Pages:
Author

Topic: [ANN] a-ads.com: Bitcoin advertising network. Advertise now! - page 15. (Read 174696 times)

newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Please a-ads ,reply to this question , i have 10 blogs(pages) , what is better for me as publisher , create 2 ad units and put them into every each of them ( 2 ad units for 10 pages ) or ....  create 2 ad units per page , so that would be 20 ad units , 2 ad units per page , what is better ? how would i earn more ,i think the second option its better , what do you suggetst better ?
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
I also had an issue with my ad code not showing up while it is.

The ad unit HTML code has not been found at the specified URL! (checked 3 minutes ago)
https://a-ads.com/ad_units/389974

My ad code is inserted into the html as seen here https://i.imgur.com/PZbyjN9.png

Thank you!

newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1012
Let me give you another advice. Can you change another payment like Ethereum, Lisk and so on? Their blockchain is still fresh and take only 10s. Beside this, ad network pool is less than 1BTC and spread to thousands of publishers. So micro payment will be continue. And BTC is not for micro payment anymore. It transformed to digital gold. People buy and hold as investment. No use. Hope you guys will find best answer.


Please, consider using IOTA, as it is made for micro transactions, without network fees. It is still under heavy development and perfectionment, but it is already a successful project.

The service you provide, by the way, is one of the perfect examples of use cases for IOTA.

You are welcome to know IOTA and the Tangle better, and to visit their Slack at slack.iotatoken.com, where you will receive all the support you need.
Regarding the fee part, it's killing microtransaction businesses currently.

I've been heavily involved with faucets. Without microwallets, I wouldn't be able to afford to pay the huge fees on small transactions.
After faucetbox announced they're going out of business, I decided to launch my own microwallet, since I was already running 8 successful sites and I needed to keep my fees the lower possible.

If you ever think you'd need a microwallet, which would eliminate user fees, give a look at www.faucethub.io. (Site is paying the fees)
It's as much secure possible. It's heavily pentested and being pentested constantly.

Currently, there's 600+ potential publishers you'd be able to reach through the platform.
2 other ad nets are using faucethub currently, since not many ad net owners/devs haven't thought of using such service, due to lack of information.

If you're interested and need any kind of information, please let me know. I'll be glad to help.


Thanks for the proposed solutions, we will carefully consider them!

Hi Admin,

I need your support.

Could you please check Ad Unit #389857 for me please?

Suddenly from 09th February 2017, I got messenge : The ad unit HTML code has not been found at the specified URL! (checked 5 minutes ago)

Waiting for your answer.

Thank you!

Hi! Thanks for your message. It looks like our IP has been banned on your server for some reason. Could you please fix it?
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hi Admin,

I need your support.

Could you please check Ad Unit #389857 for me please?

Suddenly from 09th February 2017, I got messenge : The ad unit HTML code has not been found at the specified URL! (checked 5 minutes ago)

Waiting for your answer.

Thank you!
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1043
Cypherpunk (& cyberpunk)
Hi,

Can you please increase the transaction fee because transactions are taking too long to confirm.

if possible take the transaction fee from users.
I agree with you. May be 20K or 30k. Publishers will reduce low amount withdrawal to recover for that.  

Thanks for your feedback. Yes, we are aware of the problem, our withdrawal system was designed when Bitcoin was advertised as a cheap way to transfer money. On the one hand withdrawals are automatic (to minimize risks of holding others' bitcoins) and we don't want to charge users for them. On the other hand we do micro-transactions, so we can't set high fees.

The current fee of ~20 satoshi per byte eats about 1% of the transferred value. We can probably double it, but will it suffice? It looks like the Bitcoin Core team decided to price out all the low value transactions until the Lightning adoption. And it is unclear yet if/when it happens and what is a 'low value' transaction in their understanding. Anything less than $10? $100? or $1000? I don't know.

Anyway, micro-transactions are doomed to be low priority. And since nowadays low priority transactions may take weeks to get confirmed, we are in fact forced to increase the transaction fees (and a the threshold for automatic withdrawals) and/or add an optional withdrawal fee.

We are working on it, sorry for the inconvenience.
Regarding the fee part, it's killing microtransaction businesses currently.

I've been heavily involved with faucets. Without microwallets, I wouldn't be able to afford to pay the huge fees on small transactions.
After faucetbox announced they're going out of business, I decided to launch my own microwallet, since I was already running 8 successful sites and I needed to keep my fees the lower possible.

If you ever think you'd need a microwallet, which would eliminate user fees, give a look at www.faucethub.io. (Site is paying the fees)
It's as much secure possible. It's heavily pentested and being pentested constantly.

Currently, there's 600+ potential publishers you'd be able to reach through the platform.
2 other ad nets are using faucethub currently, since not many ad net owners/devs haven't thought of using such service, due to lack of information.

If you're interested and need any kind of information, please let me know. I'll be glad to help.
full member
Activity: 150
Merit: 100
cryptoPag.com
Hi,

Can you please increase the transaction fee because transactions are taking too long to confirm.

if possible take the transaction fee from users.
I agree with you. May be 20K or 30k. Publishers will reduce low amount withdrawal to recover for that. 

Thanks for your feedback. Yes, we are aware of the problem, our withdrawal system was designed when Bitcoin was advertised as a cheap way to transfer money. On the one hand withdrawals are automatic (to minimize risks of holding others' bitcoins) and we don't want to charge users for them. On the other hand we do micro-transactions, so we can't set high fees.

The current fee of ~20 satoshi per byte eats about 1% of the transferred value. We can probably double it, but will it suffice? It looks like the Bitcoin Core team decided to price out all the low value transactions until the Lightning adoption. And it is unclear yet if/when it happens and what is a 'low value' transaction in their understanding. Anything less than $10? $100? or $1000? I don't know.

Anyway, micro-transactions are doomed to be low priority. And since nowadays low priority transactions may take weeks to get confirmed, we are in fact forced to increase the transaction fees (and a the threshold for automatic withdrawals) and/or add an optional withdrawal fee.

We are working on it, sorry for the inconvenience.

Please, consider using IOTA, as it is made for micro transactions, without network fees. It is still under heavy development and perfectionment, but it is already a successful project.

The service you provide, by the way, is one of the perfect examples of use cases for IOTA.

You are welcome to know IOTA and the Tangle better, and to visit their Slack at slack.iotatoken.com, where you will receive all the support you need.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bawga
Thanks for your feedback. Yes, we are aware of the problem, our withdrawal system was designed when Bitcoin was advertised as a cheap way to transfer money. On the one hand withdrawals are automatic (to minimize risks of holding others' bitcoins) and we don't want to charge users for them. On the other hand we do micro-transactions, so we can't set high fees.

The current fee of ~20 satoshi per byte eats about 1% of the transferred value. We can probably double it, but will it suffice? It looks like the Bitcoin Core team decided to price out all the low value transactions until the Lightning adoption. And it is unclear yet if/when it happens and what is a 'low value' transaction in their understanding. Anything less than $10? $100? or $1000? I don't know.

Anyway, micro-transactions are doomed to be low priority. And since nowadays low priority transactions may take weeks to get confirmed, we are in fact forced to increase the transaction fees (and a the threshold for automatic withdrawals) and/or add an optional withdrawal fee.

We are working on it, sorry for the inconvenience.

Let me give you another advice. Can you change another payment like Ethereum, Lisk and so on? Their blockchain is still fresh and take only 10s. Beside this, ad network pool is less than 1BTC and spread to thousands of publishers. So micro payment will be continue. And BTC is not for micro payment anymore. It transformed to digital gold. People buy and hold as investment. No use. Hope you guys will find best answer.
legendary
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1012
Hi,

Can you please increase the transaction fee because transactions are taking too long to confirm.

if possible take the transaction fee from users.
I agree with you. May be 20K or 30k. Publishers will reduce low amount withdrawal to recover for that. 

Thanks for your feedback. Yes, we are aware of the problem, our withdrawal system was designed when Bitcoin was advertised as a cheap way to transfer money. On the one hand withdrawals are automatic (to minimize risks of holding others' bitcoins) and we don't want to charge users for them. On the other hand we do micro-transactions, so we can't set high fees.

The current fee of ~20 satoshi per byte eats about 1% of the transferred value. We can probably double it, but will it suffice? It looks like the Bitcoin Core team decided to price out all the low value transactions until the Lightning adoption. And it is unclear yet if/when it happens and what is a 'low value' transaction in their understanding. Anything less than $10? $100? or $1000? I don't know.

