ALL Initial Coin Offerings are Trash - page 14.

encryptedht

newbie

Activity: 92

Merit: 0

Quote from: 3core on January 29, 2019, 11:59:36 AM

Quote from: Thanasis on January 25, 2019, 01:01:30 PM

Most of them were just not worthy to invest but we can't say all the initial coin offerings are trash.
Some of the projects really worth to invest you need to find that by your own then you won't say they are trash when you can able to make something from it.

Right, a large percentage of them are really not worthy in terms of real a solution too, they just tend to fabricate a Whitepaper with no reasonable real use.

You need to analyze the solution the project proposes. If it is a real way to resolve a real problem the project can be a good one.

danherbias07

legendary

Activity: 3318

Merit: 1133

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

1 out of 5 or it could be 1 out of 10.
They started created more and some of them are really non sense or just a mimic of another ICO which just changed name.
Features. They say they have the better one but yet you cannot find it.

Paid too much for a non profit scheme. Better just put it in my piggy bank and let it rot than some thieves will just take it for themselves.

Reid

hero member

Activity: 3052

Merit: 651

You hit it right.

Bitcoin never need that.
Hell, even LTC and ETH did not do it.

But not all ICO's have bad endings. There is still some out there who had been pushing everything just so the project will keep on going and it is really for a change and not just profits.

Bounties have been enormous before and they pay quite fine. But now they will give you dust. Grin

Commitments

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 10

Maybe last one year we faced with bad moment with bitcoin and altcoin always at lower price, we got many ICO are trash because have lower and dump price after listing at exchange market, how ever we need new era at this years with bitcoin and altcoin at higher price.

thefoex

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 101

not all ico are rubbish, there are some projects that are worth investing in so try to open up and find out about any current projects. I don't say ico is good, but I just want to give a good project a chance to grow.

bountylayomi

copper member

Activity: 234

Merit: 0

I will agree with you if you have said many of them are trash and not the all that you said. The truth is, there are still legitimate ICOs only that they are very few compared to the rate at which those trash ones are coming out these days. We all just need to careful so that we won't fall in their tracks.

jerrison

full member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 106

they aren't all trash as most of them become better just as they proposed it will be. it has a greater value when they work in line with their roadmap and get better. they may have challenges along the line as they control just a few of the market resources and that makes them have less control over the pricing of the project tokens or coins

nangiarushali

copper member

Activity: 257

Merit: 2

Obviously, no because i personally had done so many ICO's which had given me a good amount of profit. Though many are scans also, but it is according to the fact that most of the people are indulged in wrong illegal works nowadays.

Farma

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1001

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

I don't agree with that statement. well, although some ICOs have indeed become scams, some of them have developed quite well. well, we can't blame that, because we don't know a CEO will run away from his responsibilities. however, if a CEO is truly responsible, so many ICO projects will succeed. well, even now there are still a lot of good ICOs that have survived since 2017. we just need to be careful when choosing ICO. sometimes the team, and the products produced really affect the ICO.

Gabteb

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 256

Not all i dont think you are if you say this then you dont understand anything and havnt looked at history of ICO do you know one of first ICO s was ETH so what is it trash too?no and if you look will find more projects done afther ICO es ,yep we have many scams and fail projects but it happens becouse many users even dont understnad what is ICO start it.

No Pain No blood

member

Activity: 658

Merit: 13

I also think so, the ICO is only limited to raising funds. no real development is done by the developer. instead of making new innovations, all projects look unrealistic and seem nonsense. I prefer old projects because even though there is a lot of negative news about the coins but we know they are really developing.

3core

jr. member

Activity: 152

Merit: 1

Quote from: Thanasis on January 25, 2019, 01:01:30 PM

Most of them were just not worthy to invest but we can't say all the initial coin offerings are trash.
Some of the projects really worth to invest you need to find that by your own then you won't say they are trash when you can able to make something from it.

Right, a large percentage of them are really not worthy in terms of real a solution too, they just tend to fabricate a Whitepaper with no reasonable real use.

ikicha

full member

Activity: 788

Merit: 100

Agree on this, Most of ico its really trash. The company only want a money for make their company more bigger, better to investing with non ICO Project, so we have a true pure supporter not just only a big whale or something.

thesmallgod

full member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 129

You probably will not say this if cryptocurrency have not been hit with massive fall. I still remember vividly well in 2017 when crypto price continue to go up. Nobody will call ICO a trash because we heard alot of interesting project that are still flourishing up to date. The problem is that as soon as some people see the potential of the ICO and they see how much people take it seriously, they decide to turn the table around and turn it to scam game. Actually they didnt come too early has crypto has already fall.

CryptoAlphaStar

full member

Activity: 574

Merit: 101

I don't think the people behind it are trash, nor the ideas, nor the developers. What is trash is the timing. It is way too early for such applications and that's why 99% of ICOs are doomed to fail even before they have thought about starting. Don't blame the founders. They see an opportunity for funding and they act on it.

KKH84

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

80% ico garbage, there are still 20% that are successful, I think this is progress, considering this technology is still relatively new, there will be a lot of changes because basically we will learn from mistakes and I am still optimistic about good ico and good projects.

Royal Jelly

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 2

ECOSTART

Not all ICOs are rubbish, everything is packed and has a variety of purposes, but many are unable to continue for various reasons. I do not consider ICO to be rubbish but many frauds are rampant and we must be able to sort it out.

ElenaN

jr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 1

I think this is a wrong opinion, and although there is a lot of garbage, there will still be projects that will show their true worth!

Xetonica

sr. member

Activity: 706

Merit: 250

Yes we can say the Initial Coin Offering or ICO are trash.
But we cannot say all ICO's because they are have some good ICO's are active and better to invest of it if we want to.

chanler

member

Activity: 753

Merit: 15

mulierum.com

I really don't want to believe it. Because the ICO is actually a great way to offer the new project that may have better concept in the future. ICO is only part of the victims of bear market. So that they are following to be down after on exchange.

Topic: ALL Initial Coin Offerings are Trash - page 14. (Read 22312 times)