Topic: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion - page 65. (Read 223316 times)

Excellent!  

We are in the process of compiling a FAQ's which should be written on Monday and posted soon after that.  It may need to be reviewed and rewritten before it is posted.  I am going to post that in the reserved post that I have at the beginning of the thread.  That way if anyone ask a question that is answered in the FAQ's we can point them to that message.

48 yes to 48 no (after my yes vote). A really odd number IMHO.

To clarify, I want to keep the criticism, but just not the behaviour thats occurring... from both sides.

I think part of the problem is many people here have not done their due diligence and expect to be spoon fed information that is available elsewhere in the thread. I've studied this security and watched Ken's moves and I feel I have a good understanding of the value proposition. Basically, what I'm saying is I am comfortable with my significant investment and where we are.

However, there are outstanding questions that have not been answered, or could do with further clarification. I like your idea i.e. let's get the ball rolling. Maybe we could compile a small number of questions for Ken over several posts, to be presented *one post at a time*, and maybe Ken can commit to feedback whenever his schedule allows. The real challenge will be keeping the spammers like Megamouth in check. So, I'm afraid that although I'd like to try this approach, I'm not confident it will work because it only takes one unethical poster to sabotage the plan.

If we *can* get this approach to work, we should aim to build a FAQ which everyone can refer back to in future. If we can't get it to work, I'll live with it and wait for future news and dividend payments to validate my decision to invest.

Edit: Oh, and I really want to make it clear I believe there are a significant number of people here who are trying to get the terms of the offering modified for financial gain. It seems a lot of people got burnt through naivete/poor decisions and they should *not* be reimbursed or compensated in any way. That way lies Moral Hazard and the corruption of the legacy finance system.

Exactly. Where is Ken's input as the CEO of AMC? No responses? What kind of CEO ignores shareholders requests for clarification and solutions to a major issue.

This change needs to be a top priority as well. Unsold shares should not take in dividends. Shareholders should take in all dividends along with the fixed 20m growth fund.

Ken has not addressed many of the issues discussed here for the last few days. I've asked questions in regards to the AMC/VMC structure, capping out the shares issues at a lower number, distribution of dividends from hardware/mining, issuing of new shares, and protection of shareholders investment by keeping funds within AMC (no side project funding for Ken's personal venture). Would like to see if Ken or anyone that has asked to Ken about these issues for clarification. These are just some of the issues at the top of the list for me. I am sure we all have more to add but let's get the ball rolling from here.

We could go back and forth if you like, but what is the point? You say he hasn't, I say he has. He has. Go back and review the thread.

I voted yes to delete all the crap spam that has taken this thread over. 

I would also like to hear from Ken regarding the questions and accusations, in detail.

Why, what have you done to count yourself in MM's league?

This is an excellent post from Burnside and I recommend everyone reads it. It is sensible, level headed and a breath of fresh air in comparison to the nonsense Megamouth gets away with. Ironically, it does not give much support to MM's agenda with all his FUD  .

It's easy for people to forget that when they participate in this new economy they are among the very earliest of adopters. Every new market and industry goes through growing pains. This is what we are seeing here. We are trail blazing a new economy. We are the ones that have to take most of the pain and stress so others that follow will have a much easier time. If you are ready to accept this and the associated high risks, the rewards could be great.

Once again lolstate, you make claims that have no substance.  NONE of these have been addressed by Ken at all.

Please add me aswell, because I was about to ask you the same question. Thanks.

You've started to spam again. You're added to the list  .

Are you insane?

Dunno why you refuse to accept lots has been covered. It has been - go back and review this thread if you can hack through the noise 

Blue chips use PO Box addresses all the time. It is standard practice for mail to be sent to one location then forwarded to another. There is nothing controversial about this, it's a fact.

Nonsense - none of it has been addressed.


Blue Chip companies do not use mailboxes in side street shops. They have offices you can visit, they are regulated by government agencies, the company Directors publicly display their CV, home addresses registered, bank accounts audited, news release claims are independently verifiable for accuracy.

A lot of this stuff has been addressed. We are just going around in circles here. I also have to chuckle when people act like they are shocked a company uses a PO Box. If that qualified a company for scam status, 99% of all blue chip companies would fall foul.

Things that need to be answered directly from Ken.

And the operator of Cognitive (Garr225) has been found to shill his own auctions by using sock puppets, and he has a score of 7.

This place is a farce, and wonder why people 'participate' more and more. Bitcointalk is the centre of all things Bitcoin is it?