Anyway, micro-transactions are doomed to be low priority. And since nowadays low priority transactions may take weeks to get confirmed, we are in fact forced to increase the transaction fees (and a the threshold for automatic withdrawals) and/or add an optional withdrawal fee.

We are working on it, sorry for the inconvenience.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bawga
Hi,

Can you please increase the transaction fee because transactions are taking too long to confirm.

if possible take the transaction fee from users.

I agree with you. May be 20K or 30k. Publishers will reduce low amount withdrawal to recover for that. 
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
Hi,

Can you please increase the transaction fee because transactions are taking too long to confirm.

if possible take the transaction fee from users.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
Hi A-ads,

can you please categorize my Ad Unit #394041 and place my faucet to related category.

Thanks a lot.
legendary
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1012
Hi, my withdrawal rejected by blockchain. https://blockchain.info/address/1LevpAVNeQSraCkti2vWQk1kbHTfp2Cfdh
Can I back my btc to my account? 





Hi, thanks for the report!

It hasn't been rejected by the Bitcoin blockchain, it was just pruned by blockchain.info. They probably prune low-priority transactions, but it doesn't mean those transactions won't get confirmed.

You can track your transaction using other block explorer, e. g. https://blockexplorer.com/tx/fea29daed61336da80e4c5d7c1aaa745f07f81501007509b3014e98d8c59d9a4

You can also try https://www.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/ to accelerate the transaction confirmation.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bawga
Hi, my withdrawal rejected by blockchain. https://blockchain.info/address/1LevpAVNeQSraCkti2vWQk1kbHTfp2Cfdh
Can I back my btc to my account? 



newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Bawga
Please check my two sites and add on related categories:

http://crypto-tips.blogspot.com
   
http://entrepreneur-geek.blogspot.com
newbie
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
A-ads,

can you check my site? http://bitcoin143.com

my site is still categorized in unknown after 24 hours

Ad Unit #399839

thank you
legendary
Activity: 1199
Merit: 1012
Hello A-ads team, when I set up earning at 10000satoshi, but advertiser pay me 15000 satoshi, I can get these extra satoshi? Sry, this is already asked. But I can't find my post.

Sure, the 'wanted daily income' parameter doesn't constrain your earnings, it just helps us to determine the percentage of your traffic that goes for free affiliate ads.

If you earn less than the 'wanted daily income', then we consider that part of your traffic is under-monetized (i. e. advertisers pay you less than you think your traffic is worth). So we determine the percentage of under-monetized traffic and try to monetize it by displaying affiliate ads for free (to give you a chance to earn rewards from our partners). This may increase your income if your traffic is a good match for our partners.

If your 'wanted daily income' is lower than your actual income then we consider that your traffic is more-or-less monetized and we don't display free affiliate ads. Low value doesn't hurt your income and doesn't make your traffic more expensive for advertisers.

If your 'wanted daily income' is higher than your actual income then part of your traffic goes for free affiliate ads, thus the remaining impressions become more expensive for advertisers.

Even though that we are not pay-per-click neither pay-per-impression, advertisers still can set a soft CPM limit thus achieving a behaviour somewhat similar to the traditional CPM networks. Thus if your traffic appears too expensive for them, it may hurt your earnings.

So I'd recommend to set the 'wanted daily income' to some reasonably low value. It doesn't constrain your earnings, but it just determines what percentage of your traffic is available to the paying advertisers thus implicitly setting the price for it.

the problem i just keep my eye on (but you can embed it to other pages too)
bcz that i present my home page maybe i can create more ad spaces in ebitbux

Thanks for your feedback. What if I change it to something like that:

Quote
Ad unit must be present at the specified URL and may be present on other pages of the same domain as well.



Do you think it would be more clear? Please correct my English if I misused the words or articles.

Thanks!
hero member
Activity: 696
Merit: 500
@arsenische thank you for your reply sir yes i understand you well
the problem i just keep my eye on (but you can embed it to other pages too)
bcz that i present my home page maybe i can create more ad spaces in ebitbux

any way going to add the same ad unit in the home page
thank you so much and good luck for your services

Regards!
Pages:
Jump to: