Topic: AMHash1: Cost-Effective Mining Contract - page 78. (Read 304259 times)
It has been said that one of the major shortcomings of modern man is lack of understanding of exponential functions and compound interest can probably be added to that.
Say of lambchop all you want, as usual, he has a point. Havelock has been bleeding money according to their own (ridiculously unspecific) financial 'statements', and the drop in BTC price will not have helped.
It also appears to be going nowhere (which I assume is not what they meant when they said "no plans to go anywhere"). Fund after fund goes inactive or delists and aside from AM/AMhash, pretty much nothing goes on there.
And then there is little pesky issue of violations of security regulations in almost any country outside Panama. Sooner or later someone is going to do something about that, and unless you live in Panama, its probably gonna affect you.
So no, I wouldnt keep a lot of coins on havelock either, but I think its also fair to say that AMhash, like AM, will continue operating even without havelock. I just hope they have contingency plans in place and dont get caught by surprise again as they were with Hashie.
Do you also "invest" in all the ponzis in the gambling section, and act surprised when they okthxbai?
He does.
Actually I´ve done very well with all those so called ponzis. Started out six months ago without a clue about bitcoin with amount x. Haven´t added a single satoshi since then and now have amount 5x and earning 1.3x per month. So, it´s all good.
There are a finite number of solutions to your mathematical earning puzzle; x=0 being one of them. How much of that did you make with AMHash?
I´ve only been in AMHASH for six weeks or so. They´did well for me last month, don´t have any units at the moment. It was a useful part of my earnings and of course kept working through reinvestments elsewhere. I keep churning the returns from my investments around to get maximum yield.
No dividend announcements today (01-29-2015) whats going on?
Any official please tell us whats going on.
Say of lambchop all you want, as usual, he has a point. Havelock has been bleeding money according to their own (ridiculously unspecific) financial 'statements', and the drop in BTC price will not have helped.
It also appears to be going nowhere (which I assume is not what they meant when they said "no plans to go anywhere"). Fund after fund goes inactive or delists and aside from AM/AMhash, pretty much nothing goes on there.
And then there is little pesky issue of violations of security regulations in almost any country outside Panama. Sooner or later someone is going to do something about that, and unless you live in Panama, its probably gonna affect you.
So no, I wouldnt keep a lot of coins on havelock either, but I think its also fair to say that AMhash, like AM, will continue operating even without havelock. I just hope they have contingency plans in place and dont get caught by surprise again as they were with Hashie.
Do you also "invest" in all the ponzis in the gambling section, and act surprised when they okthxbai?
He does.
Actually I´ve done very well with all those so called ponzis. Started out six months ago without a clue about bitcoin with amount x. Haven´t added a single satoshi since then and now have amount 5x and earning 1.3x per month. So, it´s all good.
There are a finite number of solutions to your mathematical earning puzzle; x=0 being one of them. How much of that did you make with AMHash?
Say of lambchop all you want, as usual, he has a point. Havelock has been bleeding money according to their own (ridiculously unspecific) financial 'statements', and the drop in BTC price will not have helped.
It also appears to be going nowhere (which I assume is not what they meant when they said "no plans to go anywhere"). Fund after fund goes inactive or delists and aside from AM/AMhash, pretty much nothing goes on there.
And then there is little pesky issue of violations of security regulations in almost any country outside Panama. Sooner or later someone is going to do something about that, and unless you live in Panama, its probably gonna affect you.
So no, I wouldnt keep a lot of coins on havelock either, but I think its also fair to say that AMhash, like AM, will continue operating even without havelock. I just hope they have contingency plans in place and dont get caught by surprise again as they were with Hashie.
Do you also "invest" in all the ponzis in the gambling section, and act surprised when they okthxbai?
He does.
Actually I´ve done very well with all those so called ponzis. Started out six months ago without a clue about bitcoin with amount x. Haven´t added a single satoshi since then and now have amount 5x and earning 1.3x per month. So, it´s all good. Compound interest sure is a wonderful thing.
Say of lambchop all you want, as usual, he has a point. Havelock has been bleeding money according to their own (ridiculously unspecific) financial 'statements', and the drop in BTC price will not have helped.
It also appears to be going nowhere (which I assume is not what they meant when they said "no plans to go anywhere"). Fund after fund goes inactive or delists and aside from AM/AMhash, pretty much nothing goes on there.
And then there is little pesky issue of violations of security regulations in almost any country outside Panama. Sooner or later someone is going to do something about that, and unless you live in Panama, its probably gonna affect you.
So no, I wouldnt keep a lot of coins on havelock either, but I think its also fair to say that AMhash, like AM, will continue operating even without havelock. I just hope they have contingency plans in place and dont get caught by surprise again as they were with Hashie.
Do you also "invest" in all the ponzis in the gambling section, and act surprised when they okthxbai?
He does.
...We still did very well during 2012 and 2013...
Right. Except that in 2012 & 2013 Havelock was not a Panamanian shelf. It was run by a Canadian Anon going by Lightbox.
Ever since the ownership of Havelock was [allegedly] transferred to The Panama Fund, Havelock had shown only losses.
Nice try tho.
P.S: almost forgot--the future looks bright!
~Happy Investing.
We have been around since 2012 and we don't have any plans to go anywhere. We have answered the "shelf company" claims countless times over the past year, but some "shelf people" still like to bring it up again and again. Havelock is located and operates from Panama. Havelock is a small part of our overall investments portfolio and as a Bitcoin business and just like any Bitcoin related business has had losses during 2014. We still did very well during 2012 and 2013. We look forward to 2015 regardless of the price of btc/usd.
As on member here always says:
"Happy Investing"
As on member here always says:
"Happy Investing"
right dont pay attention to attention whoe.
could you answer the questions regarding your development plan tho: whats your plans for the future? any timescale?
We have been around since 2012 and we don't have any plans to go anywhere. We have answered the "shelf company" claims countless times over the past year, but some "shelf people" still like to bring it up again and again. Havelock is located and operates from Panama. Havelock is a small part of our overall investments portfolio and as a Bitcoin business and just like any Bitcoin related business has had losses during 2014. We still did very well during 2012 and 2013. We look forward to 2015 regardless of the price of btc/usd.
As on member here always says:
"Happy Investing"
As on member here always says:
"Happy Investing"
So NotLambchop, gimme odds on Havelock still being among us fifteen weeks from now.
Thanking you beforehand, g
Thanking you beforehand, g
You're asking me to guess what a Panamanian shelf company called The Panama Fund, which is purportedly losing money hand over fist, is planning to do in 15 weeks? RLY?
Is this how you manage your money, by asking random d00ds from the internet to give you odds on shit that was structured specifically to defraud?
Do you also "invest" in all the ponzis in the gambling section, and act surprised when they okthxbai?
So NotLambchop, gimme odds on Havelock still being among us fifteen weeks from now.
Thanking you beforehand, g
Thanking you beforehand, g
...
Just to put your mind a bit at ease, you can just ignore anything LambChop says, he's the biggest troll on this forum. Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
Just to put your mind a bit at ease, you can just ignore anything LambChop says, he's the biggest troll on this forum. Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
Lol, when you can't refute the fact, stoop down to ad hominem. No wonder you got kicked from default trust.
Still pimping AM & its byproducts I see? I'm sure the folks who bought into your wisdom can't thank you enough
I don´t have any AMHASH units at the moment but it´s always on the radar and I have an accumulation plan which will kick in soon most likely. Dumped it all and loaded up on B.MINE. This will gradually go to zero over the next 110 days or so all the while paying a rather fat dividend. Which i would like to reinvest in AMHASH over the period especially if BTC could somehow stop tanking and get more stabilized on a higher level. And it would be really really good for me if Havelock stayed around for the next 15 weeks at least.
Come on guys, start a NotLambchop appreciation thread if one doesn't already exists and we can try to remain topical in here.
We want information and discussion about AMHash not about the nuance of NotLambchop.
Quote
Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
Yeah, familiar sentiment.
Quote
I pretend to be crazy in order to drive you all crazy.
Look, I can handle fluctuating prices of what i trade. If I fail to anticipate and react to them it´s because I´m a lousy trader and I only have myself to blame. And i don´t really think that BTC will tank enough to wipe out mining. BUT and it´s a very big but if I have to worry about whether the bloody trading platform itself will be around the next morning that´s something real serious. It´s systemic flaw of an intolerable order. Obviously you can´t have this dangerous overhang in any marketplace that wants to be taken seriously. So, the policy behind bitcoin is obviously geared towards destruction of confidence and trust and buying interest and thus market value. It´s really weird but can´t be denied - it´s before you like an open book whether you like it or not.
Just to put your mind a bit at ease, you can just ignore anything LambChop says, he's the biggest troll on this forum. Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
LambChop may be a troll, but there is some merit to what is said.
Quote
Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
Probably very true...
Actually i have no complaints at all about Havelock. It has served my purposes perfectly so the last thing I needed or expected was having to worry about them and any nuclear war on BCT as a result of their, heavens forbid, untimely demise.
Look, I can handle fluctuating prices of what i trade. If I fail to anticipate and react to them it´s because I´m a lousy trader and I only have myself to blame. And i don´t really think that BTC will tank enough to wipe out mining. BUT and it´s a very big but if I have to worry about whether the bloody trading platform itself will be around the next morning that´s something real serious. It´s systemic flaw of an intolerable order. Obviously you can´t have this dangerous overhang in any marketplace that wants to be taken seriously. So, the policy behind bitcoin is obviously geared towards destruction of confidence and trust and buying interest and thus market value. It´s really weird but can´t be denied - it´s before you like an open book whether you like it or not.
Just to put your mind a bit at ease, you can just ignore anything LambChop says, he's the biggest troll on this forum. Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
Yeah, I know he´s a troll. But sometimes I glean something of use from trolls. And I did have a look at those laughable "financials". My worrymeter went down considerably now though. Thanks Mabsark and good luck, g
Look, I can handle fluctuating prices of what i trade. If I fail to anticipate and react to them it´s because I´m a lousy trader and I only have myself to blame. And i don´t really think that BTC will tank enough to wipe out mining. BUT and it´s a very big but if I have to worry about whether the bloody trading platform itself will be around the next morning that´s something real serious. It´s systemic flaw of an intolerable order. Obviously you can´t have this dangerous overhang in any marketplace that wants to be taken seriously. So, the policy behind bitcoin is obviously geared towards destruction of confidence and trust and buying interest and thus market value. It´s really weird but can´t be denied - it´s before you like an open book whether you like it or not.
Just to put your mind a bit at ease, you can just ignore anything LambChop says, he's the biggest troll on this forum. Whether what he says is right or wrong, he's just trying to wind everyone up and piss them off. That's how he get his jollies.
Look, I can handle fluctuating prices of what i trade. If I fail to anticipate and react to them it´s because I´m a lousy trader and I only have myself to blame. And i don´t really think that BTC will tank enough to wipe out mining. BUT and it´s a very big but if I have to worry about whether the bloody trading platform itself will be around the next morning that´s something real serious. It´s systemic flaw of an intolerable order. Obviously you can´t have this dangerous overhang in any marketplace that wants to be taken seriously. So, the policy behind bitcoin is obviously geared towards destruction of confidence and trust and buying interest and thus market value. It´s really weird but can´t be denied - it´s before you like an open book whether you like it or not.
Jump to: