Tried really hard to look for some info about it but found nothing on the internet.
Topic: AMD R9 290X? - page 19. (Read 108823 times)
Everyone have been talking about AMD R9 290x, 290, 280x. Did you guys forget about R9 270x?
Tried really hard to look for some info about it but found nothing on the internet.
Tried really hard to look for some info about it but found nothing on the internet.
Either way, nobody is going to buy a $600 card for 1Mh/s, so I'm really not in great anticipation
Maybe if power is a concern and they really improve on that front...say 300w for 1mh/s, it won't be so bad.
Yup, a lot people are more concern about the power consumption, If it is 2x better 7950 or 7970. I it is good as FPGA and people would buy
Either way, nobody is going to buy a $600 card for 1Mh/s, so I'm really not in great anticipation
Maybe if power is a concern and they really improve on that front...say 300w for 1mh/s, it won't be so bad.
Either way, nobody is going to buy a $600 card for 1Mh/s, so I'm really not in great anticipation
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
I get 650-700 from 7950s..
Yup I figured as much..but I Dont know what. Using higher TC makes cgminer crash on start, same with using lookup-gap, tried clocking some, that got me 20-30 higher khash but crashed the card efter 15 mins
Try setting a different -g. Some card uses 1 and some uses 2 to be effience. Also do you happen to have watt a kill to test out the power consumption?
I tried 1, 2 or 3... khash upped to 605.... ;/ Sry no watt tester atm
anyone have got 290x ? and what's the hash rate?
best.
best.
I am still waiting for an answer too. But the card launch on 15 October which is few days left.
AMD postpones launch date to maybe October 24th, nobody knows exact date.
http://videocardz.com/46741/radeon-r9-290x-pictured-close
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
I get 650-700 from 7950s..
Yup I figured as much..but I Dont know what. Using higher TC makes cgminer crash on start, same with using lookup-gap, tried clocking some, that got me 20-30 higher khash but crashed the card efter 15 mins
Try setting a different -g. Some card uses 1 and some uses 2 to be effience. Also do you happen to have watt a kill to test out the power consumption?
anyone have got 290x ? and what's the hash rate?
best.
best.
I am still waiting for an answer too. But the card launch on 15 October which is few days left.
anyone have got 290x ? and what's the hash rate?
best.
best.
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
I get 650-700 from 7950s..
Yup I figured as much..but I Dont know what. Using higher TC makes cgminer crash on start, same with using lookup-gap, tried clocking some, that got me 20-30 higher khash but crashed the card efter 15 mins
Hi there, after a weekend full of testing.. all I can get is 605khash with my R9 280X with 1080/1500 settings...tried a lot of things, but most settings get a HUGE amount of HW errors.
I saw someone posted this to another site
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
Thanks for the info, looks like the hash is almost the same as HD 7970. Have to wait for R9 290X now.. few more days
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
I've tried lots of things and bioses, and drivers with my former 7970 and had similar results. Had to clock it to 1053/1850 to get to 620kh/s :/
Are you guys doing it right? In term of thread count and other settings. Because you should be getting 630 at stock clock and about 750 overclocked.
Too bad I don't have one and I can't really test it myself.
I did everything I could do, researched a whole lot and even helped others achieve good results with their gpus over at overclock.net but couldn't get my gpu to mine properly. I never had an issue with my former 6950, nor my 7950. (which wasn't the best miner but still pulled over 600kh/s without so much hassle)
Trying to figure out what card to get next, I'll probably order next month.
I use the exact same settings on my sapphire 7970, with exception of not setting shaders but thread concurrency to 8192 and it works 760khash. Clock is set to 1080/1500 1,13v, 80 C in a computer case, not open air.
I saw someone posted this to another site
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
Thanks for the info, looks like the hash is almost the same as HD 7970. Have to wait for R9 290X now.. few more days
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
I've tried lots of things and bioses, and drivers with my former 7970 and had similar results. Had to clock it to 1053/1850 to get to 620kh/s :/
Are you guys doing it right? In term of thread count and other settings. Because you should be getting 630 at stock clock and about 750 overclocked.
Too bad I don't have one and I can't really test it myself.
I saw someone posted this to another site
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
Thanks for the info, looks like the hash is almost the same as HD 7970. Have to wait for R9 290X now.. few more days
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
I've tried lots of things and bioses, and drivers with my former 7970 and had similar results. Had to clock it to 1053/1850 to get to 620kh/s :/
I saw someone posted this to another site
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
Thanks for the info, looks like the hash is almost the same as HD 7970. Have to wait for R9 290X now.. few more days
I get 550khash with these settings :O ?
300w looks like ALOT doesnt it?
I saw someone posted this to another site
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
Thanks for the info, looks like the hash is almost the same as HD 7970. Have to wait for R9 290X now.. few more days
I saw someone posted this to another site
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
R9 280X
740 KH/s
300 Watts
1100 Core
1500 Memory
cgminer 3.5.0
Gigabyte GV-R928XOC-3GD
"-w 256 -g 2 -I 13 --shaders 2048" / Windows 7, 1.15v - not locked, 78C, 015.039.000.001 firmware version
Jump to: