Third, why does AMC need VMC to re-sell its chips in bulk? Why can't AMC handle that itself? So, you bulk-sell chips to VMC, VMC sells them on, AMC gets 70% of the profits, VMC 30%? Why do it like that? Why not just have AMC/VMC together, AMC sells the chips and it receives 100% of the profits from these sales?
Let me just ask you a simple question. How would AMC sells chips itself? Explain to me how that would be done?
Just like how Avalon, BFL or BitFury is selling their chips. AMC's website (we should get one made), group buys on the forum, website, eBay, BitMit or through authorized resellers.
Here is why AMC can not sell the chips. There are no provisions for employees, unless you hire 4 at the same time. There are no provisions for any kind of sales expenses one you hire the 4 employees. There are no provisions for any kinda of hosting services. There are no provisions for hiring someone to develop a website to sell the chips. Even if you hired the 4 employees, the expenses are limited to a 10% maximum. So please tell me how this would be done.
Cool, you posted that 7 seconds before my post above
You are making everything way too complicated.
How is ASICMINER able to do everything under one company? But somehow, you think it's an impossibility
https://asicminer.info/what-is-asicminer/ASICMINER has issued 400,000 shares, and is contractually obligated to never dilute them. 163,962 of the shares are publicly owned, originally purchased during ASICMINER’s IPO on the now-defunct Global Stock Exchange (GLBSE). They were sold for 0.1 Bitcoins per share, to fund the development of the hardware, the setup of the datacenters, and all other operating expenses. The remaining 236,038 shares are owned by the corporation known as Bitfountain, which is registered in China, and operates the mining datacenters, hardware sales, share transfers, and all the other day-to-day dealings of ASICMINER.
Obviously you will have to do everything you just outlined at some point in order to get VMC to sell the chips, right? Why not just call VMC AMC's hardware division and merge the 2 companies into AMC?
The general feeling I am getting is that most people including myself are getting past the "AMC might be a scam" point to more of a "The way Kenneth Slaughter has set these 2 companies up is not optimal for the shareholder" viewpoint.
VMC becoming AMC's division or vice versa might work out. Just like how Bitfountain and ASICMINER is under one roof. Bitfountain holds 236,038 shares out of the 400,00 which is used to pay the owners and for Bitfountain and to run both entities under one umbrella such as day to day operations, mining and making sales on hardware. There might be a way for VMC and AMC to coexist under these terms. 20m shares can be allocated for the VMC division which will run the day to day operations and make sales of the chips/machines. 20m shares for the investors to be sold. 20m to growth and development? The numbers can be discussed and changed but it might be fair it we do a 20/20/20 to make everything equal. All profits from sales/mining will be divided equally.
Another issues is the dilution of shares. This security should issue a set amount of shares and should be obligated to never dilute them. This way it keeps investors happy and dividends consistent without major changes by flooding the market with new shares.
Ugh, more obfuscation!
Why are unsold shares being given dividends? If the unsold/unissued shares are treasury shares, they shouldn't get dividends (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treasury_stock). 85% of dividends (should this be 'profit'?) being kept for reinvestment? I thought that's why shares were sold in the first place? To raise capital? Having read this,
http://www.sharesexplained.com/shares-explained, it seems that it's to raise funds for capital expansion/start up, but it sometimes looks as though it's more to 'reward the owner', which is odd, given that the company has barely even started.
If the value of the company is
BTC6000, then it's worth ~$600k. But you've issued 40 million shares, so any coins mined at the moment are split up over 40 million shares, soon to be 100 million shares in a year. Call me crazy, but I don't see how that's in the best interests of investors.
Unsold shares should not be given dividends. Only shares that have been sold should be given profits. Nothing else to say here. Thalum pretty much covered it.
If that's the case, then it would be worthwhile talking with the mods/staff at bitfunder and seeing what, if anything can be done. As I'm sure you've noticed, it's something that almost everyone here is clamouring for, and it would go a long way to soothing much of the craziness that has been going on in this thread over the past four days.
+1 I really hope that Ken will consider doing this. I personally think that this is what is holding things back, and the trolls are eating us alive over it.
I as well as other investors would probably start investing more money into AMC on top of what we have already invested. It would also attract new investors to hope on board and join us as they would see it is a fair investment for the issuer and and the shareholder.
Ok, Let say we merge AMC and VMC, who is going to run it?
Ken I was happy with you running things before. I still am.
Tell us what resources you need, I'm sure we can work something out. We all want this to succeed.
Ken would continue to run the business with his team (VMC). Just like ASICMINER has a team (BitFountain) to run the business that is generated by the profits from the dividends. This would keep the day to day operation running and once again all profits from sales and mining would be divided equally in shares sold/owned.