Pages:
Author

Topic: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion - page 66. (Read 223316 times)

hero member
Activity: 662
Merit: 545

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.

lolstate role on this forum (this thread actualy, since he posted nowhere else) is to distract, derail debate and turn us naysayers into mere trolls
and spammers. He wants to pick a pointless fight and extend thread to thousands of pages of shit so that concerns and questions asked become
buried under nothing but crap and spam. Don't fall for it. Give sucker negative trust and ignore him, thanks!

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
What we need here is *serious* discussion. Ideally we can get rid of the likes of MM, Swede and Entropy and allow genuine comments of all types, whether negative, neutral or positive. I'd be delighted to hear real criticism that we can all engage with - if it was real - but alas the likes of MM have shown it often isn't.

You couldn't be more wrong. What we need now are verifiable facts from Mr Slaughter. Not more discussion. Not more promises or predictions. Just facts. All the questions have been asked and from Mr Slaughter - silence.

Unfortunately, what seems to happen is people ask sensible questions of Ken, and while we wait for a response, the thread gets spammed by people whose only aim appears to be to disrupt it. I've lost track of all the sensible questions and concerns asked of Ken and whether there have been satisfactory answers because of the extreme signal-to-noise you helped to contribute to. An example was the insults you threw around when you refused to believe that 'weak hand' was a finance term without negative connotations. You are not the worst offender, steveioio, but I do question your sincerity.

Another major problem is the same questions that *have* been answered are asked over and over again. We really need a central FAQ where this stuff can be recorded, because the serial, unfolding nature of this forum thread isn't the best way to communicate this info.

Latest AMC share holdings on BitFunder over 100K:

20000000
9845216
2000000
1643032
1005641
647927
214522
203001
200000
187773
179000
150000
131000
128730
125700
106671
104044
101000
100977
100228
100126
100126
100126

 Grin
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.

lolstate role on this forum (this thread actualy, since he posted nowhere else) is to distract, derail debate and turn us naysayers into mere trolls
and spammers. He wants to pick a pointless fight and extend thread to thousands of pages of shit so that concerns and questions asked become
buried under nothing but crap and spam. Don't fall for it. Give sucker negative trust and ignore him, thanks!

More updates from Ken

"Have the documents scanned and redacted, waiting on PR approval."

A day passed, any update? No, of course. 1 hour, 1 day, 1 week or 1 month makes no difference when there is nothing to show.

A day has passed and he's not been to bed yet.  Could someone please hide his crack pipe, then we might get some peace.  I suppose he'd only wake up more bitter when the reality of his situation hit him.
He tried but failed in his own Bitcoin startup and from that day swore to himself that he would ensure that EVERY other business idea that had potential would see his wrath. 

The only scam I see here is this muppets attempt to scam all the genuine investors out of their future Bitcoins.

Please don't reply to me MagaMouth because I will not reply to you.  Ever.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
What we need here is *serious* discussion. Ideally we can get rid of the likes of MM, Swede and Entropy and allow genuine comments of all types, whether negative, neutral or positive. I'd be delighted to hear real criticism that we can all engage with - if it was real - but alas the likes of MM have shown it often isn't.

You couldn't be more wrong. What we need now are verifiable facts from Mr Slaughter. Not more discussion. Not more promises or predictions. Just facts. All the questions have been asked and from Mr Slaughter - silence.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.

lolstate role on this forum (this thread actualy, since he posted nowhere else) is to distract, derail debate and turn us naysayers into mere trolls
and spammers. He wants to pick a pointless fight and extend thread to thousands of pages of shit so that concerns and questions asked become
buried under nothing but crap and spam. Don't fall for it. Give sucker negative trust and ignore him, thanks!

I'll go with the majority view on this.

Seems a strange thing to say - as though you were the one with the ability to determine what happened.  Unless you're a sock-puppet of Ken's you have no option BUT to accept what Ken decides (which may or may not be the same thing as going with the majority view).

No, I'm only saying I'm sure the community will come to the best decision. I'm eager to get on with it, whatever the decision is - new moderated thread or moderate this one, whatever.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.

lolstate role on this forum (this thread actualy, since he posted nowhere else) is to distract, derail debate and turn us naysayers into mere trolls
and spammers. He wants to pick a pointless fight and extend thread to thousands of pages of shit so that concerns and questions asked become
buried under nothing but crap and spam. Don't fall for it. Give sucker negative trust and ignore him, thanks!

I'll go with the majority view on this.

Seems a strange thing to say - as though you were the one with the ability to determine what happened.  Unless you're a sock-puppet of Ken's you have no option BUT to accept what Ken decides (which may or may not be the same thing as going with the majority view).
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I fear this thread will turn into a "open" discussion where only praise is accepted.

What we need here is *serious* discussion. Ideally we can get rid of the likes of MM, Swede and Entropy and allow genuine comments of all types, whether negative, neutral or positive. I'd be delighted to hear real criticism that we can all engage with - if it was real - but alas the likes of MM have shown it often isn't.
newbie
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
What's with all this zealotry?
Some people are asking questions about this security. And they should be allowed. Because most of them have concerns that they want put to rest. Before investing their money into AMC.

But then random people start getting into arguments with them.
If you've invested in AMC. Fine you seem to have trust.
But is it necessary that everyone follows your vision?

Seriously it's like a Mac vs PC discussion here.
Where everyone is fighting but nobody is winning.

And the idea of cleaning up the thread seems like an awful move.
I fear this thread will turn into a "open" discussion where only praise is accepted.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.

lolstate role on this forum (this thread actualy, since he posted nowhere else) is to distract, derail debate and turn us naysayers into mere trolls
and spammers. He wants to pick a pointless fight and extend thread to thousands of pages of shit so that concerns and questions asked become
buried under nothing but crap and spam. Don't fall for it. Give sucker negative trust and ignore him, thanks!

I'm sensing regret from MM, we definitely saw it earlier from Entropy and Swede. I think they realise how ridiculously shallow they have made themselves appear here. I'm coming around to the idea of keeping everything in this thread to act as a guide to future Bitcoin generations on how not to behave and moving to a brand new, moderated thread. But that's just my opinion, I'll go with the majority view on this.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
The question should be, who is paying for the coordinated negative postings? I vote to easily investigate multiple accounts, and the buying/selling of accounts, which of course wont happen.

Ken. Someone influential voted you enemy of the week, me thinks.
People who actually know how to invest, simple.

How to invest = Attack the enemy.

Really TF?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.

I think I already said I'll be ignoring you from now on. I'm temporarily breaking that pledge to point out to you and any new comers that you have been part of the problem on this thread. We need to raise the quality of comments here, so please lend a hand  Wink.

Edit: 'Threat' ?! It's a statement of fact. Stop playing the victim.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.

I wont directly reply to this threat that adds nothing to the discussion. Pure spam.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Forget the Poll Ken - the thread has only got this way because of your silence. Start addressing the valid concerns and you won't then need to censor your shareholders.

My advice needs to be repeated - cover yourself here and don't put anymore money into VMC's account until 'Mr Slaughter' reveals himself and answers the valid questions that he has blatently been refusing to answer.

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.
Having being around when pirateat40 was around, you can tell that lolstate is pretty much identical to one of the pirate supporters.

Have fun losing your money.

Tell me more. We need some genuine discourse in this thread.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
Forget the Poll Ken - the thread has only got this way because of your silence. Start addressing the valid concerns and you won't then need to censor your shareholders.

My advice needs to be repeated - cover yourself here and don't put anymore money into VMC's account until 'Mr Slaughter' reveals himself and answers the valid questions that he has blatently been refusing to answer.

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.
Having being around when pirateat40 was around, you can tell that lolstate is pretty much identical to one of the pirate supporters.

Have fun losing your money.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Forget the Poll Ken - the thread has only got this way because of your silence. Start addressing the valid concerns and you won't then need to censor your shareholders.

My advice needs to be repeated - cover yourself here and don't put anymore money into VMC's account until 'Mr Slaughter' reveals himself and answers the valid questions that he has blatently been refusing to answer.

Steveioio, I'm close to putting you in the same bucket as MM, Swede and Entropy. I'll be watching carefully to see if you can stay on topic, or resort to spamming people with inane typing like they have.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
The question should be, who is paying for the coordinated negative postings? I vote to easily investigate multiple accounts, and the buying/selling of accounts, which of course wont happen.

Ken. Someone influential voted you enemy of the week, me thinks.
People who actually know how to invest, simple.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Forget the Poll Ken - the thread has only got this way because of your silence. Start addressing the valid concerns and you won't then need to censor your shareholders.

My advice needs to be repeated - cover yourself here and don't put anymore money into VMC's account until 'Mr Slaughter' reveals himself and answers the valid questions that he has blatently been refusing to answer.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
The question should be, who is paying for the coordinated negative postings? I vote to easily investigate multiple accounts, and the buying/selling of accounts, which of course wont happen.

Ken. Someone influential voted you enemy of the week, me thinks.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
I think this is a perfect example for why there should be more enforcement by the mods here on bitcointalk.

Why are the mods allowing this thread to be filled with such drivel for so long? It is not little to no discussion and instead just garbage 1 on 1 arguments that add nothing to the topic at hand. It got so bad, even another thread was made!

I have created a poll, to ask users of this thread whether I should delete post that are not discussing the merits of AMC.  Please vote on this poll.

I voted Yes, let's see what you consider worth keeping. My bet is none of questions or concerns rised by few of us here will stay.

Megamouth, most of your posts here are spam. Even if Ken deletes all of your posts, you, Swede and Entropy won't escape your malicious and juvenile behaviour. I'll be reminding people on other threads that you tried to bully your way through this one, for whoever knows what real reason.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Pages:
Jump to: