we are in a unexplored land....
we are doing highest high ever!!!
now it's good for liquidate last long position and buy alts...
Topic: Analysis - page 83. (Read 941567 times)
<3 If I was a bear I would buy some weedcoin or kushcoin if I wanted to be bearish. There is no place for bears at bitcoin.
You think it would be more profitable than mining ETH? We have to assume that ETH will continue going up as BTC goes down due to this HF as has been the case.
wpalczynski are you still kissing the black ass of Africoin to receive his 100% correct amylases?
whats the color of his skin got to do with anything? racism on the sly is still racism, there's enough stuff dividing us already as humans.
Its not racism to correctly observe how someone looks, dont be so uptight, Bitcoiner. We can talk openly here.
However and I agree with you, its pretty fucking arrogant to call other "ass-kissers" for acknowledging alternative opinions. Afrikoin has good track record and put his free time into sharing it with us. Unlike this immature brat "Gillete", who seems to base his entire self-worth on success or failure of his actual gambling trip. Lets not lose more time on him. Even passing look at his post history reveals, that he is short on prozac.
Hey Okurkabinladin, you are still waiting for $ 465 per BTC with your beloved Africoin right?
RIP.
Bulls strike again, just like the last 4 years.
You think it would be more profitable than mining ETH? We have to assume that ETH will continue going up as BTC goes down due to this HF as has been the case.
wpalczynski are you still kissing the black ass of Africoin to receive his 100% correct amylases?
whats the color of his skin got to do with anything? racism on the sly is still racism, there's enough stuff dividing us already as humans.
Its not racism to correctly observe how someone looks, dont be so uptight, Bitcoiner. We can talk openly here.
However and I agree with you, its pretty fucking arrogant to call other "ass-kissers" for acknowledging alternative opinions. Afrikoin has good track record and put his free time into sharing it with us. Unlike this immature brat "Gillete", who seems to base his entire self-worth on success or failure of his actual gambling trip. Lets not lose more time on him. Even passing look at his post history reveals, that he is short on prozac.
Hey Okurkabinladin, you are still waiting for $ 465 per BTC with your beloved Africoin right?
You think it would be more profitable than mining ETH? We have to assume that ETH will continue going up as BTC goes down due to this HF as has been the case.
wpalczynski are you still kissing the black ass of Africoin to receive his 100% correct amylases?
whats the color of his skin got to do with anything? racism on the sly is still racism, there's enough stuff dividing us already as humans.
Its not racism to correctly observe how someone looks, dont be so uptight, Bitcoiner. We can talk openly here.
However and I agree with you, its pretty fucking arrogant to call other "ass-kissers" for acknowledging alternative opinions. Afrikoin has good track record and put his free time into sharing it with us. Unlike this immature brat "Gillete", who seems to base his entire self-worth on success or failure of his actual gambling trip. Lets not lose more time on him. Even passing look at his post history reveals, that he is short on prozac.
You think it would be more profitable than mining ETH? We have to assume that ETH will continue going up as BTC goes down due to this HF as has been the case.
wpalczynski are you still kissing the black ass of Africoin to receive his 100% correct amylases?
whats the color of his skin got to do with anything? racism on the sly is still racism, there's enough stuff dividing us already as humans.
You think it would be more profitable than mining ETH? We have to assume that ETH will continue going up as BTC goes down due to this HF as has been the case.
wpalczynski are you still kissing the black ass of Africoin to receive his 100% correct amylases?
^*
a) people are hedging or diversifying -- no matter which side you're on, btc development has an unresolved problem finding some (high level) decision making process that doesn't involve different sides bitch slapping each other until one of them caves in. b) people like to trade on volatility. alts certainly are attractive for that, precisely because of their lower capitalization and higher trading-to-usage ratio.
Cause a) won't go away, and it shouldn't. The size of that effect depends on the path the main crypto takes -- in my opinion, not /which/ path is taken, but /how/ the decision is made. b) contains a negative feedback component, i.e. it is self-stabilizing: as capitalization increases, volatility decreases, making (volatility) trading less attractive.
The current numbers: btc to next highest alt currently at ~4.5:1; btc vs. total of all alts combined above 2:1.
Let's take two other examples of 'network effects' (in a loose, maybe unrelated sense. it's the best I got): Google search share fluctuated over the past years, but was at 60-something percent 2-3 years ago. I don't recall thinking Google would lose its pole position. US military spending accounts for 37% of the world's total. There's little doubt where US military capacity stands in relation to 'the rest'.
I don't have a fixed ratio in mind that would make me conclude the picture fundamentally changed (aside from parity with a single other coin (edit), but by then, it'd be rather late). However, 80/20% vs the next highest, 66/33% vs all, doesn't mean anything yet, in my opinion, only that a) alts are there to stay (deal with it *sunglasses*), and b) our little market is growing up.
a) people are hedging or diversifying -- no matter which side you're on, btc development has an unresolved problem finding some (high level) decision making process that doesn't involve different sides bitch slapping each other until one of them caves in. b) people like to trade on volatility. alts certainly are attractive for that, precisely because of their lower capitalization and higher trading-to-usage ratio.
Cause a) won't go away, and it shouldn't. The size of that effect depends on the path the main crypto takes -- in my opinion, not /which/ path is taken, but /how/ the decision is made. b) contains a negative feedback component, i.e. it is self-stabilizing: as capitalization increases, volatility decreases, making (volatility) trading less attractive.
The current numbers: btc to next highest alt currently at ~4.5:1; btc vs. total of all alts combined above 2:1.
Let's take two other examples of 'network effects' (in a loose, maybe unrelated sense. it's the best I got): Google search share fluctuated over the past years, but was at 60-something percent 2-3 years ago. I don't recall thinking Google would lose its pole position. US military spending accounts for 37% of the world's total. There's little doubt where US military capacity stands in relation to 'the rest'.
I don't have a fixed ratio in mind that would make me conclude the picture fundamentally changed (aside from parity with a single other coin (edit), but by then, it'd be rather late). However, 80/20% vs the next highest, 66/33% vs all, doesn't mean anything yet, in my opinion, only that a) alts are there to stay (deal with it *sunglasses*), and b) our little market is growing up.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
I think this is true.
But does it even matter if another coin is of the same value? its surely not the end of bitcoin.
It will just be a different way people making a service will have to pin their colours to a mast.
Users will have to decide in the end.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
True.
Look what happened with the Roman empire, or Apple.
If you dont move foward, you will go backward.
There's no middleground in crypto.
Look like Tether ;-)
Dash isnt a real threat yet, because its quite scammy.
Ether is a platform with to many tokens to be a good investment like BTC is.
Its also to much centralized.
Most important difference between BTC and Ether:
BTC = community
Ethereum = Vitalik Buterin
The only one who could destroy Bitcoin is Bitcoin itself (community)
Just like the Roman Empire.
The parallels are amazing.
History is made rightnow.
Yes but we wont let it be destroyed like roman empire right
I mean as a community we wont let this happen in any way, like some of your impressions on some coin and think that also what yous dais is accurate only we can destroy it.
No I dont think that either.
Anyway its still the current situation rightnow in cryptoworld.
We have some medium-large 'clans' that try to battle Bitcoin.
(Ripple(bankcoin), Ethereum(hedge), Dash, monero, and I could go on for a while but my point is made.
They are not united but still they are some coins to keep an eye out for.
A strong Roman Empire , united and working together could easily maintain their lands ( marketdominance).
But when they are backstabbing eachother (Ceasar) and fighting eachother and stop being innovative (scaling) the other clans like the germans did (altcoins) will invade the once mighty Roman Empire united with other small clans from all over Europe.
Borders will fall, the Roman Empire will burn because of indecision and bad financial leadership (postponing a scaling solution for years).
The Roman Empire made a last stand at the borders of Italy. The dream was gone, their dream was destroyed.
Will BTC unite behind 1 solution to maintain its ground?
Or will it burn and make a last stand when its too late?
Only time can tell, but this parralel is simply amazing.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
True.
Look what happened with the Roman empire, or Apple.
If you dont move foward, you will go backward.
There's no middleground in crypto.
Look like Tether ;-)
Dash isnt a real threat yet, because its quite scammy.
Ether is a platform with to many tokens to be a good investment like BTC is.
Its also to much centralized.
Most important difference between BTC and Ether:
BTC = community
Ethereum = Vitalik Buterin
The only one who could destroy Bitcoin is Bitcoin itself (community)
Just like the Roman Empire.
The parallels are amazing.
History is made rightnow.
There it goes to the whole world and digital currency is now growing well to the users who entrusted their future in bitcoin. Yeah it's now a reality that comes from a dreams of lots of us who hopes for better bitcoin future that we always wanted for our family. With these analysis more positive thoughts will be coming our way here and it will not change for a long time as long as digital currency still be patronized by people.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
True.
Look what happened with the Roman empire, or Apple.
If you dont move foward, you will go backward.
There's no middleground in crypto.
Look like Tether ;-)
Dash isnt a real threat yet, because its quite scammy.
Ether is a platform with to many tokens to be a good investment like BTC is.
Its also to much centralized.
Most important difference between BTC and Ether:
BTC = community
Ethereum = Vitalik Buterin
The only one who could destroy Bitcoin is Bitcoin itself (community)
Just like the Roman Empire.
The parallels are amazing.
History is made rightnow.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
True.
Look what happened with the Roman empire, or Apple.
If you dont move foward, you will go backward.
There's no middleground in crypto.
Look like Tether ;-)
Dash isnt a real threat yet, because its quite scammy.
Ether is a platform with to many tokens to be a good investment like BTC is.
Its also to much centralized.
Most important difference between BTC and Ether:
BTC = community
Ethereum = Vitalik Buterin
The only one who could destroy Bitcoin is Bitcoin itself (community)
Just like the Roman Empire.
The parallels are amazing.
History is made rightnow.
Yes but we wont let it be destroyed like roman empire right
I mean as a community we wont let this happen in any way, like some of your impressions on some coin and think that also what yous dais is accurate only we can destroy it.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
True.
Look what happened with the Roman empire, or Apple.
If you dont move foward, you will go backward.
There's no middleground in crypto.
Look like Tether ;-)
Dash isnt a real threat yet, because its quite scammy.
Ether is a platform with to many tokens to be a good investment like BTC is.
Its also to much centralized.
Most important difference between BTC and Ether:
BTC = community
Ethereum = Vitalik Buterin
The only one who could destroy Bitcoin is Bitcoin itself (community)
Just like the Roman Empire.
The parallels are amazing.
History is made rightnow.
The only thing bitcoin has going for it right now is the brand name and the network effect. It has been riding on that for about 2 years. How long do you think it will be able to last?
Looks like that if we are very lucky it will go the way of IBM:
http://prnt.sc/ep7ib8
But my guess is that the idiots led by saboteurs will utterly destroy it and it will become just another old failed cryptocoin.
Intersting theory,but crypto is booming Bitcoin is still the biggest by far. It has the biggest community by far, huge mining farms, worldwide attention, investors have discovered it. It has the worldwide press on it, and adoption is still increasing. So Bitcoin will continue to grrow for a while if you ask me. Its the mother of crypto. If bitcoin fails, it is most likely that 80% of the altcoins are going with it.
95% of the altcoins will fail regardless of what bitcoin does, it's those 5% you need to watch out for.
ETH is already 1/4th of the value of bitcoin. Dash is also a large contender.
Bitcoin is not invincible, and they should not act like they are.
What, with all that drama no one follows a level-headed analysis by lucif any longer? 
Source: https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga
Well, if you look at bitcoin statistics, the price always increases in a few years. Can be said this is a very fast development, because in just 7 years, bitcoin prices are very high, this will probably continue to grow in the next few years. Quote
BTC followed perfectly both bullish wedge and bullish divergences, as I predicted before.
What may come next? Wave structure suggests a completing diagonal turning into a bearish wedge peaking around 1500. After that, a retest of 1000 level is quite possible.
What may come next? Wave structure suggests a completing diagonal turning into a bearish wedge peaking around 1500. After that, a retest of 1000 level is quite possible.
Source: https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga
What, with all that drama no one follows a level-headed analysis by lucif any longer?
Source: https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga
Quote
BTC followed perfectly both bullish wedge and bullish divergences, as I predicted before.
What may come next? Wave structure suggests a completing diagonal turning into a bearish wedge peaking around 1500. After that, a retest of 1000 level is quite possible.
What may come next? Wave structure suggests a completing diagonal turning into a bearish wedge peaking around 1500. After that, a retest of 1000 level is quite possible.
Source: https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga
Any new information on bitcoin price development from Masterluc? Even in russian, if possible.
This thread just turned into mining debate, that has little to do with weekly price analysis. Not that it is not important, but more long term, than what we came for here originally. Technical analysis.
Thanks guys.
https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga?w=wall-130254204_976This thread just turned into mining debate, that has little to do with weekly price analysis. Not that it is not important, but more long term, than what we came for here originally. Technical analysis.
Thanks guys.
Quote
"If we reach $1118, the bull wedge I described on March 25th goes into force. This, along with mentioned daily divergences, can send us towards ATH ($1200-1300). No higher, I think atm. Maybe it will start to draw some big triangle."
The wedge he mentions is described here: https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga?w=wall-130254204_917Thank you.
He basically predicts, that we will be moving between 1000 and 1300 for the following months. Possibly breaking towards new all time high in autumn. On another thread, Afrikoin persists on revisiting 800 before then.
Back in 2013, we also spend months moving between 100-130 before market capitulation at 85 and subsequent spike towards ATH at 1000 towards the end of the year. We might be for grand second round of that.
Well this thread is completely off the rails.
Is Luc ever coming back here, or is the VK page now his only home?
Is Luc ever coming back here, or is the VK page now his only home?
That doesnt matter all that much. As long as he makes his analysis public on VK, here, we can have discussion about it in english language. From his point of view, it is understandable, that he doesnt expend more energy than necessary. He is not dead, though. Just writing in russian all the time now
Jump to: