All rating platforms are shit!? | Bitcointalksearch.org

gwensarah1

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 100

Quote from: De_nis on June 02, 2018, 02:08:33 AM

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

I don't think all rating platforms are shit. After all, no one can foretell how successful a project or an ICO may become, even the investors. ICO's success depends on a lot of factors especially once it enters the market, however, investors and experts' views may also be limited to some technical analysis and readings. In any case, I still trust some of the rating platforms such as ICODROPS, not because of their ratings or anything but because of the details provided especially in terms of the amount raised by a project. Although, you can just do your own research and compare it to some reviews in different rating platforms to widen your views and garner other's opinion about a project.

X3rto14

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Hi,
yes this is absolutely true!
the do not understand cryptos real value...
those are just shitty invented ratings.
Don't believe them, anybody shouldn't.
cheers mate

fourokavas

member

Activity: 96

Merit: 10

Most of them are crap nowadays, that is the main reason of why you should avoid taking them as reference in order to make an investment, it is not a trusted source

duonghi99c88

newbie

Activity: 112

Merit: 0

How come alsomst all ICOs are receiving 5/5 on track ICO and other platforms. I think these ratting are paid rattings and bullshit. Just do your own research before investing.

apaev

member

Activity: 108

Merit: 16

DAICO or other good platform can help. There, investors will have to register their documents. This will serve as an excellent protection against scammers

IsabellaSophia

jr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 1

Yes this is really disgusting. They give a rating without proper research and many are being decieved and are at loss seeing this rating. So make sure the site you are using gives the true rating or not.

cctv0

member

Activity: 344

Merit: 10

I never look at those rating platforms. I don't believe them because I think that these rating platforms may be making false analysis because they have charged some items of money. I only believe my own judgment!

EfterlysT

full member

Activity: 425

Merit: 109

That is a very good and sensible idea. You are right and so much far, not all of the rating websites are not faked. I think even all of them being paid to list a coin into the rating.

Sebas.tian

full member

Activity: 2184

Merit: 184

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

Quote from: De_nis on June 02, 2018, 02:08:33 AM

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

I lost faith in rating platforms, specifically icobench, when they have given a scam project (Benebit) high ratings. They should have spotted this one a mile a way given that they claim a 'professional review' of ICOs. Similar platforms might have done the same thing but are too many to bring up. The bottom line is to just do due diligence in what project you set your eyes upon.

razzor

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 10

Most of them are just being paid in order to put good stars in the project website, that is the main reason of why most of them are crappy right now, they are just the youtubers 2.0 which are getting paid.

@rt27

jr. member

Activity: 227

Merit: 3

If all the ratings are shit then I assume that it should be stop immediately coz not helpful to community. By the way you're wrong because rating is one way to know which is and which not to participate. You have points about protecting the project that meaningful however it is another solution to another problem. Let each development protect their own area's of responsibility.

Arsaen

newbie

Activity: 110

Merit: 0

Quote from: De_nis on June 02, 2018, 02:08:33 AM

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

I think it will be a breakthrough in the future. I mean the passion for crypto needs to be built with things that benefit the community. Perhaps a third party is still needed, even in crypto.

alonelyorange

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 10

All rating platform for an ico permonce is was right and many ico was success based on rating platform, rating paltform will be make many ivestor intersested to invest and buy ico token because there are on platform rating more positive respond form another investors. This key for ico success and sold out their token, just small chance ico will be broken because the fault of their owner was run away investor money and make their ico was scam and fake.

tomwell

newbie

Activity: 294

Merit: 0

Well, it is true that there are many fake information in the market but all the rating platform is not shit. There are many examples that they showed their value as they told. But I agree with you that more upgraded mechanism is needed.

googs84

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 256

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: De_nis on June 02, 2018, 02:08:33 AM

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

They are not shit but they are bought one! Everyone loves money and in what sense you think that ICO rating platforms are running? Do you think they are having fun rating the other projects? I dont think that at all and what I believe is, ICO companies provide lot of money to them so that they can give them higher reviews and may be this is non ending. Not only this, now a days ICO rating sites have also turned into bounty portals so that they can have double benefits. They will rate it themselves and will give participation by all themselves only.

tahmad

member

Activity: 252

Merit: 14

I'm literally agree with you, but not all rating platforms are shit. There are some professional and have real reviewer.
Yes, there are a shit rating platform which always reviewing some project with fake review. They only want the money, so if the project owner agree to pay amount as platform said, they will give good rating. And this is very risk for all investors.

duoduoshigexiaozhu

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: De_nis on June 02, 2018, 02:08:33 AM

Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?

The ico rating platforms are all scams. Their rating does not depend on considerable judgment. Instead, they collect more money to give you a better rating. Even if it is a shit, it is only willing to pay for those rating platforms. Can also get a high rating.

sirengutou

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 10

Fast, Smart, Trustworthy

I think you are a very smart person. Our ideas are basically the same. I also do not believe in the rating platform. I think there are benefits here. So it is a scam.

Rexxxem

full member

Activity: 368

Merit: 100

I'd say most of them are, probably. Icodrops are legit. They do diligent research and pretty transparent. Not sure about others.

sergienkoe

member

Activity: 350

Merit: 11

I have noticed on many occasions that on rating platforms unjustifiably high marks were given to frankly bad projects. Apparently they get a good "reward" for manipulating the rating, otherwise it's not clear why they do it.
I'm no longer guided by the rating platform in choice of ICO.

Topic: All rating platforms are shit!? (Read 631 times)