@lewicki Thank You. Grin

lewicki

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Ken's been busy today taking orders and such. Transfers will be taken care of tonight and tomorrow. Likewise, dividends will be payed tomorrow as well.

lolstate

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: noah tall on July 17, 2013, 12:40:19 PM

Quote from: lolstate on July 17, 2013, 12:19:56 PM

I know how Google works, the point of my post was to highlight the typo for Ken's attention.

Sorry, I thought you were talking about the ranking.

No, I just threw that in there for a bit of colour. The typo is the problem.

noah tall

full member

Activity: 524

Merit: 100

Quote from: lolstate on July 17, 2013, 12:19:56 PM

I know how Google works, the point of my post was to highlight the typo for Ken's attention.

Sorry, I thought you were talking about the ranking.

lolstate

full member

Activity: 196

Merit: 100

Quote from: noah tall on July 17, 2013, 12:16:09 PM

Quote from: lolstate on July 17, 2013, 04:48:11 AM

When I google 'bitcoin mining machines', VMC is about rank 7. The summary beneath the URL says 'plant' instead if 'planet'. I can't see this typo on the VMC home page or meta data, so it could be an out of date Google cache.

You need to understand how google works. They store your searches and preferences (and god knows what else) to personalize your "experience". Here's a little experiment:

User 1 searches "monsanto" resulting in pages describing pesticides and GMOs and protests.

User 2 searches "monsanto" resulting in pages describing financial reports and court decisions.

As is the case you've heard so often, "results may vary".

I know how Google works, the point of my post was to highlight the typo for Ken's attention.

noah tall

full member

Activity: 524

Merit: 100

Quote from: lolstate on July 17, 2013, 04:48:11 AM

When I google 'bitcoin mining machines', VMC is about rank 7. The summary beneath the URL says 'plant' instead if 'planet'. I can't see this typo on the VMC home page or meta data, so it could be an out of date Google cache.

You need to understand how google works. They store your searches and preferences (and god knows what else) to personalize your "experience". Here's a little experiment:

User 1 searches "monsanto" resulting in pages describing pesticides and GMOs and protests.

User 2 searches "monsanto" resulting in pages describing financial reports and court decisions.

As is the case you've heard so often, "results may vary".

Vbs

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Quote from: Streets 2.0 on July 17, 2013, 12:09:49 PM

Quote from: Vbs on July 17, 2013, 11:59:26 AM

Just posted some fresh estimates on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2749219 Grin

Will update the Speculation thread OP with this chart if you dont mind?

Of course not! Grin

Feel free to add any remarks also!

Streets 2.0

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 101

FRX: Ferocious Alpha

Quote from: Vbs on July 17, 2013, 11:59:26 AM

Just posted some fresh estimates on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2749219 Grin

Will update the Speculation thread OP with this chart if you dont mind?

Vbs

hero member

Activity: 504

Merit: 500

Just posted some fresh estimates on https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2749219 Grin

Streets 2.0

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 101

FRX: Ferocious Alpha

Quote from: Vbs on July 17, 2013, 10:49:16 AM

Quote from: Streets 2.0 on July 17, 2013, 10:41:09 AM

LOL there is complaints about the chassis the miner is to be housed in. Lots of tears over the images being stolen, without any realization that those generic chassis' from chenbro are in fact what the miner will go in.

There!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/98907028@N08/9282024072/ An ungeneric one straight from VMC's shop! Grin

Yep, I posted this elsewhere as well. Shit, at my place of employment we have two of these cases, one houses an old phone system for a remote region, the other is a generic server outside of our vSphere cluster. I dont see why all the uninformed people out there assume it was stolen. They were able to discern it was a chenbro but not at the same time realize it is a generic case that could be used for many different setups?

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread - page 308. (Read 479317 times)