Author

Topic: [ANN] AEON [2019-09-27: Upgrade to version 0.13.0.0 ASAP HF@1146200 Oct 25] - page 166. (Read 625666 times)

member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
Looking to purchase a significant quantity of Aeon. Please PM me if you are interested in selling an amount over 10000. Escrow will be used.

You might want to try your luck in the AEON speculation thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1197508.940) as well Wink
sr. member
Activity: 243
Merit: 250
Looking to purchase a significant quantity of Aeon. Please PM me if you are interested in selling an amount over 10000. Escrow will be used.
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Hi ,
i have made a test  transaction from my local wallet to my bittrex wallet

transfer 0 WmtK9TQ6yd2ZWZDAkRsebc2ppzUq2Wuo9XRRjHMH2fvqM3ARVqk3styJ6AavJFcpJFPFtxRGAqGFoJM ZGJ6YYzQ61TYGfpykX 2 96507b65d3474ddebeb0656e98322f66f3e9164aa04d47c3be0e2ea893607068

i got this message

Money successfully sent, transaction

when i search into https://minergate.com/ form this transaction i found nothing.

where can i find this transaction ?

Thanks

sr. member
Activity: 520
Merit: 253
555
Solo GPU mining is not possible directly against daemon.
commit #6084250 "Mine directly against daemon" was merging to follow wolf-xmr-miner development but it's not functional with aeond for now (perhaps it will be possible after rebasing, just guessing)
At least there's a serious suggestion, I wish more coins would do this. I've ended up setting personal pools, as today's coins are no longer following the original ideals of decentralization. It feels incredibly wasteful for something that was simple and natural just a while ago.

Back in 2010, you could only mine bitcoins with the daemon itself, and of course it was CPU-only. The first GPU miners came with a patch to the daemon to support "getwork", and soon it became official. First pools used getwork but it was too heavy and slow for such distributed work, so getblocktemplate and Stratum were developed. It would be great if we could still use getwork or GBT locally.

In fact, the problem can also be solved by better miners, without changes to the daemon.  Bitcoin-based coins have GBT, which the pool uses to make work available for miners. There are some rare coin/miner combos where GBT can be used directly with miners. Whatever the equivalent of GBT is in Cryptonote coins, that should be a valid alternative for enabling solo mining.

Alternatively, a proxy could be developed to work between the daemon and current miners -- basically a simplified version of pools, without all the databases and accounting.
hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 500
Hey could someone give me a quick tutorial on how to set up to solo GPU mine? I am having some difficulties setting it up. I tried by setting up a config file in the Roaming folder but it just screwed everything up. Maybe I have the wrong information input. PM or Open response. Thx.
Solo GPU mining is not possible directly against daemon.
commit #6084250 "Mine directly against daemon" was merging to follow wolf-xmr-miner development but it's not functional with aeond for now (perhaps it will be possible after rebasing, just guessing)

curently, to solo GPU mine, you must setting up a pool (linux only). no need to open it to the outside, the core running on localhost is enough. no need to host a front end and manage payments, you'll check stats on the terminal and the pool wallet is all for you.

there's some tweaks to launch the pool on ubuntu 16.04, no time now but i'll try to update my former instructions from ubuntu 15.10 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14609519
member
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
Hey could someone give me a quick tutorial on how to set up to solo GPU mine? I am having some difficulties setting it up. I tried by setting up a config file in the Roaming folder but it just screwed everything up. Maybe I have the wrong information input. PM or Open response. Thx.

member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
guys.. i found something a little bit weird here...
when i look at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aeon/#markets ,
it show total supply 12.4million

and also at the same time bittrex is dominating 100% Aeon's volume trading at the moment

Meanwhile at bittrex... only 1.2 million Aeon being traded
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-AEON

So.. where the rest of the token? or is it coinmarketcap who show wrong stat?

I would like to think most people holding AEON especially longer-term are smart enough not to keep them on an exchange. Ever hear of MtGox, Bitfinex, etc., etc., etc.?
hero member
Activity: 1923
Merit: 538
Many wallets are erased, this coin has been abandoned..


not precisely.
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Many wallets are erased, this coin has been abandoned..

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
guys.. i found something a little bit weird here...
when i look at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aeon/#markets ,
it show total supply 12.4million

and also at the same time bittrex is dominating 100% Aeon's volume trading at the moment

Meanwhile at bittrex... only 1.2 million Aeon being traded
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-AEON

So.. where the rest of the token? or is it coinmarketcap who show wrong stat?

1.2 million AEON refers to the amount of coins that are deposited in the Bittrex wallets, but is not counting the coins that are in the users own wallets on their PC/Laptop.  

yeah i know that there will be other people who kept their token... but still only 10% is being traded is somehow seems "weird" u know... if it is 30% or 40% then it is still quite logical .

edit:
well nevermind,... just wanna make sure if the supply on coinmarketcap is wrong or not... btw if coinmarketcap is correct then, aeon is pretty cool.  Grin
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
guys.. i found something a little bit weird here...
when i look at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aeon/#markets ,
it show total supply 12.4million

and also at the same time bittrex is dominating 100% Aeon's volume trading at the moment

Meanwhile at bittrex... only 1.2 million Aeon being traded
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-AEON

So.. where the rest of the token? or is it coinmarketcap who show wrong stat?

1.2 million AEON refers to the amount of coins that are deposited in the Bittrex wallets, but is not counting the coins that are in the users own wallets on their PC/Laptop. 
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 251
guys.. i found something a little bit weird here...
when i look at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aeon/#markets ,
it show total supply 12.4million

and also at the same time bittrex is dominating 100% Aeon's volume trading at the moment

Meanwhile at bittrex... only 1.2 million Aeon being traded
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-AEON

So.. where the rest of the token? or is it coinmarketcap who show wrong stat?

Mine and hold?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
guys.. i found something a little bit weird here...
when i look at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aeon/#markets ,
it show total supply 12.4million

and also at the same time bittrex is dominating 100% Aeon's volume trading at the moment

Meanwhile at bittrex... only 1.2 million Aeon being traded
https://bittrex.com/Market/Index?MarketName=BTC-AEON

So.. where the rest of the token? or is it coinmarketcap who show wrong stat?
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
I guess i will go back through it all again, but im sure ive covered all the bases. If you have anymore odeas or if anyone is able to mine Aeon with a RX 480 please tell me!
sr. member
Activity: 520
Merit: 253
555
if you are using simplewallet in RPC mode for any reason, you should avoid doing so on the same system as a web browser. If you are using simplewallet in the default mode without enabling RPC, you are not affected
In fact, many other cryptocurrencies besides the Cryptonote family have a similar issue. For example, Vanillacoin/Vcash and Ethereum don't have RPC authentication by default, though of course they only listen on localhost. I'm not aware of similar attacks on them, but it's good to keep in mind as a general principle.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
Security advisory regarding RPC wallets

MWR Labs reported a vulnerability to Monero (see link below). It applies to all Cryptonote-based which use simplewallet, when simplewallet is used in RPC mode. RPC mode is not the default and would have to be enabled by the command line.

The primary situation in which this would occur is running a GUI wallet wrapper which accesses simplewallet via the rpc service (several are listed in the advisory, though most are obsolete). It could also occur if simplewallet running in rpc mode were used to support a service (such as exchange back end) and the system on which the wallet is hosted is also used with a browser (it would not be a good idea to do this in any case).

The vulnerability occurs when a user:

1. Is using simplewallet in rpc mode
2. Is using a web browser on the same system as simplewallet
3. Browses to a malicious site

Monero implemented a fix for this but the fix is complex and back porting it to AEON's older code base, along with the necessary testing and careful evaluation to avoid introducing any new vulnerabilities does not make sense given that we are moving away from that codebase and simple workarounds exist. I have instead decide to issue this advisory. I may also release a simpler, partial fix that reduces the vulnerability, but caution will still be needed.

In the case of AEON, I have not determined whether the community-supported GUI wallet listed in the OP uses the rpc mode and is vulnerable, though that is most likely the case. As such I recommend not to use the community supported GUI and noted this in the OP. I'm not aware of any other wrapper wallets for AEON but if any exist the same advice would apply.

In addition, if you are using simplewallet in RPC mode for any reason, you should avoid doing so on the same system as a web browser. If you are using simplewallet in the default mode without enabling RPC, you are not affected

https://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/advisories/csrf-vulnerability-allows-for-remote-compromise-of-monero-wallets/
hero member
Activity: 500
Merit: 500
i tested wolf-xmr-miner v0.4.
Same platform (tahiti gpu), same conf file: it's working in linux (latest commit a7d8072, share accepted) but the official win64 binary (two commits behind) don't work with 16.9.1 driver(low diff share)
i guess the binary need to be build again with latest commit.

my latest win64 binary for aeon (c8a5322) was built with latest commit and is working for me in linux and windows10, 16.9.1 driver.

my xmr conf files:
Code:
{
"Algorithms":
[
{
"name": "CryptoNight",
"devices":
[
{
"index": 0,
"corefreq": 975,
"memfreq": 1450,
"fanspeed": 65,
"powertune": 20,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 640,
"worksize": 16
},
{
"index": -1,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 16,
"worksize": 16
}
],
"pools":
[
{
"url": "stratum+tcp://xmr.crypto-pool.fr:3333",
"user": "44AFFq5kSiGBoZ4NMDwYtN18obc8AemS33DBLWs3H7otXft3XjrpDtQGv7SqSsaBYBb98uNbr2VBBEt7f2wfn3RVGQBEP3A",
"pass": "x"
}
]
}
]
}

and my aeon conf file:
Code:
{
"Algorithms":
[
{
"name": "AEON",
"devices":
[
{
"index": 0,
"corefreq": 975,
"memfreq": 1500,
"fanspeed": 65,
"powertune": 20,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 1328,
"worksize": 16
},
{
"index": -1,
"threads": 1,
"rawintensity": 16,
"worksize": 16
}
],
"pools":
[
{
"url": "stratum+tcp://98.238.231.31:5555",
"user": "WmsSWgtT1JPg5e3cK41hKXSHVpKW7e47bjgiKmWZkYrhSS5LhRemNyqayaSBtAQ6517eo5PtH9wxHVmM78JDZSUu2W8PqRiNs",
"pass": "x"
}
]
}
]
}

the source of the "Low difficulty share" is unclear for me, i don't see where it's coming from  Huh
newbie
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
A few posts ago a user shown that his was working. Windows 7 i think. Im using windows 10. Could this be involved in any way?
sr. member
Activity: 432
Merit: 251
I have 280x, driver is 16.9.1.
Miners are wolf-xmr-miner-v0.4 for XMR and aeon_gpu_miner_c8a5322 for AEON.

With bouth of miners I have rejected shares on XMR and AEON.

Can someone with working miner post here his .conf files??



Same issue with same GPU, only claymore works for me
Jump to: