Topic: Anita Sarkeesian - Feminist Frequency - Donating in Bitcoin (Read 39015 times)

Christina Somers is a true hero.

Strategic Butt Coverings - Tropes vs Women in Video Games

Don't forget the ignore list at post #309.
Blocks out most of the KiA/gator brigading that has been outraged about the thread.

Can't get more off topic. Someone close this cesspool of a thread.

Is makeup sexist? Anita Sarkeesian has makeup on her, and even earrings, but does that make her sexist?(some of her gator/KiA "critics" think so) What is your(as a bitcoiner part of this specific forum) view on this?

Take this course from Laci Green "WAIT, IS MAKEUP SEXIST?"
and tell us your view

If you want to post on-topic content you can start with replying to what you think about:
ref http://feministfrequency.com/2013/03/07/damsel-in-distress-part-1/

Also don't forget the Public filter list / ignore list at #309

My comment wasn't an opinion, just a generic comment about issues with being or not being "ad hominem" in the given context. Please let me know if you need more explanation .

I think this must be a bot or something. It randomly quotes week-old posts and never follows the actual conversation. It doesn't address any fact you throw at it and keeps trolling by the same schema.

This can't be a human - not even a dumb one.

For anybody who wants to participate in the discussion follow the filter list at  #309
Nobody has stated yet in that list they want to participate on-topic posts to this thread yet.

Is replying on-topic so hard? What is it that Anita Sarkeesian has said that made you so angry? Quotes please.

I did try to contact OP (tjohej) after being asked if I know any female bloggers in the bitcoin space but never got a response and shortly after OP disappeared only for you to take their place. I still find the fact that some very vocal American feminists try to put non-issues like the ones you talk about in their agenda. Goes to show how disconnected individuals can get from the rest of the world.

BTW, if you for some reason think there's productive discussion to be made between us, I'm all ears.

How is this still in project development?

Thanks for proving that AS has nothing to do with feminism in general.

Just continue your discussion about "Feminism in general" in PM. Your inability/unwillingness to participate in this specific thread is showing, because you adress "feminism in general", and there is no "feminism in general", there are many different individuals and this thread is about Feminist Frequency/Anita Sarkeesian which you could have adressed but you choose to go off-topic because "feminists in general"(whatever the heck that means) have angered you.

not received any PMs from alani123 + alani123 has not claimed trying to contact me.
This kind of filter inspired by ggautoblocker is to filter out any off-topic spam, stop spamming this thread with nonsense, not appreciated.
This KiA/gator tirade must stop, or if bitcointalk.org really supports these things show it to me, I'm tired of the human age of stupidity kind of thing going on in this thread. If you don't have anything on-topic to say don't say it.

Fortunately, there are still sane women out there who see through all the bullshit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAJRx6EkrdI

I'm not from KiA and your assumptions are so fucking offensive. Your privilege allows you to spend hours online watching internet drama only to come here babbling about it while I, a feminism fundamentalist, live in a country where women still have to fight for basic rights. Please stop destroying feminism, do something more productive with your life other than trying to promote a branch of feminism that tries to uplift the most privileged and free citizens on earth, American women. For the last decades you have been having it so well there that somewhere along the way you must have forgotten what feminism and equality actually is.

It's in fact you that is off-topic, off topic about everything in fact. You care about objectification of women in entirely virtual environments, use shaming tactics as a defense mechanism whenever you're confronted with facts or facts and still dare to call yourself a feminist? Shame on you, you're the actual troll here. You're trolling the people you're supposedly fighting for by making them look so ridiculous that the rest of the world won't bother to take them seriously any more. Time for you to step away from your confirmation bias bubble isn't it?

Cute how it thinks it has any kind of power with its "public ignore list".


0/10. This shit is boring.

Cite any scientific source that says video games have any effect on society as is claimed by this mental diarrhea.

Here's a counter-study: http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/gaming/long-term-us-study-finds-no-links-between-violent-video-games-and-youth-violence-9851613.html

If it's not valid for violence, your evidence must be really strong to be able to claim it's valid for sexism and misogyny and whatever you dumbass cunts pull out of your ass. You are old and boring and no one gives a shit about you.

GriffinHeart and alani123. This is not KiA or your gator echo chamber and if you
think so you obviously do not want to get removed from my public ignore list filter so
make up your minds about how you want your continued stay here to be like.
I hope you're not allergic to PMs because if you want to post on-topic content you might have
to fight that allergy.

GriffinHeart put on public ignore list filter:
post #316 insults are not arguments, #258 "FF con artist" trope,
#260 claiming 100% of all arguments made in Tropes vs Women are false is like
claiming Peach in Mario is not a damsel in distress while not providing any context
or argumentation whatsoever to back that post.
Stop overgeneralizing if you want to contribute on-topic content
Read cryptofeminism #313 on how to get removed from the filter.

alani123 put on public ignore list filter:
post #261 how alani123 remarks about friends derailing the topic
#274 'please stop posting on-topic in this thread' kind of thinking.
#272 'lol that off-topic youtube video that jimbobway posted was funny'(ignoring
the public ignore list and encouraging off-topic posts makes you extra eligible
to be included in the public ignore list, this is somehow how Good Game autoblocker works)
#317 'alani123 doesn't approve on-topic content'. Spams images from some dictionary,
attempts to "politely insult".
Read cryptofeminism #313 on how to get removed from the filter.

Anybody who wants to reply on-topic(if you know how to use arguments and not just pure statements parroted from some KiA/gator "source" then you know what that is) use the public ignore list at
#309

Can you enjoy video games while being conscious of tropes regarding women within those
games? All depends if you take yourself seriously,
that's the only thing that's required to post on-topic so please try.

http://feministfrequency.com/2013/03/07/damsel-in-distress-part-1/

This thread isnt serious is it?

i.e. what you do

Whoah, this thread has gotten big.
And we have a moron on the line. TCM, I suggest you follow me and take the liberty to ignore this "cryptofeminism" thickhead.
I'm thinking she needs a strong male admin to silence us since the nut can't defend their own "points" which are so unfounded that the cockhead has to ignore you instead of intelligently answering you.
Eat a fat one, cryptofeminism.