Pages:
Author

Topic: All rating platforms are shit!? - page 3. (Read 649 times)

member
Activity: 530
Merit: 10
Revolutionizing Crypto Payment Solutions
June 06, 2018, 02:44:29 AM
#96
Sorry I cant agree with you that all ratting platforms are shit. Some of them might be bad but not all of them.For your doubtness I recommend you to analyze all the project by yourself

in fact they are either independently, but the facts prove their analysis also can not speak much when many projects become unsuccessful and even scam. They are no different from the advertising sites and are not very accurate in assessing the project. they do not seem to be a professional platform and just pursue traffic only. I'm not a critic to go back to personal analysis, but there is great hope for them to become more reliable in the future and keep improving common mistakes.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
June 06, 2018, 02:32:27 AM
#95
Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?
This is what I was thinking, I don't think they are trusted and reliable. It's not a secret anymore that they can manipulate or list a bad ICO into their site. The solution is "do your own research" The first step is to check the team and their advisors, are they real or not, then keep in touch with them. Next, check if the project has a competitor or not, or is there something similar to the project? and the last analyze future prospects of a project.
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 251
June 06, 2018, 02:21:56 AM
#94
the rating which provides platform does not guarantee the success of the ICO. better analyze yourself and are confident with the choice of owning on trust in rating. they value are also not entirely true because many have the good rating but did not succeed in earning. It's a lot going on and of course rating, I think to begin to have no function.
newbie
Activity: 111
Merit: 0
June 06, 2018, 02:03:21 AM
#93
I also think there is dishonesty here. Many expert votes are being purchased for the purpose of enhancing the virtual value of an ICO project.  Sad Angry Angry
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 521
June 06, 2018, 01:49:00 AM
#92
Although there are lot of review sites that are coming up, but except icobench, I don't think any other is reliable enough.
The funny part is that the same ICO is given a rating of 3 on one platform and 4.4-4.7 on the other review platform. Any investor who goes by the rating of a scam ico on a scam review website is in for a lot of trouble since he would be losing his hard earned money to some scam ICO.
I don't trust any other website except icobench and I feel others shouldn't trust too.
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 250
June 06, 2018, 01:46:00 AM
#91
Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?


of course the scammer makes the crypto industry become negative. and it is very difficult to detect any cheats that are in the name of an ico. as for ico is successful but very no good chance and grow. even tend to walk on the spot, there are many altcoin that fall more than 90% of ico price. this is very regrettable, and make ico reputation even more negative
copper member
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
June 06, 2018, 01:33:27 AM
#90
I do not think so, all rating platforms are shit. Some are doing a great job and giving appropriate information. On the other hand some platforms provide a false or fake information related to campaigns and ICO and this is a big problem for crypto because it is very difficult to trust something who is fake or who is real.
full member
Activity: 304
Merit: 100
June 06, 2018, 01:23:35 AM
#89
I've heard about one particular project when the wife was an expert on the rating site and the husband was a leader of project and they would rate it.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 100
June 05, 2018, 10:39:57 AM
#88
Rating agencies today are really very often wrong, and from this it can be concluded that they do not exactly make the correct forecast, because now there are already many projects, about which they wrote and appropriated good grades, as a result, they turned out to be a scam.
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 100
June 05, 2018, 10:39:47 AM
#87
hahaha i hate to say it but i agree with it. most ico rating is fake and not independent, i prefer to learn it by myself
full member
Activity: 910
Merit: 103
June 05, 2018, 10:38:37 AM
#86
I don't trust all the rating platform because I believed that "experts" just paid for rating, I saw that high rating project also don't have people invest, but low rating project raised more than 10M $$$, they also don't do any action after report to them about scam ICO project, so I just trust my eyes and do my own research to find out potential ICO project
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 101
June 05, 2018, 10:33:14 AM
#85
I know that many such platforms really uncompromisingly evaluate campaigns and ICO and this big problem for crypt because it is very difficult to trust something..because of scam and fake. I hope we will find some ways to cope with it.
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1029
June 05, 2018, 10:20:22 AM
#84
Sorry I cant agree with you that all ratting platforms are shit. Some of them might be bad but not all of them.For your doubtness I recommend you to analyze all the project by yourself
The majority of them are shit and i will never repeat it again, i agree with OP basically the majority of them are getting paid by manipulating the rate of ico itself. More than 90% of ico site.
To do any research has become the investor's responsibility but it looks so shady to see even there is an ico rating site that listed scam ico.
newbie
Activity: 266
Merit: 0
June 05, 2018, 10:11:55 AM
#83
Sorry I cant agree with you that all ratting platforms are shit. Some of them might be bad but not all of them.For your doubtness I recommend you to analyze all the project by yourself
member
Activity: 210
Merit: 14
The revolutionary Export system/One-click Export
June 04, 2018, 04:16:47 PM
#82
We need DAICO or another platform where inventors must register their docs or something for help searching them. This protection against scammers will make investors lives easier. Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 250
June 04, 2018, 03:52:43 PM
#81
We can not rate all rating platforms as shit but some i read that they raise the grade with invalid votes, the goal may be to mislead the investor. When participating in an ICO, it would be a huge mistake for the investor only to base itself on the ICO rating.
hero member
Activity: 620
Merit: 500
June 04, 2018, 03:36:17 PM
#80
not true, there are good rating sites but some of it are paid sites. Some of it are giving false ratings and some people might bite the project because of it. Sometimes this trash ratings sites lead them to scams.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 259
June 04, 2018, 03:32:35 PM
#79
Then rate it yourself. Look deeper into one project and see thru how they are committed with their project.

It is not bad to ask. As of now, almost every ICO have a telegram group where you could ask anything about the project. They like it more to have some questions like that so that they can clear some questions which investors cannot ask.
Look at how they answer and rate it as how much your instinct tells it.
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 596
June 04, 2018, 03:28:48 PM
#78
Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?
Even a month or two ago I was believing in ICO rating platforms.
But someone opened my eyes when I was suggesting rating platforms to someone who created a thread to ask.
Second incident was, I complained about a scam project to a rating platform once and they did nothing.

Since then, I mean after those 2 incidents I am much careful about rating platforms and I actually don't believe in them... They are just paid promoters and the ratings are manipulated.
full member
Activity: 560
Merit: 100
June 04, 2018, 03:28:06 PM
#77
Too much deception around, investor confidence starts to decline and the market reacts naturally! I think we need some mechanism to protect honest projects, some kind of association in which guarantees the reputation of the project, because all rating platforms are shit!

What do you think?


yes, I almost agree. some projects become very useless and do not even have great growth opportunities. there are many ico who are just chasing profit and looking for fast money. maybe we should seriously discuss this issue, more so on the regulations that can mediate the ico problem as we discussed.
Pages:
Jump to: