So, how this move from btc-tc > bitfunder(?) will go actually? What shareholders needs to do?
Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 496. (Read 771302 times)
September 23, 2013, 02:25:29 PM
September 23, 2013, 12:47:35 PM
Lets not put all our eggs in one basket or exchange until the dust settles but evaluate it over time
Thanks for all the updates Ken
Thanks for all the updates Ken
September 23, 2013, 12:35:43 PM
September 23, 2013, 12:15:32 PM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
+1
September 23, 2013, 12:03:57 PM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
No, setup is required, as we already have planned for this. All I have to do is take the shares off of BTC-TC and issue the shares on Bitfunder.
Yes, kudos for forward thinking Ken. We're in much better shape than many other assets, so a thank you is definitely in order. Thanks!
Once things are stable, diversifying to Havelock will help reduce our risk yet again, should something similar happen with Bitfunder. One silver lining to all of this may be that more attention is given to the development of a decentralized exchange to minimize regulatory risk in the future.
September 23, 2013, 11:52:40 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
No, setup is required, as we already have planned for this. All I have to do is take the shares off of BTC-TC and issue the shares on Bitfunder.
I'm assuming you are going to be doing this on or shortly after October 7th?
Quote
October 7, 2013, all forms of secondary market trading will be halted on both sites.
Thank you for the clarification
Seems like that would be what we would do.
September 23, 2013, 11:34:54 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
No, setup is required, as we already have planned for this. All I have to do is take the shares off of BTC-TC and issue the shares on Bitfunder.
September 23, 2013, 11:31:22 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
+1
+1
-1 Let's merge everything at Havelock for liquidity purposes.
-1 Let's try to be realistic. Ken has so far shown little interest in getting us listed on Havelock in the immediate future. While I really want to see us on there, I do not see it happening in the near term. Bitfunder will be the easiest solution for the time being.
September 23, 2013, 11:28:37 AM
Ken, would our ActM shares also grant us a stake in the AMC Exchange, in the event that it goes live? 
according to Ken, yes
AMC already has a Stock Exchange built and is in the testing phase.
If BF failed and we used that exchange, would it be owned by the shareholder and would we receive the trade fee as a dividend?
Yes, at this time AMC owns the exchange.
He also stated that he would have to move the exchange under a different corporation due to licensing issues... So, if it isn't owned by AMC do we get a stake in the transfer fees?
Yes, the profit would go to AMC as that corporation would be owned by AMC.
September 23, 2013, 11:28:29 AM
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
+1
+1
-1 Let's merge everything at Havelock for liquidity purposes.
I believe that there's no question that BF has more liquidity than Havelock. Havelock has some better features like notifications, however.
September 23, 2013, 11:27:32 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
I'm sure Ukyo is giggling like a school girl when he hears stuff like that. Well, aside from the worries about the same issues that threatened BTCT.
September 23, 2013, 11:26:46 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
+1
+1
-1 Let's merge everything at Havelock for liquidity purposes.
September 23, 2013, 11:22:53 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
+1
+1
September 23, 2013, 11:20:52 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
+1
September 23, 2013, 11:13:26 AM
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Let's merge everything into BitFunder for liquidity purposes.
September 23, 2013, 11:12:29 AM
Sure, that is a possibility also.
I think BF for the immediate future is the best idea. At least it would join both the markets finally.
IMHO Havelock is a much better choice.
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
Yes, these are my thoughts on this too.
September 23, 2013, 10:53:00 AM
This is actually very bullish news
I´m definitely gonna buy more shares
I´m definitely gonna buy more shares
+1 this
bump
September 23, 2013, 10:34:29 AM
Have to say Im impressed by the foresight of already having developed your own exchange as "plan C". Ken may not be a marketing genius, but he is showing something here.
September 23, 2013, 10:34:13 AM
Sure, that is a possibility also.
I think BF for the immediate future is the best idea. At least it would join both the markets finally.
IMHO Havelock is a much better choice.
I'm not a big fan of Bitfunder either, but let's not complicate this at the moment. The important thing is to maintain liquidity, so immediately moving to Bitfunder makes the most sense as no setup is required.
September 23, 2013, 10:22:18 AM
...
We need income and profits big time.
We need income and profits big time.
Truth.
Jump to: