Topic: [AMC]-The Official Active Mining Cooperative Discussion - page 77. (Read 223316 times)

BINGO. Perfect trading reasoning. +1

In fewer words, I bought at .00082 because that was the price before the announcement.  I asked myself "what about the announcement could make this thing worth LESS than what is was worth before the announcement?"  The answer was nothing.

Admittedly, I also bought some of the newly released shares at .0025, which I regret now, but suspect I won't regret at this time next year.  

Sure.
Entering any trade is essentially an individuals judgement of the value of what he/she has just bought, together with what the perceived value it should be, according to that individual. How does anyone perceive what 'value' is at a given time? Thats a subjective question with many results, which is good, or we would have a very flat and boring market, with no opportunities. Whatever strategies or techniques you employ, it cannot be based on emotion.
Anybody who has had the briefest experience of established market trading, will know that emotion destroys all the think processes you need to judge a given share/future/option etc. And thats my point. The adolescents here either need to either log off and choose their favorite toy to play with, on this fine Saturday (here anyway), OR realize they may not know anywhere near enough to 'survive' these kind of markets, and get a fucking education, or i WILL take your BTC, and you WILL buy mine, and you WILL lose. Sorry, that's what i see, because that's what happened. 

So i repeat my previous post, as something to consider. Sentiment @ ~.0008 was nicely positive. It was an accepted level of value at that time, without knowing any details of the NDA, and knowing we had the Avalon/s and chips coming. There were some people who it seemed could not put together what AMC was trying to achieve, and i would accept that as understandable to some extent, but this recent news sets out a reasonably detailed plan, that should provide some kind of vision to price against.
Whats the value today? You decide, but make sure you have arrived at a figure that is based on reasoned thinking, and not correlated to the amount of adrenalin rushing through your ignorant veins. Whatever the value is, its definitely more than .0008 of anyone's money (currently ~.00130).

Disclaimer: I DO NOT offer advice, only considerations.

Interesting statement. Care to elaborate?

Anyone who was able to buy @ ~.0008, but didn't, needs a lesson in Risk/Reward calculations.

Scooped more up at .00082 yesterday.  I am very patient.

Yes, I'll explain it to you. It doesn't matter if AMC gets its chips in 2014, 2015 or 2016.

What matters is bitcoin mining is transitioning to a corporate structure, so whoever can make their own chips and buy them as cheap as possible, will have the ultimate advantage.

As more and more hardware is bought, the cost for owning significant network % goes up and up. Do you think individual miners paying extra for their hardware will stand? I don't.

AMC is in a good position right now, as a partnership with eAsic allows the chip to be converted to ever decreasing transistor sizes, when they are available, almost effortlessly.

Fast access to hardware and a very low cost is all that matters, independently of the time you do it. Asicminer proved that to any significant GPU farm holder.

THEIR motive, more like. Some of the comments coming from senior members, operators, and issuers, have a coordinated feel to them, from where im sitting.

As with all things Bitcoin related, there is healthy skepticism, cautious optimism and FUD. TheSwede75 is the later. Swede, give it a rest, we have all read your 'concerns' and thank you for your 'insight'. Now back to the main event... how long before we hit 0.0025? I say Monday (1st July 2013) at the latest, but I'm honest enough to admit this is cautious optimism and I could be wrong, right Swede?  

Edit: added Monday's date for the benefit of readers looking back in 3 months and ltfao at Swede's antics.

TheSwede75 has been pushing the hate train with all his might. I really wonder what his ulterior motive is...

Will you stop with the FUD already? The price you quote for the machines to be delivered from VMC to AMC is a red herring. The machines will be delivered to AMC at cost price minus 10%. The current retail price has nothing to do with it. What *will* be delivered is the hashing power stated by Ken in the original prospectus at cost price minus 10% when manufacture/delivery is made.

Buying more shares now. Anyone care to join me?  

Gotta love this guy.  Not content with showing up on a thread in a timely manner to spread fear, uncertainty and doubt for his own greedy gains, he tries to drag people into childish arguments while throwing insults and profanities around as if they were as abundant as AMC shares.

While tempted, I'm not going to respond to your 'religion' comment rather I thought I'd quote you and allow others the opportunity to decide on how big a pinch of salt to use.

"What the hell are you talking about, you must be sniffing glue or something.  It doesn't take a damn genius to read up village idiot!"

There is a definite theme running through Swede's posts, that of village idiots. My favourite is Tiff Tannen from Back to The Future, "Think McFly!". Proof that I was right to assume he share's his DNA with a root vegetable.

I'm sorry, I was wrong

What does RentalStarter have to do with AMC (or kslaughter), exactly?

RentalStarter : IPO!
Posted: 2013-06-27 13:13:23 - Written by RentalStarter
 ( Click to Hide ) 

We are finally ready to issue all available shares.


Written by: RentalStarte

@kslaughter is this true ?

I've been chomping at the 0.0025 "wall" with a very little investment sum. I won't buy "cheap" now and hope that confidence is restored along the way.

I'd rather buy again when I see 0.0030 happening. I'd love to double up before reaching that point, but not at any price...

This is what is really unfair about this investment. Investors are putting up all the money for VMC's hardware development taking all risks. I think AMC should be putting up investors money for it's own hardware development and AMC investors should be paid in dividends for mining and hardware sales. Why should VMC benefit a majority of the income from hardware sales that AMC investors funded? AMC should keep all IP rights. Shares should be capped at a reasonable amount which could be 40m (20m to investors/shares & 20m growth and expansion). I think 50% of revenue put back in for growth is reasonable and i am sure other investors would be happy with something like this as well. Then we wouldn't have pages of talk in regards to the shady business plan, people bad mouthing Ken and this would give people more confidence in this security. We would then move forward from here and grow AMC into a security with a promising future. Just my thoughts.

What would be the possible reason for Ken to give away a massive amount of what right now is about $18.000.000?

Would it make sense to cap the total amount of shares to become available at 40,000,000? Rather than the 100,000,000? Is the 100m shares really necessary? Wouldn't keeping it at 40m give the shares more value for the company and the investors?