[AMBER] X13 POW/POS| 10k AMBER=0,01% SHARES | BUY, HOLD & GET DIVIDENDS in BTC/$ - page 11.

Quote from: PowerHemp on May 02, 2017, 10:35:09 AM

BlockExperts explorer seems to be stuck on block 1895598 (4 days old). The chain itself is moving well though (block 1905742 already).

I have an impression all those issues and negative balances are purely explorer (and maybe C-Cex fork) problems. Not sure there is any issue with the chain itself. If I have time next few days (which is unlikely though Undecided

), I will fire up a simple Iquidus explorer based on the current correct blockchain, which I loaded from the scratch. If it doesn't show any issues, the problem with BlockExperts would be confirmed.

EDIT: ok, I have went ahead and put the explorer up. Lets wait until it fills the database (it could take a while though, as the chain is very long..).

Any update on this ? (tnx for doing this and sharing btw;)

I was extremely busy (on business trip now, with almost no time for anything else)... Just checked it, and explorer database is filling up very slowly... in fact it crashed due to the VPS running out of space

- the Amber blockchain is huge, and the DB ate more than 6GB already.

It is here: http://45.32.207.94:3001/, but is somewhere on block 1.4M yet. Still about 500K blocks to go. I would expect it to become up-to-date in 2-3 days.

sluppy

legendary

Activity: 2020

Merit: 1041

Quote from: sluppy on May 02, 2017, 05:08:08 AM

Quote from: sluppy on May 02, 2017, 05:08:08 AM

BlockExperts explorer seems to be stuck on block 1895598 (4 days old). The chain itself is moving well though (block 1905742 already).

I have an impression all those issues and negative balances are purely explorer (and maybe C-Cex fork) problems. Not sure there is any issue with the chain itself. If I have time next few days (which is unlikely though Undecided

), I will fire up a simple Iquidus explorer based on the current correct blockchain, which I loaded from the scratch. If it doesn't show any issues, the problem with BlockExperts would be confirmed.

EDIT: ok, I have went ahead and put the explorer up. Lets wait until it fills the database (it could take a while though, as the chain is very long..).

Any update on this ? (tnx for doing this and sharing btw;)

Any word on suntri ? doesn't seem to be anything legit , only this that still puzzels me is the tweet.

https://twitter.com/AmberTradeLTD/with_replies

Only reason I can think of that they wanted people to put up some buy orders they could dump into that's the only thing that makes sense to me.

i dont understand why they scam us with dividends but dont dumped the coins?

There was no buy support to dump into.
I really hope for everyone still here that they will actually do something but "The merge process is now still in progress and should be completed in the first quarter of 2017. "
" All details and roadmap of SUNTRI Group will be published after finishing of this process.
The holder of AmberCoins owns a part of the profits from the activities of one company – Amber Trade LTD. AmberCoins will be replaced with SUNTRI Tokens. The holders of SUNTRI Tokens will make profit from the work of investment fund and all companies of the group."

Suntri I still cant find anything about that company the First quarter has come and gone no word nothing.

PowerHemp

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1001

Ganja <3

BlockExperts explorer seems to be stuck on block 1895598 (4 days old). The chain itself is moving well though (block 1905742 already).

I have an impression all those issues and negative balances are purely explorer (and maybe C-Cex fork) problems. Not sure there is any issue with the chain itself. If I have time next few days (which is unlikely though Undecided

), I will fire up a simple Iquidus explorer based on the current correct blockchain, which I loaded from the scratch. If it doesn't show any issues, the problem with BlockExperts would be confirmed.

EDIT: ok, I have went ahead and put the explorer up. Lets wait until it fills the database (it could take a while though, as the chain is very long..).

Any update on this ? (tnx for doing this and sharing btw;)

Any word on suntri ? doesn't seem to be anything legit , only this that still puzzels me is the tweet.

https://twitter.com/AmberTradeLTD/with_replies

Only reason I can think of that they wanted people to put up some buy orders they could dump into that's the only thing that makes sense to me.

i dont understand why they scam us with dividends but dont dumped the coins?

sluppy

legendary

Activity: 2020

Merit: 1041

Quote from: Jayfek on April 24, 2017, 10:48:03 AM

BlockExperts explorer seems to be stuck on block 1895598 (4 days old). The chain itself is moving well though (block 1905742 already).

I have an impression all those issues and negative balances are purely explorer (and maybe C-Cex fork) problems. Not sure there is any issue with the chain itself. If I have time next few days (which is unlikely though Undecided

), I will fire up a simple Iquidus explorer based on the current correct blockchain, which I loaded from the scratch. If it doesn't show any issues, the problem with BlockExperts would be confirmed.

EDIT: ok, I have went ahead and put the explorer up. Lets wait until it fills the database (it could take a while though, as the chain is very long..).

Any update on this ? (tnx for doing this and sharing btw;)

Any word on suntri ? doesn't seem to be anything legit , only this that still puzzels me is the tweet.

https://twitter.com/AmberTradeLTD/with_replies

Only reason I can think of that they wanted people to put up some buy orders they could dump into that's the only thing that makes sense to me.

drays

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1073

BlockExperts explorer seems to be stuck on block 1895598 (4 days old). The chain itself is moving well though (block 1905742 already).

I have an impression all those issues and negative balances are purely explorer (and maybe C-Cex fork) problems. Not sure there is any issue with the chain itself. If I have time next few days (which is unlikely though Undecided

), I will fire up a simple Iquidus explorer based on the current correct blockchain, which I loaded from the scratch. If it doesn't show any issues, the problem with BlockExperts would be confirmed.

EDIT: ok, I have went ahead and put the explorer up. Lets wait until it fills the database (it could take a while though, as the chain is very long..).

coinscoins68

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Blockexplorer https://www.blockexperts.com/amber is on the wrong chain, as it contains negative AMBER balance. See Drays link some posts ago.
AmberTrade server(s) are on the wrong chain too - open https://www.blockexperts.com/amber and click to "nodes" - blockexplorer sync's with AmberCoin mooo-s (AmberTrade server(s)). @ the moment only one mooo left as seen there.
Fork started from C-Cex according to Kelsey, so C-Cex is on the wrong chain with AmberTrade and Blockexperts.
If AmberTrade fired Dev, who can put this powerful Triade to the right chain?

Ed:
I think I am on the right chain with my 2 wallets from 2015. No visible errors, all amounts before fork in/out are right (after fork only staking).
Getblockcount = 1895720 @ exactly 15:20 UTC, all synced, staking, 26/27 peers connected both.
Seems like only C-Cex/AmberTrade/Blockexperts are on the wrong chain? Tongue

If you have 27 peers and only C-Cex/AmberTrade/Blockexperts are on the wrong chain they should go back to the right one quite fast or all your 27 peers should move to the C-Cex chain if it is stronger. I don't thing there could be 2 connected chains in parallel.

Jayfek

full member

Activity: 139

Merit: 100

Blockexplorer https://www.blockexperts.com/amber is on the wrong chain, as it contains negative AMBER balance. See Drays link some posts ago.
AmberTrade server(s) are on the wrong chain too - open https://www.blockexperts.com/amber and click to "nodes" - blockexplorer sync's with AmberCoin mooo-s (AmberTrade server(s)). @ the moment only one mooo left as seen there.
Fork started from C-Cex according to Kelsey, so C-Cex is on the wrong chain with AmberTrade and Blockexperts.
If AmberTrade fired Dev, who can put this powerful Triade to the right chain?

Ed:
I think I am on the right chain with my 2 wallets from 2015. No visible errors, all amounts before fork in/out are right (after fork only staking).
Getblockcount = 1895720 @ exactly 15:20 UTC, all synced, staking, 26/27 peers connected both.
Seems like only C-Cex/AmberTrade/Blockexperts are on the wrong chain? Tongue

kelsey

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ZzzzeyeZzzz on April 22, 2017, 04:32:03 PM

That showed then that the code Is badly written!

yes as badly written as all similar POS coins, or BTC for that matter which will all fork if similar happens.

this time ambercoin forked because c-cex in their wisdom turned on staking (after not having staking going), had large supply of ambercoin + plus large staking age.......and Shocked

ZzzzeyeZzzz

full member

Activity: 377

Merit: 108

ChessCoin 1.4

Quote from: drays on April 21, 2017, 03:17:07 PM

Quote from: ZzzzeyeZzzz on April 21, 2017, 02:39:11 AM

Quote from: drays on April 20, 2017, 05:00:28 PM

Quote from: ZzzzeyeZzzz on April 21, 2017, 02:39:11 AM

My ambercoin wallet has many connections and syncs just fine all those people are on the wrong chain then ?

same.

i think perhaps c-cex themselves forked it?

It might be the case, as C-Cex typically stakes their coins. But the fact is - the chain indeed forked, with some strange things shown by block explorer...

Only reason I traded on C-cex was Ambercoin allways thought it was a shady exchange with all the ICO's they do.

Is there any indication that a fix is coming ? Cant someone just sent them the Ips from the configs of the wallets that are working ?
I don't like that they are stuck in the exchange If I could at least withdraw them id be a lot happier.(not that I think much will happen with ambercoin But I don't want the Exchange to be holding my stuff.)

It looks like this is not a simple issue with a regular fork. The network itself is running smooth now, I was able to download the whole blockchain from scratch and appeared on the same chain as the block explorer. So from the first glance the newtork is ok.

However there was an issue on the blockchain, which resulted in some strange balances. That issue is reflected on the official block explorer too. As I told above, I have opened a ticket with C-Cex, asking for a proof that chain is broken. They linked me to the following: https://www.blockexperts.com/amber/address/AMP7SP6iif59qHPiMo63BqKc8UTf7ZLgLu, and truly saying, I cannot explain what I see there ("Balance -185440.84852750 AMBER", note the 'minus' sign)... As far as I understand, with healthy blockchain such things could not happen. Can anyone explain how those numbers could appear?

AmberCoin has several times forks and back again on a mainblockchain - between the forks a transaction and then again on mainblockchain - now they have minus...
Best regards

Still I don't understand. I have seen many coins which just on a fork, then returned to the single "main" blockchain, and they are working ok since, without any addresses having those strange negative balances.

Explorer is on the main blockchain, right? After the forks have resolved and a node returned to the main blockchain, it should forget (invalidate) all the transactions done on the fork, so only the transactions done on the main blockchain can be visible. So how the block explorer shows the negative balance? The main blockchain should be self-consistent, right? It cannot have addresses with negative balances.

+100 - this blockchain has been broken since XXX and all transations afterwards it are invalid - as ambercoin with this wallet started we had many forks - I have only read here and always controlled that the wallet was on the right chain - That showed then that the code Is badly written!

We can´t do anything and hope the Ambercoin buys a developer - then reprocess the blockchain before this has broken - a swap can not
be made because the company shares are on the blockchain Huh

Best regards

drays

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1073

Quote from: drays on April 20, 2017, 05:00:28 PM

Quote from: drays on April 20, 2017, 05:00:28 PM

My ambercoin wallet has many connections and syncs just fine all those people are on the wrong chain then ?

same.

i think perhaps c-cex themselves forked it?

It might be the case, as C-Cex typically stakes their coins. But the fact is - the chain indeed forked, with some strange things shown by block explorer...

Only reason I traded on C-cex was Ambercoin allways thought it was a shady exchange with all the ICO's they do.

Is there any indication that a fix is coming ? Cant someone just sent them the Ips from the configs of the wallets that are working ?
I don't like that they are stuck in the exchange If I could at least withdraw them id be a lot happier.(not that I think much will happen with ambercoin But I don't want the Exchange to be holding my stuff.)

It looks like this is not a simple issue with a regular fork. The network itself is running smooth now, I was able to download the whole blockchain from scratch and appeared on the same chain as the block explorer. So from the first glance the newtork is ok.

However there was an issue on the blockchain, which resulted in some strange balances. That issue is reflected on the official block explorer too. As I told above, I have opened a ticket with C-Cex, asking for a proof that chain is broken. They linked me to the following: https://www.blockexperts.com/amber/address/AMP7SP6iif59qHPiMo63BqKc8UTf7ZLgLu, and truly saying, I cannot explain what I see there ("Balance -185440.84852750 AMBER", note the 'minus' sign)... As far as I understand, with healthy blockchain such things could not happen. Can anyone explain how those numbers could appear?

AmberCoin has several times forks and back again on a mainblockchain - between the forks a transaction and then again on mainblockchain - now they have minus...
Best regards

Still I don't understand. I have seen many coins which went on a fork, then returned to the single "main" blockchain, and they are working ok since, without any addresses having those strange negative balances.

Explorer is on the main blockchain, right? After the forks have resolved and a node returned to the main blockchain, it should forget (invalidate) all the transactions done on the fork, so only the transactions done on the main blockchain can be visible. So how the block explorer shows the negative balance? The main blockchain should be self-consistent, right? It cannot have addresses with negative balances.

ZzzzeyeZzzz

full member

Activity: 377

Merit: 108

ChessCoin 1.4

My ambercoin wallet has many connections and syncs just fine all those people are on the wrong chain then ?

same.

i think perhaps c-cex themselves forked it?

It might be the case, as C-Cex typically stakes their coins. But the fact is - the chain indeed forked, with some strange things shown by block explorer...

Only reason I traded on C-cex was Ambercoin allways thought it was a shady exchange with all the ICO's they do.

Is there any indication that a fix is coming ? Cant someone just sent them the Ips from the configs of the wallets that are working ?
I don't like that they are stuck in the exchange If I could at least withdraw them id be a lot happier.(not that I think much will happen with ambercoin But I don't want the Exchange to be holding my stuff.)

It looks like this is not a simple issue with a regular fork. The network itself is running smooth now, I was able to download the whole blockchain from scratch and appeared on the same chain as the block explorer. So from the first glance the newtork is ok.

However there was an issue on the blockchain, which resulted in some strange balances. That issue is reflected on the official block explorer too. As I told above, I have opened a ticket with C-Cex, asking for a proof that chain is broken. They linked me to the following: https://www.blockexperts.com/amber/address/AMP7SP6iif59qHPiMo63BqKc8UTf7ZLgLu, and truly saying, I cannot explain what I see there ("Balance -185440.84852750 AMBER", note the 'minus' sign)... As far as I understand, with healthy blockchain such things could not happen. Can anyone explain how those numbers could appear?

AmberCoin has several times forks and back again on a mainblockchain - between the forks a transaction and then again on mainblockchain - now they have minus...
Best regards

drays

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1073

My ambercoin wallet has many connections and syncs just fine all those people are on the wrong chain then ?

same.

i think perhaps c-cex themselves forked it?

It might be the case, as C-Cex typically stakes their coins. But the fact is - the chain indeed forked, with some strange things shown by block explorer...

Only reason I traded on C-cex was Ambercoin allways thought it was a shady exchange with all the ICO's they do.

Is there any indication that a fix is coming ? Cant someone just sent them the Ips from the configs of the wallets that are working ?
I don't like that they are stuck in the exchange If I could at least withdraw them id be a lot happier.(not that I think much will happen with ambercoin But I don't want the Exchange to be holding my stuff.)

It looks like this is not a simple issue with a regular fork. The network itself is running smooth now, I was able to download the whole blockchain from scratch and appeared on the same chain as the block explorer. So from the first glance the newtork is ok.

However there was an issue on the blockchain, which resulted in some strange balances. That issue is reflected on the official block explorer too. As I told above, I have opened a ticket with C-Cex, asking for a proof that chain is broken. They linked me to the following: https://www.blockexperts.com/amber/address/AMP7SP6iif59qHPiMo63BqKc8UTf7ZLgLu, and truly saying, I cannot explain what I see there ("Balance -185440.84852750 AMBER", note the 'minus' sign)... As far as I understand, with healthy blockchain such things could not happen. Can anyone explain how those numbers could appear?

sluppy

legendary

Activity: 2020

Merit: 1041

My ambercoin wallet has many connections and syncs just fine all those people are on the wrong chain then ?

same.

i think perhaps c-cex themselves forked it?

It might be the case, as C-Cex typically stakes their coins. But the fact is - the chain indeed forked, with some strange things shown by block explorer...

Only reason I traded on C-cex was Ambercoin allways thought it was a shady exchange with all the ICO's they do.

Is there any indication that a fix is coming ? Cant someone just sent them the Ips from the configs of the wallets that are working ?
I don't like that they are stuck in the exchange If I could at least withdraw them id be a lot happier.(not that I think much will happen with ambercoin But I don't want the Exchange to be holding my stuff.)

drays

legendary

Activity: 2548

Merit: 1073

My ambercoin wallet has many connections and syncs just fine all those people are on the wrong chain then ?

same.

i think perhaps c-cex themselves forked it?

It might be the case, as C-Cex typically stakes their coins. But the fact is - the chain indeed forked, with some strange things shown by block explorer...

kelsey

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1000