Pages:
Author

Topic: An (even more) optimized version of cpuminer (pooler's cpuminer, CPU-only) - page 49. (Read 1958601 times)

hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
Scattering my bits around the net since 1980
gaise pls, it's just botnets.

Anyways I deleted it. Everyone do as you please....
As long as you downloaded it through the link at the top of the thread, yer fine...

It has been included with malware so the botnet operator can use other people's computers to mine. That's why cgminer and minerd got tagged by the virus scanners.

It isn't a virus itself, it was just the payload, but the scanner companies don't really care about that.

They aren't as thorough as they used to be. >shrugs<

-- Smoov
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
gaise pls, it's just botnets.

Anyways I deleted it. Everyone do as you please....
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
gaise pls, it's just botnets.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.
check the MD5 from the github dowload and compare it with urs, if its the same then its a false positive, otherwise u maybe got a problem Wink

I really don't know how to check MD5 from github. I'm pretty sure I'm safe.
download the file, check it? aint that hard. DL it with https too Wink
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.
check the MD5 from the github dowload and compare it with urs, if its the same then its a false positive, otherwise u maybe got a problem Wink

I really don't know how to check MD5 from github. I'm pretty sure I'm safe.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
I have Downloaded this from

Binaries for Windows:
https://github.com/downloads/pooler/cpuminer/pooler-cpuminer-2.2.3-win32.zip (32-bit)

From the Original Post.

Its the minerd.exe   Microsoft essentials checks out ok
Spybot sd has flagged it twice and has deleted it  immediately so I downloaded it and
I put it though an online virus scanner....




WTF is going on here?

Someone else please verify Thanks



Botnets.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
I have Downloaded this from

Binaries for Windows:
https://github.com/downloads/pooler/cpuminer/pooler-cpuminer-2.2.3-win32.zip (32-bit)

From the Original Post.

Its the minerd.exe   Microsoft essentials checks out ok
Spybot sd has flagged it twice and has deleted it  immediately so I downloaded it and
I put it though an online virus scanner....




WTF is going on here?

Someone else please verify Thanks

sr. member
Activity: 389
Merit: 250
Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.
Botnets are a great source of computing power, bitcoin miners are a great way to capitalize on computing power, and I have heard some about these being distributed in such a manner but I'm not sure how common that actually is.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.
check the MD5 from the github dowload and compare it with urs, if its the same then its a false positive, otherwise u maybe got a problem Wink
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
Can anyone put my anxiety at ease here.

I dl the new cpuminer and this is what came up after the 4th hash



I trust spybot and it never failed me to date. I know some things can be accidentally added to DB's However this has never come up with these miners.

This one is the first miner program that has done this.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
can somone be as kind as to tell me how to setup cgminer to mine using my cpu for ltc please

am reading through this thread and understand nothing and they are no hlep files to put in comnads for bat etc

what do i need to change in this

cgminer -o http://url -u worker1 -p xxx -I 14 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-memclock 300

any ideas plz or do  i need to download files from here and replace etc thx
NO! ur in the wrong thread!
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
@muqali i believe that is only valid if you are pool mining, i`m solo mining...

i`ll send my logs to @K1773R so he can show us some scrollbar magic, right dude?
then u have to wait until u find a block to get the neat "accepted: */* (100.00%), * khash/s (yay!!!)" message Wink

lets see what poolers is coming up with, or do you want to submit patches? (if you can)
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
@muqali i believe that is only valid if you are pool mining, i`m solo mining...

i`ll send my logs to @K1773R so he can show us some scrollbar magic, right dude?

Sorry, didn't realize that.
sr. member
Activity: 458
Merit: 250
beast at work
@muqali i believe that is only valid if you are pool mining, i`m solo mining...

i`ll send my logs to @K1773R so he can show us some scrollbar magic, right dude?
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
hmm, already implemented you say, ok ... how much is my total hash rate based on the image below ?
kind of hard to read, huh ?

in this case information is free and at hand, why not show it ?

Odd, mine shows it relatively often.
Code:
[2012-10-22 16:01:42] thread 8: 403344 hashes, 6.76 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 0: 691404 hashes, 11.57 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 5: 402024 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 3: 400524 hashes, 6.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 2: 403548 hashes, 6.70 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 4: 402060 hashes, 6.67 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:44] thread 6: 398976 hashes, 6.51 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] thread 7: 154992 hashes, 11.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] accepted: 341/341 (100.00%), 70.04 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] thread 7: 144936 hashes, 11.46 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] accepted: 342/342 (100.00%), 69.82 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] thread 4: 235908 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] accepted: 343/343 (100.00%), 69.88 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] thread 7: 366624 hashes, 11.97 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] accepted: 344/344 (100.00%), 70.38 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 4: 168276 hashes, 7.16 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 6: 383928 hashes, 6.63 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 3: 400992 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 5: 403536 hashes, 6.74 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 2: 402228 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 1: 403956 hashes, 6.67 khash/s
correctly, that simple. learn to use the scrollbar lol
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
hmm, already implemented you say, ok ... how much is my total hash rate based on the image below ?
kind of hard to read, huh ?

in this case information is free and at hand, why not show it ?

Odd, mine shows it relatively often.
Code:
[2012-10-22 16:01:42] thread 8: 403344 hashes, 6.76 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 0: 691404 hashes, 11.57 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 5: 402024 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 3: 400524 hashes, 6.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 2: 403548 hashes, 6.70 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:43] thread 4: 402060 hashes, 6.67 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:44] thread 6: 398976 hashes, 6.51 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] thread 7: 154992 hashes, 11.68 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:01:56] accepted: 341/341 (100.00%), 70.04 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] thread 7: 144936 hashes, 11.46 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:09] accepted: 342/342 (100.00%), 69.82 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] thread 4: 235908 hashes, 6.73 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:18] accepted: 343/343 (100.00%), 69.88 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] thread 7: 366624 hashes, 11.97 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:39] accepted: 344/344 (100.00%), 70.38 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 4: 168276 hashes, 7.16 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 6: 383928 hashes, 6.63 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 3: 400992 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:42] thread 5: 403536 hashes, 6.74 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 2: 402228 hashes, 6.72 khash/s
[2012-10-22 16:02:43] thread 1: 403956 hashes, 6.67 khash/s
sr. member
Activity: 458
Merit: 250
beast at work
hmm, already implemented you say, ok ... how much is my total hash rate based on the image below ?



kind of hard to read, huh ?


in this case information is free and at hand, why not show it ?
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
something like: total hashrate,
At present this is printed when a share is submitted. I could add an option so that it is printed every N seconds instead.

running time,
I'm curious... what for?

server ip/port,
I don't think that would make sense, since it's the user himself who supplies the information. It does make sense in cgminer as cgminer can handle multiple providers.

blocks found (if any) etc.
Could be done, but wouldn't it be a bit useless?

1. already implimented if you dont use the quiet option.
2. same
3. same
4. you cant distinguish a 1dif share on a pool with a real, therefore it would be inaccurate at all.
hero member
Activity: 848
Merit: 507
something like: total hashrate,
At present this is printed when a share is submitted. I could add an option so that it is printed every N seconds instead.

running time,
I'm curious... what for?

server ip/port,
I don't think that would make sense, since it's the user himself who supplies the information. It does make sense in cgminer as cgminer can handle multiple providers.

blocks found (if any) etc.
Could be done, but wouldn't it be a bit useless?
sr. member
Activity: 458
Merit: 250
beast at work
Could you not just record those stats in a few variables and from time to time, 5s or so echo them to stdout? Maybe have a moving average of some of them.

+1
Pages:
Jump to: