Author

Topic: Analysis - page 220. (Read 941582 times)

legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
January 01, 2015, 08:07:17 AM
If this (from coinsight.org) is correct, I don't know, but looks legit:

sr. member
Activity: 341
Merit: 250
January 01, 2015, 08:06:24 AM
I made a comparison of the current bid and ask sums on Bistamp and Huobi, with the ones during the second half of September 2014.
The differences are massive: for Bitstamp, they suggest a major drop starting 3 - 5 days from now, and reaching 155$ - 180$ about 20 - 25 days from now.
For Huobi, the bid sum has increased a lot, maybe the reinstated deposits are working and there has been fresh CNY entering Chinese exchanges.
This complicates the situation, because the direction of the market depends on who leads. To crash Huobi a lot of coins must be dumped.
Where do you see Huobi's total bid sum? Only if you sign up?
I usually use coinigy but it doesn't show the full depth chart for Huobi and OKcoin...

How come Huobi is not shown in the markets on coinmarketcap?

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/#markets
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
January 01, 2015, 07:58:56 AM
I made a comparison of the current bid and ask sums on Bistamp and Huobi, with the ones during the second half of September 2014.
The differences are massive: for Bitstamp, they suggest a major drop starting 3 - 5 days from now, and reaching 155$ - 180$ about 20 - 25 days from now.
For Huobi, the bid sum has increased a lot, maybe the reinstated deposits are working and there has been fresh CNY entering Chinese exchanges.
This complicates the situation, because the direction of the market depends on who leads. To crash Huobi a lot of coins must be dumped.
Where do you see Huobi's total bid sum? Only if you sign up?
I usually use coinigy but it doesn't show the full depth chart for Huobi and OKcoin...
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
January 01, 2015, 07:52:13 AM
I made a comparison of the current bid and ask sums on Bistamp and Huobi, with the ones during the second half of September 2014.
The differences are massive: for Bitstamp, they suggest a major drop starting 3 - 5 days from now, and reaching 155$ - 180$ about 20 - 25 days from now.
For Huobi, the bid sum has increased a lot, maybe the reinstated deposits are working and there has been fresh CNY entering Chinese exchanges.
This complicates the situation, because the direction of the market depends on who leads. To crash Huobi a lot of coins must be dumped.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
AltoCenter.com
December 30, 2014, 11:44:35 PM
Analysis is the way to keep our mind pleased with forced results. Since the mind is not so easily pleased, so does the analysis continue.
hero member
Activity: 545
Merit: 500
December 29, 2014, 06:35:29 PM
Any idiot drawing a line can see it will be $250. Follow the major support line. Stop using fancy bs - nobody gives a shit about it anyway, so it wont work.
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
December 29, 2014, 06:12:04 PM
A bit of nasty speculation for you all...

Bitcoin hits $200 in January  Wink



And why would this be nasty? I would call a 200$ bottom on the bullish side.
However, very short term a small uptrend is possible, even a fake breakout.
hero member
Activity: 509
Merit: 564
"In Us We Trust"
December 29, 2014, 05:45:03 PM
A bit of nasty speculation for you all...

Bitcoin hits $200 in January  Wink

full member
Activity: 167
Merit: 100
December 29, 2014, 04:29:22 PM
I guess Masterluc will not show up until the price finally reaches sub-200.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
December 26, 2014, 02:42:03 PM

Thanks for the feedback RyNinDaCleM, appreciated.

So, if I understand your remarks (please tell me if I summarized it wrong), you pointed 2 things :

- from EW rules my first C target ($300) is incorrect cause wave 5 of smaller degree, labelled (5), should at least go as far as (3)
- from EW rules my second C target (testing again $278 or ultimately $257) is correct - still - my "ultimately" is (from your experience) not correct since C can end up in between III (old ATH) and IV ($85 but lowest point inside this wave is $45). For different reasons I don't see 257 a possible breakable level but thanks for providing a classical initial target ; I didn't know about this.  

Now I can see your yellow (5). All the labels were stacked up on top of each other so it made it difficult to see. That is where the first remark came from. And I should clarify, C is always 5 waves, and always follows impulse rules except if it's an ending diagonal which is still 5 waves in the form of 5 zigzags as you have drawn. So that is valid.

The second remark was more in response to the green note you made on the chart. Maybe I misunderstood it and you weren't saying that it can't go below $259, just that it shouldn't due to fibo targets/trend lines/structures.

Wave-5 does not need to make a new low. This is called truncation and it happens, especially in Bitcoin.
Your counts are fine, I just had to stretch them a bit to see what labels were there. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057
bigtimespaghetti.com
December 26, 2014, 02:03:37 PM
Feels like we need to test 300-305 again. But the honeybadger does as it pleases.
legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
December 26, 2014, 01:53:40 PM
where is the master

Frantically getting rid of his Rubles.

So majority feels its gonna go south?
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
December 26, 2014, 12:12:50 PM
The $300~ support level has been tested several times in the past few months (since ~september) and such support appears to be very strong. Breaching this level will probably result in further price declines of at least $40-$50 in the near term

I think 300 is pretty strong too, but different EW counts leads to suppose a breach to 275 is also probable.

Here is a chart of mine, using EW (I'm beginner in EW analysis so feel free to criticize and give feedback) :
- check https://www.tradingview.com/v/5KWjIxbQ/ for details and more explanations



Wave-C is always an impulse, meaning 5 waves and standard impulse rules apply.


As you have your chart labeled with the pink (III), the (IV) actually can drop below the green iii according to the typical retracement of an impulsive wave. After a fifth wave is complete, the correction usually ends in the territory of the 4th wave of one smaller degree. In this case, somewhere between $259 (stamp wave-iii high) and $45 (stamp wave-iv low). It isn't an absolute rule, but it should be expected as an initial target. Since the April high is the 3 to Decembers 5, that is where to look for a bottom.



Thanks for the feedback RyNinDaCleM, appreciated.

So, if I understand your remarks (please tell me if I summarized it wrong), you pointed 2 things :

- from EW rules my first C target ($300) is incorrect cause wave 5 of smaller degree, labelled (5), should at least go as far as (3)
- from EW rules my second C target (testing again $278 or ultimately $257) is correct - still - my "ultimately" is (from your experience) not correct since C can end up in between III (old ATH) and IV ($85 but lowest point inside this wave is $45). For different reasons I don't see 257 a possible breakable level but thanks for providing a classical initial target ; I didn't know about this.  
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1009
Legen -wait for it- dary
December 26, 2014, 11:08:47 AM
The $300~ support level has been tested several times in the past few months (since ~september) and such support appears to be very strong. Breaching this level will probably result in further price declines of at least $40-$50 in the near term

I think 300 is pretty strong too, but different EW counts leads to suppose a breach to 275 is also probable.

Here is a chart of mine, using EW (I'm beginner in EW analysis so feel free to criticize and give feedback) :
- check https://www.tradingview.com/v/5KWjIxbQ/ for details and more explanations



Wave-C is always an impulse, meaning 5 waves and standard impulse rules apply.


As you have your chart labeled with the pink (III), the (IV) actually can drop below the green iii according to the typical retracement of an impulsive wave. After a fifth wave is complete, the correction usually ends in the territory of the 4th wave of one smaller degree. In this case, somewhere between $259 (stamp wave-iii high) and $45 (stamp wave-iv low). It isn't an absolute rule, but it should be expected as an initial target. Since the April high is the 3 to Decembers 5, that is where to look for a bottom.



 
member
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
December 26, 2014, 10:32:16 AM
The $300~ support level has been tested several times in the past few months (since ~september) and such support appears to be very strong. Breaching this level will probably result in further price declines of at least $40-$50 in the near term

I think 300 is pretty strong too, but different EW counts leads to suppose a breach to 275 is also probable.

Here is a chart of mine, using EW (I'm beginner in EW analysis so feel free to criticize and give feedback) :
- check https://www.tradingview.com/v/5KWjIxbQ/ for details and more explanations

legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Thug for life!
December 25, 2014, 02:43:25 PM
The bid side has recovered somewhat, 6h PSAR has flipped to bullish, but 15 min MACD looks bearish.
A quadruple top, yikes. Will there be another dump before a strong rebound, that is the question?

Does a classic double top usually happen before a crash, and a triple top happen before a rally?

Does a quadruple top have significance in TA?

A triple top is also bearish. Breaking support at 305$ would trigger a large dump.
AFAIK there is no quadruple top in TA. But if a breakout succeeds after this, it would look bullish.
I interpret the quadruple top as a temporary inability to break resistance, this can change tomorrow.
The $300~ support level has been tested several times in the past few months (since ~september) and such support appears to be very strong. Breaching this level will probably result in further price declines of at least $40-$50 in the near term
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
December 23, 2014, 05:44:12 AM
China still looking somewhat bullish, but with bearish divergences in small time frames.
MFI and SRSI are slowly descending from the overbought area, IMO this uptrend lost momentum.
To confirm upcoming correction, I look for 6h PSAR to flip in China (it did temporarily flip on Bitstmap at the 2k dump).
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1010
he who has the gold makes the rules
December 23, 2014, 01:51:55 AM
strange we are going up leading up to the bitcoin bowl i guess
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
December 19, 2014, 04:04:23 PM
The bid side has recovered somewhat, 6h PSAR has flipped to bullish, but 15 min MACD looks bearish.
A quadruple top, yikes. Will there be another dump before a strong rebound, that is the question?

Does a classic double top usually happen before a crash, and a triple top happen before a rally?

Does a quadruple top have significance in TA?

A triple top is also bearish. Breaking support at 305$ would trigger a large dump.
AFAIK there is no quadruple top in TA. But if a breakout succeeds after this, it would look bullish.
I interpret the quadruple top as a temporary inability to break resistance, this can change tomorrow.
sr. member
Activity: 326
Merit: 250
December 19, 2014, 03:32:37 PM
The bid side has recovered somewhat, 6h PSAR has flipped to bullish, but 15 min MACD looks bearish.
A quadruple top, yikes. Will there be another dump before a strong rebound, that is the question?

Does a classic double top usually happen before a crash, and a triple top happen before a rally?

Does a quadruple top have significance in TA?
Jump to: