[ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 6.

JoTheKhan

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: VolanicEruptor on February 14, 2014, 01:13:24 AM

Pictures of that poor of quality simply do not exist anymore, unless they are deliberately made that way. Ken should be ashamed of himself to think we would actually eat that up.. they aren't even bfl chips for fuck sakes..

C'mon now, some people are eating it up. Is Ken lying, what's going on? It's quite a conundrum now isn't it? lol Find out next Wednesday on. Active.. Mining!

Seriously though, those pictures are a joke. Plus if MrTeal is right, then ken lied about another dumb thing for little reason on the last page. It's quite exhausting.

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Pictures of that poor of quality simply do not exist anymore, unless they are deliberately made that way. Ken should be ashamed of himself to think we would actually eat that up.. they aren't even bfl chips for fuck sakes..

knybe

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

decentralize EVERYTHING...

This gets stinkier with each day.

RickJamesBTC

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

I thought that picture was an old video game
Funny how none of these companies can take their phone and snap a picture of what they work on, not just kens bullshit empty benches in a garage.

VolanicEruptor

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 10:02:40 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

No, it would have to be a redesign, but not much of one.

It doesn't even sound like you're trying to be convincing anymore. You're just randomly slopping together a bunch of lies of chips that don't even match what you're showing. Everyone is calling you on your lie, so just shut up already with this bullshit. it's 2014 and that picture quality doesn't even exist anymore, not even with a 20 year old camera. Get real...

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

with all due respect, Sir, i'm pretty sure there's no requirement to have any fucking sort of a reality base whatsoever to one's mouthflappings in this particular venue, Sir

Are you going to give us the run-down on whose farm it is and what machines they are using? They have 2 PH and they are buggy hardware - they are not KNC machines.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: DeadwoodDan on February 13, 2014, 10:25:41 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 10:18:21 PM

Quote from: DeadwoodDan on February 13, 2014, 10:04:03 PM

Hey Vigil, remember when you saw some hash power come online in roughly 25GH/s chunks and you were SO FUCKING CONVINCED that just had to be VMC machines coming online?
Stop imagining up the best possible explanation for every event that occurs and start living in the real world.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. I was simply clarifying Ken's statement in regards to the board in the picture.

What's the mystery? You were slobbering all over that hashpower, holy shit you were so into it, it took three burly guys with hospital armbands to convince you it was not VMC, and we're still not sure you believed it.

That was like a month ago... and I was figuring they were machines used to mine in secret. But what does that have to do with me clarifying what Ken claimed to be saying in the last post? I wasn't saying that what he said was true.

But it brings up the question that has been repeated on here... what did we get with the $1 million? Can't I at least get a few non-functional chips as a consolation prize?

DeadwoodDan

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 10:18:21 PM

Quote from: DeadwoodDan on February 13, 2014, 10:04:03 PM

Hey Vigil, remember when you saw some hash power come online in roughly 25GH/s chunks and you were SO FUCKING CONVINCED that just had to be VMC machines coming online?
Stop imagining up the best possible explanation for every event that occurs and start living in the real world.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. I was simply clarifying Ken's statement in regards to the board in the picture.

What's the mystery? You were slobbering all over that hashpower, holy shit you were so into it, it took three burly guys with hospital armbands to convince you it was not VMC, and we're still not sure you believed it.

mainline

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

@Vigil: Please see MrTeal's posts above. He is right on in both of his assertions. That's most likely a Bitfury board. (see the caps on 3 of the four sides of each chip? That's because there's nothing but power there.)

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: DeadwoodDan on February 13, 2014, 10:04:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

Hey Vigil, remember when you saw some hash power come online in roughly 25GH/s chunks and you were SO FUCKING CONVINCED that just had to be VMC machines coming online?

Stop imagining up the best possible explanation for every event that occurs and start living in the real world.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. I was simply clarifying Ken's statement in regards to the board in the picture.

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Actually, I'd say I'm 90% sure even from the crappy pictures those are Bitfury chips.

DeadwoodDan

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: DeadwoodDan on February 13, 2014, 10:08:33 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 10:02:40 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

No, it would have to be a redesign, but not much of one.

holy crap so this really IS a stolen BFL design

HOLY CRAP

Jesus christ Ken, come good with your Lord and Maker, you cannot possibly hope to come ahead in this fight

mainline

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: MrTeal on February 13, 2014, 10:08:09 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

I can say with 100% certainty that those are not BFL chips, either with the old or the new package design. The BFL chips are a 144 pin BGA.

Seriously, that's just pathetic.

Yup.

mainline

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 10:02:40 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

No, it would have to be a redesign, but not much of one.

So, let me get this straight: Your engineers designed a PC board for their chips ... that's not pin compatible with their chips? I'm not against recreational drug use, but how much paint are your boys huffing?

DeadwoodDan

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 10:02:40 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

No, it would have to be a redesign, but not much of one.

holy crap so this really IS a stolen BFL design

HOLY CRAP

MrTeal

legendary

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1004

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

I can say with 100% certainty that those are not BFL chips, either with the old or the new package design. The BFL chips are a 144 pin BGA.

Seriously, that's just pathetic.

DeadwoodDan

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

Hey Vigil, remember when you saw some hash power come online in roughly 25GH/s chunks and you were SO FUCKING CONVINCED that just had to be VMC machines coming online?

Stop imagining up the best possible explanation for every event that occurs and start living in the real world.

kslaughter

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:59:09 PM

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

No, it would have to be a redesign, but not much of one.

Vigil

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

I think he is saying that that isn't the board for the 55nm, but a board one of the engineers made for the BFL chip.

DeadwoodDan

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

Quote from: mainline on February 13, 2014, 09:56:55 PM

Quote from: kslaughter on February 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM

Quote from: Vigil on February 13, 2014, 09:43:20 PM

Ken, whose board is in those pictures? What chips are on that board?

This is a board that our engineer designed and those are BFL chips. He will be designing a reference board for our DIY for our 55nm and 28nm chips like this one.

How about postin' a pic that doesn't look like pixel art? Also, your chips are pin-compatible to BFL? Honest Injun?

pretty sure BFL never registered copyright on their design

People's ASIC are just trying to set information free, man

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 6. (Read 771302 times)