What we need here is *serious* discussion. Ideally we can get rid of the likes of MM, Swede and Entropy and allow genuine comments of all types, whether negative, neutral or positive. I'd be delighted to hear real criticism that we can all engage with - if it was real - but alas the likes of MM have shown it often isn't.
You couldn't be more wrong. What we need now are verifiable facts from Mr Slaughter. Not more discussion. Not more promises or predictions. Just facts. All the questions have been asked and from Mr Slaughter - silence.
Unfortunately, what seems to happen is people ask sensible questions of Ken, and while we wait for a response, the thread gets spammed by people whose only aim appears to be to disrupt it. I've lost track of all the sensible questions and concerns asked of Ken and whether there have been satisfactory answers because of the extreme signal-to-noise you helped to contribute to. An example was the insults you threw around when you refused to believe that 'weak hand' was a finance term without negative connotations. You are not the worst offender, steveioio, but I do question your sincerity.
Another major problem is the same questions that *have* been answered are asked over and over again. We really need a central FAQ where this stuff can be recorded, because the serial, unfolding nature of this forum thread isn't the best way to communicate this info.
Latest AMC share holdings on BitFunder over 100K:
20000000
9845216
2000000
1643032
1005641
647927
214522
203001
200000
187773
179000
150000
131000
128730
125700
106671
104044
101000
100977
100228
100126
100126
100126