Pages:
Author

Topic: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] - page 71. (Read 771512 times)

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
Exactly right. The nm figure has been misunderstood by the entire investing community. There is no guarantee that a smaller die size is reflected in a more efficient chip. 20nm (KnC Neptune) in my view is a step too far and it's cost of production will not be justified by it's meagre if any improvements over top-spec 28nm.

Again, there is nothing more in friedcats release than in Ken's from last week (plus his posts) except I/O standard (as investors do we need to know that!) and a price point that has a variability of 100%.

Now some people may think a theorhetical chip that hasn't been taped out with a cost per chip prediction that ranges by 100% from a proposer who does not have the funds available to produce that chip is hard news but I would wonder at their sanity.

When he's selling the chip in bulk, selling 10TH/s mining rigs (55nm chip only) with it and running a substantial farm with his chip maybe we can pay him due respect as a competitor. Till  then we just get on with our own projects.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
1) What will be reveal today in the weekly PR posting?

2) Will the CEO of Active Mining say that trading will begin?

3) Will the CEO of Active Mining say that there are new delays for trading to begin?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Some hard news 4 Bob:
...
Specification
Process node: 40nm
Package type: QFN64 8mmx8mm (with another option of QFN64 7mmx7mm possible)
I/O: Standard SPI protocol with clk, in, out and cs.
Rated Hashrate: 12.8GHash/s per chip, with a wide range of overclock/downclock options
Rated Voltage: 0.72V, recommended voltage range is 0.55V-1V
Power Consumption: 0.2J/GHash low voltage, 0.35J/GHash rated voltage
...
Price range
0.49$/G-0.99$/G, depending on order size and delivery speed of choice.

...

As promises go, I like friedcat's better.

0.2w/GH at 40nm... wow... let's hope Ken can get proportionally efficient chips at 28nm... 0.1w/gh should be possible if friedcat can get 0.2w/gh on a 40nm

It doesn't work like that.  Bitfury's 55nm chips aren't half as efficient as today's 28nm chips.  They're *more* power-efficient Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Some hard news 4 Bob:
...
Specification
Process node: 40nm
Package type: QFN64 8mmx8mm (with another option of QFN64 7mmx7mm possible)
I/O: Standard SPI protocol with clk, in, out and cs.
Rated Hashrate: 12.8GHash/s per chip, with a wide range of overclock/downclock options
Rated Voltage: 0.72V, recommended voltage range is 0.55V-1V
Power Consumption: 0.2J/GHash low voltage, 0.35J/GHash rated voltage
...
Price range
0.49$/G-0.99$/G, depending on order size and delivery speed of choice.

...

As promises go, I like friedcat's better.

0.2w/GH at 40nm... wow... let's hope Ken can get proportionally efficient chips at 28nm... 0.1w/gh should be possible if friedcat can get 0.2w/gh on a 40nm
sr. member
Activity: 302
Merit: 250
re: friedcat 40nm


Thats not hard news - far from it. The opening disclaimer says specs and cost and delivery dates are subject to change. In other words this is a theorhetical chip. It hasn't been taped out and he has no funding to have is produced.

Keep bringing us the 'hard news'. lol Its far less substantial than Kens release from last week but lets ignore that shall we?

So many misinformed posts ITT in general, as a reminder take everything with a grain of salt:

Bitfountain (ASICMiner and its employees) is one of the largest BTC holders in the world. AND has been holding back the majority of dividends for months.. they have funding

They have also already shipped multiple PH of miners so i wouldn't take their projections too lightly
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
re: friedcat 40nm


Thats not hard news - far from it. The opening disclaimer says specs and cost and delivery dates are subject to change. In other words this is a theorhetical chip. It hasn't been taped out and he has no funding to have is produced.

Keep bringing up the 'hard news'. lol Its far less substantial than Kens release from last week but lets ignore that shall we?

Compared to the promises made by Ken, friedcat at least bothers to spice his with numbers & stuff, so his shareholders don't have to constantly pick their sphincters for numbers to plug into their smartiferous maths.  Smiley
As i said in my post, "As far as promises go, I like Friedcat's better."

The only thing you know about Ken's "theoretical chips" is the ones he has promised you in the past never materialized Cheesy
Happy trading!
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
re: friedcat 40nm


Thats not hard news - far from it. The opening disclaimer says specs and cost and delivery dates are subject to change. In other words this is a theorhetical chip. It hasn't been taped out and he has no funding to have is produced.

Keep bringing us the 'hard news'. lol Its far less substantial than Kens release from last week but lets ignore that shall we?
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Some hard news 4 Bob:
...
Specification
Process node: 40nm
Package type: QFN64 8mmx8mm (with another option of QFN64 7mmx7mm possible)
I/O: Standard SPI protocol with clk, in, out and cs.
Rated Hashrate: 12.8GHash/s per chip, with a wide range of overclock/downclock options
Rated Voltage: 0.72V, recommended voltage range is 0.55V-1V
Power Consumption: 0.2J/GHash low voltage, 0.35J/GHash rated voltage
...
Price range
0.49$/G-0.99$/G, depending on order size and delivery speed of choice.

...

As promises go, I like friedcat's better.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank

Any chance for real news? News, that actually matter? I guess not.

I guess this thread as become as useless as 2 previous Actm Threads.

 
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.

Oscar Wilde


Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/o/oscarwilde104298.html#hSCfGDmdfszckBW9.99


This requires no further explanation. You to whom this is directed know who you are.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
1) Tomorrow is a scheduled PR update

2) Active Mining still has a window of opportunity to be great and to make some of its shareholders and it CEO very rich

3) That window will not stay open forever

4) Too many people spend too much time both here and in the IRC channel speculating on what the CEO of Active Mining is doing, planning and intending to do.

5) Instead of that delusional hopefulness, they should be putting polite pressure on the CEO of Active Mining to honor deadlines, provide an accurate report on progress and to get trading restarted

6) Tomorrow is a schedule PR update. Let's see what gets reported.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?

BTCT does not have an update book of asset holders. Bitfunder does until our shares go on the exchange excluding the >100 sold on Cryptotrade
you can get your data from BTCT.co if you have your API key that you were emailed around the middle of this month.

see this post for how to obtain your data - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4723937
Wasn't emailed anything. I think my email was still set to Lavabit, and we all know lavabit was destroyed.

BTCT's asset list is out of date is what I am saying. None of the shares on there are valid if they were transferred over to Bitfunder, because no one knows if you sold them or bought more by looking at the BTCT asset list. the Bitfunder asset list is the only thing
I'd like to have both.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?

BTCT does not have an update book of asset holders. Bitfunder does until our shares go on the exchange excluding the >100 sold on Cryptotrade
you can get your data from BTCT.co if you have your API key that you were emailed around the middle of this month.

see this post for how to obtain your data - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4723937
Wasn't emailed anything. I think my email was still set to Lavabit, and we all know lavabit was destroyed.

BTCT's asset list is out of date is what I am saying. None of the shares on there are valid if they were transferred over to Bitfunder, because no one knows if you sold them or bought more by looking at the BTCT asset list. the Bitfunder asset list is the only thing
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?

BTCT does not have an update book of asset holders. Bitfunder does until our shares go on the exchange excluding the >100 sold on Cryptotrade
you can get your data from BTCT.co if you have your API key that you were emailed around the middle of this month.

see this post for how to obtain your data - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4723937
Wasn't emailed anything. I think my email was still set to Lavabit, and we all know lavabit was destroyed.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
decentralize EVERYTHING...
Our shares are not trading yet but soon will be.

An account will be created for you on the trading platform Crypto-trade, not to be confused with Cryptostocks.

This is expected to happen in only a matter of days but be sure to tune back in on Wednesday around 2345hrs GMT and look for Ken's 'Weekly Update' for more information.

You will need access to the email address you used in Bitfunder (expect to be contacted through that) as well as the public address from Bitfunder that you would have given to receive dividends.  To prove ownership of your shares you will need to be able to 'sign a message' from that public address when the time comes.

At least there's some decency left on this thread.

I would pay to find out how old crumbs & co are and what they do with their day-to-day lives. Simply cannot believe the amount of time they spend on here typing inanities.

+1

I've come to the point where I automatically ignore any and every (a ton lately) noob that enters this thread, purely on troll assumption.

it's baffling to me that anyone would spend that much time doing something so useless.

on another (off topic) note, this guy just did a piece about trolls:

The Experience of Being Trolled | Idea Channel | PBS Digital Studios
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Is there no longer any way to get data from BTCT.co?

BTCT does not have an update book of asset holders. Bitfunder does until our shares go on the exchange excluding the >100 sold on Cryptotrade
you can get your data from BTCT.co if you have your API key that you were emailed around the middle of this month.

see this post for how to obtain your data - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4723937
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Are you ready to buy, or just typing inanities?
Pages:
Jump to: